
New York energy company ramps up disconnections as it seeks 11% price hike
Con Edison, the monopoly utility that provides electricity to 3.6m homes across the country's largest city and neighboring Westchester county, disconnected almost 2.5% of all its customers between January and June this year – triple the total number of families left without power in 2024. One in five disconnected homes remain without power for at least a week.
The utility shut off 16,327 households in the month leading up to 25 June. New York was hit by its first heatwave between 23 and 25 June, breaking daytime and night-time records in Central Park and driving a surge in emergency room visits.
New York is among the most expensive places for electricity, with families shouldering above-inflation price hikes in recent years on top of unaffordable housing and the broader cost of living crisis stemming from the Covid pandemic.
Heat-related deaths account for about 3% of all fatalities from May through September, making New York the second deadliest city for heat after Phoenix, Arizona.
In the past five years, more than 40% of New Yorkers have fallen into arrears, and 23% of households were disconnected at least once – leaving families without access to a fridge, internet, cooking facilities and heat or cooling until they can find the money to pay for reconnection.
Black and Latino New Yorkers are more than twice as likely as white residents to fall behind, and almost eight times more likely to have a utility shutoff, according to the 2024 Poverty Tracker/Robin Hood report on energy insecurity.
'Disconnection is an effective cost recovery strategy for Con Edison but it's also completely inhumane. It's traumatizing for families and costs some people their lives,' said Diana Hernandez, co-author of the report and associate professor of sociomedical sciences at Columbia University.
'People want to pay their bills but they are unaffordable for too many families.'
Almost 16% of New York homes – one in six Con Edison residential customers – were behind on their energy bills at the end of 2024, with debts totaling $948m, according to data submitted by the utility to the state regulator.
But as Con Edison ramped up disconnections over the past six months, the debt fell to $840m by the end of June with 12.5% of New Yorkers now behind on their bills.
At the current rate, Con Edison could disconnect 150,000 households by the end of the year, the highest number by any utility in the country, according to Mark Wolfe, an energy economist.
'Energy is unaffordable so people fall behind. The disconnection numbers show that Con Edison is aggressively cracking down, and life is going to become harder for poor people in New York,' said Wolfe, executive director of the National Energy Assistance Directors Association (Neada).
Researchers at Neada, the organization for state directors of the federally funded Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (Liheap), collated the debt and disconnection figures submitted to the New York Public Services Commission, the regulator.
There is no demographic breakdown but people of color, households with children, renters in small buildings, and people with pre-existing medical conditions who rely on electronic devices such as oxygen dispensers, as well as Bronx residents are all more likely to experience energy poverty and therefore a disconnection, the 2024 Robin Hood report found.
A Con Edison spokesperson said: 'Termination of service is a last resort, and we do so only after extensive outreach and exhausting all other options … nearly two-thirds of residential customers in arrears are on payment plans. It is essential that our customers pay their bills to maintain safe service and the most reliable system in the nation.'
Most customers were reconnected within 24 hours and 80% within a week, the spokesperson added.
Nationwide, an estimated one in three households experience energy poverty – the inability to access sufficient amounts of electricity and other energy sources due to financial hardship. Low-income households, people of color and states with the fewest social safety nets are disproportionately affected, and millions of families are regularly forced to ration food, medicines, energy and other essentials
Across New York state – and the country – a patchwork of regulations prevent some households from being shut off on very hot or cold days, but millions are not protected at all.
New York, like much of the US, is susceptible to extreme highs and low temperatures, and the climate crisis is driving more frequent and more intense heatwaves.
The number of heat deaths has been rising over the past decade, and on average 525 people in New York City die prematurely each year for heat-related reasons – the vast majority due to the impact high temperatures and humidity have on existing medical conditions, according to the latest figures from the city's department of public health.
Heat kills twice Black New Yorkers at twice the rate of white residents due to past and current structural racism that creates economic, healthcare, housing, energy and other systems that benefit white people and disadvantage people of color, the report found.
