‘This was a principle thing': Colorado man fights back after emergency hospital stay results in $104K bill
Pfeifer underwent emergency stomach surgery at the University of Colorado Health Memorial Hospital Central in 2022 and was surprised when bills for his week-long stay just kept coming.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
'We literally had bills scattered all over the floor and it covered the entire office,' Dawn Pfeifer, Blake's wife, shared with NBC News.
Pfeifer was originally charged $104,000 for his hospital stay, which was reduced to $58,124 as he would be paying out of pocket. However, more bills kept arriving, and Pfeifer's attempts to contact the hospital for clarity on the charges reportedly went nowhere.
'I've always paid my bills,' Pfeifer, 63, told NBC News. 'I wanted a little better explanation.'
Unfortunately, patient advocate groups say that Pfeifer's experience is quite common.
'Hospitals and insurance companies alike have even hired many middle-player firms to be able to maximize their margins and profits at every single patient encounter,' Cynthia Fisher, founder of PatientRightsAdvocate.org, told NBC News. 'Sometimes what we're finding is the charges like Blake's that are billed are far beyond even the highest rate that they have within their hospital pricing file.'
Fisher told NBC News that hospital billing systems seem to be 'intentionally complex.' NBC noted that under Colorado law, hospitals that violate the federal price transparency rule — which went into effect in 2021 — are liable to be penalized for deceptive trade practices. The law requires hospitals to clearly state pricing on their respective websites.
However, NBC News found that a number of Pfeifer's bills are higher than the hospital's listed prices, including $99 for a blood culture that was listed between $8 and $61 for insured patients, and $104 apiece for a series of 10 blood tests that should cost anywhere between $6.52 and $52.89 per test, based on the hospital's website. In fact, NBC News found that only 25% of the charges Pfeifer received were listed on the hospital's required price list.
'What happened to Mr. Pfeifer unfortunately repeats itself and plays out across the country thousands of times every year,' said Steve Woodrow, Pfeifer's lawyer and a Democratic member of the Colorado House of Representatives. 'We now have a situation where people are afraid to get medical care because of the financial ramifications.'
Dan Weaver, a spokesman for UCHealth, said in a statement shared with NBC News that the health system 'does everything possible to share prices and estimates with our patients, encourage insurance coverage, assist patients in applying for Medicaid and other programs that may offer coverage.'
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
NBC found that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) had penalized only 27 hospitals for non-compliance with transparent billing practices in the last four years since the law took effect. However, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General found in 2024 that only 63 out of 100 hospitals studied were up-to-date with price transparency requirements.
Furthermore, a study from The Commonwealth Fund found that over 45% of working-age adults in the U.S. who had insurance were charged for a health service that they thought was covered by their insurer.
NBC also interviewed Damon Carson, a small-business owner in Colorado who was sued by a collection company after he refused to pay the additional bills that started rolling in after his outpatient endoscopy at a UCHealth hospital.
Carson was originally quoted $1,448 for the procedure and paid upfront, out of pocket, but was later charged an additional $4,742. In mediation, his additional bills were reduced by one-third to settle the case.
'I was surprised they caved that fast,' Carson told NBC News. '[My wife] and I could easily have paid the $4,000 and our lives gone on. But this was a principle thing.'
The American Journal of Managed Care reported on 'pervasive billing errors' and 'aggressive tactics' in the health care and insurance industries in 2024. Dr. Jeffrey Sippel, associate director of inpatient clinical services and associate professor of clinical medicine in the Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine Division at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, said he's been overwhelmed with denied insurance claims from Medicare Advantage plans.
'It's driven by money,' said Sippel in an article on The American Journal of Managed Care's website. 'It's driven by a lack of appreciation of how dynamic these patients are, and how quickly they can change from sort of stable to doing quite poorly.'
These overbilling practices are all the more troubling considering how much the federal government spends on health care in the United States.
Data from the World Health Organization shows the U.S. government spends approximately double what other G7 nations spend on health care per citizen. In 2021, the U.S. spent $12,000 per person on health care while the average spend for other G7 countries was between $4,400 and $7,600. Canada, for example, reportedly spent $6,600 per person on health care, while the U.K. was at $6,200 per citizen.
So, what can you do if you find yourself with additional bills piling up after a hospital stay? In Colorado, patients can sue a hospital for instigating debt collection proceedings against them if they believe the hospital violated price transparency laws.
If you find yourself in a dispute over a hospital bill, advocate for yourself and insist on a clear explanation of your charges. In fact, Fisher has some strategic advice for anyone facing charges after a stay in the hospital.
'No one should ever pay that first bill,' she told NBC News. 'The onus of proof needs to be on the hospital and the insurance company to prove that they have not overcharged us.'
