Head of Royal Navy steps back after investigation into alleged relationship with female colleague
The head of the Royal Navy has stepped back from the job after an investigation was launched into an alleged relationship with a female colleague, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The Ministry of Defence confirmed earlier in the week that Admiral Sir Ben Key had stepped away from being First Sea Lord, sending shockwaves through the service.
But a spokesperson at the time merely said this was because of "private reasons".
A spokesperson on Friday night updated this response to say: "An investigation is ongoing and it would be inappropriate to comment at this time."
The Sun and The Financial Times first reported the true reason behind his premature exit. Admiral Key had always been due to step down from leading the Navy in the summer.
The FT quoted two people familiar with the matter saying that the investigation related to a relationship with a female subordinate.
The Sun said Admiral Key, who is married with three children, is suspected of breaking the Navy's strict "service test" which effectively prohibits sexual relationships between commanders and their subordinates.
It is not thought that the person involved was in his immediate chain of command. But as head of the Navy, the First Sea Lord is in overall charge of all naval personnel.
Admiral Key's sudden disappearance has forced the Navy to cancel its flagship annual Sea Power Conference, which was due to start on Monday with military guests from all over the world.
Read more from Sky News:
Second Sea Lord Vice Admiral Martin Connell has temporarily taken charge of the service before a full-time replacement is announced.
General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, a Royal Marines officer who lost out on becoming national security adviser following last year's election, is widely expected to become the next First Sea Lord.
If confirmed, he would be the first Royal Marine to head the service.
Admiral Key, who was appointed as First Sea Lord in 2021, has placed a strong focus on eliminating unacceptable behaviour in the Navy.
Last year, he declared "zero tolerance for unacceptable behaviours".
In 2022, he said: "Those who do not wish to serve in accordance with the values and standards of life in the United Kingdom's armed forces will be removed.
"There is no place for you."
Admiral Key joined the Navy as a cadet in 1984 and commanded two frigates, a minehunter and the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious.
The Navy lists integrity as one of its six core values. It says: "Integrity is that quality of an individual's character that encompasses honesty, sincerity, reliability and unselfishness.
"It is an essential requirement of both leadership and comradeship. Unless we maintain our integrity, others will not trust us and teamwork will suffer."
Sky News has approached Admiral Key via the Ministry of Defence for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Chinese Aircraft Carrier Seen Operating Deeper Into Pacific
A Chinese aircraft carrier made one of its deepest forays into the Pacific Ocean over the weekend as Beijing continues to project its military power further from its shores. The Liaoning and three other Chinese naval vessels were seen on Saturday around 300 kilometers (some 185 miles) southwest of the remote, uninhabited Japanese island of Minamitori, according to a statement from Japan's Joint Chief of Staff.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Naval Academy Reinstates Hundreds of ‘DEI' Books
This article was originally published in The 19th. This story was originally reported by Nadra Nittle and Mariel Padilla of The 19th. When the U.S. Naval Academy stripped 381 books tied to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) from its library, retired Commander William Marks saw more than censorship — he saw a threat to the Navy's future. But last week, after immense public outcry, most of those books returned to Nimitz Library shelves. 'Do you believe it?' asked Marks, a 1996 alum who spearheaded a campaign to maintain student access to the books. 'What great news. We're thrilled.' Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter All the books the academy removed in early April had one thing in common: Officials flagged them for DEI themes. They include Maya Angelou's 'I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,' Harper Lee's 'To Kill a Mockingbird' and Elizabeth Reis' 'Bodies in Doubt: An American History of Intersex.' The purge followed directives from Trump-appointed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has called DEI initiatives 'divisive.' Determined to ensure that students could still read the works, Marks began crowdfunding to replace them on April 5. 'The motto of the Naval Academy is 'from knowledge, seapower,'' said Marks, who served as a Navy commander for 22 years. 