Most deaths occur in homes without access to a functioning air conditioning. Citywide, 11% of New Yorkers do not have air conditioners at home but the rate is much higher in low-income communities of color. One study found that a fifth of renters do not use their air conditioner due to cost.
And while protections have improved in recent years, it has not been enough to shield families hit hardest by rising energy prices, rents and inflation – or the increasingly brutal heat and humidity.
According to its website, Con Edison currently suspends disconnections on the hottest and coldest days based on forecasts from the National Weather Service. In the summer, the utility will not disconnect a family the day of or day before the heat index – what the temperature feels like when humidity is taken into account – is forecast to hit 90F (32.2C) at Central Park – one of the shadiest parts of the city. It also suspends disconnections for two days after a 90F heat index day.
Yet temperatures in some neighborhoods in the Bronx and upper Manhattan, where there are fewer trees, less access to air conditioning, more Black and Latino residents, and most heat deaths, exceed Central Park by 6 to 8 degrees due to the heat island effect, according to one study from 2022.
Energy poverty is a chronic problem for many New Yorkers.
New York state is the largest recipient of Liheap, the chronically underfunded bipartisan federal program that helped about 6m households keep on top of energy bills last year – and which narrowly survived being cut completely from Trump's 2026 budget.
In fiscal year 2024-25, New York received $379m (almost 10%) of the total Liheap fund, and Governor Kathy Hochul invested an additional $35m to supplement support for heating bills in January after Liheap money ran out with months of winter still to go.
In the summer, the Liheap program only covers the cost of an air conditioning unit and installation for qualifying low-income households in New York – not energy bills. A city program can provide a means-tested loan for working families in arrears.
Disconnections declined during the pandemic thanks to a statewide moratorium and debt forgiveness schemes, as well as child tax credits and a boost to food stamps among other federal programs that helped lift millions of Americans out of poverty. But the Covid-era social safety programs have now all been terminated, and recent focus groups conducted by Hernandez and her colleagues found people still struggling to recover and rationing energy use because they were so concerned about rising bills.
'The city has got better at advocating for households disproportionately impacted by disconnections but it's a drop in the bucket of where it should be,' said Hernandez, the energy justice expert. 'The 88,000 households disconnected are people who have done everything to get the money and still couldn't get caught up. It illustrates families have been left completely exposed.'
Yet energy costs are about to get even higher in New York.
Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act will make electricity production more expensive, leading to residents paying $140 a year on average more by 2030, according to analysis by Energy Innovation. The bill also slashes benefits such as Snap (food stamps) and Medicaid, which will put further pressure on millions of families.
Meanwhile, Con Edison is under fire from city and state politicians including Hochul and the city comptroller (chief finance officer) and former mayoral candidate, Brad Lander, for requesting a rate hike of 11% for electricity and 13% for gas, which the regulator is currently considering. Con Ed's proposed electricity rate hike could raise the average household bill by $372 next year. (The utility provides gas to 1.1m homes.)
'The combination of rising temperatures, rising electricity rates, the possible termination of the federal Liheap program, and this increase in shutoffs by Con Ed risks dramatically increasing heat-related illness and deaths for New Yorkers,' Lander told the Guardian.
'There needs to be strategies in place so that people will pay their bills – but to punish people who are poor by cutting off their electricity ever, but especially in extreme heat or wintertime, is inhumane. It is a form of debtors' prison.'
