Advocates warn proposed bill could increase veteran homelessness in Minnesota
"The House committee has, it was an 80% cut to the Department of Veterans Affairs housing line item in their budget," said Minnesota Assistance Council for Veterans CEO Neil Loidolt.
In 2024, 2,883 veterans walked through the doors of MACV looking for help.
According to Loidolt, proposed Minnesota House bill HF 2444 will dismantle the system designed to get veterans in a home and the care they need to be whole.
"The real progress over the last couple of years has come with the chronic and long-term homeless population," Loidolt said.
Loidolt testified in front of lawmakers that eliminating funding could more than double the state's homeless veteran registry.
"When I met MACV, I was in a very dark place," said Marine veteran Ramel Winston.
Winston is one of many veterans who say the state's MNVEST voucher program helped subsidize their rent. He is worried that veterans looking for help will not have the resources to find stability and live with dignity.
"A man that puts his life on the line for his country should be able to come home and have the help he needs to be where he needs to be," Winston said.
MNVEST is one of three programs that could end July 1 if funding is eliminated. Two hundred housing units throughout the state and financial assistance that supports more than 600 veterans' households are also on the chopping block.
"The greatest risk is there are 92 veterans that have one of those state vouchers, so if you are in that category, when your voucher comes up for expiration, it won't be renewed," said Loidolt.
Loidolt does not want the hard work MACV has done to end veteran homelessness to stop. He hopes concerned Minnesotans let lawmakers know this is not the way to honor our veterans.
"Send a note that says, 'Hey, we don't think the state of Minnesota should be abandoning homeless veterans right now, find the money,'" Loidolt said.
MACV says it sees new veterans needing its help to find a home every month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court overturns order that stripped some protections from pregnant Texas state workers
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court has upheld a law strengthening the rights of pregnant workers, vacating a judge's earlier order that had stripped those protections from Texas state employees. The ruling was a victory for advocates of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, a law that passed with bipartisan support in 2022 but quickly became embroiled in controversy over whether it covers workers seeking abortions and fertility treatments. A federal judge last year blocked enforcement of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act for Texas state employees, ruling that its passage was unconstitutional because a majority of House members were not physically present to approve the law as part of spending package in December 2022. In a 2-1 decision, the Fifth Circuit appeals court disagreed, finding that the law was properly passed under a COVID-19 pandemic-era Congressional rule allowing members to vote by proxy to meet the quorum requirement. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act strengthens the rights of women to receive workplace accommodation for needs related to pregnancy and childbirth, such as time off for medical appointments and exemptions from heavy lifting. Its passage came after a decades long campaign by women's advocacy groups highlighting the struggles of pregnant workers, especially those in low-wage roles, who were routinely forced off the job after requesting accommodations. The Texas case differed from other lawsuits that have narrowly focused on federal regulations stating that abortion, fertility treatments and birth control are medical issues requiring protection under the new law. The lawsuit, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, instead took aim at the entirety of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, drawing opposition from Republican lawmakers including former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who defended the pandemic-era proxy voting rule. Under the Trump administration, the Department of Justice has continued to fight Paxton's lawsuit, which if successful, could help open the door to legal challenges of other pandemic-era laws passed by proxy. Paxton's office did not reply to emails seeking comment, and it was not clear whether he would appeal Friday's ruling. The Justice Department declined to comment. 'This is a big win for women's rights. We are really happy to see that the Fifth Circuit agreed with us that the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was passed constitutionally and will continue to fight for the PWFA to stay legal,' said Inimai Chettiar, president of a Better Balance, an advocacy group that spearheaded the campaign for passage of the law. Texas state employees are not immediately protected, however, because the appeals court ruling doesn't become final for several weeks to give time for a possible appeal, Chettiar said. Conservative officials and religious groups, meanwhile, have been largely successfully in challenging the regulations passed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which established that workers seeking abortions are entitled accommodations. In May, a federal court struck down the abortion provisions of the EEOC regulations in response to lawsuits brought by states of Louisiana and Mississippi, and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic University and two Catholic dioceses. The Trump administration is almost certain to comply with that ruling. President Donald Trump in January fired two of the EEOC's democratic commissioners, paving the way for him to quickly establish a Republican majority at the agency. EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, a Republican, has signaled her support for revising the regulations, arguing the agency exceeded its authority by including not only abortion but fertility treatments and birth control as medical needs covered by the law. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
