logo
Gakharia Defends Chorchana Checkpoint with Tsulukiani Commission, Alleges ‘Sabotage'

Gakharia Defends Chorchana Checkpoint with Tsulukiani Commission, Alleges ‘Sabotage'

Civil.ge04-07-2025
Giorgi Gakharia again defended building a checkpoint near the Tskhinvali occupation line in 2019, and implied other Georgian Dream officials might have sabotaged the plan for more checkpoints, as he
remotely
testified from Germany to the Tsulukiani Commission for the second time on July 2.
Tsulukiani Commission, an investigative body in Georgian Dream's one-party parliament with steadily creeping scope to probe alleged crimes of former officials, resummoned ex-GD Prime Minister and current opposition party leader Gakharia to testify mid-June, two months after his
initial testimony
.
Repeated summons came as Georgian prosecutors
started probing
ex-PM as part of a 'sabotage' investigation over posting a police checkpoint near the Tbilisi-controlled Chorchana village adjacent to the Tskhinvali occupation line in 2019, when he was the interior minister. Gakharia offered to testify online since he was abroad. Tea Tsulukiani, former Justice and Culture Minister who chairs the Commission, initially declined to allow remote participation but ultimately
agreed
.
Gakharia's decision to testify comes in contrast with other opposition leaders, who chose to boycott, citing their rejection of parliament's legitimacy. Seven individuals, including six opposition party leaders, have been
sentenced
to months in jail for defying Commission summonses.
The key issue during the two-and-a-half-hour questioning—marked by bitter exchanges and mutual accusations—was the Chorchana episode.
The Commission had already questioned Gakharia on the matter during his April testimony. At the time, the former Prime Minister faced accusations from Commission members about failing to coordinate the move with other officials, and about the move ultimately backfiring by prompting Tskhinvali to open additional checkpoints and further push the occupation line into Tbilisi-controlled territory.
During the June 2 testimony, Gakharia again defended his 2019 decision, coming just weeks before he was promoted as prime minister. He said establishing the outpost was necessary to ensure that both Georgian representatives and those from the EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) could conduct patrols without obstruction and to 'establish effective control over Georgian territory.'
According to Gakharia, work on the plan began in late 2018 and involved both the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the State Security Service (SSSG). The plan called for the creation of seven checkpoints, with the first installed on August 24, 2019. The EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) was also informed about the plan, Gakharia claimed.
Gakharia noted he became Prime Minister on September 8—two weeks after the installation, by which, against the original plan, Russian forces established checkpoints at the coordinates initially selected by the Georgian side.
'Somehow, surprisingly, Russian Federation checkpoints turned up on the coordinates where Georgian checkpoints were supposed to be,' Gakharia said, implying that Vakhtang Gomelauri, who succeeded him as Interior Minister, and then-State Security Service head Grigol Liluashvili may have undermined the original plan. Gomelauri, who quit his post as Interior Minister late in May, testified to the prosecution two weeks after his resignation over the Chorchana episode. He told the press before his testimony that he was against opening the Chorchana checkpoint in 2019.
'Time will come when a special commission will be established, which will figure out why the completion of the plan that was meant to take full control of this road was obstructed? What did [Vakhtang Gomelauri], who at the time had moved into the Interior Ministry, do to stop this process and not bring the plan to an end, or what [Grigol Liluashvili], appointed at the time at the SSSG or as acting head as a deputy, did when all these points [now Russia-controlled] were supposed to be Georgian checkpoints?' – Gakharia told the Commission. 'At a certain moment, when this transition phase was underway, this plan was sabotaged.'
Gakharia described the failed implementation of the plan as 'the first serious conflict' with the State Security Service leadership, arguing that had the original plan been fully executed, it would have led to the installation of Georgian—not Russian—checkpoints.
Tea Tsulukiani, on the other hand, cited
testimony
from local resident Elguja Kharazishvili as saying that following the checkpoint installation, locals could no longer enter the nearby Tsagvli forest, as the occupying regime had set up its checkpoint inside and seized half of its territory. According to Tsulukiani, there is a 'diametrical' difference between the accounts of the local resident and Gakharia. She demanded that Gakharia answer if his 'uncoordinated and reckless move' caused Georgia to lose its territories.
Gakharia rejected the accusation, calling it 'absolutely unacceptable' to involve local villagers in what he described as a politically motivated prosecution. He defended the construction of the checkpoint, arguing it was necessary due to the Georgian side's lack of effective control over the area—an assessment he said was supported by the State Security Service's
2019 annual report
.
(The 2019 report cited by Gakharia described 'extremely alarming' and 'dangerous' actions by Russian forces, including marking trees and clearing paths to enable 'illegal patrolling' in the forests near Chorchana and Tsagvli. It also stated that the Georgian police checkpoint had been placed roughly 250 meters from the occupation line to respond to ongoing borderization activities.)
Gakharia cited specific incidents of Georgian citizens being 'detained' by occupation forces, including one involving a hunter who, according to Gakharia, was disarmed and sent back to his village with a warning not to return. Tsulukiani challenged the account, saying that the man was 'stopped, disarmed, and released,' accusing Gakharia of lying.
'That's not detention,' she said. 'We will verify your claims, we can't simply take your word for it, no offense.'
Gakharia further defended the checkpoint by noting that the so-called Tskhinvali General Prosecutor's Office opened an investigation into the Chorchana checkpoint in 2019 – mirroring the Georgian prosecution's current probe. 'And what you are doing now here, you are actually giving testimony and strengthening the occupiers' interest,' he told the commission.
The
opening of the police checkpoint
led to a flare-up of tensions in August 2019 with de facto authorities in Tskhinvali, who demanded that the checkpoint be dismantled. This was a rare moment under the Georgian Dream administration when police services overtly resisted the demands from Russia-backed Tskhinvali. Some two weeks after the tensions, the Georgian Dream party endorsed Gakharia as prime minister, and backed him prior to his resignation and move to the opposition in 2021.
Gakharia has since faced repeated attacks and accusations from his former party colleagues, from allegations of substance abuse to linking both his appointment as prime minister and later his resignation to foreign interference. 'There was a call from the 'Deep State' and his appointment as prime minister followed,' GD Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze
recalled
on June 18, claiming that certain 'compromise steps' were taken at the time, which GD no longer tolerates.
Georgian Dream officials have repeatedly invoked the 'deep state' conspiracy theory to allege Western interference in Georgian politics, including claims that the West is attempting to drag Georgia into a war with Russia.
Also Read:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Detained Activist's Forced Psychiatric Examination Feared to Mimic Soviet Repressive Practices
Detained Activist's Forced Psychiatric Examination Feared to Mimic Soviet Repressive Practices

