logo
NASA to build nuclear reactor on Moon by 2030: What is behind the ambitious plan?

NASA to build nuclear reactor on Moon by 2030: What is behind the ambitious plan?

Time of India5 days ago
NASA
has unveiled plans to build a
nuclear reactor
on the Moon by 2030 as part of its
Artemis program
, which aims to return humans to the lunar surface and establish a sustainable presence. This ambitious move comes amid increasing international competition in space exploration, with countries like China and Russia developing similar nuclear-powered lunar projects. The reactor is designed to provide a continuous, reliable source of energy to power habitats, scientific instruments, rovers, and mining operations, especially during the Moon's lengthy nights and permanently shadowed craters where solar power is ineffective.
The development of this nuclear power system marks a crucial step toward creating the infrastructure necessary for long-term lunar habitation and resource utilization. Unlike previous missions that relied heavily on solar panels and limited battery storage, a nuclear reactor could enable round-the-clock operations and pave the way for deeper space exploration, including future missions to Mars.
Why NASA wants to build a nuclear reactor on the Moon
NASA has been quietly developing small nuclear power systems in collaboration with the Department of Energy for years. The plan is to deploy a small modular nuclear reactor capable of producing at least 100 kilowatts of electricity, enough to power about 80 homes on Earth. This reactor will provide continuous energy without interruption, a critical advantage over solar power, which falters during the Moon's two-week-long nights.
The Moon's south pole is a particular focus due to its abundant water ice deposits, essential for life support and fuel production. However, these craters are permanently shadowed, receiving little to no sunlight, rendering solar energy impractical. The nuclear reactor will enable operations in these challenging environments, supporting scientific research, mining activities, and habitat life-support systems.
NASA's Acting Administrator Sean Duffy has emphasized the importance of this technology for Artemis' goals, calling it a 'game changer' for sustained lunar presence. The project is also seen as a testbed for technologies that could eventually support human missions to Mars, where solar energy is even less reliable.
Geopolitical stakes and the race for lunar infrastructure
The push for a nuclear reactor on the Moon comes at a time of heightened geopolitical competition in space. China announced plans in 2025 to build a nuclear power plant on the Moon by 2035, while Russia has also expressed ambitions in this domain. Establishing nuclear infrastructure is more than a technical achievement; it signals a country's ability to exert influence and control over critical lunar regions.
Under the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, no nation can claim sovereignty over the Moon or other celestial bodies. However, building infrastructure such as nuclear reactors and bases effectively sets 'keep-out zones' around these installations. These zones grant operators significant control over access to nearby resources, like the valuable ice deposits at the lunar south pole, which could be used to produce rocket fuel and sustain life.
Experts view NASA's project as a strategic move to maintain U.S. leadership in space exploration and to shape international norms for the responsible and peaceful use of nuclear power beyond Earth. Transparency, adherence to international guidelines, and cooperation will be essential to prevent conflict and ensure that space remains a domain for peaceful exploration.
Why nuclear power is essential for the future of space exploration
Solar panels have powered numerous space missions successfully, but their limitations are becoming increasingly apparent as humans prepare for long-term habitation beyond Earth. The Moon's long nights and shadowed craters present significant challenges for solar energy, while Mars' greater distance from the Sun further reduces its effectiveness.
A nuclear reactor on the Moon can provide a stable, high-density power source capable of supporting demanding applications such as 3D printing of habitats, life support systems, communication networks, and scientific experiments. It also reduces reliance on expensive and logistically complex resupply missions from Earth.
While concerns about safety and radiation risks exist, NASA and international space agencies adhere to strict safety protocols. The use of radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) in past missions, such as the Voyager probes and Mars rovers, has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of nuclear power in space. The planned lunar reactor would be designed with containment and fail-safe measures to minimize risks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump eases spaceflight rules in big boost to Elon Musk's SpaceX
Trump eases spaceflight rules in big boost to Elon Musk's SpaceX

India Today

time4 hours ago

  • India Today

Trump eases spaceflight rules in big boost to Elon Musk's SpaceX

U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday to streamline federal regulations governing commercial rocket launches, a move that could benefit Elon Musk's SpaceX and other private space order, amongst other things, directs the U.S. transportation secretary to eliminate or expedite environmental reviews of launch licences administered by the Federal Aviation Administration, the White House said in a declaration also calls on the secretary to do away with "outdated, redundant or overly restrictive rules for launch and reentry vehicles." "Inefficient permitting processes discourage investment and innovation, limiting the ability of U.S. companies to lead in global space markets," the executive order Musk and Trump had a high-profile falling out months ago, the billionaire entrepreneur's SpaceX rocket and satellite venture potentially stands to be the single biggest immediate beneficiary of Trump's order on though not mentioned by name in Trump's order, easily leads all U.S. space industry entities, including NASA, in the sheer number of launches it routinely conducts for its own satellite network, the U.S. space agency, the Pentagon, and other Bezos' private rocket company Blue Origin and its space tourism business could also gain from a more relaxed regulatory has repeatedly complained that environmental impact studies, post-flight mishap investigations and licencing reviews required by the FAA have needlessly slowed testing of SpaceX's Starship rocket, under development at the company's South Texas launch Starship is the centrepiece of Musk's long-term SpaceX business model, as well as a core component of NASA's ambitions for returning astronauts to the moon's surface, establishing a permanent human lunar presence and ultimately sending crewed missions to has viewed FAA oversight as a hindrance to his company's engineering culture, considered more risk-tolerant than many of the aerospace industry's more established players. SpaceX's flight-test strategy is known for pushing spacecraft prototypes to the point of failure, then fine-tuning improvements through frequent has appeared to run afoul at times with the FAA's mission of safeguarding the public and the environment as it exercises its regulatory jurisdiction over commercial this year, the FAA grounded Starship test flights for nearly two months after back-to-back post-launch explosions rained debris over Caribbean islands and forced dozens of airliners to change course. The FAA ended up expanding the aircraft hazard zone along Starship's launch trajectories before licencing future flights.- EndsTune InMust Watch

