Shocking footage from rural Australia shows bulldozers tearing up vineyards
In the Riverina region of NSW, grapevines are being ripped from the ground as the market is overwhelmed by a massive oversupply of wine that simply isn't selling.
Known for its Mediterranean-style climate and top-quality Chardonnay, Sémillon and Shiraz, the Riverina is now at the heart of a crisis threatening Australia's $45 billion wine industry.
A perfect storm of falling demand, particularly among younger Australians, and crippling Chinese tariffs which were only lifted in March 2024 has pushed the industry to breaking point, with industry leaders now calling it an 'oversupply crisis'.
Jeremy Cass, CEO of Riverina Winegrape Growers (RWG), said many growers have been forced to operate at massive losses for four years, particularly those producing red varieties.
'Our industry is in a real crisis due to the oversupply caused by the Chinese tariffs that were imposed after Scott Morrison challenged China on COVID yet support from the government has been sorely lacking,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
Some growers are out of pocket up to $150,000 a year, Mr Cass said, just to stay afloat, and many are now ripping up vineyards that cost up to $35,000 per hectare to plant.
RWG chair Bruno Brombal said growers need to start making 'difficult but necessary decisions' now to avoid another season of devastating financial loss.
'Whether the decision is to reduce plantings, exit part of the business, or adapt in other ways, growers need to be having these conversations now before they're locked into another season of loss,' Mr Brombal said.
While demand from China is showing signs of recovery, many inland growers have been left behind as consumers both overseas and at home chase trendier alternatives like seltzers, spirits, and so-called 'functional beverages.'
Wine now ranks last among preferred drinks for younger Aussies, with Gen Z turning away from alcohol altogether in favour of 'sober-curious' lifestyles and health-conscious choices.
Even major wineries are scrambling to adapt, experimenting with wine cocktails, liquor-wine blends, and low-alcohol options to stay relevant.
'Australian Grape and Wine has put in a prebudget submission to government two years in a row for $85 million, $30 million of which is earmarked to help some growers transfer to other crops,' he said.
'This has been ignored but we see government spend $70 million a year for 10 years so that we can get an NRL team from Papua New Guinea.'
Australia is home to 2,156 wineries and more than 6,000 grape growers, supporting nearly 165,000 jobs.
But with red wine fetching just 50 cents per bladder in some cases, the bottom has fallen out.
Globally, wine consumption has dropped by 3.1 billion litres in five years - a shift that's rocked even the world's most established producers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Qantas has devalued its frequent flyer points. What should you do now?
Qantas was back in the spotlight this week with news that affected members of its frequent flyer program. The airline has made significant changes to its loyalty program, effectively devaluing its frequent flyer points. While we don't know the full extent or the specifics of the changes, airline loyalty program experts estimate a 20% average increase in the number of points needed to redeem a seat. Qantas has given us a few examples, including that a Classic Rewards economy seat on a Sydney-Melbourne flight has risen to 9,200 points plus $55 in fees, from 8,000 points plus $55 in fees. So, will the Qantas promise of more rewards seats available to flyers make the additional expense worth it? Or are people better off spending their points on shopping instead of flights? Flagging the changes in January, the chief executive officer of the frequent flyer program, Andrew Glance, said: 'A lot has changed in the last six years.' He suggested the changes would mean the airline could increase the number of Classic Rewards and Classic Plus Rewards seats available to be booked with frequent flyer points. Qantas has for some time fielded complaints about the scarcity of Classic Rewards seats in general, especially in premium classes. The airline has acknowledged the changes would force many members to spend more points and more cash on fees. However, Qantas said it hadn't adjusted the value of its loyalty scheme since 2019, and that the August changes were only the second since 2004. Daniel Sciberras, who works for the guide website Point Hacks, says the latest increase is 'relatively reasonable', even if customers aren't happy about it, because the program 'needs to remain viable'. In his view, this is because the average 15% to 20% jump in the number of points needed to book flights works out to about a 2% to 3% rise a year since 2019 – roughly in line with inflation. The specifics of what each Classic Rewards seat will cost under the new scheme have not yet been revealed. However, Sciberras says his tips for consumers in general haven't changed. He says there's no difference to 'the general rule' – that redeeming points for premium seats on long-haul fights is the 'best bang for your point'. 