logo
In the Arizona desert, a farm raising fish raises questions about water use

In the Arizona desert, a farm raising fish raises questions about water use

The Hill13-06-2025
DATELAND, Ariz. (AP) — Storks scatter, white against blue water, as Dan Mohring's pickup truck rumbles down the dirt road. He's towing a trailer full of ground-up beef, chicken, fish and nutrient bits behind him, ready to be shot out of a cannon into the ponds below.
It's time to feed the fish.
Mohring fires up the machine and the food flies out in a rainbow arc. Then the water comes alive. Hundreds of thrashing, gobbling barramundi wiggle their way to the surface, all fighting for a piece. Until, in a few months, they will become food themselves.
In the desert of landlocked Arizona, where the Colorado River crisis has put water use under a microscope, Mainstream Aquaculture has a fish farm where it's growing the tropical species barramundi, also known as Asian sea bass, for American restaurants.
Mainstream sees it as a sustainable alternative to ocean-caught seafood. They say chefs and conscious consumers like that the food has a shorter distance to travel, eliminating some of the pollution that comes from massive ships that move products around the world. And they and some aquaculture experts argue it's efficient to use the water twice, since the nutrient-rich leftovers can irrigate crops like Bermuda grass sold for livestock feed.
'We're in the business of water,' said Matt Mangan, head of Australia-based Mainstream's American business. 'We want to be here in 20 years', 30 years' time.'
But some experts question whether growing fish on a large scale in an arid region can work without high environmental costs.
That question comes down to what people collectively decide is a good use of water. In Arizona, some places manage water more aggressively than others. But the whole state is dealing with the impacts of climate change, which is making the region drier and water only more precious.
The farm uses groundwater, not Colorado River water. It's a nonrenewable resource, and like mining, different people and industries have different philosophies about whether it should be extracted.
'As long as groundwater is treated as an open resource in these rural parts of Arizona, they're susceptible to new industries coming in and using the groundwater for that industry,' said Sarah Porter, director of the Kyl Center for Water Policy at Arizona State University's Morrison Institute.
Some scientists believe aquaculture can play a role in protecting wild ocean ecosystems from overfishing. And it might play at least a small role in smoothing any supply problems that result from the Trump administration's tariffs on imports from dozens of countries, including those that send the U.S. about 80% of its seafood, per the United States Department of Agriculture.
In the greenhouses at University of Arizona professor Kevin Fitzsimmons' lab in Tucson, tilapia circle idly in tanks that filter down into tubs full of mussels and floating patches of collard greens and lettuce. Fitzsimmons mentored the student who started the tilapia farm eventually bought by Mainstream about three years ago where they now raise barramundi.
'I don't think desert agriculture is going away,' he said. 'Obviously, we want to do it as water-efficient as possible.'
But not everyone agrees it's possible.
'Artificial ponds in the desert are stupid,' said Jay Famiglietti, a professor at ASU and director of science for the Arizona Water Innovation Initiative. He worried about heavy water losses to evaporation.
Mangan says that evaporation hasn't been an issue so much as the loss of heat in the wintertime. That has required pumping more water since its warmth when it arrives at the surface helps keep the barramundi cozy. But Mangan says they've been improving pond design to retain heat better and have found, after the last year of research and development, that they can cut their water requirement by about half as a result.
Plus, he argues, the water coming out of the fish ponds is 'essentially liquid fertilizer,' and though it's slightly salty, they use it for crops that can tolerate it, like Bermuda grass dairy cows can eat.
But that's supporting the cattle industry, which contributes more than its share of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, Famiglietti said.
'Doing two suboptimal things doesn't make it better,' he said.
Purple flowers sprout alongside paddle wheels. Fish bones crunch underfoot. The faint odor of brackish water and ammonia catches in the breeze.
Without groundwater, none of it would be possible.
Some farmers in Arizona rely on water from the Colorado River, but many others use well water to irrigate crops like alfalfa for the dairy industry or the lettuce, cucumbers and melons shipped nationwide year-round.
Arizona has seven areas around the state where groundwater is rigorously managed. Dateland doesn't fall into one of those, so the only rule that really governs it is a law saying if you land own there, you can pump a 'reasonable' amount of groundwater, said Rhett Larson, who teaches water law at ASU.
What might be considered 'reasonable' depends from crop to crop, and there's really no precedent for aquaculture, an industry that hasn't yet spread commercially statewide.
Using numbers provided by Mainstream, Porter calculated that the fish farm would demand a 'very large amount' of water, on par with a big ranch or potentially even more than some suburbs of Phoenix. And she noted that although the water use is being maximized by using it twice, it's still depleting the aquifer.
When the company scoped out Arizona to expand, Mangan said they didn't see nearly the same kinds of regulations as back in Australia.
As part of its growth strategy, Mainstream is also hoping to work with other farmers in the area so more can use nutrient-rich fish pond wastewater to produce hay. They say a few have expressed interest.
The seafood industry needs to reduce its reliance on catching small wild fish to feed bigger farmed ones that humans eat, said Pallab Sarker, an assistant professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who studies sustainability in the aquaculture industry. He said seabirds and mammals rely on small species like anchovies and mackerel commonly used in fish meal.
'We should not rely on ocean fish to grow fish for aquaculture to meet the demand for humans,' Sarker said.
Mainstream gets its fish feed from two suppliers, Skretting and Star Milling, but Mangan and Mohring said they didn't know for certain where those suppliers got their base ingredients from.
Fitzsimmons, of the University of Arizona, also pointed out that between pollution, overfishing and oceanfront development for recreation, the commercial fishing industry had already been facing problems. He doesn't think that Trump's moves this spring to open up marine protected areas for commercial fishing will improve that situation the way aquaculture could.
'We can't keep hunting and gathering from the ocean,' Fitzsimmons said.
___
Follow Melina Walling on X @MelinaWalling and Bluesky @melinawalling.bsky.social. Follow Joshua A. Bickel on Instagram, Bluesky and X @joshuabickel. Follow Annika Hammerschlag on Instagram @ahammergram.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Epic Games wins partial victory in Australian court against Google and Apple
Epic Games wins partial victory in Australian court against Google and Apple

