EU says 'well on track' to reach 2030 climate targets
The European Union said it is on track to reach its 2030 climate targets, but uncertainty remains over the bloc's ambitions to cut greenhouse gas emissions much further by 2040.
The European Commission expects emissions to fall by 54% by 2030 compared to 1990, very close to its 55%, it said, after analysing member states' energy and climate plans for the coming years.
"Emissions are down 37% since 1990, while the economy has grown nearly 70% - proving climate action and growth go hand in hand. Now we must build on this momentum," said the EU's climate chief, Wopke Hoekstra.
The EU also pointed to disparities between member states and highlighted the problems of protecting forests and carbon storage.
Ireland's Environmental Protection Agency has said the country has gone backwards in its attempts to achieve its greenhouse gas emissions targets.
The latest greenhouse gas emissions projections from the EPA said emissions could fall by up to 23% by 2030 if every climate policy and measures currently planned by the Government is fully implemented on time.
The European Commission has singled out Belgium, Estonia and Poland, which have not submitted their energy and climate plans, urging them to "do so without delay".
"We have reasons to be proud, although we cannot be satisfied. We've come a long way, but we're not where we need to be yet," said energy commissioner Dan Jorgensen.
The EU has set a goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050, and Brussels wants to agree on an interim target for 2040 - with the commission seeking to cut emissions by 90% compared to 1990 levels.
But negotiations are stalling between EU countries on the 2040 target, and the commission has shied away from formally proposing the 90% cut to member states.
For some countries like the Czech Republic and Italy, the target is unrealistic.
The bloc has this year focused on ramping up European businesses' competitiveness against fierce competition in the United States and China.
The commission is considering greater flexibility in its calculations for 2040, including through the purchase of carbon credits on international markets.
The EU's executive arm insists it will submit a formal proposal before the summer and stresses that the bloc will be ready for the next UN COP30 climate conference, which will be held in November in the Amazonian city of Belem in Brazil.
The delays have raised concerns among environmental groups, which have called for Europe to take the lead on tackling climate change after US President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement after he returned to the White House in January.
The organisations are also fearful of a wholesale unravelling of the European Green Deal, a landmark package of measures that defined Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's first term in office but has since come increasingly under fire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Suzanne Harrington: 'North Korea currently looks more enticing than the USA as a destination'
Old friends of my partner invite us to stay at their beach house on Malibu – admittedly a very small beach house, but a beach house on Malibu nevertheless. The photos are breathtaking. Yet being of sound mind, we politely decline. Thanks, but no thanks. They laugh, nodding, rolling their eyes. They get it. Another friend, a freelancer with a UK passport, is offered a fat fee to fly to Atlanta for a weekend's work – he's a photographer - but also declines. He could do with the money, but finds the prospect of entering the US, even without a fancy camera in his bag, so stressful that he decides to forfeit the cash and stay at home. He says he keeps thinking of those German teenage backpackers, Maria Lepere and Charlotte Pohl, who were strip-searched, handcuffed, body scanned, and locked in a cell overnight in Honolulu for the crime of not having booked advance accommodation, before being deported. Now Irish students are cancelling planned cultural exchange trips to the US too, rather than potentially allowing the current regime's border guards to scrutinise their social media feeds or access their phones. Imagine uniformed meatheads scrolling through your private messages, like perverts sniffing through your knicker drawer. No thanks. This is not the kind of culture fit for any form of exchange. Meanwhile, Harvard is running free online courses to educate their own citizens on the basics of their own democratic structures. Offering ordinary Americans a kind of Democracy for Dummies as they sleepwalk over the cliff into dictatorship. The current US administration's ongoing propensity for picking fights with Harvard, women's reproductive rights, Canada, people of colour, Taylor Swift, people dependent on US foreign aid, Chinese students, trans people, migrants, the EU, Bruce Springsteen, Vladimir Putin, free trade, Oprah, Beyonce, facts, free speech, science, medicine, climate safeguarding, and probably gravity itself – while endorsing genocide, white supremacy, illegal deportations, medical quackery and the pardoning of criminals – continues to give the rest of us whiplash. The kind of whiplash you get when someone you'd long regarded as perhaps a slightly racist neighbour turns out to be a raging psychopath; culturally speaking, the abrupt speed of this about-turn is causing our necks to snap. We have our list of travel no-go zones, places our consulates advise us to proceed towards with great caution, or to swerve completely. You wouldn't book a sunshine holiday in South Sudan, pursue sex tourism in Iran, shoplift in Saudi. We know about the tricky places. We proceed accordingly, or don't proceed at all. The US was never, ever on that list; we were schooled to regard it as a place of adventure and opportunity, a place where you could make it, maybe even hit the jackpot. Now, thanks to its rapid slide from jackpot to jackboot, visiting America has become about as enticing as a colposcopy. Why would you want to go there, to contribute even a single dollar to its continued existence? As a destination, North Korea currently looks more enticing, for the simple reason that North Korea is not pretending to be anything other than what it is – a mad dictatorship overseen by a mad dictator. No offence Malibu, but right now I'd rather be a tourist in Pyongyang. Read More