Con Edison did not respond to criticisms over its proposed rate hike but said it provided $311m in bill discounts to income-eligible customers last year, and the regulator (PSC) recently expanded the Energy Affordability Program to help more vulnerable residents.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geeky Gadgets
10 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Sam Altman's Prediction : ChatGPT 5 Will Create First $1 Billion One-Person Company
What if the next billion-dollar company didn't need a sprawling office, a massive team, or even a traditional CEO? Imagine a single entrepreneur, armed with nothing but a laptop and innovative AI tools, building an empire that rivals the giants of Silicon Valley. This is the bold future Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, envisions—a world where artificial intelligence enables individuals to achieve what once seemed impossible. His prediction? By 2026-2028, the first one-person billion-dollar company could emerge, driven by the fantastic capabilities of AI systems like GPT-5. It's a claim that challenges everything we know about business, innovation, and scale. In this piece, Greg Isenberg explores how advancements in AI are reshaping the entrepreneurial landscape, making Altman's vision not just plausible but increasingly likely. From automating entire workflows to leveling the playing field for solo creators, AI is redefining what it means to build and scale a business. You'll discover the key trends fueling this revolution, the industries most ripe for disruption, and the skills needed to thrive in this new era of solopreneurship. Could this be the dawn of a world where individuals rival corporations in power and influence? Let's unpack the possibilities. How AI is Redefining Solopreneurship AI is transforming the concept of solopreneurship, empowering individuals to accomplish what once required entire teams. By integrating AI agents into your business, you can automate essential tasks such as marketing, sales, design, and customer support. Instead of managing employees, your role evolves into overseeing and optimizing these AI systems. This shift allows you to focus on strategy, innovation, and growth while significantly reducing operational costs. The result is a streamlined, high-performing business that you can manage independently, offering unparalleled scalability and efficiency. AI tools also enable solopreneurs to compete with larger organizations by leveling the playing field. With access to advanced technologies, you can deliver high-quality products and services, maintain agility, and respond quickly to market demands. This redefinition of solopreneurship is not just about efficiency—it's about unlocking new opportunities for innovation and growth. Steps to Building an AI-Driven Business To thrive in this AI-driven entrepreneurial model, you need a clear and strategic approach. Here are the key steps to get started: Build an Audience: Use social media platforms to connect with potential customers, understand their needs, and establish your brand presence. Use social media platforms to connect with potential customers, understand their needs, and establish your brand presence. Develop a Tailored Product: Use customer insights to create a product that aligns with their preferences, a process often referred to as 'vibe coding.' Use customer insights to create a product that aligns with their preferences, a process often referred to as 'vibe coding.' Foster a Community: Cultivate a loyal following around your brand to drive organic growth and enhance customer retention. Cultivate a loyal following around your brand to drive organic growth and enhance customer retention. Automate Processes: Implement AI tools to handle repetitive tasks such as data analysis, customer inquiries, and content generation, freeing up your time for strategic decision-making. By combining these steps, you can create a scalable business model that maximizes efficiency, minimizes costs, and delivers value to your audience. Sam Altman's ChatGPT 5 Prediction : One-Person Billion-Dollar Company Watch this video on YouTube. Here are additional guides from our expansive article library that you may find useful on AI business. Key Trends Driving AI-Driven Solopreneurship Several technological and societal trends are converging to make AI-powered solopreneurship not only possible but increasingly viable. These trends are reshaping the way businesses are built and operated: Services Becoming Software: AI is transforming traditional services—such as copywriting, graphic design, and customer support—into scalable software solutions. AI is transforming traditional services—such as copywriting, graphic design, and customer support—into scalable software solutions. Instant Distribution: Social media platforms and creator partnerships provide immediate access to global audiences, reducing marketing costs and timelines. Social media platforms and creator partnerships provide immediate access to global audiences, reducing marketing costs and timelines. Platform Ecosystems: Tools like OpenAI, Shopify, and Supabase simplify infrastructure, allowing you to focus on innovation and customer experience. Tools like OpenAI, Shopify, and Supabase simplify infrastructure, allowing you to focus on innovation and customer experience. Consumer Trust