'What we mean is without knowledge, education and intellectual growth, we will never become a strong Navy. So this contradiction really struck me, that instead of encouraging knowledge and encouraging discussion, the Pentagon was actually suppressing knowledge and limiting discussion.' About 4,400 students, members of the Brigade of Midshipmen, attend the Naval Academy while on active duty in the U.S. Navy. After graduation, they are required to serve in the Navy or Marine Corps for at least five years. Women represent more than a quarter of the student body, while men make up over 70 percent of midshipmen. Initially, Marks hoped to fundraise $3,810, which he figured would be enough to cover the cost of the books pulled from Nimitz Library. Since Marks lives in Arlington, Texas, he tapped Old Fox Books & Coffeehouse in Annapolis, Maryland, home to the academy, to be his local partner. Donations have far exceeded his goal, topping $70,000. Jinny Amundson, an owner of Old Fox Books, said by the time she got the call from Marks, she had already heard about the books removed and had started compiling a list of them to purchase for the store's inventory. 'For a bookseller, the idea of censoring any kind of books just gives us heart palpitations,' Amundson said. 'And it's our community. The [midshipmen] think of our shop as a place that they love and one of their sort of unofficial bookstores. We have the mids, the faculty, the administration that come in and think of our space as their own.' Amundson said she understood that the removal of books was an order, which has to be followed within the military. But she found the loophole: Her bookshop could store the titles targeted. It is conveniently located about a block away from the Naval Academy gates. The day before the institution's May 23 graduation, Amundson learned that most of the pulled books were back on the library's shelves. She went to see for herself, took pictures of the books and sent them to many of the authors, who had personally contacted her when the restrictions on the works took effect. Now, just 20 books are being sequestered pending a formal compliance review, according to the Department of Defense. A Navy spokesperson did not provide details to The 19th about those titles. Ultimately, a narrowing of the search terms used to flag books for review resulted in the return of hundreds of books to the Nimitz Library, as the Department of Defense first issued broad guidance about book removals to the military services. 'What struck me was the very arbitrary and even cruel nature of the books that got removed,' Marks said. 'These books were a cross-section of American culture. They were important to the discussion of American history.' In an updated May 9 memo, the Pentagon instructed the military services to use 20 search terms to pinpoint books in their academic libraries that might need to be set aside because of how they engage race or gender. Among those terms were affirmative action; critical race theory; gender-affirming care; transgender people; and diversity, equity and inclusion. People across the political spectrum expressed alarm about the book restrictions, which have been widely opposed, according to Marks. 'We really shouldn't be banning any books,' he said. That includes those with unpopular, or even offensive, ideas like Adolf Hitler's 'Mein Kampf,' which managed to evade the Naval Academy's book purge, he noted. He calls his effort to maintain the midshipmen's access to all books in the Nimitz Library Operation Caged Bird, after the 1969 Angelou memoir that was likely targeted because it describes racial segregation and child abuse. The name Operation Caged Bird also alludes to the feeling of being restrained by censorship. 'I almost felt like I could feel the bars closing in on me in terms of what I can read and can't read,' Marks said. 'That didn't sit right.' Marks' GoFundMe campaign has raised enough money to supply 1,000 books in 2025 and fund a three-year initiative at Old Fox, ensuring midshipmen can access any contested title for free. 'If you're a midshipman and you're writing an essay paper and there's a book you can't find, maybe it's been removed or banned, you can call them, and they'll order it for you, and then you just pick it up free of charge,' Marks said. He's also coordinating with other service academies, anticipating similar battles. At the Navy's three other educational institutions, fewer than 20 books have been flagged as potentially incompatible with the military's mission, as have a few dozen at the Air Force Academy and other Air Force academic institutions. The Army has also been ordered to assess library books at its educational institutions, but a spokesperson from West Point told The 19th that no books have been pulled at this time, as its compliance review is still underway. The return of nearly 400 books to the Naval Academy library coincides with a pending lawsuit accusing Department of Defense-run schools of violating K-12 students' constitutional rights for limiting books and subject matter related to gender, race and sexuality. The American Civil Liberties Union filed E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on behalf of 12 students. A hearing will take place June 3. The ACLU seeks a preliminary injunction to give the youth access to materials it argues have been restricted to align with President Donald Trump's executive orders and political agenda. Amundson said she was pleasantly surprised that it took just weeks for the books to be returned to the Naval Academy. 