'So, you're still going to get great value when it comes to flights, especially in those long-haul premium cabins.' He says people are generally better off redeeming points on business-class seats than paying for an economy seat and using points to get an upgrade. His advice remains the same when it comes to domestic bookings too: use your points on routes with less competition. Sciberras says this is because busy domestic routes with lots of competition – such as flights between Sydney, Brisbane and Adelaide – generally have lower ticket prices. The amount of points needed to redeem a seat is fixed, and based on distance, he says. This means you're better off using points to book domestic flights that would otherwise be more expensive, such as to destinations like Hamilton Island, Uluru or Broome. Not if you want to get the best value for money, Sciberras says. 'You're always going to get more value by redeeming your points for flights than other things: accommodation, car hire, anything from the shopping mall,' he says. This is because points – when worked out in dollar terms – end up being worth more when used to book flights, he says. Sciberras says points usually work out to be about 1c in value when used to book flights. 'But … if you want to get a $50 gift card, it'll be like 10,000 points, right? That gives you half a cent in value,' he says. 'Short-haul domestic might be only around 0.7c per point, so it's not much more. But if you're going international first class, you could get 4c or 5c in value, or even more per point.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘No clear explanation': businesses reliant on Meta struggle in the wake of wrongful suspensions
This time of the year is typically the busy booking season for Sam Enticknap, a makeup artist based in Margaret River, Western Australia. But the phone has stopped ringing since her Instagram account, which had 48,000 followers, was suspended without notice by Meta three weeks ago. 'I received a horrible email saying a reference to child sexual exploitation content, which obviously was quite traumatic to see,' she said. 'Saying my Instagram accounts have been disabled with just no clear explanation.' Enticknap estimates that, as a result of her account being wrongly suspended, she has lost 80% of the bookings she otherwise would have leading into the busy wedding season in Margaret River. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'A lot of people come through Instagram, they find hashtags and they find word of mouth, and obviously through other businesses that always tag us,' she said. Enticknap said it made her realise how reliant she was on Meta for business. She said she lost two Instagram accounts and a Facebook account as a result of the permanent suspension, and said attempts to contact the company to have the ban appealed had resulted in a 'dead end'. She said she was not alone, citing another Western Australian business – which sells artificial flowers – which had been suspended from Meta platforms and received the same reference to child sexual exploitation. 'My friend who has another successful makeup business, she went down the week after me, but she's managed to get her account back,' Enticknap said. Incorrect account suspensions on social media platforms are not a new phenomenon. Often when Meta is asked by media about an account, it is later restored. However, something changed in July. A flood of emails were sent to journalists from people all over the world saying that, without warning, their Facebook and Instagram accounts had been suspended. Many were told – erroneously – by Meta that their accounts had been suspended for breaching community standards on child sexual exploitation, abuse and nudity. Users report Meta has typically been unresponsive to their pleas for assistance, often with standardised responses to requests for review, almost all of which have been rejected. There are petitions with tens of thousands of signatures, a subreddit devoted to people who have had their accounts disabled and talk of a class action against Meta over the bans. From around a dozen emails received in the past two weeks, Guardian Australia has reported five accounts – including Enticknap's to Meta, which said it had internally escalated the investigation of those accounts. Media reporting of the plight of businesses struggling as a result of their Instagram ban has led to many of those accounts being restored. But the company claims there has not been an increase in incorrect account suspension, and the volume of users complaining was not indicative of new targeting or over-enforcement. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We take action on accounts that violate our policies, and people can appeal if they think we've made a mistake,' a spokesperson for Meta said. Meta is reliant on a mix of human reports and automation to find and remove accounts in breach of its rules. The company publishes data on how many accounts it removes – and data on how many it subsequently restores – in its quarterly community standards enforcement report. However, the latest report only covers to the end of March, so it can't yet be judged whether the company has had a significant uptick in removed accounts or appeals. For Enticknap, the suspension carries an emotional weight. Her father died this year, and the photos and messages her father uploaded to Facebook cannot be accessed. 'I've tried to message and just say: 'Can I just get my data? Can I just get that? Shut me down, but let me get those pictures back',' she said. 'But nothing. I've not had any reply.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Arsenic in the damper, campers driven off a cliff: the murky historical links of AACo, Australia's largest beef producer
Warning: This article contains historical records that use racist and offensive language, and descriptions of events that will be distressing to some readers. It also contains references to Indigenous Australians who have died In a bustling Newcastle suburb there is a large park where families gather under giant fig trees. Few know it is named after a man who killed Aboriginal people. Gregson park was given to the local council in 1889 by Jesse Gregson, then the head of one of the nation's most important enterprises, the Australian Agricultural Company. AACo, today worth about $830m, is still Australia's largest beef producer, with stations covering almost 1% of the nation's land mass. Its majority shareholder is the UK billionaire Joe Lewis, whose family own Tottenham Hotspur, followed by the Australian mining magnate Andrew Forrest and his ex-wife, Nicola Forrest. An investigation as part of Guardian Australia's the Descendants series has revealed the company's historical links with the dispossession, shooting and poisoning of Aboriginal people – through the exploits of Gregson before he joined the company, and others who helped establish its farming operations in the 19th century. The discoveries raise complex questions about how longstanding Australian companies can reckon with past harms. Before Gregson joined AACo in the 1870s, he managed a sheep station in central Queensland where he perpetrated a series of massacres that unleashed a bloody war. Gregson arrived at Rainworth station, 300km inland from Rockhampton, in June 1861. Queensland had become a self-governing colony two years earlier and the frontier was moving north, assisted by the notorious native police – contingents of Aboriginal troopers led by white officers tasked with protecting the livelihoods of settlers and punishing Aboriginal resistance. As Gregson and his workers approached the station, they were greeted by Aboriginal people. 'We had been met by blacks who made overtures of peace by attaching white feathers to our horses' bridles or anywhere they could stick them,' the pastoralist wrote in his memoirs. 'As soon as the drays reached the camp I gave the blacks to understand that they must keep clear which they did good humouredly enough.' The next month he and the native police went looking for some missing sheep, finding them on the side of a ridge with a Gayiri tribe. They opened fire. Gregson describes the encounter as a 'brush' but native police records show at least four Gayiri people were shot. Months later, on the property next to Gregson's, the Gayiri responded by killing 19 men, women and children – including the Victorian sheep farmer Horatio Wills, the father of Australian rules football co-founder Tom Wills. It was Queensland's largest massacre of white settlers by Aboriginal people. Gregson assembled a group of settlers to track those he believed to be responsible. Finding them within days, they shot the sleeping tribe, killing at least 30. More reprisals would follow, led by native police and vigilantes, wiping out about 300 Aboriginal people. There are various theories about what provoked the Wills massacre but the commonly held view among historians, Indigenous knowledge holders and Wills' descendants is that the encounter with Gregson and the native police was a tipping point. It is believed that the Gayiri thought Horatio Wills was Gregson's brother, and therefore an appropriate target for retribution. About a decade later Gregson moved to Newcastle in New South Wales to take up the position of superintendent of AACo. He remains the company's longest-serving superintendent, holding the position for 30 years and wrote one of the first histories of the company. Darryl Black, a Bidjara and Ghungalu man from central Queensland who learnt of the massacres from his father, said Gregson 'wasn't a very good person at all'. He described Gregson's appointment to the prestigious