Google unveils new AI video tool Flow along with Veo 3 at Google I/O 2025
Google unveiled Flow, a new AI video tool, at its developer event on May 20. The tool is targeted towards filmmakers and creatives.
Users can prompt a description of a video they want and the tool will output clips that can be pieced together to make a sequence. The scene builder can also extend shots and help users choose the direction of a scene.
There are also features that allow users to choose a camera angle and the point of view in a scene as well as asset management so users can handle all the parts within the video.
Google will also be launching 'Flow TV' so others can see the exact prompts and methods used in certain video clips and learn.
Last year, the company launched a similar AI video generation tool called VideoFX on Google Labs for limited users as a precursor to Flow.
Alongside Flow, Google also launched Veo 3, the improved AI video generator that also generates sound. The tool also has better quality and is able to comprehend longer prompts better.
'Veo 3 excels from text and image prompting to real-world physics and accurate lip syncing,' Eli Collins, Google DeepMind product vice president, said in a blog Tuesday. Additionally, its predecessor, Veo 2 will also have options for camera control and object removal from its clips.
Google also announced Imagen 4, their latest AI image generator to generate higher quality of images and is able to export in more formats. The tool has also been upgraded to generate text better in the images.
Flow is available under the Google AI Ultra plan for $249 per month in the U.S. now. Google AI Pro users can also access a slightly downgraded version of Flow which is powered by Veo 2. 'Google AI Pro gives you the key Flow features and 100 generations per month, and Google AI Ultra gives you the highest usage limits and early access to Veo 3 with native audio generation,' a blog post noted.
Meanwhile, Veo 3 will be available for users on the Vertex AI platform.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
AI's dirty secret: How your chatbot is draining Earth's water and energy
Every time you ask a chatbot for help or generate an AI image, somewhere a vast facility hums to life. It's easy to forget that each 'effortless' AI interaction leans on gigantic data centres -- buildings full of servers running nonstop, devouring electricity and gulping is World Environment Day, so it feels fitting to pull back the curtain on AI's unseen carbon footprint, even as we keep creating content with the help of AI, like the images used in this very POWER BEHIND THE MAGIC: WHY AI NEEDS HUGE DATA CENTRESAI models like ChatGPT and sophisticated image generators don't float on dreams. They rely on colossal data centres packed with racks of servers that rarely sleep. IAD71 Amazon Web Services data centre (as on July 17, 2024 in Ashburn, Virginia) () In 2024, global data centres -- including those powering AI -- used around 460 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity. That's roughly equal to Sweden's entire annual power consumption (International Energy Agency, 2024).Forecasts suggest this figure could double to 1,000 TWh by 2026, which would almost match Germany's yearly electricity per the US Department of Energy, a single data centre can draw over 100 megawatts (MW) of power -- enough to run 80,000 average American homes at now you can begin to see why AI has become a 'sizable' contributor to global emissions. AI's rapid expansion is a big driver behind this surge. CARBON COST OF CHATBOTS: ENERGY USED PER PROMPTTraining a large language model isn't a weekend project -- it's an electricity instance, powering up OpenAI's GPT-3 used about 1.3 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electricity, enough to supply roughly 120 average American homes for a year (ScienceDirect, 2023).Once the model is live, every single prompt you send to GPT-4 still sips power -- about 0.0003 kilowatt-hours (kWh). That's like leaving a 60-watt light bulb on for 20 seconds (Epoch AI, 2025).Now imagine this at scale: ChatGPT answers over 1 billion queries a day. If every Google search worldwide -- around 9 billion a day -- were replaced with a ChatGPT query, global energy use would spike by an extra 10 TWh per year. That's enough to power all the homes in a city the size of San Francisco for a year (Hugging Face and Carnegie Mellon University, 2024).advertisementGenerating a single AI-created image isn't free either. It can use as much energy as fully charging your smartphone once. THE WATER-COOLING FACTOR: HOW AI IS DRAINING RESOURCESElectricity tells only half the story. Those thousands of servers run hot, and cooling them eats up alarming amounts of 2024, Google's data centres consumed nearly 6 billion gallons (22.7 billion litres) of water -- about one-third of Turkey's drinking water for an entire year, as per its 2024 Environment model training, every 10-20 prompts to Google's Bard chatbot reportedly required about 500 ml of water -- mostly for average, data centres use about 1.8 litres of water