G7 Summit: Will Global South Voices Be Heard?
President Cyril Ramaphosa met several former African Heads of State and Government who are championing the African Leaders Initiative on Debt Relief at his official residence, Genadendal, in Cape Town on February 25, 2025. President Ramaphosa will attend the G7 summit in Canada today. For the Global South middle powers, an important responsibility in global G7 and G20 platforms is the commitment to articulate the interests of the G77 and the majority world, says the writer.
Image: GCIS
Ashraf Patel
This year's G7 Summit takes place in Kananaskis Canada, under the theme Governance in a Fragmented World.
The world in 2025 stands at a critical juncture. Geopolitical fragmentation, systemic economic shocks and accelerating technological change are reshaping the contours of the international order.
While the values underpinning the postwar multilateral system — democracy, open markets, human rights and the rule of law — remain foundational, their global reach and efficacy face a real threat of erosion from multiple directions.
In this context, a narrative has emerged of Southern powers that can, in some way, influence the global agenda via the G20 and some presence at the G7.
Canada generally has good programs aligned with the UN SDGs and responsible middle power, but will it sway the big powers to a broader development agenda?
What, then, is the value of Southern nations participating in the G7 in the current globally fractured era amidst trade wars and conflict? The BRICS nations bloc was conceived to chart an independent pathway due to these unequal relations in the world order.
Currently, most G7 core nations are in perilous economic stagnation. The UK, Germany, France and the US face multiple crises. The US domestic situation is divided with major strife and an authoritarian turn, and today, many US cities mirror that of Global South societies.
A key question then is what is to be gained from participation at the G7 when the policy prescripts in this context is a forgone conclusion.
For President Cyril Ramaphosa, this is his 5th trip to a G7 Summit as an observer. Observer status of Global South leaders generally means they have at least a day to engage over lunch and working sessions with the G7's core leadership.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
For South Africa, it's a case of the same old dialogue. In 2020 the South African president was invited to the G20 in Gleneagles, UK. The Covid pandemic was at its peak and G7 nations and their pharmaceutical industries ensured Covid nationalism that left Africa languishing at the bottom of the pyramid. At that summit, a new Just Energy Transition (JET) program was conceived, and over the years transformed into an investment program JET IP.
While couched in terms of 'development co-operation on climate', upon closer scrutiny, South Africans discovered that they were green loans repayable with interest.
Even more concerning is that this year's G7 takes place against the backdrop of regressive Development Aid policies by core EU states - UK, Germany, and Netherlands which is predicated on a 'new development business interest paradigm' with cuts to core development aid, and linking Development Aid directly to investment and business outcomes.
More concerning is the commitment by the EU and NATO states to increase Defence expenditure to 5% of GDP. Invariably, these structural shifts meant that the Northern world G7 would likely adopt more structural reforms, austerity and a push for neoliberalism in the Global South, meaning more extractive policies.
This can be seen by increased oil and gas explorations by G7 nations across Africa, thus contradicting their commitments to UN Climate Change COP targets. It is in these multi-layered complexities - and contradictions that Middle Powers - India, South Africa and Brazil are invited to the G7 this weekend. Realistically, prospects for a 'new deal' on debt, climate finance and meeting SDGs in this austerity ecosystem are low indeed.
By contrast, just this week China has removed tariffs for all 53 African states who export to China, thus boosting job creation and industrial development. In just one sweep it has done more for African trade than G7 nations communiques have done in a years. This is a concrete example of development solidarity and moves towards fair and balanced trade. By contrast, core G7 states are engaged in trade wars, tariff imposition and economic nationalism.
The G7 themes do somehow weave into the G20 just as the BRICS nation's themes on green industrial development and IFI reforms have. In terms of Southern agency and agenda setting, South Africa is generally a middle power committed to multilateralism and the UN charter, a laudable approach, but it has limitations in the current era.
For the Global South middle powers, an important responsibility in global G7 and G20 platforms is the commitment to articulate the interests of the G77 and the majority world. In the current context of Trump 2.0 trade wars and WTO ineffectiveness, geopolitical conflicts, and the lack of any agency or power by smaller nations such as Lesotho means that Low-Income Countries (LIC) are now most vulnerable and are facing ever deeper poverty as a result of trade wars and abrupt cuts in USAID etc.
The recent G77 June statement has decried that at a time of converging global crises including conflict, climate change, hunger, poverty, food insecurity, rising inequalities, declining official development assistance, and rapid technological disruption and has reaffirmed development as a fundamental pillar of peace and security.
