
After Chelsea's mother died in an unsafe cell the coroner delivered a scathing message
In November last year a coroner issued a scathing message to the Western Australian government.
In a report handed down into yet another suicide in the state's jails, Michael Jenkin upbraided the government for its 'painfully slow progress' on removing deadly hanging points from prison cells, calling it 'a serious and unacceptable blight'.
To drive that point home, he then cut and pasted two sentences:
This Court cannot continue to make these types of recommendations in the face of ongoing prisoner deaths by hanging. The Department must now take urgent action to address this appalling situation.
Word for word, they were the same two sentences he had used in a coronial report into a prison suicide in November 2022, and then again in March last year, while presiding over an inquest into the death of Suzzanne Davis, a 47-year-old Torres Strait Island woman who died by suicide while on remand at Melaleuca women's prison in 2020.
Suzzanne's daughter, Chelsea Fisher, spoke to the Guardian as part of a five-month investigation into hanging deaths in Australian prisons, which found 57 deaths across 19 jails from ligature points that were known to authorities.
Over and over, coroners made recommendations after many of these deaths that state governments should work quickly to remove these points.
Again and again, governments and prison authorities failed to act.
'You publish [recommendations], you follow them up by saying, 'Has anything happened?' You get fobbed off,' says Michael Barnes, a former state coroner in Queensland and New South Wales. 'And the authorities, private operators – there's no compulsion on them to justify their inaction.'
Coroners in all states have limited power to ensure this work is carried out.
After the death of a prisoner at south-east Queensland's Borallon correctional centre in 2004, Barnes recommended that any exposed bars in cells be covered in mesh. In 2011 another man killed himself in the same manner at Borallon.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Barnes said such cases made him question the 'efficacy' of the coronial system, with coroners unable to scrutinise whether their recommendations have been properly acted on – except during the next inquest after yet another death.
In Chelsea's Perth home, the photos she still has of her mother show a woman with a wide, irresistible smile – piggybacking her daughter; leaning over her shoulder as she cuts a birthday cake covered in sprinkles.
Suzzanne's life was troubled on the outside but in prison she was a nurturing figure, dedicating herself to exercise, art and gardening. When Chelsea was little, she would visit her once a week in the jail, where everyone from the guards to the other inmates loved her.
'She was a role model in there,' Chelsea says. 'That's what all the girls said when she passed away. She was really caring … She was just a good person.'
Jenkin found the mental health care Suzzanne received was 'inadequate' and, despite a 'chronic, long-term risk of self-harm', the prison failed to place her in a cell that was fully ligature-minimised – a situation he said had to change as an 'absolute priority'.
The inquest that made this finding was not held until 2024 – four years after Suzzanne's death.
The failure to hold timely inquests means that obvious hanging points are sometimes used again before the inquest into the first death is completed. After a 2017 hanging from a cell window in the Darcy unit of Sydney's Silverwater jail, it took five years for the coronial investigation to be completed. By the time the court recommended the ligature point be addressed, another inmate had used it.
Guardian Australia has spent five months investigating the deadly toll of Australia's inaction to remove hanging points from its jails, a key recommendation of the 1991 royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody.
The main finding – that 57 inmates died using known ligature points that had not been removed – was made possible by an exhaustive examination of coronial records relating to 248 hanging deaths spanning more than 20 years.
Reporters combed through large volumes of coronial records looking for instances where a hanging point had been used repeatedly in the same jail.
They counted any death that occurred after prison authorities were made aware of that particular hanging point. Warnings were made via a prior suicide or suicide attempt, advice from their own staff or recommendations from coroners and other independent bodies.
Guardian Australia also logged how many of the 57 inmates were deemed at risk of self-harm or had attempted suicide before they were sent into cells with known hanging points.
In adherence with best practice in reporting on this topic, Guardian Australia has avoided detailed descriptions of suicide. In some instances, so that the full ramifications of coronial recommendations can be understood, we have made the decision to identify types and locations of ligature points. We have done this only in instances where we feel the public interest in this information being available to readers is high.
Even four years after Suzzanne's death, according to the coronial report, no ligature minimisation work had been carried out at Melaleuca.
For Chelsea, the wait for her mother's inquest meant years of anxiety. 'I just wanted it to be over with,' she says. 'I couldn't start to properly heal until afterwards. Just the waiting, wondering for that long.'
Coronial delays are not limited to WA, which claims to have improved its backlog. In a 2022 NSW parliament report on the coronial system, the state's Bar Association described the delay of death-in-custody inquests as 'chronic'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
A former NSW deputy coroner, Hugh Dillon, estimates there is a backlog of about 130 mandatory inquests into deaths in custody or deaths during police operations. His analysis suggests that in 2024 more than 70% of published inquests took more than three years from the date of death to complete.
