Locals in Pakistani Kashmir Fear Being the First to Face India's Ire
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
On Pakistan's Side of Kashmir, Locals Fear They'll Be the First to Face India's Ire
Many in the region are preparing for a possible military confrontation between India and Pakistan because of a terrorist attack two weeks ago.
Learn more
Listen to this article · 7:01 min
Share full article
A giant sign extolling love for Kashmir in Muzaffarabad, the capital of the Pakistani-administered side of the disputed region, belies the tension reignited after a deadly attack on the Indian side of Kashmir.
Credit...
Saiyna Bashir for The New York Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
As Harvard fights Trump admin in court, professors are quietly dropping courses
Jules Riegel, a lecturer in History and Literature, planned to teach a course in the fall at Harvard University on global transgender history. Now they are opting out of teaching the course due to fears of content-based retaliation and fears for their students' safety and as an openly transgender individual, according to a Monday court filing. 'I have had to reevaluate how I can safely teach courses on topics including global transgender history, World War II and the Holocaust,' Riegel said. Riegels' decision comes at a time when Harvard University says it is fighting in federal court to protect its academic freedom, aiming to push back billions of dollars in funding cuts executed by the federal government. The Harvard faculty chapter of the American Association of University Professors is also suing the federal government in a separate lawsuit. Riegel's commentary is included in court documents on the case. Both Harvard and the association submitted motions for summary judgment on Monday. As a non-tenure-track faculty member, Riegel said they are worried the Trump administration's goal of 'reducing the power held by students and untenured faculty,' as stated in an April 11 letter. They are concerned about having 'even less control around my curriculum, such as hindering my ability to determine my own course content, or being forced to teach content with which I disagree,' they said. 'I am fearful for the safety of my students, especially international students or students with immigrant backgrounds, including their ability to engage with critical scholarship around the Holocaust and transgender history,' Riegel said. 'Because of the administration's actions, I could not in good conscience recommend that doctoral applicants attend Harvard right now,' they said. Riegel isn't alone in altering course plans. Read more: Harvard foreign students feel like 'poker chips,' consider transfer after Trump attacks An anonymous faculty member in the court filing also changed their teaching plans for next semester due to fears of harassment. The professor, a member of the faculty of arts and sciences, planned to teach a course addressing the lead-up to the U.S. Civil War, according to a court filing from Harvard professor Kirsten Weld. However, they felt like the topic would be considered a part of diversity, equity and inclusion programing due to its focus on slavery, settler colonialism, Indian removal and the U.S.-Mexico War. The professor was concerned that they would face false accusations under Title VI — which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin — since the course would explore white supremacy in American history. They were also nervous that, because they had already experienced public targeting and harassment at Harvard due to being in support of pro-Palestine student protesters, greater emphasis could fall on them. For other Harvard professors, canceling courses isn't an option. One anonymous faculty member, who has been working at the medical school and has decades of clinical expertise, said they will be working outside of the U.S. next year and plan to eventually leave the country 'because they do not feel comfortable being at Harvard anymore.' The faculty member said their pro-Palestine advocacy and opinions make them a target at Harvard, according to the court filing. Harvard researchers are also being discouraged from publishing in scholarly and public-facing materials on topics opposed by the federal government, according to Weld's court filing. Since the attacks against Harvard, the American Association of University Professors has had to prioritize training on digital surveillance and information security and a Know Your Rights workshop, using up valuable resources for the organization. They also have had to hold twice as many meetings with members as they typically do to help navigate the Trump administration's actions, according to the court filing. Clark University to lay off up to 30% of faculty amid enrollment woes 'Incredibly ironic': Trump antisemitism effort may force out Harvard's Israeli Jews MIT bans class president who gave pro-Palestine speech from commencement Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too Harvard affinity group graduations held off campus amid 'capitulation' to Trump Read the original article on MassLive.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
A DNA technique is finding women who left their babies for dead
Advertisement Then, one day in 2023, his phone blew up. Former colleagues at the sheriff's department were calling to say that a 45-year-old woman, Maricela Frausto, had been identified as the baby's mother. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Frausto, a mother of two who owned a restaurant in nearby Hondo, Texas, with her family, had been identified using a relatively new technique known as forensic genetic genealogy. Using DNA data from thousands of volunteer donors, investigators can create family trees and use them to match DNA found at crime scenes. Frausto was arrested and charged with murder. Law enforcement investigators have been flummoxed for years by cases of newborn babies who were abandoned and apparently left to die. They are known as Baby Does: unidentified infants whose remains were discovered in wooded areas, garbage cans, or roadside ditches. Such cases historically have been hard to solve. Advertisement That changed around 2019, when police first used the enormous public DNA databases that have been created for amateur genealogists to trace their lineages as a resource to solve these crimes. Since then, law enforcement investigators have used the technique to identify nearly 40 women as the mothers of newborn infants who were found dead around the country, most of them decades ago. 'In the past, these cases were unlikely to be solved, and now it's very likely that they will be solved, and that's because of investigative genetic genealogy,' said Christi Guerrini, a professor of medical ethics at Baylor University. For police officers, these identifications help close cases that may have gone years without a resolution. But for the women being identified, many of whom have married, pursued careers, and given birth to other children, the new technology has brought the unearthing of long-hidden tragedies and the upending of their lives. At least two women among the dozens of cases reviewed by The New York Times took their own lives after being approached by investigators armed with DNA evidence. Others have been sentenced to years in prison. The circumstances that could have led a woman to abandon her newborn many years ago can be far more complicated than a simple DNA match can reveal, according to civil rights advocates, doctors, and defense lawyers. They say the new technique is raising questions that the courts are not yet prepared to answer. Some of the women who have been identified in these Baby Doe cases say they did not know they were pregnant until they went into labor. Some of the women who have been charged told police their baby was stillborn. Determining the truth of the matter can be difficult. Advertisement In the case of Frausto, who insisted that she had never heard her baby cry or take a breath, the medical examiner concluded that the baby was born alive on the basis of a lung test that has been widely criticized as unreliable. 