What India need to plan for in the second Test against England
Bumrah's likely absence is one of the main things the Indian team has to contend with, after going down 1-0 in the five-match Test series. Defeat in the first Test would have been particularly galling because India dominated that match for large parts. However, they could not shut England out of the game and paid the price.
IND vs ENG: Why did India pick a bowling combination they had little faith in for a high-stakes Test series?
While Gill was very clear that a call on Bumrah would be taken as late as possible, the indications were that India would be without their best bowler - and indeed the world's best bowler - for the second Test at Edgbaston.
The captain and the coaching staff have repeatedly said that Bumrah was going to be available for only three Tests. It makes sense, then, to have him play the third Test at Lord's rather than this one.
Unless Bumrah can actually play four Tests instead of three. But if he can, it would mean Bumrah plays three consecutive Tests, because the gap between the fourth and fifth Test is too small for Bumrah to play both. Assuming he does not play, the question India have to wrestle with is, how best to take 20 wickets.
'It is difficult, but at the end of the day, we have picked the best players in India in this squad,' Gill said on the eve of the second Test. 'It's not impossible. The other bowlers have also performed well, that's why they are playing for the country. We have a great pool of talent.
He added, 'We knew before the series that he would only be playing three Test matches, so we had all the different combinations we might go with, depending on the pitch. You definitely do miss your best bowler if he's not playing, but we had that sorted before the series.'
Can India bring in Kuldeep Yadav as their spinner, because he is India's best wicket-taking option after Bumrah? The issue is, the other two spinners - Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar - offer much more with the bat. And India will be wanting some batting insurance after two spectacular lower-order collapses in the first Test.
'If you are going with an extra spinner, the only thing you have to see is how do you manage him on Day 1, if you are bowling on Day 1,' explained Gill. 'If at all, there is anything on these kinds of pitches, it is on Day 1 in the first couple of sessions. The main call you have to take is how to manage your spinner on Day 1.'
However, England's unusually hot summer has made it easier to contemplate a two-spinner attack.
'You don't usually see two spinners playing in England, but the weather has not been typical. It's been quite hot,' said Gill. 'Last game also, we felt that if we had another spinner in the fourth innings, the game could have been closer. When the ball gets old, we also felt it's easier for spinners to contain runs than the fast bowlers. Maybe a second spinner on these pitches, even if they can't take wickets, they can contain the scoring till the second new ball becomes available. If we get a similar wicket to the first Test, then a second spinner won't be a bad option.
'Our first priority on these pitches is always how we can get 20 wickets, rather than playing that extra batter.'
So Gill left the door open for India to include Kuldeep. However, he also pointed out how that would be tricky if India finds themselves bowling on Day 1.
Gill was also categorical in saying that the team could not afford to repeat the sloppiness from the first Test - collapsing with the bat, spilling too many catches, and not bowling consistently.
'We did play well in a lot of moments, but in certain moments, we didn't just play badly, we played very badly,' he said. 'You cannot have a phase that is so bad that you are out of the game.'
India have said the right words and prepared in the right manner for the second Test. Now they'll need to translate that to results on the field.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
12 minutes ago
- NDTV
Shubman Gill's Strange Reason Behind Not Picking Kuldeep Yadav For 2nd India vs England Test
Ravichandran Ashwin 's exit from the Indian team seemed to have paved the way for Kuldeep Yadav to cement a spot in India's Test team but India head coach Gautam Gambhir and skipper Shubman Gill seem to have other ideas. Despite being tempted to play second spinner in the second Test against England at Edgbaston, the Gill-Gambhir duo decided to snub Kuldeep, and instead picked Washington Sundar in the team. When asked about the reason behind snubbing Kuldeep, arguably a better spinner than Sundar, Gill cited 'batting depth as the reason'. "We were tempted to play Kuldeep (Yadav) but decided to add some depth to the batting," he said. Earlier, former India cricketer Mohammad Kaif had said that it would be 'unfair' if Kuldeep isn't picked in the team. It will be unfair if Kuldeep Yadav doesn't get into the playing XI for second Test. He has just played 13 Tests in 8 years. Earlier he was kept out because of Ashwin now how do you justify his exclusion. — Mohammad Kaif (@MohammadKaif) July 1, 2025 Gautam Gambhir seems to have played a role in Sundar's selection over Kuldeep too. The head coach's admiration for the spin-bowling all-rounder isn't hidden from anyone. It is also well known that Gambhir prefers a utility player like Sundar over a one-dimensional player like Kuldeep. It was also confirmed that India's pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah will return to the playing eleven against England in the third Test at Lord's next week after sitting out of the second match in Edgbaston, captain Shubman Gill said on Wednesday. Bumrah was rested from the second Test, which began here on Wednesday, as part of his workload management. He played in the first Test at Leeds which India lost by five wickets. "Third Test being at Lord's, we think there'll be more in that pitch so we'll use him there," Gill said at the toss for the second game here. The third Test is scheduled to start on July 10. The Indian team management had declared at the start of the series that Bumrah will only play in three Tests out of five.
