France's plan to cull public holidays may not help the economy
Prime Minister Francois Bayrou has proposed scrapping two of the country's 11 public holidays as part of a deeply unpopular emergency plan to plug a budget hole. In his sights is Easter Monday and one of four bank holidays in May, a month Bayrou compared to Gruyère cheese for its many holes.
Bayrou's idea is that working two extra days will generate more economic output and therefore revenues for the government. Recent experience from elsewhere and various economic studies suggest it won't be as simple as that.
In 2023 Denmark abolished Great Prayer Day, a Christian holiday that fell on the fourth Friday after Easter and dated back to 1686, to great popular discontent.
On the surface, the sacrifice paid off. The number of hours worked by the average Dane fell by less than in previous years, according to Danske Bank.
Yet when it comes to economic output, which is what matters for public finances, the impact of the extra day was tiny at between 0.01% and 0.06%, according to IMF estimates.
France's statistical agency INSEE put the boost to GDP of Bayrou's proposal at a similarly negligible 0.06%.
This is because time off is not all bad.
Of course it slows down production, particularly for manufacturing companies.
But it is also considered key for mental and physical health, and typically proves a boost to sectors like tourism.
LEISURE CAN BE AN ECONOMIC BOOST
In fact, economic studies find that output increases along with the number of national holidays - but only up to a point.
One study of 101 countries by the Centre for Future Labour Market Studies in Malaysia put that sweet spot at nine or 10 public closures in a year.
"As the number of public holidays increases, initially economic growth increases, but after some optimal point, when the number of public holidays increases further, economic growth starts to decline," the researchers said in the 2023 study.
The exact number may depend on the make-up of a country's economy.
A study of the Italian economy, which like the French is dominated by services and has on average 12 public holidays in a year, found that economic output did not vary or even slightly increased in years with more closures, indicating it was close to its own sweet spot.
"Companies have fixed production targets and work around holidays," said author Francesco Maria Esposito, an assistant professor at the Birmingham Business School.
The situation was similar in Germany, where the calendar is set by the 16 states and ranges from 10 to 13 holidays.
The Dusseldorf-based Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK) found that German states that introduced a public holiday more often than not experienced stronger economic growth than those that cut one.
"The equation 'fewer holidays equals more growth' simply does not hold up," said Sebastian Dullien, IMK's scientific director.
Portugal scrapped four public holidays at the height of its debt crisis in 2012 -- only to reinstate them four years later.
(Additional reporting by Maria Martinez in Berlin and Leigh Thomas in Paris Editing by Mark John and Frances Kerry)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Crypto Insight
2 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
CoinShares secures French MiCA license, cementing EU presence
CoinShares, a major European cryptocurrency investment firm, has secured a license under the local regulatory framework, Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). CoinShares received the MiCA license through its French subsidiary, CoinShares Asset Management, the company announced on Wednesday. With the license, CoinShares became the 'first continental European regulated asset management company' to be qualified under MiCA, the announcement noted. CoinShares, a major provider of crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs) in Europe, has also been expanding its US presence since acquiring Valkyrie Funds last year. Triple license mix Following the new license acquisition, CoinShares now holds three regulatory licenses in Europe, including MiCA, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) license and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFM) license. CoinShares said it's the only continental European asset manager with this triple license, allowing it to offer services across all EU asset classes. CoinShares' MiCA license, issued by the French Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) on Thursday, allows the company to offer portfolio management and advice on crypto assets in the EU. The MiFID license allows it to do the same for traditional financial instruments. The AIFM license authorizes CoinShares to provide services in alternative fund management and delegated management under the EU's Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (UCITS). A milestone for entire EU industry According to CoinShares co-founder and CEO Jean-Marie Mognetti, the MiCA license acquisition marks a major milestone not only for CoinShares, but for the entire crypto industry in Europe. 