'The ship is sinking,' Dillon said of the NSW coroners court. 'They're bailing it out as fast as they can. But they're going down with the ship.'
A NSW Department of Communities and Justice spokesperson said it had provided funding for two temporary coroners for 18 months to assist with the backlog. The two new coroners will be appointed in coming months, the spokesperson said.
In WA, Guardian Australia found repeated 'strident' warnings in more than two decades of coronial findings about the need to address hanging points, alongside pleas for better staffing and healthcare.
In his findings on the death of Suzzanne Davis, Jenkin noted that in 2023-24, only $1.645m was allocated by the government for ligature-minimisation work across the state's adult prison system.
This funding was, by the department's own analysis, 'only sufficient to refit approximately 8 cells to be fully ligature minimised', he wrote.
In 2024-25, the allocation was even more 'parsimonious', he said, with $1.137m set aside.
Peter Collins, the director of legal services at the Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia, says the situation is maddening. 'It's really easy for governments, especially in this state, to simply ignore the recommendations of coroners such that coronial findings just gather dust on a bookshelf.'
A 2023 report by the state's Office of the Inspector of Custodial Services found that the Department of Justice 'frequently' closed its responses to coronial reports without fully implementing their recommendations. The report found one prison had increased its number of ligature-minimised cells, but it was due in large part to the prison's expansion and not the retrofitting of old cells.
On a visit to Broome regional prison, the inspector found at least 40 ligature points in the minimum-security area, despite the coroner recommending a ligature-minimisation program after a 2015 death.
The almost 60 deaths from known ligature points identified by Guardian Australia comes as no surprise to Megan Krakouer, a Menang woman of the Noongar nation and the director of the National Suicide Prevention and Trauma Recovery Project.
She has attended many inquests into the deaths of First Nations people in custody in WA and has seen first-hand the government's failure to act on coroners' recommendations.
'They just make these recommendations one after the next, after the next, after the next,' she said. 'You can see the frustrations but the bottom line is the coroner can only do so much.
'It becomes extremely devastating for the particular families because then they carry this hurt … and yet there's no accountability whatsoever.''
The Western Australian Department of Justice said it had undertaken a comprehensive hanging point removal program since 2005. It also completed an audit in 2023 that confirmed all cell furniture and fixtures at Melaleuca Prison are 'ligature-minimised compliant'.
A spokesperson said that it was 'not possible to achieve the complete elimination of all ligature points' but priority was 'given to facilities with the highest risk and need'. The state is expanding services for those with complex mental health issues, including by building dedicated therapeutic accomodation and employing specialist mental health staff, the spokesperson said.
For Chelsea, the lack of answers still weighs heavily. She is haunted when she hears about each new death in custody.
'That's why I'm just so angry at everybody, I guess,' she said. 'I don't understand why it had to be like this. It just makes no sense, cause it was pretty black and white to me.'
In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Indigenous Australians can call 13YARN on 13 92 76 for information and crisis support. Other international helplines can be found at befrienders.org
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Wayne Carey ducks into strip club for meet-and-greet - as he moves on from pub toilet controversy
Wayne Carey smiled broadly as he walked into a strip club in Geelong on Friday night as the AFL great held a meet-and-greet appearance at the unusual venue. The former North Melbourne premiership captain was snapped walking into After Dark Gentleman's Club, where attendees were enjoying pole dancing at a venue self-described as a 'realm of seduction'. Carey, whose off-field controversies have created more headlines than even his brilliant playing career, had described the venue as 'classy' in justifying his appearance, describing the women that work there as 'highly skilled'. 'This is just another way of creating jobs,' he said on his podcast earlier in the week. It comes after Carey outed himself as the footy star who appeared in a viral video that was the talk of Melbourne last month. The footage showed the 54-year-old emerging from the toilets at Melbourne's trendy Toorak Cellars bar shortly after Kate Aston, a Melbourne marketing and communications executive, made her exit. A female voice was heard saying 'we've got you on camera' as the woman walked past, before asking 'What's he doing in there?' and remarking, 'She looks embarrassed.' Carey said he contacted Victoria Police over the video. Carey is seen entering the stip club where he said he'd stay for hours 'Being filmed without consent coming out of a public bathroom and then filming a complete stranger within a minute coming out of that public bathroom is NOT OK.. Then the persons who are filming adding their disgusting narrative and posting it on social media ruins lives …Enough,' he wrote on X. 'I've gone through disbelief, sadness, I've gone through anger. 'This woman has been thrown into this just because I could kick a footy. 'And you've got two vile, disturbing, probably p**sed women who want to do this to another woman. 'That's all they were doing, they were slut-shaming another woman. 'If two men had done that they would be raked over hot coals, it would be the biggest story going around. 'But because it's two women doing it to another woman … you don't know what's going on, this other woman has had all sorts of stuff going in her life, I've since found out. 'You talk about vile and disgusting, what they've done and who they have affected by a few sh**s and giggles drinking their chardonnay, sitting up there. 'I'm not going to name them because that would be as pathetic as what they are. I'll let the law take care of it.' He left Australia to get away from the furore, but refused to specify where he'd jetted off to, saying, 'No one knows where you are, and where I am, who I am. Just a beautiful part of the world.' The toilet incident came decades on from his infamous 2002 sexual liaison with Kelli Stevens, the wife of his then teammate Anthony Stevens, in a toilet at another teammate's house party which ended his time at North Melbourne. In 2004 he was arrested by police in Las Vegas, in 2007 in Miami, and in 2008 in Port Melbourne. In 2022 he was expelled from Crown Casino in Perth when he was found to have a plastic bag containing white powder, which he explained was crushed anti-inflammatories he required. .