per kWh of electricity consumed (Meta Platforms, 2023). Put another way, a single large data centre can guzzle as much water in 24 hours as a small that thirst is rising -- industry water consumption grows by 8-20% each year, thanks to AI's surging role and stiff competition (University of California, Riverside, and University of Texas at Arlington, 2025). advertisementWHO'S DOING IT BETTER: GREEN AI INITIATIVES AND THEIR LIMITSSome big names in tech are trying to curb AI's environmental chew. Microsoft, for instance, has cut its water use per computing unit by 39% since 2021, saving about 125 million litres per data centre annually by using reclaimed water and smarter cooling methods (Meta Platforms, 2023).Alternative cooling strategies -- like air cooling or immersing servers in liquid -- are also under the microscope. But these options come with their own cooling cuts water use but can drive up energy needs for pumps or special fluids. Air cooling can be less water-dependent, yet efficiency dips when temperatures climb (Meta Platforms, 2023).Switching to renewables helps, but even 'green' electricity can't keep pace with AI's relentless demand. A recent MIT Lincoln Laboratory report warned that global demand for clean power is lagging far behind AI's growth many companies still don't fully share their energy or water metrics, making it near impossible to verify progress. advertisementTHE BOTTOM LINEAI's magic comes at a genuine cost. Data centres powering our digital conversations and image creations now rival entire nations in electricity use. They swig water comparable to small as AI continues its meteoric rise, this environmental toll only grows World Environment Day, it's worth asking: how can we keep enjoying the convenience of AI without letting it swallow our planet?'Green AI' efforts -- more efficient hardware, smarter cooling, renewable electricity -- are steps in the right direction. But the gap between AI's hunger and our ability to supply green power remains we don't face this challenge head-on, our planet will bear the brunt. Every prompt you send, every image you generate, leaves an unseen footprint that's getting harder to Watch
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use
HighlightsGoogle is facing an $800 million lawsuit in Santa Clara County, California, from Android smartphone users who claim the company misappropriates their cellphone data, affecting an estimated 14 million Californians. The plaintiffs allege that Google secretly transmits data over cellular networks even when devices are turned off, which they argue improperly consumes purchased data from mobile carriers without user consent. Despite Google's history of settling class actions, the company is opting for a trial, disputing the plaintiffs' claims that they have a property interest in cellular data allowances and arguing that no actual losses were incurred. Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending itself before a jury in Santa Clara County, California, superior court in an $800 million lawsuit by Android smartphone users who say Google misappropriates their cellphone data. A jury of eight women and four men was seated on Tuesday in what lawyers say is expected to be a three-to-four-week trial, with opening statements kicking off on Wednesday. The stakes are high, but the class, which includes an estimated 14 million Californians whose mobile devices use Google's Android operating system, is in some ways just an appetizer. The same plaintiffs lawyers from Korein Tillery; Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner are litigating a parallel case in San Jose federal court covering Android users in the other 49 states, with billions of dollars in alleged damages. The plaintiffs in court papers say that even when their phones are turned off, Google causes Android devices to surreptitiously send information over cellular networks "for Google's own purposes," including targeted digital advertising. These transfers improperly eat up data that users purchase from their mobile carriers, the plaintiffs allege. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said the claims "mischaracterize standard industry practices that help protect users and make phones more reliable," he told me. "We look forward to making our case in court." A unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, Google has a well-used playbook for settling class actions. Earlier this week, for example, the company agreed to pay $500 million to resolve shareholder litigation - a move that comes on the heels of a $50 million deal in May to resolve class-wide allegations of racial bias against Black employees and a $100 million payout in March to a proposed class of advertisers who claimed they were overcharged for clicks on ads. So why is Google taking this case to trial? In court papers, Google's outside counsel from Cooley argue that Android users incurred no actual losses, and that consumers consented to Google's so-called "passive" data transfers via terms of service agreements and device settings. The lawyers also