logo
CNN's Tapper rips media smear campaign against Hur, WSJ report on Biden decline without mentioning own network

CNN's Tapper rips media smear campaign against Hur, WSJ report on Biden decline without mentioning own network

Yahoo04-06-2025
CNN anchor Jake Tapper has taken aim at the media's treatment of those who sounded the alarm about former President Joe Biden's cognitive decline before it was fully exposed at the now-infamous presidential debate, despite the fact that his own network was guilty of lobbing such attacks.
As Biden was actively seeking reelection, there were two explosive moments that drew attention to his mental acuity before the debate. The first was in February 2024 with the release of the Hur report, which determined the Justice Department would not seek criminal charges over the then-president's mishandling of classified information, in part because a jury would deem him as a "sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory." The report also revealed Biden couldn't remember key dates, such as when he was in office and when his son Beau died.
The second was in June 2024, weeks before the debate, when The Wall Street Journal published a bombshell report titled, "Behind Closed Doors, Biden Shows Signs of Slipping," a months-long investigation by reporters Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes involving more than 45 sources who were either directly involved or briefed on meetings with Biden, who they said "appears slower now, someone who has both good moments and bad ones."
Jake Tapper Declares Biden White House Lied About 'Cheap Fakes' After Cnn Peddled Narrative In 2024
On Bari Weiss' "Honestly" podcast Thursday, Tapper spoke about how the Biden White House went to "war" with Special Counsel Robert Hur, who he described to Weiss as a "serious civil servant," and how members of the media participated.
"A lot of people in the media are very complicit and part of the smear machine against Robert Hur," Tapper told Weiss. "Robert Hur is smeared and cannot get a job for months. And he was – honestly, if you look back at what he said, that was polite!"
Read On The Fox News App
Shielding Biden: Journalists Shed Light On The Media's Cover-up Of A Weakened President
He also praised "great reporters" Linksey and Hughes, noting they, too, were viciously attacked.
"[They] are garroted by the Democratic Party and by journalists and by media critics, and by journalism professors and this whole industry of people who claim to be non-partisan assessors of truth… that had to have been traumatizing for them," Tapper said.
What Tapper failed to mention was that CNN was among those "complicit" in Team Biden's attacks on Hur and The Wall Street Journal.
Jim Acosta, who at the time was Tapper's CNN colleague, wondered aloud if Hur's assessment was "out of bounds," while CNN commentator and former Biden White House communications director Kate Bedingfield accused Hur of "editorializing" his report, and then-CNN political analyst John Avlon wondered why "some spin on the ball" was included.
One of CNN's go-to legal experts, Jeffrey Toobin, scolded Hur for making "unnecessary points" about Biden's advanced age, characterizing the special counsel as a "Republican partisan" who "trashed" the president despite not bringing charges.
"Part of that report was an outrage, was a disgrace," Toobin said at the time. "I mean, the idea that they that he would make such a big point of Biden being elderly is not something a prosecutor needed to do."
Credibility Crisis: Press Dismissed Hur Report On Biden's Memory Issues Long Before Concerns Became Undeniable
CNN liberal pundit Paul Begala similarly attacked the "partisan Trumper" for "editorializing way out of his league," even suggesting Hur was motivated to seek revenge on Biden for voting against William Rehnquist, for whom Hur had clerked, during his Supreme Court confirmation as Chief Justice in 1986 when Biden served as a senator.