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Drogs in talks with UEFA over Conference League participation
Drogheda United are in discussions with UEFA over their Conference League participation after Danish side Silkeborg IF, who have the same owners as the Louth club, also qualified for the third-tier European competition on Sunday. Silkeborg IF beat Randers FC 3-1 in the Danish Superliga to secure a place Conference League qualifiers. Last November, the Drogs earned their spot after they beat Derry City to win the FAI Cup. A month after that memorable triumph, the US-based Trivela Group secured a majority share of Silkeborg IF. They also own English League Two outfit Walsall. UEFA's regulations regarding multi-club ownership and participation state that: "No individual or legal entity may have control or influence over more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition, such control or influence being defined in this context as: Holding a majority of the shareholders' voting rights; Having the right to appoint or remove a majority of the members of the administrative, management or supervisory body of the club; Being a shareholder and alone controlling a majority of the shareholders' voting rights pursuant to an agreement entered into with other shareholders of the club; or Being able to exercise by any means a decisive influence in the decision-making of the club." A Drogheda United statement released on Sunday night read: "Drogheda United Football Club can confirm that it has been engaged in ongoing discussions with UEFA in recent months regarding a regulatory matter that has now arisen following Silkeborg IF's qualification for the UEFA Conference League qualifiers. "As supporters will know, Silkeborg IF is also part of the Trivela Group ownership structure, which includes Drogheda United. "UEFA's regulations regarding multi-club ownership and participation in UEFA Club Competitions require careful consideration, and the club has been working proactively with the relevant authorities. "At this time, due to the confidential and ongoing nature of the process, Drogheda United is unable to provide further comment. However, the club remains committed to transparency and will provide updates as soon as there are any significant developments to share. "We appreciate the continued support and understanding of our fans, partners, and wider community."
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Trump's latest tariff move: this is how trade wars start
The latest decision by Donald Trump t o double the level of tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent may have a limited direct impact on Ireland. But the move is of wider importance than just its narrow impact on the sectors involved. And this needs to be understood in Dublin. The first point to note is the obvious one. Despite the ruling of the federal trade court last week that Trump had gone beyond his authority in imposing tariffs without getting the go-ahead from Congress, the US president is determined to push ahead. In choosing the steel and aluminium tariffs, he is focusing on an area which was not part of the federal court ruling - tariffs imposed in a specific sector for national security reasons. For Ireland , the concern here is that pharma and computer chips also fall into this category. In pharma, in particular, the president may soon be in receipt of a report he commissioned which could give him leeway to impose sectoral tariffs. Ireland needs to remain alert to this risk. The second point to note is that Trump's tariff policy continue to be driven in large part by headlines rather than substance. The steel and aluminium tariffs allowed him to trumpet his protection of a key US sector. But in reality there is little space capacity in the sector to take up the slack from a lower level of imports. And prices will rise for the many businesses importing these products. READ MORE The same calculus may apply in the pharma sector – and here it would take American companies a long time to return production to the US market. Tariffs would mean supply disruption and higher prices. But that does not mean they will not happen. The final, and perhaps most concerning, point is what Trump's latest move means for the negotiations between the EU and the US. Brussels has held off from responding to the tariffs imposed by Trump so far – including the first round of steel and aluminium tariffs, hoping to clear the way for a negotiated deal. It would be in Ireland's interests were such an agreement to emerge, avoiding a full-scale transatlantic trade war. Now, however, with the steel and aluminium tariffs hiked to 50 per cent, pressure will grow on Brussels to respond. The EU wants to do a deal , for sure, and there is an argument for it to drag things out a bit longer to see how this latest move plays out. But the EU cannot be seen to be pushed around by Washington. In turn, if it retaliates, this could sour the mood of the talks and lead to further retaliation from Trump. This is how trade wars start. The concern is that the US side still expects unilateral concessions from the EU, while Brussels is preparing for a give-and-take negotiation. Despite Trump's legal power on blanket tariffs being trimmed, significant risks still lie ahead.