More Texas Democrats plan to spend the night in the state Capitol in protest amid redistricting fight
A group of Texas Democrats are returning to the state House in Austin where they will spend the night — the latest step in a broader protest over Republican plans to redraw congressional districts in the state. The state House Democratic caucus said in a news release that eight of its members will return to the floor Tuesday evening, 'publicly tearing up the permission slips required by Republicans for members to leave the chamber.' The Democrats will join state Rep. Nicole Collier, their colleague who has remained locked in the state House chamber since Monday afternoon after she refused the condition of a security escort to leave the chamber. After Democratic lawmakers fled the state for two weeks, denying the House a quorum to move forward with redistricting legislation, Republican leaders have demanded that Democrats agree to around-the-clock security escorts to ensure they would return to the chamber Wednesday for the redistricting vote. Collier didn't agree, so she has remained on the floor, while her party has livestreamed her protest for more than a day. Tuesday night, though, she'll have company ahead of passage of the redistricting plan in the House, which could happen as soon as Wednesday. The legislation is meant to pad the GOP majority in Washington. Collier has framed her decision to remain in the Capitol as an act of defiance, telling NBC News she wouldn't sign the de facto permission slip House GOP leaders presented to Democrats outlining the conditions that allowed them to leave the chamber. Those conditions are in effect because the House approved civil arrest warrants for the dozens of Democrats who left Texas this month. Rep. Mihaela Plesa, a Dallas-area Democrat, said during a press conference Tuesday that former Vice President Kamala Harris was among the "history makers" who called Collier to send their support for her protest. Rep. Penny Morales Shaw, a Houston-area Democrat, told NBC News that she decided to return to stand with Collier because she didn't want to be seen as 'validating' the GOP's 'narrative that we were derelict.' 'Nicole was right. We should not have submitted to this,' she added. 'I cannot support this very low and bad precedent for all future legislators.' Rep. Rhetta Andrews Bowers told reporters that she also believed the decision to have law enforcement follow Democrats was a waste of taxpayer dollars, evoking last month's floods in the Hill Country that killed more than 100 people. "Families in the Hill Country who lost everything to the devastating floods need our help. Yet instead of providing relief, those dollars are being spent on constant [Department of Public Safety] patrol," she said. Now that dozens of Democrats have returned to the state, there's little else they can do to prevent the GOP-controlled Legislature from passing their maps, which could help Republicans flip up to five U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump meets Zelenskyy, take two: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, a newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we have the latest on President Donald Trump's meeting with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Republicans' redistricting plans in Texas now that a group of Democratic lawmakers have returned home. Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here. — Adam Wollner Trump and Zelenskyy signal progress as they meet with European leaders on Ukraine war By Peter Nicholas, Megan Lebowitz and Kristen Welker President Donald Trump met for about an hour at the White House today with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in an accelerating effort to end the grinding war with Russia on terms acceptable to both sides. Trump greeted the Ukrainian leader in the early afternoon with a smile and warm handshake — a stark difference from the tense televised meeting the two men held in February in the Oval Office. Fresh off a summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump summoned Zelenskyy to see if they can resolve sticking points centered on Ukraine's future security and the status of territory that the Russian military has seized in eastern and southern Ukraine. A number of European leaders joined Zelenskyy and Trump at the White House to work toward a breakthrough in the nearly three-and-a-half-year conflict that Trump himself has cautioned could erupt in a third world war if allowed to persist. Asked if U.S. troops would help secure a peace deal, Trump did not rule out the possibility. As a condition of ending the war, Putin has insisted that Russia retain about 20% of