Are Americans following MAHA push to eliminate synthetic food dyes?
(NewsNation) — Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s push to crack down on synthetic food dyes in school lunches is resonating with parents who say they have seen the negative effects firsthand.
Brandon and Whitney Cawood set out to examine the research on synthetic dyes in a new documentary, 'To Dye For,' after seeing their own son's disturbing reaction.
'We kind of had this Dr. Jekyll-Mr. Hyde thing going on, where he was really struggling with aggression and just emotions and anger,' Brandon Cawood told NewsNation.
Whitney Cawood said their son's behavior changed once they eliminated synthetic dyes.
Texas investigating cereal giant Kellogg over food dye use
'Within 48 hours, that child that we had on those good days, we had that child for 30 days straight,' she said. 'When I started to dig in, there was a lot of research.'
The couple felt so strongly that they became first-time filmmakers to help others learn about the potentially harmful food additives.
Some people interviewed for the documentary think synthetic dyes can even increase suicidal thoughts.
'When you're on dyes, [thoughts] get loud. They get to be like, 'Hey, are you sure you want to be alive right now?' Alexander Bevans, a student at Western Nevada College, said in the film trailer.
West Virginia becomes first to ban artificial food dyes
Testimony like that is one of the reasons Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is touring the country to 'Make America Healthy Again,' calling for major changes to the food we eat.
Kennedy was in Arizona on Tuesday, where officials are trying to cut ultraprocessed food ingredients out of school lunches.
But how much are Americans paying attention to the national conversation about chemical dyes and ultraprocessed foods? NewsNation spoke to several people in Miami, Florida, who had different views.
'I would really appreciate it if the U.S. government cared more about what was in our food,' said Amanda Lewan.
Another man, Nick Jackson, called food dyes 'poison.'
Someone else, who didn't want to be named, didn't think the government should have control over people's diets.
Last month, West Virginia became the first state to pass a sweeping ban on artificial food dyes, and lawmakers in more than 20 states are pushing to restrict access to dyes to some degree.
As for the Cawoods, they're excited the topic has grown into a broader national conversation.
'Both Republicans and Democrats are getting behind it, and I think that's a beautiful thing,' Whitney Cawood said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans to Omit Medicare Advantage Cuts in Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) — Senate Republicans are proposing cuts to the Medicaid program for low-income and disabled people that are more aggressive than policies the House passed to help pay for President Donald Trump's sweeping tax package, according to people familiar with the legislation. As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space As American Architects Gather in Boston, Retrofits Are All the Rage Notably, the Senate abandoned efforts to cut costs in the Medicare program that provides health insurance to people over age 65 and the disabled. The decision is good news for Humana Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Inc., which are major players in the Medicare Advantage insurance market. Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana had pushed to clamp down on private Medicare Advantage insurers by making it harder to game the federal subsidy system by exaggerating the health challenges their enrollees face. But Cassidy's proposal faced some opposition among Republicans. The Senate plan — slated to be released on Monday — solidifies congressional Republicans' decision to cut funding for Medicaid health insurance for the poor to pay for tax cuts, which Democrats are eager to attack them for ahead of next year's midterm elections. Republicans are eager to portray the cost savings as reductions to 'fraud, waste, and abuse' in the programs, though the changes would also lead to millions of people losing health insurance. Senate Finance Committee Republicans did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Senate went further than the House's proposal to limit the options states have to fund their share of Medicaid. The House bill would set a moratorium on new or increased taxes on medical providers, while the draft Senate bill would cut the amount that states that have not expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act can tax health care providers to help fund their programs, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss a plan that is not yet public. The Senate proposal would gradually limit states to taxing providers at 3.5% of facilities' net revenues from treating patients from the current level of 6%. In the Senate proposal, non-expansion states, such as Texas and Florida, would be frozen at current tax rates, they said. Some states tax health care providers, such as hospitals, to help raise money for state Medicaid budgets. Critics say limiting provider tax rates would simultaneously curb states' ability to pay their higher tab as a result of the reductions to federal matching funds. In the House proposal, states would also be limited from