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Epic Games wins partial victory in Australian court against Google and Apple

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — Epic Games, the company behind the popular online game Fortnite, won a partial victory in an Australian court in U.S. billionaire chief executive Tim Sweeney's claim that Google and Apple engaged in anti-competitive conduct in running their app stores. Federal Court Justice Jonathan Beach on Tuesday upheld key parts of Epic's claim that the tech giants breached Australian competition laws by misusing their market power against app developers and using restrictive trade practices. Google and Apple 's dominance of the app market had the effect of substantially lessening competition and breached Australian law, Beach found. But the judge rejected some of Epic's claim including that Google and Apple engaged in unconscionable conduct as defined by Australian law. Sweeney is also challenging Google and Apple dominance in the app markets through the courts in the United States and Britain. The litigation began in August 2020 when Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store expelled Fortnite because Epic installed a direct payment feature in the extraordinarily popular game. The court ruled both companies pressured app developers including Epic through contracts and technology to sell their products through the two dominant app stores. Epic posted online that the judgment was: 'Another HUGE WIN for Epic Games!' Apple said the company 'faces fierce competition in every market where we operate.' 'We welcome the Australian court's rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the Court's ruling on others,' Apple said in a statement. Google said it would review the judgment. Google and Apple could potentially appeal the ruling before the Federal Court full bench. 'We disagree with the court's characterisation of our billing policies and practices, as well as its findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape on behalf of users and developers,' a Google statement said. Beach has yet to release a 952-page judgment on Epic's case against Apple or his 914-page judgment on the case against Google. The judge gave an oral summary of his findings during a 90-minute hearing Tuesday. Lawyers will return to court on a date yet to be set to argue what Epic is entitled to in terms of damages. Rod Mcguirk, The Associated Press

Australia's NRN secures $47.3m series A funding for climate tech
Australia's NRN secures $47.3m series A funding for climate tech

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Australia's NRN secures $47.3m series A funding for climate tech