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Post and boast' laws aim to stop young Australians glorifying crimes. Will they drive them deeper into ‘a failing justice system'?
It is 1.30am in the New South Wales town of Moree, and a 16-year-old passenger in a stolen Audi is using his phone to film the speedometer as the needle climbs towards 150km/h. He shares the video with his friends on the social media app Snapchat, a court later hearing he thought it was a 'cool thing to do'. But in NSW – and increasingly across the country – such posts are illegal. This week, the Victorian and Western Australian parliaments became the latest to consider so-called 'post and boast' laws, as almost every jurisdiction in the country makes it illegal for offenders to publish footage of their crimes on social media. The laws passed in Victoria on Thursday, but will be considered by a parliamentary committee in WA before being put to a vote there. The introduction of such reforms has come despite legal and human rights groups repeatedly arguing the laws are both harmful and pointless, as they create a further mechanism for locking up young people under the false pretence of addressing a problem already handled under existing law. 'We're seeing a troubling race to the bottom across the country, with governments in multiple states competing to be the toughest on children in the justice system,' Dr Mindy Sotiri, executive director of the Justice Reform Initiative, says. ''Post and boast' laws sound catchy and might work for political point-scoring in the short term but are ultimately just a headline-grabbing distraction. The reality is these laws will be completely ineffective. 'They won't deter offending, they won't shift the way children and young people are using social media, and they won't address the drivers of crime. What these laws will do is drive more and more children deeper into a failing justice system.' The Moree case referred to a youth offender known by the pseudonym Nadj. His case is one of few publicly available court decisions about someone charged under the laws. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The children's magistrate in his case found that there was no evidence Nadj was motivated by 'posting and boasting' when the car was stolen, that there was no information about how many people saw the Snapchat post, and that there was nothing in the post that would give others information about how to steal cars. 'The public policy rationale for this offence is that boasting has the capacity to encourage others to engage in criminal behaviour,' children's magistrate Paul Hayes found in his decision from March this year. 'It might send the message to impressionable young people that criminal acts are socially acceptable. It may make others think it is desirable to commit crimes. It might influence people to commit offences to circulate on social media. It may also provide people with information or ideas about how to commit criminal offences. Posting and boasting glorifies crime. 'Nadj says that the posting is a 'cool thing to do' but isolates this to his peer group … in this case the seriousness is the dissemination – not so much the effect.' Nadj could have been penalised with a maximum two years' imprisonment under the laws, but Hayes found the post would not greatly contribute to his aggregate sentence for other offences. A month earlier, Hayes dismissed similar charges involving a boy known by the pseudonym Harry, who was 13 when he was also allegedly involved in stealing a car and 'disseminated material' about this theft, leading to a 'post and boast' offence. The first state to implement the laws was Queensland, when the then Labor government, facing intense criticism over its response to crime, passed them in early 2023. The Minns government in NSW followed suit, passing similar laws in March 2024, and the Northern Territory government also implemented post-and-boast offences with two-year maximums in October last year after sweeping to power on a tough-on-crime mandate. South Australian laws were next, after they were introduced by an independent upper house MP, Frank Pangallo, who wanted a presumption against bail for youth offenders who posted and boasted about their crimes. That measure did not pass parliament, but another version of the laws – which also had two-year maximum penalties – did. 'Criminals can seek to gain notoriety by posting and boasting which could potentially incite or encourage others, and further embolden their own illegal acts,' the attorney general, Kyam Maher, said in a statement in May. 'This legislation is an important step forward in protecting the community from offenders who seek to glorify illicit activities.' The rhetoric used by Maher is common when governments trumpet these changes in media releases. There are repeated references to 'crimfluencer', a pun on social media influencers, and wordplay such as 'no likes for lawbreakers'. The Tasmanian government promised it would introduce similar laws last year, while the ACT government has no plans to introduce them. Peter Dutton even promised federal post-and-boast laws had the Coalition won the May election. The laws generally only apply to certain offences, and in some cases include carve-outs to ensure that media coverage or awareness campaigns are not endangered. Sonya Kilkenny, the Victorian attorney general, said in her second reading speech that the bill now meant a person who posted online about a home invasion faced a maximum penalty of 27 years in prison: 25 for the home invasion, and two for the post. 