logo
Mongolia PM expected to call vote of confidence in the face of protests

Mongolia PM expected to call vote of confidence in the face of protests

The Guardian27-05-2025
The political direction of mineral rich Mongolia is to be put to the test, with the country's prime minister expected to call a vote of confidence in his premiership, amid claims that allegations swirling about his son's lavish lifestyle are being exploited to push the country back to authoritarianism.
Mongolia has been an outpost of parliamentary democracy since 1992, uneasily squeezed between superpowers Russia and China.
Small but persistent protests by young Mongolians have been held in the capital's main square over the past week after reports appeared on Instagram that the son of prime minister, Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai, had given lavish gifts to his fiancee. Concerns over inequality and minerals related to corruption have been a frequent source of protests, but until recently the prime minister maintained a reputation as someone who was challenging the many vested interests that kept rare minerals in the hands of a small wealthy oligarchy.
The prime minister's allies say he is leaning towards announcing the vote of confidence on Tuesday with the vote likely to occur in the middle of next week.
The protests have been fuelled by allegations the prime minister's family are enjoying wealth far beyond the level of a civil servant. The fiancee of the prime minister's 23-year-old son, Temuuleni, posted pictures on her Instagram account showing luxury bags, an expensive ring and even a Mercedes-Benz, prompting anger.
It has been claimed the prime minister must have been aware of his son's luxury lifestyle or even funded some of gifts. Luvsannamsrai has submitted himself to a full inquiry by the country's anti-corruption watchdog, but has explained little in public. A petition signed by 59,000 people had called for him to quit citing the unknown sources of his son's wealth, high inflation and growing repression of press freedom.
But sources inside the government say the lifestyle of the prime minister's son is being exploited by the supporters of Mongolia's President, Ukhnaagiin Khürelsükhto, in a bid to give him the power to sideline the parliament and take up a second term in office. Currently the president can only serve one term of six years.
Last September the president courted controversy in Europe when he invited Vladimir Putin to Mongolia even though as a signatory to the Rome Statute, Mongolia had an obligation to arrest the Russian leader for war crimes in Ukraine as requested by the international criminal court. The president also attended Putin's recent 'victory parade' in Red Square.
Figures inside the government say Khürelsükh, previously the country's prime minister and like the current prime minister a member of the Mongolian People's Party, wants to be able to stand for a second six year term and would like to see Luvsannamsrai removed in favour of someone willing to reduce the power of the parliament.
Luvsannamsrai was re-elected prime minister only 10 months ago, with his party winning 68 seats in the 126 seat parliament. But trying to build a political consensus around the long-term changes needed to modernise the country's economy, including developing a national wealth fund and some major infrastructure investments, he chose to form a three party coalition with the Democratic Party (42 seats) and the HUN Party (8 seats) instead of governing alone.
But after three members of the Democratic Party (DP) expressed support for the street protests against the prime minister, the Congress of the Mongolian People's Party at a marathon closed door meeting voted to declare the DP had expelled themselves from the coalition, a decision that could spell the end for the prime minister.
DP leader Gantumur Luvsannyam, who is the deputy prime minister, said that the views of the three legislators were not his or his party's position, but exercising their right to free expression was not in conflict with any coalition agreement.
Jargal DeFacto, a leading Mongolian commentator and broadcaster, told the Guardian: 'Those that want an extended Presidency with more power have a simple argument. They say because China and Russia, our neighbours, have stability, when we keep changing political leaders, we need a strong Presidency. This clash has been coming for more than a year because the next Presidential election is in 2027. The controversy is dividing the ruling Mongolian People's Party into two camps'.
He added 'The government also wanted to move away from being a commodity and debt driven economy by setting up a sovereign wealth fund funded by strategic deposits. That has set the prime minister against wealthy private individuals that will not relinquish their strategic resources to the wealth fund.'
'Ironically he is facing political resistance because he is disclosing corruption in banking, mining and education, which means he is making a lot of enemies, but the court system is itself corrupt so they do not go after the big shots, and instead concentrate on small cases. It creates distrust in the state as a whole, especially when inflation and interest rates are high.'
China is Mongolia's single biggest export market, but the coalition government has tried to diversify the economy by focusing on a raft of 14 major infrastructure projects.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong court begins hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's national security trial
Hong Kong court begins hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's national security trial