Massive Object Racing Towards Earth Could Be Alien Spaceship, Warns Harvard Scientist
Massive Object Racing Towards Earth Could Be Alien Spaceship, Warns Harvard Scientist

News18

time6 hours ago

  • News18

Massive Object Racing Towards Earth Could Be Alien Spaceship, Warns Harvard Scientist

The discovery of fast-moving object 3I/Atlas has sparked debate, with Harvard's Avi Loeb suggesting it might be an alien spacecraft The age-old question of whether humanity is alone in the universe has once again returned to the spotlight after the discovery of a mysterious, fast-moving object heading toward Earth. The celestial visitor, designated 3I/Atlas, has sparked a heated scientific debate, with one prominent Harvard professor suggesting it might be an alien spacecraft capable of saving or destroying our planet. The object was first detected on July 1, 2025, and is currently hurtling through the inner solar system at an estimated 1,35,000 miles per hour, according to NASA. The agency says it will make its closest approach to the Sun on October 30, at a distance of roughly 130 million miles from Earth. While NASA insists there is no immediate threat, uncertainty over its nature has captured public attention. Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb, known for his unconventional theories about extra-terrestrial life, believes 3I/Atlas could be more than just a comet or asteroid. Drawing parallels with Arthur C Clarke's sci-fi classic 'Rendezvous with Rama', in which a seemingly natural object is revealed to be an alien craft, Loeb said that the object might show signs of 'technical design". He warned that it might carry anything from a reconnaissance probe to a weapon. 'It can come to save us or destroy us," Loeb told reporters, adding that humanity must be prepared for both scenarios. 'We should ensure all alien objects are just rocks," he said. Loeb's calculations suggest the object could reach Earth between November 21 and December 5, 2025. NASA estimates the body is between 20 and 24 kilometres in size, nearly 200 times larger than 'Oumuamua', the cigar-shaped interstellar object detected in 2017 that also stirred alien speculation. Due to its distance, scientists cannot yet determine its exact dimensions or composition. While Loeb's statements have made headlines, not all experts are convinced. Oxford University astronomer Chris Lintott dismissed the alien theory outright, calling it 'complete nonsense" and warning that such claims undermine the serious scientific work being conducted on the object. NASA and the European Space Agency currently classify 3I/Atlas as an outer solar system comet. Loeb concedes this is the most likely explanation, yet insists a 'slight possibility" remains that it is an artificial craft. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

James Webb Space Telescope rules out Earth-like atmosphere on rocky planet
James Webb Space Telescope rules out Earth-like atmosphere on rocky planet

Indian Express

time8 hours ago

  • Indian Express

James Webb Space Telescope rules out Earth-like atmosphere on rocky planet

The James Webb Space Telescope has found no signs of an Earth-like atmosphere on planet TRAPPIST-1 d, according to a study published Tuesday in The Astrophysical Journal. Using Webb's Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec), researchers did not detect common terrestrial gases such as water vapor, methane or carbon dioxide, NASA said. 'At this point we can rule out TRAPPIST-1 d from a list of potential Earth twins or cousins,' lead author Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb said. TRAPPIST-1 d is a rocky planet in a seven-world system 40 light-years away. Orbiting a cool red dwarf at just 2 per cent of Earth's distance from the Sun, it sits at the inner edge of the star's temperate, or 'Goldilocks,' zone and completes an orbit every four Earth days, NASA noted. NIRSpec observations showed no spectral fingerprints of key atmospheric molecules. Piaulet-Ghorayeb outlined scenarios that remain possible: an extremely thin atmosphere like Mars; a cloud-shrouded world akin to Venus that hides gases from detection; or a bare, airless rock. 'There are a few potential reasons why we don't detect an atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1 d,' she said. Frequent high-energy flares from the system's red dwarf star can strip atmospheres from close-in planets, making retention particularly difficult. Even so, scientists continue to probe the TRAPPIST-1 worlds because red dwarfs are the most common stars in the Milky Way, NASA said. 'We're really just getting started… and to define the line between planets that can hold onto an atmosphere, and those that cannot,' added co-author Björn Benneke. Webb observations of planets e, f, g and h are underway. Their greater distance from the star could improve the odds of intact atmospheres, though colder conditions make detections tougher, according to NASA. 'All hope is not lost for atmospheres around the TRAPPIST-1 planets,' Piaulet-Ghorayeb said. 'As NASA leads the way in searching for life outside our solar system, one of the most important avenues we can pursue is understanding which planets retain their atmospheres, and why,' said Shawn Domagal-Goldman, acting director of NASA's Astrophysics Division. Results from Webb lay groundwork for future missions like the Habitable Worlds Observatory. (With inputs from NASA's official website)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store