logo
Trump Administration Live Updates: Noem Defends Flood Response Amid Intense Scrutiny

Trump Administration Live Updates: Noem Defends Flood Response Amid Intense Scrutiny

New York Times3 days ago
President Trump announced in letters posted to social media on Saturday that he would place a 30 percent tariff on goods from the European Union and Mexico, upending months of careful negotiations and disrupting America's economic relationships with two of its biggest trading partners.
Mr. Trump's tariffs would take effect on Aug. 1, like those on many other trading partners.
But the letters to Mexico, America's largest source of imports, and the European Union, a trading bloc of 27 nations that collectively make up the world's third-largest economy, are notable. They marked a significant escalation aimed squarely at two of America's closest and most pivotal trading partners.
Both economies do a huge amount of trade in goods and services with the United States. And both governments have been in intense negotiations with the United States, right up until Mr. Trump's letters were sent.
Maros Sefcovic, the European Union's trade commissioner, was in regular contact with the U.S. commerce secretary and trade representative. Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, spoke to Mr. Trump. And until very recently, officials had hoped they were on the cusp of a deal.
E.U. policymakers had gradually come around to the possibility that the bloc could face 10 percent across-the-board tariffs on all goods sent to the United States, and were hoping to negotiate exceptions for important products. Many of the policymakers were eager to end the economic uncertainty that Mr. Trump's trade announcements had unleashed on German carmakers, Italian wine exporters and Irish pharmaceutical companies alike.
But things changed with Mr. Trump's announcement on Saturday of a flat 30 percent tariff, and his threat to make that rate even higher should the bloc retaliate.
'If for any reason you decide to raise your tariffs and retaliate, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 30 percent that we charge,' Mr. Trump wrote in the letter, which echoed a form letter he has been sending out to many American trading partners announcing their tariff rate.
Mexican officials had also been in active negotiations. A delegation led by economy minister Marcelo Ebrard arrived in Washington on Friday to discuss an 'integral agreement' with U.S. officials covering border security, migration, trade and water management.
After an intense volley of tariffs from the United States earlier this year related to Washington's desire to curb the flow of fentanyl across the border, Mexican officials felt they had cultivated a more productive relationship with U.S. officials.
Mr. Trump placed a 25 percent tariff on all Mexican imports earlier this year, sparking an intense dispute. But the administration ultimately lifted most of those tariffs by exempting goods that trade under the United States Mexico Canada Agreement, the North American trade pact, which includes agriculture and other products. According to data from Mexican officials, about 87 percent of exports from Mexico to the United States are not currently subject to tariffs.
Mr. Ebrard said in a statement posted on social media Saturday that U.S. officials had told their Mexican counterparts that 'as part of the profound change in the United States' trade policy,' the Trump administration was going to send letters to all world leaders announcing new tariffs.
'We mentioned at the negotiating table that it was an unjust move and that we did not agree with it,' Mr. Ebrard. He said that Mexican officials would work to ensure that they had an alternative proposal that protects jobs and businesses on both sides of the border before the tariffs take effect Aug. 1.
Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, said at an event on Saturday that she believed her administration would be able to reach a deal. 'We know very clearly what we can work out with the government of the United States and what we can't,' she said.
In a letter addressed to Mexico's leader and posted to his social media platform, Truth Social, on Saturday, Mr. Trump said, 'Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done, is not enough.' He blamed Mexico for the American fentanyl crisis, saying cartels had flooded his country with fentanyl and that 'Mexico still has not stopped the Cartels who are trying to turn all of North America into a Narco-Trafficking Playground.'
In recent months, the Trump administration has taken aim at Mexican cartels and those it says work with the groups.
To avoid an earlier threat of tariffs this spring, Ms. Sheinbaum deployed 10,000 troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, building on recent efforts to curb migration by intercepting migrant caravans and busing migrants to places far from the border. Crossings have plummeted to their lowest level in decades.
She also announced a crackdown that has led to record fentanyl seizures, and agreed to extradite dozens of cartel operatives to the United States, breaking with Mexico's previous stance on extraditing the leaders. And Mexico's leaders imposed tariffs and restrictions on many Chinese imports.
Ms. Sheinbaum was broadly praised for her coolheaded approach to Mr. Trump, who called her a 'marvelous woman' after the two spoke about tariffs in February and he offered Mexico an additional month to make gains.
Mr. Trump earlier this week announced that he would aim 35 percent tariffs at Canada — another key trading partner, and another nation that had hoped it might be closing in on a negotiated deal with the United States. And he has threatened to slap tariffs ranging from 20 to 50 percent on other nations, including Brazil, Japan and South Korea.
The latest round of levies underscores that Mr. Trump is willing to upend long-held relationships in his quest to rewrite the rules of global commerce. But for major trading partners, the question now is whether they will hit back.
Mexico has never retaliated against the United States, but officials have repeatedly said that they reserve the right to, and have analyzed which U.S. exports they could apply tariffs to.
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the E.U. executive, said in a statement that Mr. Trump's latest tariffs 'would disrupt essential trans-Atlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic.'
She also threatened to hit back, though she did not make a retaliation sound like a foregone conclusion at this point, talking about the 'proportionate countermeasures if required.'
The bloc had already prepared a retaliatory package in response to earlier tariffs, but had paused them to create leeway for negotiation. That retaliation would apply to some 21 billion euros (nearly $25 billion) worth of imports from the United States. The tariffs are scheduled to kick in at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday unless E.U. officials choose to suspend them.
'Of course, there are possibilities to react, but we don't want to,' Kaja Kallas, the European Union's top diplomat, said in an interview on Friday in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 'We don't want to retaliate. We don't want this trade war.'
In the run-up to Mr. Trump's announcement, officials from the European Union had reiterated that their goal was to reach an agreement in principle, a sort of rough-draft trade plan that could serve as a basis for more detailed negotiations.
If the newly announced tariffs rates remain, however, 'that means trade war,' said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the economic think tank Bruegel in Brussels.
He did not think that Mr. Trump's warning against retaliation would have much effect on the E.U.'s appetite to hit back. He said the best Europe can hope for is a situation in which many of America's global trading partners retaliate, perhaps in a coordinated way, and Mr. Trump is pressured to strike a less extreme stance.
'They have consistently said they would defend themselves under the right circumstances,' he said. 'Now those circumstances are here.'
Zunaira Saieed , Emiliano Rodríguez Mega and Annie Correal contributed reporting.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Tough Stance on Semiconductor Tariffs Could Soften, Wedbush Says
Trump's Tough Stance on Semiconductor Tariffs Could Soften, Wedbush Says