in Small Brands: Customers increasingly value authenticity and personal connection, favoring independent creators over large corporations. Customers increasingly value authenticity and personal connection, favoring independent creators over large corporations. Precision Marketing: Platforms like Meta, Google, and TikTok offer advanced targeting capabilities, making sure your message reaches the right audience efficiently. These trends collectively lower barriers to entry, making it easier for individuals to launch and scale businesses while maintaining a competitive edge. Challenges and Risks to Consider While the potential for AI-driven solopreneurship is immense, it is not without challenges. Over-automation can lead to a loss of the human touch, which may alienate customers. Key risks include: Quality Control: Making sure consistent product or service quality can be challenging without human oversight. Making sure consistent product or service quality can be challenging without human oversight. Customer Connection: Over-reliance on automation may weaken relationships with your audience, reducing loyalty and trust. Over-reliance on automation may weaken relationships with your audience, reducing loyalty and trust. Regulatory Hurdles: Certain industries with strict compliance requirements may limit the feasibility of one-person businesses. To mitigate these risks, you must strike a balance between automation and personal engagement. Maintaining high operational standards and prioritizing customer satisfaction will be critical to long-term success. Essential Skills for AI-Driven Entrepreneurs To excel in this new era of solopreneurship, you'll need to develop and refine specific skills. These include: Code Use: Learn to use AI tools effectively to optimize workflows, enhance productivity, and automate complex tasks. Learn to use AI tools effectively to optimize workflows, enhance productivity, and automate complex tasks. Audience Use: Build and sustain a loyal following through authentic engagement, value-driven content, and consistent communication. Build and sustain a loyal following through authentic engagement, value-driven content, and consistent communication. Capital Use: Manage financial resources strategically to support growth, invest in technology, and ensure long-term sustainability. Mastering these skills will enable you to navigate the complexities of running a one-person AI-driven business while maximizing your potential for success. Industries Ready for AI-Driven Transformation Certain industries are particularly well-suited for one-person AI-driven businesses, offering high scalability and minimal barriers to entry. These include: Digital Products: Software-as-a-service (SaaS), consumer apps, and digital content platforms provide opportunities for rapid growth and innovation. Software-as-a-service (SaaS), consumer apps, and digital content platforms provide opportunities for rapid growth and innovation. Repetitive, High-Value Tasks: Fields like social media management, content creation, and data analysis are ideal for automation and efficiency. Fields like social media management, content creation, and data analysis are ideal for automation and efficiency. Low-Regulation Sectors: Industries with fewer compliance requirements, such as e-commerce and online education, offer smoother paths to success. Focusing on these areas can help you maximize your chances of building a successful AI-driven business while minimizing operational complexities. Is the One-Person Billion-Dollar Company Feasible? Sam Altman's prediction of a one-person billion-dollar company by 2026-2028 is ambitious but increasingly plausible. Advancements in AI are rapidly lowering the barriers to entry, allowing individuals to achieve unprecedented levels of efficiency and scalability. Success will depend on a combination of product innovation, strategic marketing, and precise execution. As AI technology continues to evolve, the concept of a one-person billion-dollar company is no longer a distant dream but an attainable reality for those who embrace its potential. Media Credit: Greg Isenberg Filed Under: AI, Technology News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's 401(k) order offers retirement savers crypto, private assets, but also higher fees and more risk
NEW YORK, Aug 10 (Reuters) - The new White House order directing regulators to expand access to alternative investments in 401(k) plans, like crypto or privately owned companies adds a new layer of risk to the retirement portfolios for ordinary investors that they may not fully understand, investment professionals say. "This is brand new; none of it has been stress-tested yet" in a market shock or long-term selloff, said Christopher Bailey, director of retirement, at Cerulli Associates, an asset management research firm. "There are liquidity concerns, issues around fees, among others." While industry advocates and the Trump administration say investments in private equity, crypto or privately held companies like ChatGPT developer OpenAI or Elon Musk's SpaceX hold the promise of greater returns, critics say the investments are inherently riskier, lack the same disclosures and carry higher fees than traditional retirement plans. "I don't think people are talking enough about the potential for higher fees," said Philitsa Hanson, head