'These women have been lumped in with other kinds of criminal cases, as though they're all the same,' said Diana Barnes, a psychotherapist who specializes in issues surrounding women's reproductive health. 'And I guess what I would say is that no, they're not all the same.' In the past, law enforcement officers working on Baby Doe cases relied on CODIS, the national DNA database run by the FBI, but that generally includes samples only from people who have been charged with crimes. Mothers of abandoned newborns typically have little, if any, criminal history, and thus are unlikely to appear in CODIS. Genetic genealogy now makes it possible to find them anyway. The breakthrough came in 2018 when police used the technique and the public DNA databases to identify a serial murderer known as the Golden State Killer. Less than a year later, police in Sioux Falls, S.D., announced that they had used genetic genealogy in a Baby Doe case, connecting a woman named Theresa Bentaas to the death of her newborn son in 1981. Frausto was 25 years old in September 2004, living in Hondo and married to an older man after growing up in an abusive household. According to what she later told her lawyers and an investigator who worked for them, she did not know she was pregnant. Advertisement One afternoon, she went to the bathroom and fainted, she told the lawyers. When she woke up in pain, she realized she was in labor. She gave birth, but never heard the baby make a sound. Confused and overwhelmed, she put the baby in a closet, her lawyers said. Two days later, she left the baby by the side of the road. After she was arrested nearly two decades later, she was adamant with her legal team: She did not kill her baby. But from the beginning, sheriff's deputies believed they were investigating a murder: The medical examiner had concluded that the baby was born alive. By the time genetic genealogy became a law enforcement tool, Springer had left the local sheriff's office, but other detectives had stayed on the case. In October 2022, working with a private forensic genetic genealogy company, Identifinders International, the detectives uploaded a DNA profile of the baby to two public genealogy databases. After a DNA analysis confirmed that Frausto was the baby's mother, she was arrested and charged with capital murder on Nov. 20, 2023. Frausto insisted that she had not killed her baby. Anthony Welch, one of the public defenders who represented Frausto, said that there was a strong case to be made that the baby had been stillborn, meaning that Frausto could not have been guilty of killing her. And the statute of limitations had long passed for any charges involving mishandling of human remains.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Politicians making final push for votes ahead of Holyrood by-election
Scotland's political leaders will hit the campaign trail for the final time today ahead of a Holyrood by-election. With voters in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse going to the polls on Thursday June 5, parties are making their final push for votes – with both First Minister John Swinney and the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar expected in the constituency on Wednesday. 🗳️ Less than 2 days before polls open in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse! Fab to speak to so many folk who are excited to vote for @KatyLoudonSNP this Thursday 💛 #ActiveSNP #TeamSNP #VoteSNP — Sarah Masson (@_sarahmasson) June 3, 2025 It comes in the wake of a campaign which has been, for the most part, dominated by the rise in support for Reform UK – and a row over one of the party's online adverts. The ad alleged that Mr Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community – but it was quickly branded racist by Labour, who together with rivals in the SNP demanded it should be taken down. Great to have @Nigel_Farage in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse today. Vote Reform. Get Reform. ✅ — Reform UK Scotland (@ReformUKScot) June 2, 2025 SNP leader and Scottish First Minister John Swinney meanwhile urged voters in the constituency to back his party in a bid to 'stop Nigel Farage'. His plea comes after an opinion poll in Scotland last month indicated Reform could come second in next year's Holyrood elections, ahead of both Labour and the Tories. On the doorstep, it is clear the SNP is completely failing communities in Scotland. Only Scottish Labour can beat the SNP in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. 🗳️Vote @DavyRussell4HLS on Thursday! — Elaine Stewart MP (@ElaineStewartMP) June 3, 2025 Speaking ahead of the by-election, which is taking place after the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie, Mr Swinney said that the campaign 'has made it crystal clear that the SNP is the only party listening to people and taking action on what matters to them'. The First Minister claimed: 'The Labour Party has lost its way and Keir Starmer's abject failure to deliver on his promises has led to the concerning rise of Nigel Farage across the UK – something that will worry many across Scotland. Just two days to go until the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election on Thursday 5th June 🗳️ It was great to be out yesterday in Larkhall to support @ScotTories candidate Richard Nelson. — Alex Burnett MSP (@AJABurnett) June 3, 2025 'Farage does not care about Scotland, and he also poses a threat to many of the things that we hold dear – our NHS, our parliament, and transformative policies like free tuition.' Mr Swinney insisted: 'This by-election is an opportunity to reject the politics of Farage and make sure Scotland's interests are front and centre, and only a vote for the SNP will do that.' However, Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie insisted: 'The Reform circus is nothing but a convenient distraction for the SNP – this by-election is a direct fight between Scottish Labour and the SNP.' A lot of people are frustrated that they have been let down by the SNP, Conservatives and Labour but it's the Liberal Democrats who are offering real change, not Reform. Last year's general election shows that we are winning again. If you want change, come with us. — Scottish Lib Dems (@scotlibdems) June 2, 2025 She said that Thursday's poll gives voters 'the chance to put this incompetent SNP government on notice and chart a new direction for the whole of Scotland'. Ms Baillie stated: 'The SNP's woeful record is plain to see here – chaos in local NHS services, high streets in decline, and a generation of young people let down. 'The SNP government has failed this community and Katy Loudon has made it clear she will toe the party line no matter what – but Davy Russell will be a tireless champion for the community he calls home.'