dispute the fundamental premise of the case: that cellular data allowances can be considered "property" under California law and subject to conversion, a civil cause of action that involves taking a person's property without permission. When the "rhetoric and hyperbole are set aside, Plaintiffs' theory is revealed as little more than a (misguided) product design claim - not wrongful conversion," defense counsel wrote. The Cooley team, which includes Whitty Somvichian, Michael Attanasio, Max Bernstein and Carrie Lebel, declined comment. The plaintiffs sued Google in Santa Clara County Superior Court in 2019, asserting that they have a property interest in their cellular plans' data allowances, and that each quantum they pay for has a market value. They don't object to data transmissions when they're actively engaged with Google's apps and properties, like checking email or playing a game. But they say Google never told them it would avail itself of their cellular data when they weren't using their phones to send and receive a range of information on their usage. "The upshot is that these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year," plaintiffs lawyer George Zelcs of Korein Tillery said via email. In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiffs want Google to reimburse them for the value of the cellular data the company consumed. Per person, the amount is modest - 1 to 1.5 megabytes of data each day, the plaintiffs estimate. To put that in context, Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, my Reuters colleagues reported. But with a class period dating back to 2016, the totals add up quickly. In court papers, Google lawyers sound almost incredulous at the amount of the claimed nationwide damages, which they say runs in the tens of billions - more than the $7.4 billion Perdue Pharma settlement for the opioid crisis, they note. "Plaintiffs cannot show remotely commensurate harm to the class," they wrote. In denying Google's motion for summary judgment in May, Judge Charles Adams allowed the plaintiffs' claim for conversion to go forward, ruling there are triable issues of material fact for jurors to decide. While Adams said no direct state law precedent exists as to whether cell phone data is property, he pointed to a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in the parallel federal class action, Taylor v Google. In that case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose sided with Google and dismissed the complaint with prejudice in 2022, only to be reversed and remanded on appeal. The appellate panel in an unpublished decision ruled that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged they incurred damages when Google used their cellular data. Adams in a pre-trial order set some limits on what the lawyers will be allowed to argue to the jury. Plaintiffs may not suggest Google engages in "surveillance" of Android users, he wrote, or that the data transfers are a privacy violation. As for Google, Adams said, it "must not present evidence or argument suggesting that this case is 'lawyer driven' or was 'invented' by Plaintiffs' counsel."
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Quick commerce trade-off; Uber adds board muscle
Quick commerce trade-off; Uber adds board muscle Also in the letter: Quick commerce growth cannibalising other retail channels: Kearney report Driving the news: This cannibalisation is happening despite supermarkets and ecommerce platforms offering steeper discounts (13-18%) than quick commerce (6-9%) or kiranas (2-5%), the report added. Industry executives echoed the findings, saying platforms like Zepto, Blinkit, and Instamart are generating little or no net-new demand. Quick commerce success: Originally pitched as a top-up service for last-minute groceries and essentials, quick commerce has rapidly become the fastest-growing sales channel, especially for premium products. Its share of ecommerce is doubling every year, albeit from a low base. For most FMCG brands in India, quick commerce now accounts for 3-6% of online sales. In metro cities, online grocery shopping has surged: before the rise of quick commerce, only a third of shoppers preferred digital channels; that number has now increased to 87%, according to the report. Also Read: Future outlook: Also Read: Uber appoints Palo Alto CEO Nikesh Arora to board Who is Nikesh Arora: Uber top churn: Pradeep Parameswaran, former head of India and Asia Pacific, has been promoted to global head of mobility. Andrew Macdonald, a senior vice president, has been appointed chief operating officer (COO), overseeing the mobility, delivery, and autonomous units. Pierre-Dimitri Gore-Coty, head of delivery, will depart at the end of June. In October 2024, Uber named Sachin Kansal as chief product officer (CPO) and Praveen Naga as chief technology officer (CTO). Anirban Kundu, head of delivery engineering, has left to join Instacart. Also Read: Sponsor ETtech Top 5 & Morning Dispatch! Why it matters: The opportunity: Reach a highly engaged audience of decision-makers. Boost your brand's