
Lake County election board refers Niemeyer concerns for attorney review
Niemeyer, who is also a Lake County Councilman, presented concerns Tuesday that Democratic employees set up for the party's caucus during work hours in February, and some poll workers were paid for training they allegedly didn't attend.
In regard to the caucus, Niemeyer said that at least two Democratic employees were setting up for the caucus, which was held March 1 at the Lake County Government Center, during work hours on Friday, Feb. 28.
During the May special Crown Point and Hobart school referendum elections, Niemeyer previously said he was concerned about inspectors and students being paid for training, which they have to attend by law, but records indicate that some didn't receive training.
Niemeyer told the election board members that Indiana Code allows the board to adopt a waiver of election training if certain circumstances are met.
'The purpose of this presentation is not to go on some sort of a witch hunt or to look for problems where they don't exist. It's where we have procedural issues, we want them corrected,' Niemeyer said. 'The goal of this is not to see punitive measures taken against individuals. It's to correct a problem.'
Board member Michael Mellon asked staff if the board's policy is that employees can't walk into a political, partisan situation during work hours. Lake County Board of Elections and Registration Assistant Director Jessica Messler said the employee handbook states that is 'against the rules.'
Lake County Clerk Michael Brown said the election board's attorneys should review the information Niemeyer submitted to the board to determine how the board should move forward before asking questions.
'I don't think this is an appropriate time to start questions and answers,' Brown said. 'We will make decisions based on what our attorney tells us and whatever we need to do to correct it, so it will be corrected, but it has to be done the right way. This is not the right way.'
Lake County Board of Elections and Registration Director Michelle Fajman previously said employees did not set up for the caucus during business hours. The voting machines and tables were delivered that Friday, she said, but all setup was done Saturday morning.
Fajman previously said some employees could've walked into the auditorium to see if the equipment was in the room, ready to be set up the next day. Employees like to walk the government campus during their breaks, so it's possible some employees could've walked by the auditorium, she said, but no setup was done.
Fajman said that special elections are paid for by the entity holding the election, so all payments of election workers would be paid for by the school districts. Initially, the money comes out of the county's general fund, and then the schools reimburse the county for the elections.
Under Indiana law, clerks and judges can complete election training online or in person, Fajman said. Inspectors have to do training in person, she said.
Further, Indiana law dictates that students have to attend a training, Fajman said, so they can pick in person or online.
Fajman said when election workers go to training, they show their driver's license and check in on a poll pad against voter registration data.
Because some students aren't old enough to vote yet, Fajman said they are checked in manually. To get paid, students on Election Day sign a pay claim and mark on the claim that they attend training.
Inspectors could have a discrepancy in training attendance because there could be situations where an inspector had to back out of working the election, but remains on the record, and another inspector fills in, Fajman previously said.
The election office has been working toward coming up with a system to better track attendance and payments, Fajman previously said, and hopes to launch it by the next general election.
'Right now, there's no foolproof method that we have, but we're looking into it right now,' Fajman previously said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democrats decry firing Bureau of Labour Statistics director
Senate Democrats are quickly jumping on the dismissal of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, warning that it shows Trump is acting like a dictator. In a Senate floor speech, Democratic leader Sen. Chuck Schumer said, 'Donald Trump sometimes admires dictators, he admires them. Well, he sometimes acts just like them. It's classic Donald Trump. When he gets the news he doesn't like, he shoots the messenger.' Other Senate Democrats said it showed Trump was not facing up to the realities of the economy. 'This is the act of somebody who is soft, weak and afraid to own up to the reality of the damage his chaos is inflicting on our economy,' said Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kansas Governor Laura Kelly talks about decision to leave National Governors Association
TOPEKA (KSNT) — Kansas Governor Laura Kelly is joining another prominent Democrat in stepping away from the bipartisan National Governors Association (NGA). Kelly is currently the Chair of the Democratic Governors Association. She told 27 News that she, alongside Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, are leaving the organization over disappointment with the group's failure to push back against the administration of President Donald Trump. Kelly said Kansas is not benefitting enough from the NGA for her to remain a member. 'I just felt like Kansas was not getting a return on investment, and we will keep our eyes on it,' Kelly said. 'The NGA does some very good things particularly in the area of training for governor's staff, but there also needs to be a state rights advocate and I think they've sort of fallen down on that role.' Why legalizing weed in Kansas isn't working Kelly said she will stop paying her NGA dues at the end of July. Additionally, she said she's open to rejoining the group once it focuses more on advocating for states. For more Capitol Bureau news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news in northeast Kansas by downloading our mobile app and by signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track Weather app by clicking here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Republican super PACs bank millions ahead of midterm battles
