logo
Racial disparities in criminal justice system ‘shameful'

Racial disparities in criminal justice system ‘shameful'

Sir Mark Rowley spoke on Sky News' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips where he said racial disparity among suspects and victims of crime in the capital was a 'difficult' issue for the force.
The Met Police Commissioner said there was a history between policing and black communities 'where policing has got a lot wrong, and we get a lot more right today'.
'But we do still make mistakes. That's not in doubt,' Sir Mark added.
'I'm being as relentless in that as it can be.'
He continued: 'The vast majority of our people are good people.
'But that legacy, combined with the tragedy that some of this crime falls most heavily in black communities, that creates a real problem because the legacy creates concern.'
'It's not right that black boys growing up in London are more likely to be dead by the time they're 18, far more likely than white boys,' the commissioner said.
'That's, I think, shameful for the city.
'The challenge for us is, as we reach in to tackle those issues, that confrontation that comes from that reaching in, whether it's stop and search on the streets or the sort of operations you seek.
'The danger is that's landing in an environment with less trust.
'And that makes it even harder. But the people who win out of that, all of the criminals.'
He added: 'I'm so determined to find a way to get past this because if policing in black communities can find a way to confront these issues, together we can give black boys growing up in London equal life chances to white boys, which is not what we're seeing at the moment.'
'And it's not simply about policing, is it?' he added.
'I think black boys are several times more likely to be excluded from school, for example, than white boys.
'And there are multiple issues layered on top of each other that feed into disproportionality.'
The police chief said the Met is a 'stretched service', but that people who call 999 can expect an officer to attend.
'If you are in the middle of the crisis and something awful is happening and you dial 999, officers will get there really quickly,' Sir Mark said.
'I don't pretend we're not a stretched service.
'We are smaller than I think we ought to be, but I don't want to give a sort of message of a lack of hope or a lack of determination.'
'I've seen the mayor and the Home Secretary fighting hard for police resourcing,' he added.
'It's not what I'd want it to be, but it's better than it might be without their efforts.'
Sir Mark went on to say that the criminal justice system was 'close-to-broken' and can be 'frustrating' for officers.
He said: 'The thing that is frustrating is that the system – and no system can be perfect – but when the system hasn't managed to turn that person's life around and get them on the straight and narrow, and it just becomes a revolving door.
'When that happens, of course that's frustrating for officers.
'So the more successful prisons and probation can be in terms of getting people onto a law-abiding life from the path they're on, the better.
'But that is a real challenge. I mean, we're talking just after Sir Brian Leveson put his report out about the close-to-broken criminal justice system.
'And it's absolutely vital that those repairs and reforms that he's talking about happen really quickly, because the system is now so stressed.'
Sir Mark gave the example of Snaresbrook Crown Court in London, which he said had more than 100 cases listed for 2029.
'If it's someone on bail, then who might have stolen your phone or whatever and going in for a criminal court trial, that could be four years away.
'And that's pretty unacceptable, isn't it?' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves abandons inheritance tax raid on grieving military families
Reeves abandons inheritance tax raid on grieving military families

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Reeves abandons inheritance tax raid on grieving military families

Rachel Reeves has abandoned plans to impose new inheritance tax changes on the grieving families of military personnel. The Chancellor has dropped a proposal to tax death in service payments, which are tax-free lump sums given to the families of deceased Armed Forces members. Changes unveiled in the October Budget would have made off-duty death in service payments subject to inheritance tax for the first time, if not going to a spouse or civil partner. It would have meant that children or partners of unmarried servicemen and women would have had to pay death duties on the benefit from April 2027. The Treasury has been forced to abandon the proposals after pressure from Armed Forces organisations, which said the move would have a 'corrosive' effect on trust among servicemen. The Government said that following its consultation, it had decided not to go ahead with the reform. 'Another U-turn' by Labour Mark Francois, the shadow Armed Forces minister, told The Telegraph that he welcomed the decision, 'even though it represents another U-turn by this Labour Government'. He added: 'It was always unfair that married partners of service personnel would be exempted from these changes to inheritance tax liabilities, while unmarried partners, in long-term relationships, would not. 'We highlighted this to ministers, on behalf of service families on multiple occasions and I am pleased for their sake, that common sense has now finally prevailed.' It comes after Ms Reeves's department had to water down proposals to scrap the universal winter fuel payment and reforms to the welfare system. The Government said: 'From 6 April 2027 all death in service benefits payable from registered pension schemes will be out of scope of Inheritance Tax, regardless of whether the scheme is discretionary or non-discretionary.' The HMRC document said that the new plans were 'in line with the broader policy objective of removing inconsistencies in the Inheritance Tax treatment of different types of pension benefits'. Labour 'standing up' for service personnel? Death in service payments are usually a lump sum paid to named beneficiaries of a worker who dies while on the company payroll. It is typically the equivalent of four-times the late individual's salary. For members of the Armed Forces, these are paid whether or not the individual was 'on duty' at the time of their death. Those who die 'on duty' were to continue to benefit from a separate tax-free arrangement on their death in service payments from 2027. But a military worker who dies while technically 'off duty', such as by sudden illness or accident, would have been stung by the proposed inheritance tax rules. Maj Gen Neil Marshall, the chief executive of the Forces Pension Society, told The Telegraph in January that military servicemen and women are unable to put the payment into trust, because they are part of the Armed Forces pension scheme. Labour sought to shore up support from the Armed Forces community at last year's general election, declaring the party would be 'standing up' for service personnel and veterans. The party was successful in winning over voters from military backgrounds, most notably winning in Aldershot, the site of a major garrison, for the first time in more than a century.