seeking new payments for providers that exceed Medicare payment rates. The House allowed higher rates for states that haven't yet expanded Medicaid under the ACA. The Senate proposal goes further, and reduces all state-directed payments gradually for expansion states to Medicare rates, and to 110% of Medicare rates for non-expansion states. Senate Republicans plan to drop policies that would modestly change how pharmacy middlemen called pharmacy benefit managers do business in Medicare. They also plan to omit a proposal to boost pay for doctors in the Medicare program that had been included in the House proposal, the people said. The PBM policy change is likely positive for Cigna Group and CVS Health Corp., which own two of the largest PBMs in the country. Because the House and Senate versions of the legislation differ, the legislation would need to pass the House again before it goes to the president's desk. How much to cut health care programs has been one of the major points of contention in assembling the tax package. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants US Allies and Adversaries Are Dodging Trump's Tariff Threats As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
33 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Dismissed members of CDC vaccine committee call Kennedy's actions 'destabilizing'
NEW YORK (AP) — All 17 experts recently dismissed from a government vaccine advisory panel published an essay Monday decrying 'destabilizing decisions" made by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that could lead to more preventable disease spread. Kennedy last week announced he would 'retire' the entire panel that guides U.S. vaccine policy. He also quietly removed Dr. Melinda Wharton — the veteran Centers for Disease Control and Prevention official who coordinated the committee's meetings. Two days later, he named eight new people to the influential panel. The list included a scientist who criticized COVID-19 vaccines, a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns and someone who worked with a group widely considered to be a leading source of vaccine misinformation. 'We are deeply concerned that these destabilizing decisions, made without clear rationale, may roll back the achievements of U.S. immunization policy, impact people's access to lifesaving vaccines, and ultimately put U.S. families at risk of dangerous and preventable illnesses,' the 17 panelists wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The new committee is scheduled to meet next week. The agenda for that meeting has not yet been posted, but a recent federal notice said votes are expected on vaccinations against flu, COVID-19, HPV, RSV and meningococcal bacteria. The removal of Wharton and CDC immunization staff cuts will make it hard for a group of new outside advisers to quickly come up to speed and make fact-based decisions about what vaccines to recommend and not recommend to the public, the experts said. 'The termination of all members and its leadership in a single action undermines the committee's capacity to operate effectively and efficiently, aside from raising questions about competence,' they wrote. Kennedy, a leading voice in the anti-vaccine movement before becoming the U.S. government's top health official, has accused the committee of being too closely aligned with vaccine manufacturers and of rubber-stamping vaccines. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the CDC director on how vaccines that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration should be used. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations, which are widely heeded by doctors and guide vaccination programs. ACIP policies require members to state past collaborations with vaccine companies and to recuse themselves from votes in which they had a conflict of interest, but Kennedy has dismissed those safeguards as weak.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Senate version of Trump agenda cuts more from Medicaid: GOP aides
The Senate's version of a bill to enact President Trump's agenda goes further than a House-passed bill to reduce Medicaid spending, according to GOP aides familiar with the legislation. GOP aides say it will go further to tighten Medicaid eligibility requirements and to restrict states from using health care provider taxes to draw down more federal Medicaid funding. 'It's still f'd up,' said a GOP aide about the Senate's Medicaid legislation, which does nothing to alleviate the concerns of several Senate Republicans who raised objections to the Medicaid language in the House-passed bill. At least four Republican senators have publicly raised concerns that Medicaid spending cuts passed by the House could hurt their constituents: Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Josh Hawley (R), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska). Senate GOP leaders can afford to lose only three votes and still pass the party-line bill. A broad range of GOP senators, including Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Sens. Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mike Lee (Utah) and Rick Scott (Fla.) had called for more deficit reduction in the bill, which is expected to spend roughly $150 billion on border security and immigration enforcement and increase defense spending by another $150 billion.