"This guy has donated to Republicans. He is a partisan," Begala said. "The only job he had was to indict or not indict, and to add all this — the only thing he didn't add was the legal disclaimer that this is a political ad in support of Donald Trump. It was a total cheap shot."
CNN's then-senior political analyst Gloria Borger immediately took Biden's side, insisting, "This is not a man who's going to forget the day his son died" and echoed Biden's falsehood that Hur was the one who brought up Beau's death in the interview when, in fact, it was the president.
Perhaps Biden's biggest defender at CNN at the time was its media reporter, Oliver Darcy (who has since left the network), who declared Hur's depiction of Biden's mental state "didn't match reality."
"The acknowledgement from some, but not all, news outlets on Tuesday about the true nature of Biden's deposition marked another embarrassing moment for the national press, which has floundered at pivotal moments in the lead up to the crucial 2024 presidential election," Darcy wrote in March 2024. "The deposition transcripts not only indicated that Biden appeared fairly sharp during his testimony, joking with investigators and retelling stories with granular detail, but that Hur was misleading in how he presented some of the information included in his report."
"Hur chose to portray the president as a mentally diminished elderly man who struggled to recall basic information during his deposition, raising alarm bells about whether he had the fitness to serve in the nation's highest office. Hur's characterization of Biden played directly into a years-long campaign waged by Biden's political opponents and the powerful right-wing media machine to depict the president as a senile, aloof man," he continued.
Credibility Crisis: Biden's Late-night Allies Go Quiet After Damning Cognitive Decline Revelations
Following The Wall Street Journal's report, several CNN anchors stressed that the paper's story heavily relied on Republican criticism of Biden and called out former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who gave the only on-the-record statement, for appearing to flip-flop on Biden's sharpness in previous comments (the Journal reporters later explained it as a tactical PR move at the time for McCarthy to bolster cooperation with the Biden White House).
CNN's Boris Sanchez grilled Hughes over Democratic allegations that her story was "slanted," a question that would be unfathomable to a journalist covering Donald Trump.
Darcy erupted at The Wall Street Journal, insisting its reporting "suffers from glaring problems," lecturing the paper it "owes its readers — and the public — better."
"It is difficult to imagine that the newspaper, or any outlet, would run a similar story declaring that Trump is 'slipping' behind the scenes based on the word of top Democratic figures — despite the fact that the Democratic leadership has demonstrated a much stronger relationship with the truth in recent years than their Republican counterparts," Darcy wrote.
Credibility Crisis: Wall Street Journal Report On Biden 'Slipping' Was Smeared By Media
"More broadly speaking, The Journal's piece pointed to a continued problem roiling the news media as it covers the 2024 election. Trump is permitted to fall asleep in court and make nonsensical public statements on a routine basis without any serious questions raised about his mental acuity," the ex-CNN pundit continued. "Meanwhile, Biden is judged on an entirely different standard."
A spokesperson for CNN declined to comment. Original article source: CNN's Tapper rips media smear campaign against Hur, WSJ report on Biden decline without mentioning own network
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Putin to meet Friday in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine war summit: What to know
Trump and Putin to meet Friday in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine war summit: What to know