Ukrainian territory that it now controls. For his part, Zelenskyy has said that Ukraine's constitution forbids him to cede any land. Zelenskyy sat to Trump's right in a dark, formal outfit complete with a collar — a departure from his normal wartime garb, which Trump remarked upon favorably. (At Zelenskyy's last meeting at the White House, a reporter asked him why he wasn't wearing a suit.) When his meeting with Trump ended, Zelenskyy said: 'We had a very good conversation — maybe the best one.' What happens next is far from clear. Trump said he will call Putin when he's done with the negotiations for the day. Depending on the progress made, he said he would try to convene a meeting that hasn't happened since the war began — a trilateral summit with himself, Putin and Zelenskyy. Read more → Texas Democrats return to the state, ending two-week standoff over redistricting By Natasha Korecki and Ben Kamisar Texas Democratic lawmakers returned to the state today after a two-week absence that temporarily blocked Republican leaders from enacting a plan aimed at padding their party's majority in the U.S. House, a move that sparked a national political firestorm over redistricting. The legislators decided to end their standoff after they prevented Texas Republicans from passing a redrawn congressional map during a special legislative session and after California Democrats countered with their own redistricting proposal. But Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called for a second special session, and with enough Democratic lawmakers now present in Texas, the GOP-controlled Legislature will be able to advance its new map. 'We killed the corrupt special session, withstood unprecedented surveillance and intimidation, and rallied Democrats nationwide to join this existential fight for fair representation — reshaping the entire 2026 landscape,' Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu said in a statement. 'We're returning to Texas more dangerous to Republicans' plans than when we left. Our return allows us to build the legal record necessary to defeat this racist map in court, take our message to communities across the state and country, and inspire how to fight these undemocratic redistricting schemes in their own statehouses.' Texas Democrats, without any real legislative power, won praise nationwide from members of their party for delaying the Republicans' pursuit of a rare, mid-decade redistricting effort and raising awareness of the issue. The two-week quorum break has been costly, with the Democratic lawmakers facing a $500 fine for each day they were absent. And many faced security threats while away from their families. Democrats began setting the stage for their eventual return last week, declaring victory over Republicans' decision to end their first special legislative session without a vote. They said their second condition to return was for California Democrats to release a plan that would seek to offset any changes Texas Republicans made to their map, which they did on Friday. Texas GOP leaders in the state House said they would take up their redistricting plan on Wednesday. 'The House has been through a tumultuous two weeks, but this institution long predates us and will long outlast each of us. ... This body has endured wars, economic depressions and quorum breaks dating back to the very first session. It will withstand this, too,' state House Speaker Dustin Burrows said. 'We are done waiting. We have a quorum. Now is the time for action. We will move quickly, and the schedule will be demanding until our work is complete.' Read more → 🗞️ Today's other top stories 🪖 D.C. takeover: Some Republicans governors announced over the weekend that they are sending their states' National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., to supplement Trump's effort to combat crime in the nation's capital. And some troops will begin to carry firearms. Read more → ✉️ You've got mail: Trump said in a Truth Social post that he would sign an executive order to try to get rid of mail-in ballots and voting machines. Read more → 💲 Election settlement: Newsmax will pay $67 million as part of a settlement with Dominion Voting Systems, which had brought a defamation lawsuit against the conservative cable news channel over its baseless claims that the 2020 election was fraudulent. Read more → 🏃🏼 He's running: Former Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, officially launched his 2026 Senate campaign, telling Henry Gomez that he had 'no intention' of running again but changed his mind after receiving encouragement from 'more and more people' and seeing the Trump administration's early actions. Read more → 🏃🏼♀️ She's running: Pennsylvania state Treasurer Stacy Garrity announced that she is running for governor, becoming the first major Republican candidate to jump into the race against Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro. Read more → 🌽 Field of Democrats: The field of Democratic candidates running for Senate in Iowa shrunk, with state Rep. J.D. Scholten dropping out and endorsing fellow state Rep. Josh Turek, the Des Moines Register reports. Read more → Follow live politics updates → That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Bridget Bowman. If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@ And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here. This article was originally published on