Generally, the G7 agenda is about maintaining the hegemony of the Global North. Again, the current fractured era suggests that the Middle Powers now straddle the thin line between co-option into dominant patterns of unequal trade, finance and austerity, and Sovereignty.
What pathways will be prioritised?
* Ashraf Patel is a Senior Research Associate at the Institute for Global Dialogue, UNISA.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
South Africa: the World Bank's fattened lamb for slaughter
The hubris of dividing Africa along borders drawn on lunch break napkins, for no other reason than to cannibalise it, seemed eerily similar to the ways of the World Bank and the IMF today. Image: Yuri Gripas/Reuters/File LEE Camp of the programme Unredacted makes incisive observations about the dark manoeuvres of the 1884 Berlin Conference. The hubris of dividing Africa along borders drawn on lunch break napkins, for no other reason than to cannibalise it, seemed eerily similar to the ways of the World Bank and the IMF today. From the same actors, continuing with the same insidious plans of plundering the vast mineral resources of the African continent, these Bretton Woods contraptions, with innocuously sounding names, became the latter-day agents of the Berlin Conference conspirators. If wild hogs, for whatever sinister reason, were to conference on the neighbour's corn yard, Lee calls it the Orgy of Pillaging. In the Mandela and Mbeki successive administrations, the clarity of the vision and the determination of the resolve were unequivocal. It was to square the apartheid debts, grow the economy and bolster the fiscus, a strategy that yielded an average of 4.2% growth year on year. The way to trivialise the success of this strategy, notwithstanding its weaknesses in reducing joblessness, was to claim that the prices of commodities were favourably high. Were this trivialisation rooted in political sentiment only, it would be understandable. But it has no bearing on scientific fact or economic reality. And the Zuma administration was heralded into office with a bountiful surplus. And for purposes of context, commodity prices have been way higher since 2009, or at least the prices of those commodities on which the 'favourably high' claim is predicated. Yet to the collective shock of all citizens, they have helplessly witnessed a diminishing economic growth, recording a few recessions along the way. To date, the country has borrowed oodles of money, eye-watering and mouth-dropping amounts! The gross loan debt has increased from R2.5 trillion in 2017 to R4.3trln in 2021. This means the government has borrowed an additional R1.8trln from both domestic and international investors. The debt has been so heavy on the country's purse, so much so that the Treasury honchos have to borrow an estimated R2 billion every day to service the interest on capital borrowed and to keep the failing heart of their ICU patient ticking. The Government of National Unity (GNU) is determined to borrow as much money as it can possibly sustain their mind-numbing vaudeville. It would have been entertaining if it were not so tragic. The chronology of events is disturbing. First, the exchequer announced that the taxman had over-collected taxes in 2025, to great applause. Then the sequence of events and their timelines get blurred and indistinguishable. Either before that announcement or contemporaneous to it, the geniuses at the Treasury went to Washington DC to apply for a loan of R26bn. Or how does the Minister account for the speed of approval of this amount shortly after the Constitutional Court ruled against a planned VAT increase? But someone or something had to keep the masses entertained. And the famous stage is our Tower of Babel, the parliament of the people. And the captivating showdown of all, between the two main endearing partners of the GNU, is guaranteed front row television viewership. The masses were entertained with a VAT increase imbroglio. It was rejected. And the World Bank approved the loan, all in great effort to avoid imposing the beneficiation tax on a sliding scale. John Perkins, renowned author of Confessions of an Economic Hitman, has an insider articulation acuity. The World Bank and the IMF are frontline agents in the early stages of a regime change strategy. Beyond that stage, the creditors will take over the decision-making capabilities of the country or some government will be couped or someone will be swiftly murdered. For a country that boasts of the best constitution in the world, how does it account for the fact that its eminent provisions determining the powers of different branches of government are silent about the most egregious executive abuse of power? This is when the executive branch contracts into foreign debt on behalf of the state secretly, pledging the entire sovereignty of the people as collateral? It is not even helped by the fact that the preeminent conditionality for loans with the World Bank and the IMF is secrecy. Not even the representatives of the people convened in Parliament can know. It is very secret, they say. According to the late Minister of Public Enterprises, parliamentarians have to sign non-disclosure agreements. So much for voting. At least we now know what the term 'ruling elite' means. It refers to those people who have been given privileged sight of the loan terms of the World Bank and the IMF. Thomas Jefferson, from the vantage of his political heights, addressing his countrymen and countrywomen, once observed that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. And for a country led by the ANC, a political party with a long and profound history, spanning over a century of various political and economic stages of the forging of this country's nationhood, its incumbent leaders are determined not to learn anything about money or debt or even the mastery of their predecessors. It is a fairly documented epic of South Africa's complex historic narrative that the straw that broke the apartheid camel's back wasn't a straw. It was a crushing debt, and an irate mob of creditors beating at Darius Fourie's and Chris Stals' doors, Finance Minister and Reserve Bank Governor, respectively, who were at the service of the apartheid ignominy.