visibility among the tech-savvy community. Custom sponsorship options to align with your brand's goals. What's next Google's parent Alphabet to keep hiring engineers despite AI advances: Sundar Pichai Tech layoffs: Quote, unquote: Google earned users' trust: AI privacy concerns: Also Read: Loantap secures $6.2 million in fresh funding from July Ventures and existing investors Deal details: Existing investors, such as 3one4 Capital, Avaana Capital, Kae Capital, and the Swapurna Family Office, also participated in the round. This takes the company's total equity funding to around $26 million. LoanTap has also raised an additional $2.3 million in venture debt as part of the same round. Tell me more: Cleantech asset financier StrideGreen raises $3.5 million: Eminem's publishing company sues Meta over alleged copyright violation Driving the news: What's the damage: Pay up: Quick commerce is gaining popularity at the expense of sales in other retail channels. This and more in today's ETtech Top 5.■ Google still wants engineers■ ETtech Done Deals■ Meta's new rap battleJust 6-8% of quick commerce sales are truly incremental, with the bulk of the growth coming at the expense of other channels , chiefly modern trade and ecommerce, followed by local kirana stores, according to a Kearney this year, Unilever's global CEO, Fernando Fernandez, stated that he expects quick commerce to contribute 10-15% of sales in India over the next three to four years, up from its current 2-3% share.'India is a very special place because richer and poorer Indians live in close proximity. That basically provides both the demand and labour supply, making quick commerce a logical channel to grow,' he Arora, CEO, Palo AltoUber has appointed Nikesh Arora , the CEO of Palo Alto Networks, to its board of directors as part of a broader leadership shake-up. Arora will serve on both the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation has led the cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks as chairman and CEO since June 2018. Between 2016 and 2018, Arora was an angel investor, following senior roles at SoftBank and currently sits on the board of the Swiss luxury goods group Compagnie Financière Richemont S.A. Interestingly, Arora was also among the contenders to replace Travis Kalanick as Uber's CEO in June 2017. However, the role eventually went to Dara Top 5 and Morning Dispatch are must-reads for India's tech and business leaders, including startup founders, investors, policy makers, industry insiders and employees.: Interested? Reach out to us at spotlightpartner@ to explore sponsorship Pichai, CEO, GoogleAlphabet will continue hiring engineers through at least 2026, even as the Google parent ramps up investments in artificial intelligence, CEO Sundar Pichai said at the Bloomberg Tech tech giants, including Microsoft and Google , have recently cut jobs, partly a consequence of the massive capital being poured into AI. The layoffs have fuelled fears that the technology could replace certain roles altogether.'I just view this (AI coding) as making engineers dramatically more productive, getting a lot of the mundane aspects out of what they do,' Pichai | Google has handled people's deepest, darkest secrets responsibly, said CEO Sundar Pichai. The company has earned user trust, said Pichai, by protecting them from 'bad actors' and 'unwarranted requests'.Amid growing unease regarding how user data might be used to integrate AI into its products for a personalised experience, Pichai stated that Google is evolving its offerings based on direct user most common complaint about Gemini and Gmail? 'Why can't it write more like me?' said Pichai. 'It's an ask we are responding to.'Satyam Kumar, cofounder, LoantapPune-based digital lending platform Loantap has raised $6.2 million in new equity funding led by July fundraise comes at a time when the digital lending sector is facing challenges due to stricter regulations and a more cautious stance from banks and large non-banking finance a climate-tech asset financing and management platform, has bagged $3.5 million in a funding round led by clean mobility investor Micelio Technology Fund. Early-stage venture capital firm Incubate Fund Asia also participated in the EminemA publishing company affiliated with rapper Eminem has taken Meta to court , accusing the tech giant of copyright infringement across its platforms—Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp. Curiously, the rapper himself is not a party to the Mile Style, which manages Eminem's early catalogue, alleges that Meta unlawfully stored, reproduced, and exploited 243 of his tracks on its platforms without to the suit, Meta's tools, Original Audio and Reels, 'allow and encourage its users to steal' Eminem's music for videos 'without proper attribution or license.'Eight Mile Style asserts that the alleged infringement has reduced the value of copyrights, resulted in lost profits, and unfairly enriched Meta through unauthorised publisher is seeking the maximum statutory damages of $150,000 for each track, totalling $109.35 million.
