&w=3840&q=100)
'Absolutely possible': White House 'considering' inviting Zelenskyy to Alaska for Trump–Putin talks, says report
The White House is considering inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Alaska, where President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin next week, NBC News reported, citing senior US officials.
'It's being discussed,' one source told NBC News, while another said it was 'absolutely' possible. 'Everyone is very hopeful that would happen,' the official added.
No visit has been confirmed, and it remains unclear whether Zelenskyy would join the Alaska meetings. Asked if an invitation had been extended, a senior White House official said, 'The president remains open to a trilateral summit with both leaders. Right now, the White House is focused on planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump announced Friday that he will meet Putin on August 15 in Alaska to push for a Ukraine ceasefire. Initially, the White House made a Putin–Zelenskyy meeting a precondition for the summit, but Trump later said it was not required. Even if Zelenskyy attends, it is uncertain whether he and Putin would meet directly.
The diplomatic push follows a visit to Moscow by Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff ahead of Trump's Friday deadline for Putin to agree to a ceasefire or face new sanctions. Putin has so far resisted, offering instead a deal that would allow Russia to retain large swathes of Ukrainian territory. Zelenskyy rejected the idea on Saturday, vowing that Ukrainians 'will not give their land to occupiers.'
Trump, however, hinted at possible concessions, saying Friday that 'there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' US officials are now working to rally Ukrainian and European backing for a potential ceasefire plan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As US tariff concerns mount, Textiles Ministry to hold meeting with exporters today
Amid rising concerns by businesses about the impact of the 25 per cent reciprocal tariff by the US, the Ministry of Textiles has called a meeting with major textile and apparel exporters from across the country here today. The meeting, to be chaired by Union Textiles Minister Giriraj Singh, has been called to discuss the challenges being faced by exporters in their order flows, especially amid the widening tariff differentials with other competing Asian countries after the recent imposition of secondary tatiffs by the US on India. With the US being India's largest export market for the labour-intensive textile and apparel industry, textile exporters are under stress after the hike in import tariff to 25 per cent from August 7 by the Trump administration, which is set to rise further to 50 per cent on August 27. Textile and apparel exporters have been asking for support from the government as their orders have been hit with buyers either asking them to share the tariff hike burden or pausing the orders till further clarity emerges about the trade deal negotiations between India and the US. One of the major concerns raised by textile and apparel exporters in their representations to the government has been about a disruption in their cash flow with a reduction in orders by buyers from the US, officials said. 'Exporters are asking for sops. They are asking for soft loans or interest subvention schemes or focused market schemes. Their concern is that they should get cash in hand,' an official told The Indian Express. Exporters are hoping that the tariff hike is temporary and they are able to retain the orders as buyers are already shifting to other countries with lower tariffs such as Vietnam and Bangladesh, with India's 25 per cent reciprocal tariff exceeding those applicable to other competing Asian countries, except China. If the higher levies continue, there's also a worry in policy circles that the distress in the textiles and apparels sector could result in job losses. The government is engaging continuously with exporters to understand the evolving situation. 'Exporters have been communicating their issues. The government is taking their feedback and will provide the necessary support to them,' another official said. The Ministry of Finance has estimated that more than half of the country's merchandise exports to the US will be subject to the higher reciprocal tariff. The US is a key market for Indian Ready-Made Garments (RMG) exports; its share in India's total garment exports in 2024 stood at 33 per cent, as per the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC). Home textiles and carpets are also significant export-oriented sectors, with exports accounting for 70-75 per cent and 65-70 per cent of total sales, respectively, for these sectors. Of this, the US accounts for 60 per cent of exports for home textiles and 50 per cent of exports for carpets. US President Donald Trump had announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods in a post on social media platform Truth Social on July 30, with an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for importing energy and defence items from Russia. On August 6, the penalty was clarified to be an additional 25 per cent tariff that will be effective from August 27.