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Tough Stance on Semiconductor Tariffs Could Soften, Wedbush Says

Key Takeaways President Donald Trump said late Tuesday that new tariffs on semiconductors could be coming soon, though Wedbush analysts suggested his stance could soften. The analysts pointed to Nvidia's assurances from the Trump administration of licenses to resume AI chip sales to China, and called the development 'a key strategic positive for the tech space.' ASML shares tumbled Wednesday after the semiconductor equipment maker said it couldn't guarantee growth in 2026 amid macroeconomic and geopolitical Donald Trump said late Tuesday that new tariffs on semiconductors could be coming soon, but Wedbush analysts suggested his stance could soften. The president said late Tuesday that he is probably going to impose tariffs on semiconductors, along with pharmaceuticals, by Aug. 1, Bloomberg reported. Wedbush analysts led by Dan Ives told clients in a note Wednesday, however, that they 'believe the Trump Administration will continue to soften its stance around tariffs and look to ink trade deals across the board including China, Japan, and India that do not dramatically alter the current landscape for Big Tech.' Wedbush confirmed those comments stand after the president's latest statements on semiconductor tariffs. The analysts pointed to Nvidia's (NVDA) announcement Monday that it was given assurances from the U.S. government of licenses to resume selling its H20 AI chips to China, signaling a walkback from the Trump administration after it imposed the curbs in a bid to limit Beijing's AI ambitions. The expanding access to China was, they wrote, 'a key strategic positive for the tech space.' But shares of ASML Holding (ASML) tumbled over 8% Wednesday after the semiconductor equipment maker said it couldn't guarantee growth in 2026 amid macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty. The company, whose machines are needed to make advanced AI chips, made the statement as it posted second-quarter results. ASML sells its machines to customers globally, including U.S. chipmaker Intel (INTC) and TSMC (TSM), the world's largest contract chip maker. Shares of Intel and memory chip maker Micron Technology (MU) also lost ground Wednesday. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

College sports leaders shouldn't get too excited about Trump NIL executive order
College sports leaders shouldn't get too excited about Trump NIL executive order