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Putin to meet Friday in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine war summit: What to know

Trump wants a deal to end the war — but expectations are low for a major breakthrough. President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska to discuss a way forward in the Russia-Ukraine war. It will be the first face-to-face sit-down between the two leaders since 2019, and perhaps the most significant since they met alone the following year (alongside interpreters) for more than two hours in Helsinki, Finland. It will also be Putin's first meeting with a U.S. president since the start of his invasion. He previously met with former President Joe Biden in June 2021. Friday's summit comes at what could be a pivotal point in the conflict, which escalated when Putin's forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The fighting has since caused a staggering number of casualties on both sides. Trump has been trying for months to secure a deal to end the war, but Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to Friday's summit and foreign-policy experts question Putin's desire for peace. Expectations are low for any sort of major breakthrough. 'This is really a feel-out meeting,' Trump said Monday. 'Probably in the first two minutes I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made.' Here's everything you need to know ahead of Friday's summit in Alaska. Why is Trump meeting Putin now? Trump has a long history of praising Putin, and his relationship with Zelensky is fraught. When campaigning for reelection in 2024, Trump vowed to end the war during his first 24 hours back in office; he later paused U.S. assistance to Ukraine. As a result, experts have questioned whether Trump is positioned to broker a deal that both sides could agree to. Yet in recent weeks, Trump has also expressed frustration with Putin's intensifying attacks on Ukrainian cities and civilians and his seeming indifference to peace talks. When Russian missiles pounded Kyiv earlier this year, Trump accused Putin of "needlessly killing a lot of people," adding in a social media post: "He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" "I am very disappointed with President Putin," Trump told reporters on July 13, shortly before announcing a plan to send weapons to Ukraine via NATO. "I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that." In turn, that disappointment may have 'pushed the president into closer alignment with NATO allies and even Zelensky,' according to Politico. On Wednesday, Trump participated in a video call with Zelensky and other European leaders and reportedly agreed to 'five principles' for the talks with Putin. They include keeping Ukraine 'at the table' for follow-up meetings and refusing to discuss peace terms — like swaps of land between Russia and Ukraine — before a ceasefire is put in place. For his part, Trump has framed Friday's meeting as a preliminary step in a larger process, saying that a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelensky could follow. 'First, I'll find out where we are,' Trump said Wednesday. 'If the first [meeting] goes okay, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately.' At the same time, Trump insisted Putin would face 'severe consequences' if he doesn't seem serious in Alaska about ending the war. 'There may be no second meeting,' the president added, 'because I didn't get the answers that we have to have.' So far, Trump has resisted imposing tariffs or further sanctions on Russia in an effort to bring Putin into negotiations. Last month, Trump told Putin that he would have to agree to a ceasefire by Aug. 8 or face 'very severe tariffs' and a new wave of sanctions. When that deadline passed without a ceasefire deal, Trump instead invited Putin to talk in person. According to Axios, Trump told Zelensky and other European leaders on Wednesday that his goal is to get Putin to agree to a ceasefire at Friday's meeting. Why is Putin meeting Trump now? The international community has largely isolated the Russian leader since the start of the war, with both the U.S. and Europe moving to cut off Moscow's access to western markets and its fossil fuel export revenues. But sanctions have done nothing to curb Putin's aggression in Ukraine. 'I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian peoples to be one people. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours,' Putin told guests at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in June. 'We have an old rule. Wherever a Russian soldier sets foot is ours.' Analysts say that Putin sees Trump as the rare Western leader who, in his desire to make a deal, could pressure Ukraine into accepting major concessions — adding that even Trump's invitation to meet on American soil (despite Putin's international arrest warrant for war crimes) is likely seen by the Russian president as its own reward. Putin's goal Friday, as Politico recently put it, will be to 'try to repair his personal relationship with Trump in a private meeting while convincing him that Ukraine shares the blame for the prolonged conflict.' Trump has repeatedly signaled that he does, in fact, blame Zelensky as well as Putin, most recently on Monday. "I get along with Zelensky, but, you know, I disagree with what he's done — very, very severely, disagree,' the president told reporters. 'This is a war that should have never happened.' Trump has also suggested freezing most current battle lines in place, with additional "land swaps' to be agreed upon by Putin and Zelensky — an idea that Zelensky has rejected, claiming it violates his country's constitution. What does Zelensky have to say about the meeting? Zelensky has long claimed that by continuing to insist on maximalist objectives — international recognition of seized areas of Ukraine as part of 'new Russia'; promises that Ukraine will be forever barred from NATO — Putin is deliberately making demands that he knows Ukraine cannot accept in order to convince Trump that Zelensky is the problem. 'We understand the Russians' intention to try to deceive America,' Zelensky said in his evening address on Sunday night. 'We will not allow this.' Zelensky has long called for a complete ceasefire as a precondition for negotiations; he has also said he would talk directly with Putin in any format. Putin has rejected both offers. In the meantime, the two sides are intensifying their efforts on the battlefield in order to bolster their negotiation positions. Russia's troops recently 'broke through a segment of Ukraine's defensive line near the city of Pokrovsk, a longtime stronghold,' according to the New York Times — a move that shows, in Zelensky's words, that Putin is 'redeploying [his] troops and forces in ways that suggest preparations for new offensive operations.' Putin is 'not preparing for a cease-fire or an end to the war,' Zelensky claimed. Similarly, Kyiv has 'ramped up attacks on Russian oil refineries, doubling down on its strategy of pressuring Russia … by targeting the Kremlin's main revenue source to fund the war,' according to the Times.

Roy Cooper's Chances of Flipping North Carolina's GOP Senate Seat—New Poll
Roy Cooper's Chances of Flipping North Carolina's GOP Senate Seat—New Poll