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Hong Kong court begins hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's national security trial

A Hong Kong court began hearing final arguments Monday in the landmark national security trial of former pro-democracy newspaper founder Jimmy Lai, who could be sentenced to up to life in prison if he is convicted. Lai, 77, was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019. He is being tried on charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications. Lai founded Apple Daily, one of the local media outlets that was most critical against Hong Kong's government. His high-profile case — which has already stretched nearly 150 days, far beyond the original estimate of 80 days — is widely seen as a trial of press freedom and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub. Prosecutors allege that Lai asked foreign countries, especially the United States, to take actions against Beijing 'under the guise of fighting for freedom and democracy.' On the first day of his testimony, he denied he had asked then-Vice President Mike Pence and then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to take action against Hong Kong and China during the 2019 protests. Later, when Lai's lawyer questioned him about an Apple Daily report saying he had asked the U.S. government to sanction Beijing and Hong Kong leaders, he said he must have discussed it with Pompeo, as he had no reason to doubt the accuracy of the report by the now-defunct newspaper he founded. But Lai said he would not have encouraged foreign sanctions after the national security law was enacted on June 30, 2020. The closing arguments have been delayed twice, first due to weather then to concerns over Lai's health. On Friday, his lawyer, Robert Pang, said Lai had experienced heart palpitations while in prison. The judges wanted him to secure a heart monitor and medication first. After Friday's hearing, the Hong Kong government alleged foreign media outlets had attempted to mislead the public about Lai's medical care. It said a medical examination of Lai found no abnormalities and that the medical care he received in custody was adequate. It is unclear when the verdict will be delivered. Lai's yearslong detention, especially in solidarity confinement, has drawn concerns from foreign governments and rights groups. U.S. President Donald Trump, before being elected to his second term in November, said he would talk to Chinese leader Xi Jinping to seek Lai's release: 'One hundred percent, I will get him out.' In a Fox News radio interview released last Thursday, Trump denied saying he would '100%' save Lai, but rather that he would bring the issue up. 'I've already brought it up, and I'm going to do everything I can to save him,' he said. China has accused Lai of stirring a rise in anti-China sentiments in Hong Kong and said it firmly opposes the interference of other countries in its internal affairs. Dozens of people waited in the rain Monday for a seat in the main courtroom to see Lai. Former Apple Daily reader Susan Li said she worried about Lai's health as he looked visibly thinner, and she would continue to pray for him. 'I wanted to let him know we are still here,' she said. When Hong Kong, a former British colony, returned to China in 1997, Beijing promised to retain the city's civil liberties for 50 years. But critics say that promise has become threadbare after the introduction of the security law, which Chinese and Hong Kong authorities insist was necessary for the city's stability.

Jeremy Clarkson reveals his right hand man Kaleb Cooper told JD Vance's security to 'f*** off' after US vice president's Cotswolds convoy disrupted his farming duties
Jeremy Clarkson reveals his right hand man Kaleb Cooper told JD Vance's security to 'f*** off' after US vice president's Cotswolds convoy disrupted his farming duties

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Jeremy Clarkson reveals his right hand man Kaleb Cooper told JD Vance's security to 'f*** off' after US vice president's Cotswolds convoy disrupted his farming duties