AOC should have paid more for Met Gala dress, House ethics panel says
AOC should have paid more for Met Gala dress, House ethics panel says

The Herald Scotland

time11 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

AOC should have paid more for Met Gala dress, House ethics panel says

The committee suggested the representative should make additional payments of $2,733.28 from her personal funds to compensate for the fair market value of certain expenses and $250 to compensate the Met for her partner's meal and if she does, they would consider the matter closed. "The congresswoman appreciates the committee finding that she made efforts to ensure her compliance with House Rules and sought to act consistently with her ethical requirements as a member of the House. She accepts the ruling and will remedy the remaining amounts, as she's done at each step in this process," said her Chief of Staff Mike Casca in a statement provided to USA TODAY. According to the report, Ocasio-Cortz made proactive steps to comply with the House gift rule, which limits the size of gifts members of Congress may accept, by arranging to pay for various services and to "rent" apparel out of her personal funds that might normally be loaned or gifted to Met Gala participants. More: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez might have violated House rules with Met Gala gifts, watchdog says But the committee found that she failed to fully comply by accepting free admission for her partner - the House gift rules at the time only allowed free admission for a spouse or child - and by failing to pay full fair market value for some of the items worn to the event. "The Committee did not find evidence that Representative Ocasio-Cortez intentionally underpaid for any goods or services received in connection with the Met Gala," the report states. Instead, it states that she relied on the advice from counsel to determine fair market price and payment discussions were made through a campaign staff member. The committee found evidence suggesting that the designer may have lowered costs in response to statements from Ocasio-Cortez's staff and that payments from her personal funds were not made on time or in some cases until the investigation began. According to the report, Ocasio-Cortez told the committee that she was not informed by staff about the late payments or attempts to collect them. The committee report said it found no evidence that the congresswoman was aware of the late payments. "The Committee did not find any indication that the delays in making payments wereintentional or that Representative Ocasio-Cortez was aware of the extent to which they occurred," the report states.

Funeral fraudster receives seven-year prison term
Funeral fraudster receives seven-year prison term

BBC News

time19 hours ago

  • BBC News

Funeral fraudster receives seven-year prison term

A man who deceived a grieving family into paying for a funeral which never took place has been sentenced to more than seven years in Kerbey, from Station Road in Westcliff-on-Sea, took £2,600 from the victims to arrange the service, even though he had been banned from organising funerals in the congregation arrived at Basildon Crematorium on 21 February 2020, to discover that no funeral had been arranged, Essex Police 62, who had previous convictions for funeral fraud, was sentenced at Chelmsford Crown Court on Friday after being found guilty in March. 'Blamed others' The victim's husband died at Southend Hospital in January 2020, and she paid Kerbey for the funeral under the business "Trinity Funeral Home" - not realising that it was banned from using the facilities at Basildon Crematorium and Southend Police said Kerbey's attempts to book the crematorium had been refused, but the night before the funeral he visited the family and presented them with an order of the congregation turned up to find no service had been booked, Kerbey tried to blame others and invited the family to his own funeral also sent a limousine to pick up the family which was prepared for a child's birthday the mourners arrived, they found it was a small room and much of the group had to wait Police said the 20-minute service "bore no relation" to the man who had died. 'Despicable' actions The family then had to pay an extra £700 to Kerbey for the body to be released into the care of a new funeral the victim's husband was finally laid to rest on 17 March 2020, no family were present due to the money they had already paid was jailed for seven years and three months for fraud and perverting the course of Daniel Hart, who co-led the investigation, said: "Kerbey preyed on vulnerable, grieving victims and promised them tailored and respectful funeral services for their loved one, which he knew they would never be able to deliver."His actions are despicable, dishonest and disrespectful and I am glad today that those who were sadly engulfed in the web of lies finally have justice."His colleague PC Leigh Stevenson re-scheduled her retirement in order to bring the case to court and "seek justice for the victims".A second man was charged in relation to these offences but was found not guilty of fraud by false representation. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store