'For too long, asset managers operating in crypto have been confined to partial or improvised regulatory frameworks,' Mognetti noted, adding that MiCA has brought a 'clear, harmonised structure across the EU.' CoinShares stressed that its MiCA license enables it to provide services across several EU jurisdictions, with operations currently passported in France, Germany, Cyprus, Ireland, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands. The announcement noted the possibility of extending the authorization across all EU member states. CoinShares makes moves in the US Apart from cementing its position as a key industry leader in the EU, CoinShares has also been actively working to compete with peers in the US market after officially entering the market in 2023. Since introducing the CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF (BTF) — a futures ETF tracking the price of Bitcoin and Ether — in the US in October 2021, CoinShares has launched three more crypto funds in the market. The list of CoinShares ETFs currently offered in the US. Source: CoinShares The other funds include the CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) launched in February 2022, the spot Bitcoin ETF, CoinShares Bitcoin ETF (BRRR), and the Bitcoin Futures Leveraged ETF (BTFX), launched in January 2024 and February 2024, respectively. Following last year's acquisition of Valkyrie Funds, CoinShares has also been actively applying for other ETF products in the US, including a potential spot XRP (XRP) ETF. Source:


Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Emirates introduces retrofitted Boeing 777 to Madrid
Emirates has announced it will deploy its newly refurbished Boeing 777 aircraft to/from Madrid starting from September 16. Customers can look forward to an enhanced travel experience with upgraded interiors and premium signature travel touches across all cabins. Madrid is Emirates' first destination in Spain to operate with the airline's next-generation interiors. Emirates' four-class Boeing 777 will operate as flight EK143/EK144. Emirates flight EK143 will depart Dubai at 14:30hrs and arrive in Madrid at 20:20hrs local time. The return flight, EK144 will depart Madrid at 22:05hrs and arrive in Dubai at 7:10hrs local time, the following day. The deployment of Emirates' retrofitted Boeing 777 to Madrid marks a new era of premium travel to the Spanish city - offering customers the airline's award-winning Premium Economy service, newly configured Business Class cabin, and a 'better' travel experience to/from the country. Emirates' newest Boeing 777 cabin interiors include: A refurbished First-Class cabin with upgraded interiors. New Business Class cabin that provides more privacy and comfort for customers with fully lie-flat seats in an updated 1-2-1 seating configuration. Latest Premium Economy cabin which combines accessible luxury with comfort; offering cream leather seats, increased legroom, adjustable headrests, deeper seat recline and raised cushioned leg rests. Spacious Economy Class seats with new design elements. Copyright 2024 Al Hilal Publishing and Marketing Group Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
The complex legacy of Srebrenica and why today's wars never seem to end
Earlier this month, the world commemorated the 30th anniversary of the Srebrenica genocide. The tears of the relatives of victims will not dry for as long as they live. What do they signify? A fundamental insight is that the past is always with us, and we fail to understand details at our peril. In Srebrenica's case, 19th-century Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman imperialism triggered unrest among subject Balkan populations. This was a factor in the First World War and led to a Serbian kingdom that was re-named Yugoslavia in 1929 and conquered by Nazi Germany in 1941. The successor postwar communist republic fell behind the Iron Curtain in 1945 and fragmented into six states in 1991. Thus, the Balkan states – like others elsewhere – have long formed and re-formed. The lesson for our 80-year-old United Nations age is that the sanctity of national boundaries is a recent innovation against history's repeated wars over land that has strong symbolic value everywhere. Nowadays, with 150 territorial disputes frozen, smouldering or raging worldwide, is it futile to find definitive solutions? Perhaps diplomats would be more effective, not by solving such disputes, but by getting nations to disagree in peace. The contrary winner-loser approach via international courts is usually unsuccessful, as with the many maritime disputes in the South China Sea. Furthermore, whatever the dispute, the political economy determines outcome. The relatively stable and prosperous Yugoslavia crumbled after disruption in the 1980s. The lesson for contested corners of the globe is that this is how states are made or broken. What about state structure? Like Yugoslavia, many federations have come and gone. The US and Switzerland are most successful. The Soviet Union was less so, and the Egypt-Syria-Libya and Singapore-Malaysia federations were short-lived. Several contemporary federated countries remain strife-ridden works in progress. When factors of economy and democracy are stripped out, neither federations nor unitary states (such as Afghanistan, Haiti and Lebanon) are superior in terms of stability. That is worth remembering when prescribing governance models for conflicted Myanmar, Iraq and Syria. What matters more is 'ethnicisation'. Genetic variations among humans do not result in biologically defined racial differences. But social, cultural and religious variety are easily manipulated. Yugoslavia illustrated how ambitious leaders instrumentalised the scant differences between Orthodox Serbs, Catholic Croats and Muslim Bosniaks. The lesson for outsiders is to beware the