'One of the challenges confronting our community today is the rise of 'posting and boasting' about criminal offending,' Kilkenny told parliament in June. 'The performative nature of these offences introduces a new layer of harm: it glorifies criminal behaviour, encourages others to emulate it, exacerbates community concerns and fear, and erodes public confidence in the justice system. It may also publicly identify and retraumatise victims.' Performative is exactly how critics of the laws describe the governments who are passing them. Judges and magistrates could already consider the fact a person posted about their crimes on social media as an aggravating factor when it comes to sentencing, regardless of whether post and boast laws existed. Offenders who champion their offending on social media were already likely to cop harsher sentences, especially considering such posts often feature in police briefs of evidence. The proposed Western Australian laws are considered particularly problematic, because of the possibility they could be used to outlaw peaceful protest. In a letter sent to the attorney general, Tony Buti, earlier this month, the Conservation Council of WA executive director, Matt Roberts, urged the government to make a carve-out in the laws protecting protest and satire. 'We understand the legislation is intended to deter the glorification of illegal activity on social media. We share the concerns of youth justice advocates and legal professionals who say the laws may have a disproportionate impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, particularly young people,' Roberts said in the letter. 'We are also concerned the legislation may unintentionally lead to the repression of peaceful, nonviolent protest, including for environmental causes.' WA Justice Association co-founder Tom Penglis told the West Australian there was no evidence such laws reduced crime, saying 'they're based on 'vibes' not evidence'. Sotiri, from the Justice Reform Initiative, agrees. 'It is a total fantasy to believe that threatening harsher penalties will deter children from offending … every jurisdiction that has taken this 'tough on crime' approach has seen the same result: higher incarceration rates, more children cycling in and out of harmful remand, and no long-term benefit to community safety.'


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The big move to eliminate 'dangerous loopholes' and ensure predators are kept away from kids
Anyone who fails a Working With Children Check (WWCC) will be handed a lifetime ban effective in every Australian state in order to keep kids safe. All states and territories on Friday agreed to strengthen the regulations around holding a WWCC to try and curb child predators. The new rules will also ensure anyone with a criminal history applying for a WWCC is identified and blacklisted nationwide. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said the 'ambitious reforms' would address gaps in the current system of rules. Rowland suggested the changes would come into effect by 2026, but that deadline would require each state and territory to dramatically speed up processes. The federal government recently cracked down on 30 childcare centres which were each handed compliance orders for failing to meet national quality standards. Each now faces losing its Commonwealth funding unless performance is dramatically boosted over the next six months. IT updates and standardisation of check systems in states and territories have delayed the creation of a national WWCC registry which is also under consideration. Rowland said the new changes were designed to address 'nefarious individuals' who might be seeking to work with children. 'It is notable that nefarious individuals have been shopping around the Working With Children Check system and exploiting loopholes,' she said. 'There is a firm commitment from all states and territories to pull out all stops, and we are working together as a team.' Under the new rules, anyone who has ever had a WWCC revoked will also lose their current licence for life. A National Continuous Checking Capability will soon allow authorities to monitor changes in a person's criminal history. The system is currently being piloted by the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. All jurisdictions have also agreed to strengthen the criteria used nationwide when assessing eligibility for a WWCC. This will make the creation of a national commission or registry even easier, Rowland said. No state or territory will be asked to lower its standards to comply with the incoming national standard. Whether or not the national registry would be made public is something the Attorney-General would 'examine', the Herald Sun reported. NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley said his state had already taken action to strengthen its laws for the future. Loopholes will soon be closed which certain predators have used to travel between states after their licence had been revoked in one. Coalition education spokesman Jonno Duniam encouraged leaders to include shared resources, such as CCTV footage, to ensure child protection. This would enable a 'truly national' system, Duniam said.