Civil.ge

timea day ago

  • Civil.ge

Detained Activist's Forced Psychiatric Examination Feared to Mimic Soviet Repressive Practices

The recent court decision to authorize the forced transfer of detained activist Nino Datashvili to a psychiatric facility for examination has fueled fears that Georgian Dream authorities might be resorting to repressive methods characteristic of Soviet rule or fascist regimes. On August 2, Tbilisi City Court granted prosecutors' request for Datashvili's involuntary examination, which would allow for her forced transfer to a psychiatric facility for 20 days. The request was based on 2019 medical records submitted by the defense, which indicated 'emotional lability' as a symptom accompanying a serious and painful spinal condition. The controversial decision has led representatives of various groups, including psychologists , social workers , lawyers, and educators, to condemn what they saw as an abuse of psychiatry in the crackdown on critics. 'In the Soviet Union, isolating dissidents from society through forced placement and 'treatment' in psychiatric institutions was a common method of political reprisal,' read the joint statement signed by hundreds of mental health professionals. The statement cited global statistics indicating that one in four individuals experiences common mental health conditions, such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and related emotional lability, at least once in their lifetime. 'Subjecting individuals to psychiatric examinations on this basis, without their participation in making decisions on such examination, constitutes a violation of fundamental human rights and may amount to inhuman and degrading treatment,' the statement read. The statement noted such practices were characteristic of 'fascist political regimes.' Datashvili, activist and teacher, was arrested on June 20 and faces four to seven years in jail over charges of attacking an officer, based on a June 9 episode when she was forcibly removed from court by several bailiffs. Video footage from the scene appears to show her frantically swinging her hands at a bailiff while being restrained and removed, though the nature or force of the contact is unclear from the video. Datashvili's lawyers from Partnership for Human Rights, a local group, have argued that the move was an attempt to discredit and stigmatize the detainee and served to remove her from activism. The controversy has particularly evoked chilling comparisons to the case of Nasi Shamanauri, a Soviet-era Georgian journalist who was forcibly institutionalized over her outspoken criticism of local policies. Shamanauri spent months in confinement, during which she undertook a hunger strike and reportedly succumbed to beatings and torture in 1983. 'If this toxic process isn't stopped now, tragedies like that of Nasi Shamanauri will become our everyday life,' Jana Javakhishvili, a prominent psychologist and professor of Tbilisi's Ilia State University, warned . The Prosecutor's Office of Georgia said that their request for the activist's examination was indeed based on the medical records submitted by the defense, where, the statement said, 'psycho-emotional lability is indicated as an accompanying disease.' Prosecutors claimed psychiatric evaluations are routinely ordered in such cases. But according to Nona Kurdovanidze , head of the Georgian Young Lawyers' Association, a local human rights group, the examination 'was ordered without sufficient evidence,' particularly the evidence that would mandate Datashvili's transfer to a psychiatric facility. The Public Defender's Office said on August 4 that they 'continue monitoring' Datashvili's case, and their representatives have visited her multiple times. During the recent visit on August 2, Datashvili 'spoke about various issues, including her health condition and imprisonment conditions, which in turn significantly affect the defendant's health condition,' the agency said. The Office said it has requested Datashvili's medical records, but chose not to disclose them 'since this data constitutes personal information of a special category regarding Nino Datashvili's health condition.' Datashvili's case is among several recent prosecutions that critics say demonstrate the ruling Georgian Dream party's increasing use of harsh criminal charges against activists and journalists for relatively minor incidents. Another high-profile example is the case of journalist Mzia Amaghlobeli, whose verdict is expected on August 6. Also Read:

Authorities Study Leasing Deal Between Khazaradze Family and German Ambassador
Authorities Study Leasing Deal Between Khazaradze Family and German Ambassador

Civil.ge

time2 days ago

  • Civil.ge

Authorities Study Leasing Deal Between Khazaradze Family and German Ambassador

The Revenue Service of Georgia said it was studying 'possible violation of tax law' in a leasing deal between the family of Mamuka Khazaradze, jailed leader of the opposition Lelo/Strong Georgia coalition, and German Ambassador Peter Fischer. The statement follows reports by pro-Georgian Dream media that the German Ambassador was leasing a residence from Khazaradze's family, while it was 'unknown' whether there was a leasing agreement and whether Khazaradze's family was paying relevant taxes. Khazaradze's lawyers confirmed the deal, but said there was an agreement 'executed in compliance with all legal rules' and accused pro-GD media of spreading 'distorted information.' 'Following the information disseminated in the public domain, an analysis of the issue revealed a possible violation of tax law, which is why the Revenue Service has already begun investigating the facts and will conduct tax control measures specified by law in order to fully study the information,' the Revenue Service said in its August 4 statement , citing 'high public interest' in providing information about 'possible tax evasion' in the leasing deal betwen Khazaradze family and the German diplomat. Pro-government Rustavi 2 TV channel reported on August 1 that the German Ambassador's 'up to 300 square meter' residence on Kavlashvili Street in downtown Tbilisi belonged to Irina Khazaradze, the Lelo leader's wife. The channel claimed it was unclear whether a formal lease agreement existed and whether the Khazaradze family was paying income tax on the arrangement. Leaders of the ruling Georgian Dream party seized on the media reports, with GD Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze saying the ambassador 'put himself in an uncomfortable position and, more, he put his state, his Foreign Ministry, in an uncomfortable position.' 'Let us see, wait for the information regarding the finances, how the expenses were covered, taxes were paid, and so on, all of this is very interesting,' Kobakhidze told reporters in Shovi, Racha, on August 3. 'When you rent a residence from a leader of a certain political party and then you present yourself as a staunch supporter of this political party, it raises a lot more questions.' The lawyers of Khazaradze's family issued a statement on August 2, calling the 'distorted information' spread by the pro-government channel 'another propagandistic attack' both on Khazaradze's family and the German state. 'There is a notarized agreement (N221439682 / 21.10.2022) about leasing the property in possession of the Khazaradze family to the German Ambassador, executed in compliance with all legal rules,' the lawyers said. 'Any other, i.e., undocumented cooperation with the diplomatic representation of the German Federation is impossible!' Ambassador Fischer, a vocal critic of the Georgian Dream government's anti-democratic actions, has faced repeated attacks from the ruling party and its supporters, including public verbal insults . Other European diplomats, including the EU Ambassador, have likewise been targets of sustained accusations and attacks by the ruling party leadership, drawing condemnation from Brussels. This post is also available in: ქართული

Another French Photojournalist Denied Entry to Georgia
Another French Photojournalist Denied Entry to Georgia

Civil.ge

time2 days ago

  • Civil.ge

Another French Photojournalist Denied Entry to Georgia

Hicham El Bouhmidi, a French freelance photojournalist who had been covering the capital's ongoing protests, was recently denied entry to Georgia, a move that appears to be part of a broader pattern of border refusals targeting journalists, activists, and human rights defenders. 'After being interrogated and waiting for six hours at the Armenian-Georgian border I got handed the long-awaited paper,' the photographer wrote on Instagram on August 3, referring to the official entry refusal document. He said the official reason for denied entry was 'other cases envisaged by Georgian legislation,' a vague provision frequently cited in similar cases. El Bouhmidi noted that the same motive 'has reportedly been used over the past months to refuse the entry in the country to fellow journalists reporting on the authoritarian slide of the Georgian government', citing, among others, cases of fellow French journalists Jérôme Chobeaux , Clément Girardot , and Marylise Vigneau. He also said that the same clause has been used by Georgian border authorities against Russian and Belarusian citizens who 'confronted their regimes.' The photographer said he was expecting such a decision. The streak of refusals has recently affected journalists and activists, including those who had lived in Georgia for years, many of whom believe their political views or reporting critical of the ruling Georgian Dream party were key factors in their rejection. In May, EU diplomat Simon Vanderbroucke was denied entry to Georgia, marking the first such reported case involving a diplomat. In July, OC Media also reported that Dutch journalist Joost Bosman, who had for years covered developments in Georgia, including recent protests, was turned away at the Georgian border twice in a single month. The refusal was officially based on similarly vague grounds, with border officials additionally citing an administrative fine that, according to the journalist, had already been waived at the time of the first entry attempt. In late May, the Polish and French embassies in Georgia issued advisories calling their citizens to consider potential entry risks, including participation in protests and social media activity, before traveling. Also Read:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store