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Roy Cooper's Chances of Flipping North Carolina's GOP Senate Seat—New Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former Democratic Governor Roy Cooper held a lead over Republican Michael Whatley in the latest poll of North Carolina's Senate race released on Thursday. Why It Matters Democrats view North Carolina as perhaps their best opportunity to flip a Senate seat in the 2026 midterms, when they are hoping a "blue wave" will give them a chance at winning back a majority despite a challenging map. The decision to run by Cooper, who enjoyed positive approval ratings during his time as governor, has fueled Democratic optimism about their chances. But Republicans believe Whatley, who serves as the RNC chair and is endorsed by President Donald Trump, will be a strong candidate against Cooper—and Democrats have not won a Senate race in the Tar Heel State since 2008 despite several close races. In the 2024 presidential race, North Carolina gave Trump a narrow victory of about three percentage points. The new poll underscores the competitive nature of the critical battleground race. What to Know The Harper Polling survey provided to Newsweek by the John Locke Foundation showed Cooper leading Whatley, but neither candidate had support from a majority of respondents. Cooper received support from 47.3 percent of respondents, while 39.1 percent said they planned to cast their ballot for Whatley in November next year. Forty percent said they would "definitely" support Cooper, while only 24.7 percent said they would "definitely" support Whatley. The poll surveyed 600 likely voters from August 11 to August 12, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.98 percentage points. Former Governor Roy Cooper speaks during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 22, 2024. Former Governor Roy Cooper speaks during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 22, found that 47 percent of respondents view Cooper favorably, while 40 percent view him unfavorably. Whatley was more unknown among North Carolina voters, with 51 percent saying they had never heard of him. Fifteen percent viewed him favorably, while 11 percent viewed him unfavorably. Voters were split about who they would support on the generic ballot for Congress—46 percent said they would support a Republican candidate, while 46.1 percent said they would support the Democratic candidate, according to the poll. Donald Bryson, CEO and president of the John Locke Foundation and publisher of the Carolina Journal, told Newsweek the poll findings are not surprising but provided a "great baseline" of the state of the race. "Roy Cooper has vast name ID having been attorney general for 16 years, governor for 8. He's been in elected office in North Carolina since 1986. With all of that resume, it would be strange if he had a lower name ID that Michael Whatley," he said. Whatley having lower name recognition is also not surprising as he has never held elected office in the state, Bryson said. He said that is not "necessarily a negative for Whatley," who will need to drive up Cooper's negative numbers and his own name ID over the coming year. What is more concerning for Whatley is the poll's findings that 62 percent of North Carolinians believe tariffs will make prices higher for everyday North Carolinians, Bryson said. "That is something that if I was working on his campaign as a consultant or a campaign manager, how do we answer this question on when the price of goods goes up due to the tariff regime put in place by the Trump administration—how do we spin this as good for the state of North Carolina?" he said. Whatley's fate and criticism will likely be "tied to Trump," Bryson said. Roy Cooper Leads Earliest Polls of North Carolina Senate Race The poll is in line with the other early surveys of the Senate race. An Emerson College poll released last month similarly showed Cooper with a lead over Whatley. Forty-seven percent of respondents said they would cast their ballots for Cooper, while 41 percent said they would support Whatley next November. The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters from July 28 to July 30, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. A Victory Insights poll showed a closer race, with Cooper winning 43 percent of respondents and Whatley winning 40 percent of respondents. It surveyed 600 likely voters from July 20 to July 30, 2025. While Cooper is not expected to face a competitive primary, as Democrats have cleared the field for him, it's unclear whether other high-profile Republicans will challenge Whatley, who has the support of Trump. Trump-backed candidates typically fare well in GOP primaries, giving Whatley an early advantage against other potential challengers. North Carolina—An Elusive Battleground for Democrats Democrats have made recent Senate races competitive in North Carolina but have struggled to prevail against Republicans in a state that has proven elusive for Democrats at the federal level in recent years. In 2022, Republican Tedd Bud, then a member of Congress, defeated Democrat Cheri Beasley by about three points. GOP Senator Thom Tillis narrowly defeated Democrat Cal Cunningham by less than two points in 2020. In 2016, former GOP Senator Richard Burr defeated Democrat Deborah Ross, now a member of Congress, by nearly six percentage points. At the same time, Democrats have held a grip on the governor mansion. Democrat Josh Stein, who succeeded Cooper, won November's gubernatorial race by nearly 15 points after Republican Mark Robinson faced a series of scandals on the campaign trail. Candidate quality is a key factor here, Bryson said, adding that the Republican base "tends to be more affected by national politics." What People Are Saying Bryson told Newsweek: "I think [Cooper is] in a really comfortable position now. I think it would be easy for the Cooper camp to feel like they're in a comfortable position and can coast for a little while. But I think what comes with that name ID and people being comfortable enough to say they would vote for him in this poll also comes with a long record." Roy Cooper in a video announcing his candidacy: "I never really wanted to go to Washington. I just wanted to serve the people of North Carolina right here, where I've lived all my life. But these are not ordinary times." Whatley wrote in a post to X: "President Trump asked me to run for Senate because North Carolina needs a strong, consistent conservative leader in the Senate. Someone who will fight to create jobs, protect our farmers, and make America the strongest country on the face of the Earth." What Happens Next The Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball both classify the North Carolina Senate race as a pure toss-up.