Republicans are betting that they can defend their slim congressional majorities in next year's midterm elections, and the party's biggest donors are putting their chips on the table, too. New fundraising reports filed Thursday for outside groups show that GOP megadonors are engaged in the fight for Congress, steering $59.2 million to the main two super PACs involved in House and Senate races aligned with GOP leadership, Senate Leadership Fund and the Congressional Leadership Fund, throughout the first six months of the year. The two major super PACs aligned with Democratic congressional leadership, Senate Majority PAC and House Majority PAC, raised $38.6 million combined. The GOP groups had $62 million left in their accounts as of June 30, while the Democratic groups had $35.8 million. And neither those figures nor the totals raised include all of the groups' nonprofit arms, which can also raise unlimited funds but do not have to disclose their donors. While Republicans may have an early advantage in the super PAC money chase, that doesn't necessarily mean they will be able to swamp the airwaves. Democratic candidates have typically raised more money directly for their campaigns than the average Republican candidate has in recent years, riding a wave of small-donor enthusiasm unleashed in response to President Donald Trump's first election in 2016. That candidate-to-candidate financial advantage pays dividends, since candidates can reserve television airtime at lower rates than outside groups. Still, the big hauls from Republican groups are a sign that the party's donors are tuned into the midterm battle ahead, with both groups raising substantially more than the first six months of 2021, the last midterm election cycle. That period was also marked by GOP donors pulling back from Republican causes after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. SLF, which is aligned with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, pulled in $26.5 million during the first six months of the year, four times the size of its haul at this point in 2021. CLF, which is aligned with Speaker Mike Johnson, raised $32.7 million, more than double its 2021 haul. The same group of megadonors — hedge fund manager Paul Singer, current United Kingdom Ambassador Warren Stephens, investor Mark Rowan and poultry businessman Ronald Cameron — gave $1 million or more to each of the groups. The biggest checks came from billionaire Elon Musk, who donated $5 million each to SLF and CLF on June 27, after he had left his role as a White House. Musk, who also donated to a pro-Trump super PAC, made his contributions before publicly musing about starting a third party in July. On the Democratic side, HMP saw a 50% increase compared to its 2021 haul, bringing in $21.2 million so far this year. But SMP saw a slight decrease, raising $17.3 million so far. And the groups drew from different big donors. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker gave $1 million to HMP but not SMP, the filings show. And HMP also benefited from Democratic megadonors including Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings and hedge fund manager Stephen Mandel. SMP, meanwhile, had million-dollar donations from software company founder Phillip Ragon, Olan Mills and real estate mogul George Marcus. Senate GOP candidates aren't just going to be boosted by SLF's significant resources; some will benefit from strong fundraising by outside groups specifically devoted to their elections, both in red and swing states. These candidate-specific Republican Senate super PACs have emerged to push back against the Democratic candidates' hard-money advantage. Maine Sen. Susan Collins, the only Republican defending a seat in a state Democrats regularly win statewide, has overcome a big fundraising discrepancy before — her Democratic opponent in 2020, Sarah Gideon, outraised her $75.6 million to $27.8 million between 2019 and 2020, but Collins won that race by almost 9 percentage points. After outraising her top Democratic opponent last quarter, Collins' allied super PAC, Pine Tree Results PAC, reported raising $5.6 million in the first six months of 2025, thanks to some key seven-figure checks from private equity CEO Stephen Schwarzman and New Balance executive James Davis. In Michigan, home to what's expected to be one of the most competitive Senate races of the cycle, a group backing Republican Mike Rogers could help him combat strong fundraising on the Democratic side. Great Lakes Conservatives Fund, a pro-Rogers group, raised $5.1 million through June, virtually all from oil billionaire Timothy Dunn. In Texas, where Sen. John Cornyn faces a tough GOP primary challenge from state Attorney General Ken Paxton, Cornyn is trying to counter Paxton's direct fundraising lead with a strong fundraising showing from outside groups. Texans for a Conservative Majority, a super PAC backing Cornyn, raised almost $11 million in the first six months of the year. And Louisiana GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy, who faces a primary challenge from state Treasurer John Fleming, is also getting an outside boost from a group called Louisiana Freedom Fund, which raised $2.5 million over that same time period.