News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
R Praggnanandhaa Explains Why Top Players Favour Rapid Over Classical Chess
R Praggnanandhaa notes Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura are moving away from classical chess due to its demands. He prefers rapid and blitz formats. Teenage Indian Grandmaster R Praggnanandhaa believes that players like Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura are gradually moving away from classical chess due to the mental and physical exhaustion associated with playing the long format for extended periods. Magnus, a five-time world champion, and world No.2 American Grandmaster Nakamura have been playing fewer classical games, opting instead for freestyle, rapid, and blitz formats. Praggnanandhaa, who has won three major classical titles this year, feels players do not particularly enjoy the extensive hours of preparation required for classical chess and find rapid and blitz more satisfying. '"It's difficult to play classical chess because everyone is well prepared… the opening preparation part is huge in classical chess. If you compare it to freestyle, you don't have to prepare before a game, while in classical chess, you're basically forced to. 'I don't think anyone actually enjoys that process, but you're forced to and you have to have a plan for everything. That requires a lot of effort," said Praggnanandhaa, who has won the Tata Steel Masters, Superbet Classic, and Uz Chess Cup this year. Why Classical Over Blitz? The 19-year-old from Chennai believes that the chances of burnout increase with years of playing classical chess. 'And when you play a lot of such tournaments, then your energy is also (drained)… I mean you can also be mentally and physically exhausted. So all these things happen. I think that's the reason why everyone prefers other formats," Praggnanandhaa said. 'I mean, I myself like freestyle much more because of the fact that you don't have to prepare before a game. That doesn't mean we don't want to work on (our) chess. We enjoy working on chess. 'But the fact that you have to (put endless hours in preparations)… you're forced to do before the game like three-four hours of preparation, then it's not really something that everyone enjoys. So yeah, I like freestyle. I like rapid and it's a bit more than classical for sure. But I think classical is still the main thing." Praggnanandhaa credits his professional growth to the support provided by the Adani Group over the last year and a half. 'Adani Sportsline have been supporting me for the last one-and-a-half years already. And it's quite important because we do travel a lot and training is also expensive than what people think," says Praggnanandhaa. 'For example, last year, I played in the Candidates, which required a team to help and then also like in-person camps. So all these things require support and that's where I think the Adani group has been supporting me in a huge way. 'And they were also there when I didn't have (a good) last year; they were there supporting me throughout. So, yeah, a huge thanks to them." (With inputs from PTI) About the Author Ritayan Basu First Published: July 02, 2025, 16:40 IST
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
R Praggnanandhaa explains why players like Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura are moving away from classical chess
With players like Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura gradually moving away from playing classical chess, Indian Grandmaster R Praggnanandhaa said that it was likely due to the mental and physical exhaustion that comes as a part of playing the format. 'It's difficult to play classical chess because everyone is well prepared… the opening preparation part is huge in classical chess. If you compare it to freestyle, you don't have to prepare before a game, while in classical chess, you're basically forced to. I don't think anyone actually enjoys that process, but you're forced to and you have to have a plan for everything. That requires a lot of effort,' said Praggnanandhaa. 'And when you play a lot of such tournaments, then your energy is also (drained)… I mean you can also be mentally and physically exhausted. So all these things happen. I think that's the reason why everyone prefers other formats. I mean, I myself like freestyle much more because of the fact that you don't have to prepare before a game. That doesn't mean we don't want to work on (our) chess. We enjoy working on chess. But the fact that you have to (put endless hours in preparations)… you're forced to do before the game like three-four hours of preparation, then it's not really something that everyone enjoys. So yeah, I like freestyle. I like rapid and it's a bit more than classical for sure. But I think classical is still the main thing,' he added. Magnus, the five-time world champion, and world No.2 American Grandmaster Nakamura have played fewer classical games, and instead focused on freestyle, rapid and blitz formats. Praggnanandhaa has won three tournaments already this year, including the Tata Steel Chess tournament in Wijk aan Zee in February and the Superbet Chess Classic Romania in May earlier in the year. The 19-year old also gained 12 rating points, thanks to his performance at the UzChess Cup tournament in Tashkent, which helped him climb to the world no 4 spot for the first time in his career in the latest FIDE ratings list released by the global governing body of chess on July 1.