Ron DeSantis Touts Cheaper Price Tag at 'Deportation Depot' Facility
Ron DeSantis Touts Cheaper Price Tag at 'Deportation Depot' Facility

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Ron DeSantis Touts Cheaper Price Tag at 'Deportation Depot' Facility

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration is moving forward with plans to open a second immigration detention center—this one dubbed the "Deportation Depot"—at a state prison in north Florida. The announcement comes as a federal judge weighs the future of the state's first such facility, a controversial holding center for immigrants at an isolated airstrip in the Florida Everglades, known as "Alligator Alcatraz." On Thursday, DeSantis announced that the new detention facility will be housed at the Baker Correctional Institution, located about 43 miles west of downtown Jacksonville. State officials said the site is expected to hold 1,300 immigration detention beds, with the potential to expand capacity to as many as 2,000. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and US President Donald Trump speak to reporters as Trump arrives at Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Florida, on July 1, 2025. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and US President Donald Trump speak to reporters as Trump arrives at Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Florida, on July 1, 2025. AFP/Getty Images The governor argued that the expansion is necessary to meet the needs of the federal government under President Donald Trump's administration. "There is a demand for this," DeSantis said. "I'm confident that it will be filled." Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has praised Republican-led efforts to increase immigration detention capacity nationwide, describing Florida's partnership as a potential model for other state-run facilities. DeSantis emphasized that repurposing an existing state prison offers significant savings compared to building from scratch. He estimated the build-out cost for the Baker site at $6 million—far less than the hundreds of millions of dollars the state has committed to the sprawling network of tents and trailers at the Everglades facility. "This part of the facility is not being used right now for the state prisoners. It just gives us an ability to go in, stand it up quickly, stand it up cheaply," he said, calling the location "ready-made." According to Kevin Guthrie, director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management—the agency overseeing construction—it could take two to three weeks to get the Baker site operational. The prison has been closed since 2021, when the state announced plans to shutter it temporarily due to chronic staffing shortages. "A building that's been dormant now for a couple of years is going to have some unforeseen challenges," Guthrie noted. Among the necessary upgrades: installing air conditioning, which is not required in Florida prisons despite the state's sweltering heat. Staffing for the new facility will be handled by the Florida National Guard and state contractors "as needed," DeSantis said. The Guard has previously been deployed to assist with staffing Florida's prisons and is now supporting the state's immigration enforcement initiatives. Before settling on the Baker location, DeSantis had suggested placing the second facility at Camp Blanding, a Florida National Guard training site about 30 miles (48 kilometers) southwest of Jacksonville. The historic military installation served as a major U.S. Army training facility during World War II and now functions as a "continuity of government" site for Florida's executive branch. While Camp Blanding has some air capacity, DeSantis said it was not ideal. "Blanding does have air capacity, but probably not a big enough runway to handle large planes," he explained, adding that Baker's proximity to a regional airport made it a better choice. The governor promised that detainees at the new site will receive "the same services" available at the Everglades facility. Meanwhile, conditions at "Alligator Alcatraz" are under intense scrutiny. Attorneys representing detainees have described the environment as deplorable, claiming that individuals with COVID-19 symptoms are not being isolated, rainwater regularly floods tents, and officers pressure detainees to sign voluntary removal orders before they can consult with attorneys. "Recent conditions at Alligator Alcatraz have fueled a sense of desperation among detainees," lawyers wrote in a court filing. The concerns were outlined in a Wednesday filing ahead of a Monday hearing before U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz. Civil rights attorneys are asking the judge to guarantee detainees confidential access to legal counsel—something they say has been denied—and to designate an immigration court with jurisdiction over the facility. Attorneys claim they are often told that no federal immigration court in Florida has jurisdiction over detainees held at the Everglades site, complicating efforts to file petitions for bond or release. The judge's decision could influence not only the operation of the current facility but also the future of the state's expanded detention network. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store