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The nearly 150-year old law that Trump is testing with domestic troop deployment
AP As President Donald Trump pushes the bounds of military activity on domestic soil, a debate has emerged over a nearly 150-year old law that regulates when federal troops can intervene in state issues. About 800 National Guard troops filed into Washington, D.C., on Tuesday after President Donald Trump said - without substantiation - that they were needed to reduce crime in the "lawless" national capital. Thousands of miles away, a judge in California is hearing arguments about whether the president's recent decision to federalize Guard personnel in Los Angeles during protests against immigration raids violated federal law. Trump has also created militarized zones along the U.S.-Mexico border as part of a major shift that has thrust the army into immigration enforcement like never before. The cases in both California and Washington mainly hinge on Posse Comitatus Act, which passed in 1878 and largely prevents the military from enforcing domestic laws. Experts say that in both cases there are clear limitations to the law's enforcement. Here is what to know about the law. Posse Comitatus Act stops military from enforcing US law The Posse Comitatus Act is a criminal statute that prevents the military from enforcing domestic law. It also prevents the military from investigating local crimes, overriding local law enforcement or compelling certain behavior. Posse Comitatus can be bypassed by a congressional vote or in order to defend the Constitution. The Insurrection Act of 1807 can also trigger the suspension of the Posse Comitatus Act and allows the president to deploy the military domestically in cases of invasion or rebellion. There is an exception for the U.S. Coast Guard, which has some law enforcement responsibility. The military is also allowed to share intelligence and certain resources if there is an overlwith civilian law enforcement jurisdiction, according to the Library of Congress. Law was enacted after Reconstruction era The law was enacted in 1878 following the post-Civil War era known as Reconstruction. Pro-segregationist representatives in Congress wanted to keep the military from blocking the enforcement of Jim Crow laws that allowed racial segregation. But the spirit of the law also has roots going all the way back to the Revolutionary War, when the founders of the United States were scarred by the British monarchy's absolute military control, said William C. Banks, a professor at the Syracuse University College of Law. "We have a tradition in the United States, which is more a norm than a law, that we want law enforcement to be conducted by civilians, not the military," Banks said. That ethos - ingrained in National Guard personnel starting in basic training - becomes especially powerful in the case of the Posse Comitatus Act, because the law has hardly been tested before now, said Steve Vladeck, a professor of law at the Georgetown University Law Center. "There is no authoritative precedent on exactly where these lines are, and so that's why over the years the military's own interpretation has been so important," Vladeck said. Law applies to 'federalized' troops The Posse Comitatus Act typically doesn't apply to the National Guard because members of the Guard report to the governor, not the federal government. But when Guard personnel are "federalized" they are bound by the act until they are returned to state control, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. The state of California said in a federal lawsuit that the Trump administration violated the act when it deployed National Guard soldiers and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles following June protests over immigration raids. The Trump administration has argued that the Posse Comitatus Act does not apply because the president used a provision known as Title 10 to federalize the troops. It allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service when the country "is invaded," when "there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government," or when the president is otherwise unable "to execute the laws of the United States." Attorneys for the federal government also argue that the troops are not enforcing domestic laws and are only acting to protect federal property and agents. In Washington, by contrast, the president is already in charge of the National Guard and can legally deploy troops for 30 days without congressional approval. Vladeck said that both deployments over the past three months suggest that the Trump administration "appears to be trying to dance around the Posse Comitatus Act" rather than disregard it altogether. "There is a lot in the water about the Trump administration being lawless. What is striking is actually how much the administration is trying to wrap itself in the law," Vladeck said. Law depends on executive branch policing itself Beyond the legal exceptions written into the law, there is a practical question of how to enforce it, said Joseph Nunn, counsel in the Brennan Center for Justice's Liberty and National Security Program. Because the Posse Comitatus Act is a criminal statute, not a civil one, the U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for prosecution in criminal court, Nunn said. "It's premised on the executive branch policing itself," he said. That leaves unclear legal standing for whether a state government like California's has a right to sue in civil court in the first place. The ruling in the California case will likely be a narrow interpretation based on the circumstances of the Guard's deployment in Los Angeles, Vladeck said. But he said it could still dictate how the administration uses the Guard in other cities like Chicago and New York, where Trump has threatened to federalize troops next. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Regulatory gray area makes investing in LVMH, BP tough For Indian retail How IDBI banker landed plush Delhi properties in Amtek's INR33k crore skimming As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive Stock Radar: Astra Microwave showing signs of bottoming out after 16% fall from highs; time to buy? F&O Radar | Deploy Broken Wing in Paytm to play stock's bullish outlook These 9 banking stocks can give more than 28% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Why 2025 Could Be The Astrological Turning Point We've Been Waiting For
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Our relationship with both India and Pakistan is ‘good': US
America's relationship with both India and Pakistan is 'good', the US State Department has said, asserting that the diplomats are 'committed to both nations'. Speaking at a briefing on Tuesday, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said that the US working with both nations is good news for the region and the world, and will promote a beneficial future. 'I would say that our relationship with both nations is as it has been, which is good. And that is the benefit of having a President who knows everyone, talks to everyone, and that is how we can bring differences together in this case. So it's clear that the diplomats here are committed to both nations,' Bruce said. She was responding to a question on the possibility of increased US assistance to Islamabad in terms of arms sales following Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir's meeting with Trump, and whether this was coming at the cost of Trump's relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Referring to the May conflict between India and Pakistan, Bruce added, 'Obviously, we had an experience with Pakistan and India when there was a conflict, one that could have developed into something quite horrible.' She said that there was 'immediate concern and immediate movement' with Vice President J D Vance, President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in 'addressing the nature of what was happening….we described the nature of the phone calls, the work that we did to stop the attacks and to then bring the parties together so we could have something that was enduring.' She also claimed that top leaders in the US were involved in 'stopping that potential catastrophe.' New Delhi has been maintaining that India and Pakistan halted their military actions following direct talks between their militaries without any mediation by the US. Bruce added that the recent peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan 'follows negotiated peace arrangements between Cambodia and Thailand, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Egypt and Ethiopia and Serbia and Kosovo.' Meanwhile, in an interview on Tuesday, Rubio said that 'credit goes to' Trump for helping bring several conflicts around the world to an end. Trump says he wants 'to be the President of peace. And so any time we see a conflict where we think we can make a difference, we get involved, and we've had good success in that regard. India-Pakistan, Thailand-Cambodia, the peace deal with Azerbaijan and Armenia, just a few days ago,' he said in an interview with 'Sid and Friends in the Morning'.
