Trump says outcome will be known ‘pretty soon' over steel tariffs
The president said the US wants to 'make our own steel' when he faced questions from journalists on Monday.
It remains to be seen whether tariffs on British steel imports into America will be eliminated, remain at 25% where they currently stand, or increase further.
Asked by reporters at the top of his meeting with Sir Keir Starmer when the cost of steel tariffs will come down, Mr Trump said: 'We're gonna know pretty soon, we're gonna have it pretty soon.
'These people are tough negotiators, OK. We're a big buyer of steel, but we're going to make our own steel and we're going to make our own aluminium for the most part.
'But we buy a lot of aluminium from right here and a lot of steel too.'
In a readout after the meeting, Downing Street said the leaders spoke about the 'economic prosperity deal' reached earlier this year to ease US tariffs on the UK.
'The leaders remarked on how beneficial the deal is for working people in the UK and the US and agreed to continue to work together to build further on their close and strong economic relationship,' a spokesperson said.
When the UK and US signed a trade deal in June, it reduced tariffs on car and aerospace imports to the US.
Agreement on a similar arrangement for Britain's steel imports was not reached, leaving tariffs on steel at 25%.
American concerns over steel products made elsewhere in the world, then finished in the UK, are said to be among the sticking points.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds had suggested it may take more than Monday's meeting between the two leaders to resolve the matter, telling BBC Breakfast: 'We were very happy to announce the breakthrough that we had a few months ago in relation to sectors like automotive, aerospace, which are really important to the UK economy.
'But we always said it was job saved, but it wasn't job done. There's more to do.
'The negotiations have been going on on a daily basis since then. There's a few issues to push a little bit further today.
'We won't perhaps have anything to announce a resolution of those talks, but there's some sectors that we still need to resolve, particularly around steel and aluminium, and there's the wider conversation about what the US calls its reciprocal tariffs.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UDR lifts AFFO forecast on strong apartment rental demand
(Reuters) -UDR raised its 2025 adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) forecast on Wednesday, citing strong apartment rental growth driven by solid demand. The real estate investment trust, which operates more than 55,000 apartment homes in the U.S., has benefited from steady rental demand amid a constrained housing supply across many of its markets. "A resilient employment market, continued personal income growth, favorable relative affordability for apartments, and our operating competitive advantages led to strong results", CEO Tom Toomey said in a statement. Rental revenue rose 4.2% in the Mid-Atlantic and 3.6% in the Northeast markets on a same-store basis. The Highlands Ranch, Colorado-based real estate investment trust reported a quarterly AFFO of $0.64 per share, compared with analysts estimates of $0.62 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. It now expects full-year AFFO between $2.49 and $2.55 per share, up from prior guidance of $2.45 to $2.55 per share while analysts expect $2.51 per share. Total revenue for the second quarter ended June 30 was $425.4 million, up 2.4% from a year earlier, topping the analyst's average estimate of $422.1 million.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Powell says Fed does not consider government interest rate costs in policy debate
By Michael S. Derby NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said there is no place for the central bank to consider government financing needs when setting interest rate policy. 'We have a mandate' from Congress, and that is to keep inflation in check and the job market as strong as it can be, Powell said in a press conference following the latest Federal Open Market Committee meeting. Given that legal charge, 'we don't consider the fiscal needs of the federal government. No advanced economy central bank does that, and it wouldn't be good' for the Fed to do so as it would compromise its credibility. Most economists agree that a central bank that sets interest rates to keep government borrowing costs low is a central bank that will likely lose control of inflation and will be unable to act with the independence needed to keep price pressures in check. Powell spoke to reporters after a Fed policy meeting that saw officials maintain their overnight interest rate target range steady at 4.25% to 4.5%. Officials are continuing to weigh data to see how big changes in government import taxes are affecting the economy, as financial markets continue to eye a possible September easing in short-term borrowing costs. The Fed has faced steady and often aggressive pressure from President Donald Trump to cut rates. The president has said a large move down in rates is justified by a number of factors, but part of his critique centers on the elevated interest costs now faced by the government as it sells bonds to cover oceans of red ink. Fed rates, even after cuts last year, still remain relatively high relative to where they've been in recent years. At $1.1 trillion in interest rate payments last year, the cost of managing government debt has more than doubled since before the COVID-19 pandemic, and that's in large part driven by the high rates the Fed has in place to cool inflation levels. But if the Fed were to cut rates to 1% now, a level Trump has argued for, it would run the risk that inflation pressures, already likely to go up due to trade tariffs, would rise even more given newly stimulative policy. That could in turn backfire on government borrowing as it would likely send bond yields up, meaning the government would have to pay higher rates to secure investors. In years past, the Fed has also faced some heat from critics who believed it was keeping rates low to make government deficit spending easier, a notion regularly rejected by central bankers. The issue of interest rate costs could continue to nip at the central bank as a recent Republican taxation and spending bill is expected to increase government borrowing, which could further increase how much the government has to pay to get the public to buy those bonds. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top lawyers warn Starmer recognising Palestine could breach international law
Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to recognise a Palestinian state could break international law, an influential group of peers has warned. Some 38 members of the House of Lords, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, have written to Attorney General Lord Hermer about the Prime Minister's announcement. As first reported by the Times newspaper, the peers warned that Sir Keir's pledge to recognise Palestine may breach international law as the territory may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. On Tuesday, Sir Keir announced the UK could take the step of recognising statehood in September, ahead of a major UN gathering. The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. Hamas must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', Sir Keir also said. In their letter to Lord Hermer, the peers said Palestine 'does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states'. There is no certainty over the borders of Palestine they said, and no single government, as Hamas and Fatah are enemies. Lord Hermer has previously insisted that a commitment to international law 'goes absolutely to the heart' of the Government's approach to foreign policy. In their letter seen by the PA news agency, the peers added: 'You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the Government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law.' Among the respected lawyers to have signed the letter are Lord Pannick – who represented the previous government at the Supreme Court over its Rwanda scheme – as well as KCs Lord Verdirame and Lord Faulks. Some of Parliament's most prominent Jewish voices, including crossbench peer Baroness Deech, Labour's Lord Winston and the Conservatives' Baroness Altmann, have also put their name to the letter. Former Conservative cabinet ministers Lord Pickles and Lord Lansley have also supported it, as has Sir Michael Ellis KC, a former Conservative attorney general and the only non-peer whose name appears on the letter as seen by PA. The peers' intervention follows condemnation of Sir Keir's announcement by Emily Damari, a British-Israeli women who was held captive by Hamas for more than a year. The PM is 'not standing on the right side of history' after his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state, she said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meanwhile claimed it 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. But ministers have insisted the step is important and is not an example of gesture politics. 'This is about the Palestinian people. It's about getting aid in to those starving children,' Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said on Wednesday morning. Asked directly whether the release of hostages by Hamas is an explicit condition of Palestinian recognition, Ms Alexander told BBC Radio 4: 'We will be making an assessment in September and we expect Hamas to act in the same way as we expect Israel to act.' She later added: 'We're giving Israel eight weeks to act. If they want to be sat at the table to shape that enduring peace in the region, they must act.' Sir Keir had been coming under pressure from MPs to recognise statehood, and last week more than 250 cross-party members signed a letter calling on him to act. Elsewhere on Wednesday, Palestine Action's co-founder won a bid to bring a High Court challenge over the group's ban as a terror organisation. Huda Ammori is challenging Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20.