'I believe that what happened and the response that was given in Annapolis — I think that made the administration be much more careful this time around as they're going for these other libraries, the other Department of Defense libraries around the world,' she said. Amundson said using the funds raised from the GoFundMe campaign, the bookstore was able to give away nearly 500 books in the days leading up to the Naval Academy graduation. For weeks, letters of support piled up and people stopped by the bookstore with gratitude, some even driving from hours away to show their support in person. In addition to Operation Caged Bird, Amundson said there were 'powerful arms at work.' There was pushback on the book removals from members of Congress, the Naval Academy's Board of Visitors and the superintendent — who wrote an open letter signed by hundreds of alumni. 'For right now, this was a huge win for us,' Amundson said.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Effort to rename Navy ships honoring minority, gay leaders is wrong
Nothing spells homophobia and discrimination like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's order to the Navy on Tuesday to review the names of ships honoring Harvey Milk – one of the country's first openly gay elected officials – and other prominent civil rights leaders. That his demand was made at the dawn of Pride Month is a slap at the LGBTQ+ community. 'Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all (Department of Defense) installations and assets are reflective of the commander in chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos,' the Pentagon said in a statement. The story was first reported by which said the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk, an oiler ship, was scheduled to be made June 13. The timing during Pride Month was intentional, the site said. If Milk – who served in the U.S. Navy during the Korean War aboard a submarine rescue ship – does not fit the warrior ethos, then we are living under the wrong leadership. The USNS Harvey Milk was launched in November 2021 after a 2016 decision by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus to name all John Lewis-class oilers after civil rights leaders. Milk, who was assassinated while in office in 1978, is an icon in the LGBTQ+ community. At a Friday morning raising of the Pride flag at Fresno City Hall, four individuals or their organizations were honored with the Harvey Milk Community Leader Award. The condemnations of the Trump administration's efforts to erase the memories of big swaths of Americans were quick. Gov. Gavin Newsom said Milk was more than a civil rights icon, 'he was a Korean War combat veteran whose commander called him 'outstanding.'' 'Stripping his name from a Navy ship won't erase his legacy as an American icon, but it does reveal Trump's contempt for the very values our veterans fight to protect.' Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, nailed it on X (formerly Twitter): 'Our military is the most powerful in the world – but this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos. It is a shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream.' It's time that Trump and his cronies realize that this great country has been built by generations of immigrants and people from all walks of life, religion and gender identity. They won wars, built cities, sacrificed for their families and inspired the innovation that continues to bless our nation. Hegseth's efforts to downplay their contributions reflects his weakness as a human being. It also reveals his racism and sexism. The names of the first Black Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and civil rights leader Medgar Evers are among the names the defense secretary wants banished. It's not as if minorities are absent in the military. According to the Navy, 38.4% of its service members are from minority communities. That includes Latinos (18.3%) and Blacks (17.2%). Milk, Marshall, Evers and others have served their country with distinction. Their service to this country was just as valuable as any other individual's. They represented not only their community but also their country. Others on the list include Underground Railroad figure Harriet Tubman, suffragist/abolitionist Lucy Stone and United Farm Workers co-founders César E. Chávez and Dolores Huerta. Some ships with their names have yet to be constructed, like the one for Huerta, who at 95 years of age remains active. The USNS Cesar Chavez was launched in 2012 in honor of the labor leader who died in 1993. He was 17 when he joined the Navy during World War II and served for two years. The USNS Dolores Huerta, a future John Lewis-class oiler, was named in 2024 by Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro. 'Dolores Huerta has been a leading figure in the Hispanic community and a champion of civil and workers' rights for over 70 years,' said Del Toro in announcing the name. 'Dolores Huerta dedicated her life to caring for those voiceless and underrepresented – she dedicated her life to taking care of people.' If you search the Defense Department's website and search for 'warrior ethos,' you'll get 98 replies. Unfortunately, rallying service members by yelling 'warrior ethos' at the same time you're diminishing the service of minority Americans doesn't make you a warrior. It just shows how pathetic and racist you can be. Shame on Hegseth. He shows no pride in the men and women under his command.