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

College sports leaders shouldn't get too excited about Trump NIL executive order

It's not a great sign for President Trump's potential involvement in college sports when people who work in college sports are caught off-guard after word of a forthcoming executive order leaks out of the White House. And yet that was the case Wednesday after CBS reported the night before that Trump intended to sign one 'establishing national standards for the NCAA's Name, Image and Likeness program' in the coming days. What does that mean exactly? People who are generally informed on the interplay between college sports and the federal government didn't seem to know an executive order was imminent or what exactly would be in it – even folks with a direct line to Trump and who have engaged with about potential federal action that would bail college sports out of its current dysfunction. So now we wait. For something – or maybe nothing. With the Trump Administration, you can never quite tell. What we do know, however, is that the White House has, in fact, been working on something in the form of a likely executive order since Trump met with former Alabama coach Nick Saban at the school's graduation ceremony in May. Regardless of what's ultimately in it, however, coaches and administrators should resist the temptation to get excited about the possibility of Trump saving the day for a few simple, but important reasons. An executive order isn't a law. College sports and the NCAA do not operate under the purview of the executive branch of the federal government, thus any executive order compelling them to do anything would be legally questionable at best. And finally, any so-called 'fix' for college sports made with the stroke of one man's pen can be undone by the next one who occupies that office. UNWANTED TALK: Nick Saban rumor is last thing Alabama needs Sorry, college sports executives. You're going to have to actually do the work on this one. We know that's not easy, which makes the temptation to rely on Trump more tempting. It's been nearly six years since the NCAA pivoted toward begging Congress for relief from its never-ending string of lawsuits, and so far they've gotten no reward for their effort. Unless, of course, you consider it a reward to be dragged into more committee hearings to answer ridiculous, superficial questions from legislators who know as much about college sports as they do about the Finnish language. Oh sure, there's another bill on the way. And this one apparently has bipartisan support in the House. But then there's the Senate, where the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee, Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., last week called it 'the National Championship of all heists' because it is too favorable to the NCAA's interests. Remember, any bill must get 60 votes due to filibuster rules in the Senate, which means a minimum of seven Democrats will need to sign off on it. That's not going to be easy, especially if it puts hard caps on how much college athletes can earn and eliminates the potential to bargain collectively for their rights in the future. Purely from a political standpoint, I'm not sure why Senate Democrats would cooperate at all here. If a bill finally passes that fixes some issues with the NCAA, they won't get credit – because Trump will take it. And he'll play it to the hilt, which doesn't seem particularly helpful to their electoral goals heading into the midterms next year. That's just how stuff works in Washington, and both parties play that game on issues far more serious and important than the NCAA's ability to regulate the transfer portal. It's part of why the NCAA's 'let Congress fix our mess' strategy has been a complete failure thus far and may never pay off. At the end of the day, there's a lot more upside for Congress to use college sports as a political plaything than to make a law that will only impact a relatively small number of people and isn't an urgent matter of national interest. But a 'let Trump fix it' strategy could be worse, particularly right now as institutions are scrambling to implement terms of the House vs. NCAA settlement that allow athletic departments to pay their athletes directly. At the moment, the House settlement and the College Sports Commission – a regulatory body created by the power conferences to enforce the settlement rules – hold the key to how college sports will operate over the next several years. Will the CSC get sued by athletes and booster collectives whose deals get denied because they aren't considered true NIL? Of course, but they already knew that. Unless Congress quickly grants college sports some type of antitrust exemption, the CSC will have to go in front of a judge and show that it follows the law to continue having regulatory power over college athletes' paychecks. That's really the only issue worth talking about right now, regardless of what Trump may write in an executive order. And what can he possibly do anyway? Maybe he can decree that college athletes can't be made employees through some type of National Labor Relations Board policy -- but they already aren't. So unless the NCAA is going to become a federal agency, where the president would have significant legal authority to regulate it, anything in an executive order is mostly going to be performative. And anything that touches actual NCAA business like the transfer portal or limiting how athletes earn money stands on far shakier legal ground than the guardrails that were already installed through the House settlement. Regardless of which direction a president wants to take college sports – any president, for the record – the fundamental problem will not change no matter who's in the office or how many executive orders they write. By refusing to engage in a true collective bargaining effort that mimics the relationship between the NFL/NBA/NHL/MLB and their respective players associations, the college sports industry left itself in a vulnerable position where any attempt to enforce its rules will face legal scrutiny. For better or worse, that's the American Way. And at this point, the focus of college sports should be long-term stability through the appropriate legal and legislative means instead of a flimsy proclamation. Colleges need to be especially careful right now. We've seen how the Trump Administration strongarms schools it has ideological disagreements with: Withholding federal grants, deporting international students, pressuring university presidents to resign. His involvement in college sports issues on behalf of the NCAA's immediate interests is going to inevitably create the appearance of long-term leverage. As frustrated as college sports executives might be with Jeffrey Kessler and other sports attorneys who keep them in court, creating space for tussles with this White House might not be the best tradeoff. Keep all that in mind when Trump issues his mysterious executive order. Because at the end of the day, only the people in charge of college sports can truly save it – no matter how much a president is itching to claim credit for doing so. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump NIL executive order shouldn't excited college leaders

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store