Clarkson's Farm star Kaleb Cooper told JD Vance 's security to 'f*** off', during the US Vice President's trip to the Cotswolds last week. The divisive politician's visit with his family has attracted mass criticism among locals, who complained of disruption caused by Vance's extensive security team. Among them was Jeremy Clarkson, who revealed that the one–mile no fly zone set around Vance's manor house rental had impeded the drones filming scenes for his Amazon Prime show, Clarkson's Farm. Writing about the visit in The Sunday Times, the Top Gear star, 65, explained that both he and farmer Kaleb, 27, had let loose some choice language at the security teams attempting to derail their work duties. Jeremy explained how several roads were blocked off and cars pulled over in order to allow Vance's huge convoy through. However, he revealed that when Kaleb was instructed to pull over his tractor in the wet weather, he offered a rather foul-mouthed reply. He wrote: '[Vance] arrived in a cavalcade of 27 massive black American SUVs and this was escorted by a shoal of British police remoras on motorcycles whose job was to shoo everyone out of the way. 'One of the people who they ordered to pull over was Kaleb Cooper, my tractor driver, but it was starting to rain and he urgently needed to get his load of wheat into the shed, so he invited his tormentor to eff off. And carried on regardless.' Kaleb complained about the incident earlier this week, in the comments section of one of Jeremy's Instagram posts showing the no-fly zone. The farmhand – who has his own land and has spun out a successful entertainment career of his own – fumed that his wheat had been soaked after he'd been held up by Vance's security team. He wrote: 'My wheat got wet in the trailer last night as the convoy stopped me in the rain in Chippy. 'I could easily have went on my way and got it in the shed without getting in the way.' While quipping about Vance's conspicuous presence in the area, he added: '[If] he had just drove around in a VW Polo nobody would know who he was.' Meanwhile, Jeremy appeared to take notes from his right hand man, as he revealed that he also shared a profanity-laden chat with one of Vance's security guards. The farmhand – who has his own land and has spun out a successful entertainment career of his own – fumed that his wheat had been soaked after he'd been held up by Vance's security team Detailing how the guard had told him he wasn't allowed to fly his drone due to the restrictions, the presenter explained he had simply replied: 'F*** off' - to which the security man said: 'OK.' It comes just hours after Kaleb announced the arrival of his third child, sharing the first photo his little one and revealing their sex and name. Taking to Instagram on Saturday, he revealed his fianceé Taya had given birth to a baby boy on Thursday evening, who they had named Ashton. He shared a snap of his son wrapped up in a blanket and a knitted hat, as well as another shot of him tucking into a Chinese takeaway in the hospital while Taya cuddled Ashton. In the accompanying caption, Kaleb proudly declared: 'Baby number 3. everyone meet Ashton weighing 6.13lb born 14th august at 6:28pm at chipping norton maternity. Ps don't worry I bought the amazing midwife's a Chinese as well'. Jeremy first spilled the beans that his right hand man had become a father for the third time in his column for The Sun, revealing how Kaleb had reacted when his partner notified him she was in labour. He shared a snap of his son wrapped up in a blanket and a knitted hat, as well as another shot of him tucking into a Chinese takeaway in the hospital while Taya cuddled Ashton The TV star explained how Kaleb told Taya to hang on and he would be there as soon as he had finished harvesting the field. Joking that the response was 'very farmerish', Jeremy added that his farming companion still managed to finish in record time to dash off and be by Taya's side as they met the newest member of their family. Kaleb and Taya are childhood sweethearts having got together in 2016, with Kaleb then proposing on Christmas Day 2022. The couple went on to welcome their first son Oscar, four, in March 2021 and daughter Willa, two, in June 2023. Previously opening about becoming a father, Kaleb confessed he felt 'useless' during Oscar's birth, as he felt he didn't know what he was doing. He told The Times Magazine: 'It was f***ing terrible, because when I'm helping that cow, I know exactly what I'm doing. I can bring the calf around to the mum and so on. The couple went on to welcome their first son Oscar, four, (pictured) in March 2021 and daughter Willa, two, in June 2023 'Now, when Taya was giving birth, I felt useless. I'm seeing her in pain having one of my kids.' Kaleb added that he was glad to have had children while relatively young, as he could still be 'energetic' when they were older. He said: 'I wanted a girl and boy, which I've got and am very grateful. Then when I get older I can go down the pub with them, or out on the tractors, and I can still be energetic.' Asked if he could be having more fun now, he said: 'I'll make all the money now, hopefully have a farm, then chill out, go partying and be in Ibiza, though I can't think of anything worse than being in a nightclub.'