National Renewable Network (NRN), an Australian distributed energy infrastructure provider, has closed a A$67.2m ($47.3m) series A funding round, marking one of the largest investments in Australian climate technology to date. The funding round comprises both equity and debt, with significant backing from a superannuation-linked fund. This milestone reflects an increasing interest in solar and battery solutions across the nation, driven by government incentives for renewable installations. The capital injection is supported by Australian climate tech investors such as Investible, Virescent Ventures and Electrifi Ventures, alongside Ecotone Partners' newly launched Planet Fund. Infradebt [a specialist boutique fund manager focused on originating, structuring and managing private debt investments for infrastructure projects]-managed funds have also made a significant debt commitment through vehicles such as the Australian Ethical Infrastructure Debt Fund. Throughout this process, Neu Capital has served as NRN's debt advisor. This financial boost arrives amid an unprecedented boom in demand for solar power systems, batteries and virtual power plant (VPP) schemes within Australia. NRN CEO and founder Alan Hunter said: "Millions of Australian homeowners want solar, but the costs are prohibitive, and every energy retailer wants to scale up their solar energy generation. "Our platform integrates tech, data, capital, compliance and market access to neatly solve the problem at both ends. For customers, it's access to solar with no upfront fees. For energy retailers, NRN can instantly establish or scale distributed energy businesses without capital-intensive balance sheet burdens, while maintaining complete ownership of the customer experience. Our unique model is intentionally structured around empowering partners, never competing with them." Since 2023NRN's network has grown more than sixfold, with more than $12m worth of renewable assets under management and almost 10 megawatt hours of installed battery capacity, according to the company's news release. NRN plans to utilise this new capital to fast-track its national platform expansion and enhance its pivotal role connecting industry players with government bodies and regulators. The company aims to facilitate broader access to renewable resources while supporting partner businesses and delivering cost savings for consumers. Australia has installed more than four million rooftop solar systems, transforming its energy market. But while this decentralisation benefits renewables, it has also led to rising energy prices and market instability as retailers face declining demand and fluctuating supply. NRN addresses these challenges by serving as an independent infrastructure layer between the solar industry and energy retailers. This stabilises the grid, reduces costs for households, and enables access to solar and battery systems without upfront payments, making clean energy more affordable for everyone. Infradebt co-founder Chin-Lee Yu stated: "Infradebt is pleased to provide a bespoke debt financing solution to support the rapid growth of the NRN platform. The build-out of residential battery storage and VPPs will be a key next step in the energy transition." "Australia's NRN secures $47.3m series A funding for climate tech" was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

After years of neglect, an abandoned golf course in Phoenix is being redeveloped, rebranded
After years of neglect, an abandoned golf course in Phoenix is being redeveloped, rebranded

USA Today

time34 minutes ago

  • USA Today

After years of neglect, an abandoned golf course in Phoenix is being redeveloped, rebranded

PHOENIX — The ownership group Laveen 140 is constructing Score Golf Club at Cottonfields. When complete, the course (with the standard 18 holes plus two extra) will include a renovated clubhouse, a new putting course, golf simulators and a new restaurant. While reenvisioning the 140-acre site, the developer carved out 50 acres for new single-family detached homes and for-sale townhomes and preserved 90 acres for the golf course. To conserve water, the course will mostly feature par-3 holes, as they're shorter and require less turf. In 2022, Laveen, located southwest of downtown Phoenix, 140 bought the long-neglected property that was once the Southern Ridge Golf Club and before that the Cotton Fields Golf Course. It originally opened in 1993. It closed in 2017, languishing with overgrown weeds and dead plants. Initially, the ownership group had planned to remove and redevelop the course into smaller pockets of recreational activities, like pickleball and other sports courts, as well as playgrounds and dog parks. Neighbors vehemently rejected that plan, which also sought to eliminate any golfing activity and build 800 housing units. Amid the fierce opposition, the group agreed to return golf operations to the site while modifying the course. To do so, Laveen 140 hired a Phoenix-based golf architect who has worked on international golf courses of all sizes. The project was redesigned as Score Golf Club, which decreased the course's acreage and set aside space for the new homes. The project went through the Laveen Village Planning Committee and Phoenix Planning Commission in August and September 2024, respectively. In October 2024, Phoenix leaders gave the project their stamp of approval. Laveen 140 teed off construction in early spring. When will the work be done? According to the developer's website, the project is expected to take 12 to 18 months to complete. Republic Reporter Corina Vanek contributed to this story. Is there something under construction you'd like to tell us about or find out more about? Contact the reporter. Shawn Raymundo covers Phoenix and the East Valley city of Scottsdale. Reach him at sraymundo@ or follow him on X @ShawnzyTsunami.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store