challenges of stretching such fault lines, as the European Commission (now Union) did by hurrying to recognise Serbia, Slovenia and Croatia, thereby entrenching their ethnic majorities. Germany – haunted by its past Nazi role in the Balkans – led the policy to stabilise post-Yugoslav turmoil through 'ethnic cantonisation'. That left multi-ethnic Bosnia and Herzegovina open to bitter warring in the early 1990s. Misdirected bombs and bullets wreak collateral damage among nearby innocents, weaponised language triggers wider horrendous psycho-social trauma transmitted down generations Colonial ethnicisation led to the 1994 Rwanda genocide that included a failed UN peacekeeping mission. No lessons were learnt as the Srebrenica massacre of nearly 8,400 Bosnian Muslims unfolded a year later, watched by a UN protection force. That genocides happen under public gaze and are rarely prevented is the sombre conclusion. The quest for justice in Srebrenica provides more lessons, the first obstacle for accountability being the recognition of a genocide. This was first determined by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in 2004 and confirmed by the International Court of Justice in 2007. By then, the genocide was over. All genocides suffer the same slow reckoning, leaving survivors to get what comfort they can from subsequent commemorations. One reason for tardiness is that states prefer genocide determination to be left to international mechanisms, which take time to negotiate. That allows states to avoid inconvenient implications for foreign relations, although the Genocide Convention empowers them to judge genocide cases. Germany and France have boldly done so, but selective determinations are perceived as political, undermining the universal significance of the most egregious crimes against humanity. Meanwhile, criminal justice for genocide requires finding individuals guilty. That usually means leaders because genocide is generally an act of state or authority. Thus, guilty verdicts get misrepresented as symbolic shaming of a whole nation. This is evident now in rising global anti-Semitism because of Israeli war tactics. After the Srebrenica verdict, Serbian nationalists felt insulted. 'We are not a genocidal people' was a popular slogan. And so, denial became Serbian state policy, hampering collective healing. The country remains mired in citizen discontent with unresolved historical undercurrents, including the further 'ethnicised' loss of Kosovo in 2008. Bosnia and Herzegovina also remains a fractured land. The divisive legacy continues with the neighbouring Russia-Ukraine war, where many Serbians feel a cultural affinity with Russia while the EU supports Ukraine. Russian leaders have been indicted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes and crimes against humanity, while Russia invokes alleged Ukrainian collusion with Nazi genocidaires during the Second World War. The discomfiting conclusion is that genocides provide excuses for future bad behaviours. Srebrenica also left the world more divided, as indicated by the 2024 UN General Assembly vote that established July 11 as the day for commemorating the genocide. Just 84 states voted in favour while 68 abstained and 19 opposed. The horror that should have united the world has, instead, sanctioned toxic denialism. That is echoed in current controversy on whether or not Gazan suffering under Israeli attack constitutes genocide. The stark lesson for others seeking genocide-related redress – for example, Sudan's Darfuris, Iraq's Yazidis, Myanmar's Rohingya or Ethiopia's Tigrayans – is that adversarial western judicial traditions can trigger angry pushback rather than contrite 'never-again' pledges. Such justice may seed further conflict when remembrances give prominence to a predominant category of victim while overshadowing other suffering. As with those who also suffered – such as righteous non-Jews during the Holocaust, 'good' Serbs in Bosnia, Hutus in Rwanda, Buddhists in Myanmar or Arabs in Darfur. The paucity of Nelson Mandelas means that inclusive justice through truth and reconciliation is generally not favoured. Srebrenica's lessons are not static as each generation sees the past with new eyes including the significance of genocide. Especially in our era where wars are waged not only through drones and missiles but via words to demonise and dispirit opponents. The most potent verbal assaults deploy the language of genocide because the implicit moral censure is a powerful mobiliser of political narratives that continue in Central and Eastern Europe. Meanwhile, the brutalities that accompany modern conflict, be it sexual violence in Darfur or starvation in Gaza, mean that victims and observers struggle to find language adequate for their pain and outrage. And so, cries of genocide get more common, regardless of the strict criteria of the 1948 Genocide Convention. Invoking genocidal language by human rights violators and defenders alike is one reason why today's wars never appear to end. Because while misdirected bombs and bullets wreak collateral damage among nearby innocents, weaponised language triggers wider horrendous psycho-social trauma transmitted down generations. As the flowers laid during Srebrenica commemorations fade, their biggest message is that when there are no universal settled truths, or if narratives around the lived experiences of affected people are sharply contested, peace retreats further away.