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump due in Canada as G7 confronts Israel-Iran crisis
Group of Seven leaders including US President Donald Trump headed Sunday to the Canadian Rockies for a summit that takes on new urgency after Israel attacked Iran. The three-day gathering in the mountain town of Kananaskis marks the return to the international diplomatic calendar by Trump, who in his second term has been even more emboldened to shatter norms than in his first stint. Trump is visiting Canada despite his mockery of the United States' northern neighbor, which he has said would be better off as the 51st state. Tensions have eased since Prime Minister Mark Carney, a former central banker known more for his competence than pizzazz, took over in March from Justin Trudeau, an erstwhile star on the global stage whom Trump made no secret of despising. Carney had designed an agenda aimed at minimizing disagreements during the summit of the club of major industrial democracies -- Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States. But the leaders will likely see divisions as they discuss Israel's stunning military campaign that began Friday and is aimed at Iran's nuclear program and security apparatus. Iran has hit back with a barrage of missiles and drones against Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched the attack despite public calls by Trump to step back, as the United States and Iran had been holding talks on a diplomatic resolution over the cleric-run state's contested nuclear work. Trump nonetheless has since praised Israel's strikes, while also calling on the two sides to "make a deal." European powers have been cautious. French President Emmanuel Macron has called for restraint and urged Iran to re-enter talks with the United States, while blaming Tehran for escalating tensions over its nuclear program. Japan, which historically has maintained cordial ties with Iran, made an unusually forceful break with Western allies and denounced Israel's strikes as "completely unacceptable and deeply regrettable." - Disagreement just below surface - Another war will also be under discussion in Kananaskis. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is among the invited guests and hopes to speak to Trump, who publicly derided him when they met at the White House on February 28. Trump had hoped to force Ukraine into a quick deal with Russia but he has grown frustrated after President Vladimir Putin refused US-led appeals for at least a temporary truce. Trump spoke by telephone with Putin on Saturday both about the Israel-Iran conflict and Ukraine. Neither issue is expected to figure in a joint G7 communique, with Carney instead seeking only statements on low-controversy issues such as improving supply chains. Trump, when he last visited Canada for a G7 summit in 2018, bolted out early and from Air Force One tweeted insults about Trudeau and disassociated the United States from the final statement. G7 leaders have all voiced eagerness to engage Trump but in some cases have made clear their boundaries. Macron headed to the summit after stopping in Greenland, where he denounced Trump's threats to seize the Danish autonomous territory. "That's not what allies do," Macron said. Trump for his part is heading to the summit after attending an unusual military parade in Washington that coincided with his birthday, prompting nationwide protests over steps seen as increasingly authoritarian. - Trade deadline looms - European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen also spoke by telephone Saturday with Trump and called for pressure on Russia over the Ukraine invasion. She also voiced hope for progress in trade talks. Trump, seeking a radical transformation of a global economic order centered on free trade, has vowed to slap sweeping tariffs on US friends and foes alike on July 9, a deadline he postponed once. Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council, expected US allies to tread lightly on the tariffs as previous experience showed the "huge risk" if they push Trump too hard. "If it was a ganging up, I think that would backfire," he said. Other leaders invited to Kananaskis include Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as Canada hopes to ease tensions. Trudeau had accused Modi's government of masterminding the assassination of a Sikh separatist in Canada, which expelled the Indian ambassador, prompting New Delhi to take punitive action of its own.
eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
Shaping Africa's economic destiny
JOHANNESBURG - Africa is not just participating in the global economy, it's helping define it. WATCH | Discussion | 'SA youth need less talk but more budget' As the continent takes the spotlight hosting the G20 this year, a groundbreaking movement is unfolding: Next-Gen Africa 2025. It's not just another event it's a movement empowering Africa's innovators, SMEs, and entrepreneurs to take their place on the world stage.