company as his 'reward' for opening up the region to farming and grazing. Founded in 1824, AACo is the oldest continuously operating company in Australia. It was established by an act of British parliament when a handful of UK politicians, banking directors and business leaders were granted 1m acres of land around Port Stephens to raise sheep for fleece to be sold on the London market. The Worimi historian John Maynard wrote that the company's arrival on his ancestors' country at a time when his people were being ravaged by violence and disease was both a lifeline and 'another means of enforced organised brutality'. The company employed Aboriginal people as stockmen, sailors, constables and domestic workers. When AACo experienced convict labour shortages, the company's records show that Aboriginal workers helped fill the gap and were an essential part of its success. Historical reports link the company to at least two shooting attacks on Aboriginal people near Newcastle in the Hunter Valley region, in 1830 and 1835, in retaliation for the spearing of shepherds and livestock. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In the later encounter, according to a 1922 newspaper article, soldiers retained by AACo joined local vigilantes in tracking an Aboriginal group who had speared five shepherds. The soldiers, fearing ambush, stopped before the rest of the group fired on the sleeping camp at a cliff's edge – but according to the report later re-engaged to hunt down survivors. 'Maddened with fear under the gunfire they broke hither and thither in vain attempts to escape,' the article says of the clifftop encounter. 'Panic stricken they turned to the cliff edge and sprang into space.' About the same time, the same article claims that a group of convicts employed on an AACo station poisoned a group of Aboriginal people in retaliation for raids on cattle, by giving them damper laced with arsenic. It says they 'lay down and died all around'. The modern-day suburb of Belbora (from the Worimi Baal Bora) is said to be named after the tragedy, meaning 'a place to be shunned'. AACo eventually sold its NSW properties and moved into cattle production. Today it holds 7m hectares across the Northern Territory and Queensland, including two properties within an hour of Gregson's former station. An AACo spokesperson told Guardian Australia: 'We won't and can't comment on historical matters, especially given we don't have access to records from the time.' Most of the company's records, dating back to 1824, are held at the Australian National University. Last year, to mark its 200th anniversary, the company held an exhibition showcasing its history through archival photos, maps, drawings and papers held at the university. The exhibition's section on Aboriginal history said the Worimi people had been largely displaced by cedar getters (convicts who harvested timber) before AACo was established, but said the company 'would also have displaced some of the local Worimi'. James Fitzgerald, a legal consultant for the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said companies had an obligation to confront the 'evils of the past'. 'Just creeping along as though nothing happened is moral cowardice, particularly when it's an enterprise that's making money off dispossession,' he said. 'The more a company's wealth is built on that sort of dispossession, I would have thought, the greater its obligation to take account of that as a decent corporate citizen in 2025.' Fitzgerald said there were comparable cases where mining companies had made reparations through apologies, working with traditional owners to improve cultural heritage management, setting Indigenous employment targets or negotiating financial compensation. The AACo spokesperson said the company had built 'trusted relationships' with many traditional custodians across the properties managed. 'We recognise their culture and deep connection to Country and work with them to ensure we engage respectfully,' they said. Joe Lewis, through a spokesperson, declined to comment to Guardian Australia. Andrew and Nicola Forrest did not respond to questions. Fitzgerald said the 1992 Mabo verdict, which recognised Indigenous peoples' rights to their land, raised complex questions for Australian companies that had built their wealth on land taken from and cleared of Aboriginal people. 'If you keep pulling at the thread long enough, it implicates the entire basis of our sovereign state economy,' he said. 'We are all the beneficiaries of these actions in one way or another, whether as real property owners, shareholders or super fund members.' Indigenous Australians can call 13YARN on 13 92 76 for information and crisis support; or call Lifeline on 13 11 14, Mensline on 1300 789 978 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636 Lorena Allam is a professor at the Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous research at the University of Technology Sydney