ckglxlx5vldo (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)
ckglxlx5vldo (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

ckglxlx5vldo (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)

Frank Gardner BBC Security Correspondent Getty Images It is quite possible that Monday's meeting in the White House could prove even more crucial to the future of Ukraine - and for all of Europe's security - than last Friday's US-Russia summit in Alaska. On the surface, that Putin-Trump reunion seemed to live down to every expectation. There was no ceasefire, no sanctions, no grand announcements. Were Ukraine and Europe about to get cut out of a deal cooked up behind closed doors by the world's two foremost nuclear powers? Not, apparently, if Ukraine and its partners can prevent it. The presence of Sir Keir Starmer, President Macron, Chancellor Merz and other leaders alongside President Zelensky in Washington is about more than making sure he does not get ambushed in the Oval Office again, in the way he did on 28 February. They are determined to impress upon Donald Trump two things: firstly, that there can be no peace deal for Ukraine without Ukraine's direct involvement and secondly, that it must be backed by 'cast-iron' security guarantees. Above all, Europe's leaders want the US President to see that Ukraine and Europe present a united front and they are eager to ensure he is not being swayed by his obvious personal rapport with Vladimir Putin into giving in to the Russian leaders' demands. Watch: How the Trump-Putin summit unfolded... in under 2 minutes This is where the Sir Keir Starmer's diplomatic skills will be sorely tested. Trump likes Starmer and listens to him, and in a month's time Trump will be coming to the UK on a state visit. He also likes Mark Rutte, the NATO Secretary-General who will be in attendance, a man who is sometimes called 'the Trump Whisperer'. The US President appears to be less fond of President Macron and the White House was sharply critical recently of his intention to unconditionally recognise a Palestinian state at the next UN General Assembly. For a peace deal in Ukraine to have any chance of working, something has to give. European leaders have said frequently that international borders cannot be changed by force and President Zelensky has said time and time again he will not give up land and besides, Ukraine's constitution forbids it. But Putin wants the Donbas, which his forces already control around 85 per cent of, and he has absolutely no intention of ever handing back Crimea. Yet as the former Estonian PM and now Europe's top diplomat Kaja Kallas once said to me: victory for Ukraine in this war does not have to be exclusively about reconquering occupied land. If Ukraine can obtain the sort of Article 5-type security guarantees now being talked about, sufficient to deter any future Russian aggression and thereby safeguard its independence as a free and sovereign state, then that would be a form of victory. It does now appear that what the US and Russia have been discussing is a proposal that broadly trades some Ukrainian land for security guarantees that it won't have to give up any more to Russia. But the question marks are huge. Could Ukraine accept a deal that ends the war but costs it land, especially when so many thousands have died trying to save that land? If it is asked to give up the remaining 30 per cent of Donetsk Oblast that Russia has yet to occupy then does that leave the path westwards to Kyiv dangerously under-defended? And what of Starmer's much-vaunted Coalition of the Willing? Earlier talk of deploying tens of thousands of boots on the ground have since been scaled back. Now it's more about 'safeguarding skies and seas' while helping Ukraine to rebuild its army. But even if peace does break out on the battlefield we are still in dangerous territory. Every military expert I have spoken to believes that the moment the fighting stops Putin will reconstitute his army, build more weapons, until he is in a position, perhaps in as little as three to four years, to grab more land. If and when that happens it will be a brave Typhoon or F35 pilot who is prepared to fire that first missile on an advancing Russian column. Zelensky and allies head to White House for Ukraine talks

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store