The CMS also advises patients to shop around for their health care and compare prices and price transparency practices between hospitals to avoid higher-than-necessary bills. Finally, it's best to keep your primary care physician involved in the process, as they may be able to help advocate for you and offer additional information on finding accessible health care.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Circle's Q2 Pop Fizzles as Price Target Gets Cut
Circle Internet Group (NYSE:CRCL) had its big earnings debut since going public in June, and on paper, the numbers looked impressive. Revenue for the second quarter jumped 53%, fueled by a 90% year-over-year surge in USDC circulation to $61.3 billion. But despite that strong top-line growth, the stock fell almost 6% after-hours on August 12. The drop came after Circle revealed it plans to sell 10 million new shares, which raised concerns about dilution. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with CRCL. US Tiger Securities analyst Bo Pei isn't ready to turn bullish just yet. He trimmed his price target from $200 to $180, pointing out that while Circle is in a strong position in the regulated stablecoin market and has its new Arc blockchain product on the way, several red flags remain. Profit margins are under pressure and may tighten further in the second half of the year. Operating costs are climbing faster than expected. And with 96% of revenue still coming from interest-sensitive reserves, a cut in Federal Reserve rates could take a bite out of income. On top of that, the valuation is steep, trading at more than 60 times projected 2026 EBITDA. Investors are betting heavily on Circle's growth story, but without a crypto market rebound or better industry conditions, that bet might feel expensive. For now, the stock's future seems to hinge on whether the momentum in digital assets can keep up with the lofty expectations. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Recent IPO Stock Gains Suggest a 'Spillover' Effect Could Boost Upcoming Debuts
Key Takeaways This year's cohort of new issues are popping on their first trading day, with some closing at more than double their IPO prices. Well-received IPOs tend to spawn other pops, University of Florida business professor Jay Ritter says. The median first-day performance of U.S. IPOs that raised $100 million or more was about 19% so far this year, the highest since 2020, according to Renaissance demand for initial public offerings is putting the shine in 2025's newest stocks. The median first-day performance of US IPOs—those that raised at least $100 million—was about 19% so far this year, the highest since 2020's median of 33%, according to Renaissance Capital, a provider of pre-IPO research and related ETFs. The firm's index of larger new listings that have been public for less than three years, tracked by the US IPO ETF (IPO), was up 12% through the Friday's close, ahead of the S&P 500's 8.6% gain. Firefly Aerospace (FLY), WhiteFiber (WYFI), and HeartFlow (HTFL), which priced last week, were included in those figures. Hot first-day performance can effect subsequent deals in what University of Florida business professor Jay Ritter calls a "spillover" effect. Companies waiting in the wings to go public could bask in the afterglow of NewsMax (NMAX), FatPipe (FATN), Circle Internet Group (CRCL), AIRO Group Holdings (AIRO) and Figma (FIG), all of which doubled their IPO prices, or better, over their respective trading debuts. More IPOs are on the way. Crypto exchange and CoinDesk owner Bullish is set to debut today under the ticker "BLSH." Tickets provider StubHub, which delayed its IPO plans following Liberation Day stock volatility, is reportedly kicking off its roadshow after Labor Day and will make its public debut in late September. There is no crystal ball for how well a new stock will do, but the ones that tend to outperform have things in common. "The vast majority of those with big run-ups are venture-capital backed. Lots are tech stocks. They're hard to value," Ritter told Investopedia, citing examples like Netscape in 1995 or Airbnb (ABNB) in 2020. Of the top 10 VC exits via US IPOs in value terms, which include Figma (FIG), Chime Financial (CHYM), and Circle (CRCL), according to PitchBook data, only one didn't pop on Day 1: CoreWeave (CRWV), which priced its IPO also under its marketed range. Its shares have subsequently risen almost 250% since its March debut. Figma, which went on a blistering rally as soon as it listed on July 31, has since declined about 25%. New stocks generally experience mean reversion. "Those that double or more on the first day have average long-term returns below IPOs that had less-than-enthusiastic first-day receptions," according to Ritter, who defines "long-term" as three years. The issue with the companies that tend to rocket up on their trading day, is that they then have a very high price-to-sales ratio. "It's difficult for a company to meet expectations when there's so much optimism built into the price," he said. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ravens' Lamar Jackson ends No. 8 trademark battle with Troy Aikman
Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson has ended his challenge to Troy Aikman's trademark use of the No. 8, according to the Baltimore Sun. Jackson originally filed the challenge in July 2024, and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said this week that the Ravens quarterback filed to withdraw his challenge on Monday. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] At issue was Aikman owning and applying for several trademarks featuring the word "EIGHT" on apparel and bags, which Jackson's legal team reportedly argued would be "likely to cause confusion, or cause mistake, or to deceive" the public when it comes to figuring out if they're buying a Troy Aikman T-shirt or Lamar Jackson T-shirt. FL101, the company behind the Aikman products, has several products featuring "EIGHT," including a light beer brand, but Jackson was only disputing the bags and apparel. Aikman responded jokingly on social media following the July 2024 news by telling Jackson, 'Hey Lamar, looks like a worthy conversation over a couple cold EIGHT beers! Maybe Steve Young can arbitrate??' Jackson has been making his own apparel for years under his Era 8 Apparel brand, with products including T-shirts that just have the numeral 8 on them. Jackson has reportedly applied for a number of trademarks around the number, most of them featuring the "Era 8" name. This isn't the first time Jackson has gone to battle over his apparel company, as he filed a lawsuit against Amazon in 2020 over selling unlicensed merchandise featuring his registered trademarks. He also resolved a trademark dispute with Dale Earnhardt Jr. in April after the NASCAR Hall of Famer secured the right to a different No. 8.