of product, equity and fund administration, Allvue Systems, a software and solutions provider for private asset managers. The executive order, she said, "raises more questions than answers. Someone will need to be very thoughtful about how these types of assets can be incorporated" into 401(k) plans. Private equity and other alternative asset funds have increasingly been raising capital from wealthy individuals but are traditionally designed for institutional investors and typically include layers of fees. Private equity, for instance, has long had the "2 and 20" structure: managers collect a 2% overall fee, as well as 20% of any gains. In contrast, the mutual funds that today make up the lion's share of 401(k) plan assets offer fees that average a mere 0.26%, according to the Investment Company Institute. Dmitriy Katsnelson, deputy chief investment officer at Wealthspire Advisors, which manages $30 billion for affluent and high net worth individuals and families, notes that if the executive order triggers a rapid and significant change in the menu of investment plans open to investors, that would reverse the trend of the last few decades. "It's been all about cutting fees, doing no harm," Katsnelson said. "It's going to take a while for people to come up with a framework to make this work and think about the risks." Alternative asset managers will likely need to come up with new products with lower fees, greater liquidity and more transparency if they want to tap into the trillions of dollars and 90 million investors in employer-sponsored retirement plans. Jason Kephart, an analyst at Morningstar, said the fees for some alternative investments aren't clearly spelled out, some even have to be deciphered from footnotes. They "might be even underrepresenting the actual cost to the end investor, and I have a hard time seeing how plan sponsors are going to get comfortable with that," he said. "I think there is going to be more light shed on all these fees and exactly where they are and make it transparent." Under the current system, investors can also monitor fluctuations in their portfolio's performance on a daily basis and understand precisely what is contributing to those results, Hanson said. That won't be so easy for investments that aren't traded on open exchanges. "Private equity, private assets are the opposite," said Allvue's Hanson. "You're asking systems designed for daily trades to support illiquid and sometimes manually priced assets. There's a fundamental mismatch there.' That creates an obligation on the part of asset managers and plan sponsors to increase their outreach and education efforts, suggests Cerulli's Bailey. A typical retirement fund investor "is not sitting there thinking about optimizing their portfolio" and considering the impact of adding private assets to the mix on their risk or potential return, he said. Blackstone President and Chief Operating Officer Jon Gray recently told analysts that private assets are more appropriate for younger investors that have a longer investing horizon than for someone nearing retirement. One test case for the legal risks of putting retirement nest eggs in private markets has played out at chipmaker Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab, where employees brought a lawsuit over two retirement plans that included investments in hedge funds, private equity and commodities. An appeals court finally dismissed the complaint after seven years of court battles this year but lawyers at Debevoise & Plimpton said that asset managers and plan sponsors generally don't have the resources to manage multi-year litigation. Regulators will have to give the industry some legal protection from investor lawsuits to make good on Trump's plan, they said.


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Our pharma industry powerhouses need emergency treatment
Most of Donald Trump's tariffs look likely to settle around the 15pc mark, a level that can be absorbed into the global trading system without too much disruption. But the President appears determined to bring pharmaceutical manufacturing back on shore, using punitive tariffs where necessary. It might start with a few percentage points. But very quickly it will ramp up. The UK needs to find a way of making sure we are exempt from that – otherwise one of our most valuable industries may very soon be lost completely. Amid all the noise over his range of import levies, the constant changes of plan, and the boasting about 'great deals', President Trump has at least been consistent on one point. He thinks medicines should be manufactured within the United States. 'In one year, one and a half years maximum, it's going to go to 150pc and then it's going to go to 250pc because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Trump announced last week. With levies on that scale, in effect the major drug companies won't have any choice. They will have to manufacture within the United States, or else their profits in the world's largest market for medicines will be completely wiped out. There are a handful of countries that will be hit, and arguably more so than the UK. Switzerland is already reeling from the 39pc tariffs that Trump has imposed on the country, a move that may well plunge its fabulously wealthy economy into a rare recession, and drugs are one of its major exports.