LGBTQI people carrying burden of sexual violence: study
Almost 3200 LGBTQI people participated in the national survey on experiences of sexual violence, making it the largest of its kind in Australia and internationally.
Most of those who took part were cisgender women (41.1 per cent) followed by cisgender men (30.9 per cent) and people who identified as non-binary (18 per cent).
More than 400 respondents identified themselves as First Nations Australians.
The study found unwanted sexual requests or comments were common (74.1 per cent), with cisgender men reporting the lowest rates.
Transgender women and men were more likely to report being targeted due to their gender or sexuality.
More than half of those surveyed said they had experienced sexual violence in childhood and adulthood.
The majority of people who disclosed said the experience had been before they were 18 or more than five years ago.
The findings suggested many LGBTQI people were carrying a significant burden of sexual violence, often for a long time, lead investigator Michael Salter said.
"This is important from a service provision point of view … people have been carrying something with them for a long time and need sensitivity to that," he said.
There were also elevated incidents in the previous 12 months among cisgender men and transgender women surveyed.
"This suggests people who engage sexually with cisgender men in their adult life are more at risk of sexual violence," Professor Salter said.
Fewer than 40 per cent of cisgender men disclosed their experiences of sexual violence.
However, those who did were most satisfied with the response compared to other members of the LGBTQI community.
The survey also highlighted the proactive stance of most LGBTQI people in intervening in situations of sexual risk and danger to others.
This strongly suggested that community norms were a pivotal resource to include in future sexual violence prevention efforts.
The survey indicated policymakers needed to do more to ensure that sexual violence intervention and prevention measures acknowledged people were part of the LGBTQI community, Prof Salter said.
"We also need to hold space for young people figuring out their gender identity and sexual orientation," he said.
"We currently don't do enough for kids who experience sexual violence if we don't support them therapeutically and they accumulate compounding traumas."
Lifeline 13 11 14
Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Violence intervention, prevention and support services are being urged to be alert to the specific needs and experiences of LGBTQI people following a landmark study on the impact of sexual violence.
Almost 3200 LGBTQI people participated in the national survey on experiences of sexual violence, making it the largest of its kind in Australia and internationally.
Most of those who took part were cisgender women (41.1 per cent) followed by cisgender men (30.9 per cent) and people who identified as non-binary (18 per cent).
More than 400 respondents identified themselves as First Nations Australians.
The study found unwanted sexual requests or comments were common (74.1 per cent), with cisgender men reporting the lowest rates.
Transgender women and men were more likely to report being targeted due to their gender or sexuality.
More than half of those surveyed said they had experienced sexual violence in childhood and adulthood.
The majority of people who disclosed said the experience had been before they were 18 or more than five years ago.
The findings suggested many LGBTQI people were carrying a significant burden of sexual violence, often for a long time, lead investigator Michael Salter said.
"This is important from a service provision point of view … people have been carrying something with them for a long time and need sensitivity to that," he said.
There were also elevated incidents in the previous 12 months among cisgender men and transgender women surveyed.
"This suggests people who engage sexually with cisgender men in their adult life are more at risk of sexual violence," Professor Salter said.
Fewer than 40 per cent of cisgender men disclosed their experiences of sexual violence.
However, those who did were most satisfied with the response compared to other members of the LGBTQI community.
The survey also highlighted the proactive stance of most LGBTQI people in intervening in situations of sexual risk and danger to others.
This strongly suggested that community norms were a pivotal resource to include in future sexual violence prevention efforts.
The survey indicated policymakers needed to do more to ensure that sexual violence intervention and prevention measures acknowledged people were part of the LGBTQI community, Prof Salter said.
"We also need to hold space for young people figuring out their gender identity and sexual orientation," he said.
"We currently don't do enough for kids who experience sexual violence if we don't support them therapeutically and they accumulate compounding traumas."
Lifeline 13 11 14
Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Violence intervention, prevention and support services are being urged to be alert to the specific needs and experiences of LGBTQI people following a landmark study on the impact of sexual violence.
Almost 3200 LGBTQI people participated in the national survey on experiences of sexual violence, making it the largest of its kind in Australia and internationally.
Most of those who took part were cisgender women (41.1 per cent) followed by cisgender men (30.9 per cent) and people who identified as non-binary (18 per cent).
More than 400 respondents identified themselves as First Nations Australians.
The study found unwanted sexual requests or comments were common (74.1 per cent), with cisgender men reporting the lowest rates.
Transgender women and men were more likely to report being targeted due to their gender or sexuality.
More than half of those surveyed said they had experienced sexual violence in childhood and adulthood.
The majority of people who disclosed said the experience had been before they were 18 or more than five years ago.
The findings suggested many LGBTQI people were carrying a significant burden of sexual violence, often for a long time, lead investigator Michael Salter said.
"This is important from a service provision point of view … people have been carrying something with them for a long time and need sensitivity to that," he said.
There were also elevated incidents in the previous 12 months among cisgender men and transgender women surveyed.
"This suggests people who engage sexually with cisgender men in their adult life are more at risk of sexual violence," Professor Salter said.
Fewer than 40 per cent of cisgender men disclosed their experiences of sexual violence.
However, those who did were most satisfied with the response compared to other members of the LGBTQI community.
The survey also highlighted the proactive stance of most LGBTQI people in intervening in situations of sexual risk and danger to others.
This strongly suggested that community norms were a pivotal resource to include in future sexual violence prevention efforts.
The survey indicated policymakers needed to do more to ensure that sexual violence intervention and prevention measures acknowledged people were part of the LGBTQI community, Prof Salter said.
"We also need to hold space for young people figuring out their gender identity and sexual orientation," he said.
"We currently don't do enough for kids who experience sexual violence if we don't support them therapeutically and they accumulate compounding traumas."
Lifeline 13 11 14
Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Violence intervention, prevention and support services are being urged to be alert to the specific needs and experiences of LGBTQI people following a landmark study on the impact of sexual violence.
Almost 3200 LGBTQI people participated in the national survey on experiences of sexual violence, making it the largest of its kind in Australia and internationally.
Most of those who took part were cisgender women (41.1 per cent) followed by cisgender men (30.9 per cent) and people who identified as non-binary (18 per cent).
More than 400 respondents identified themselves as First Nations Australians.
The study found unwanted sexual requests or comments were common (74.1 per cent), with cisgender men reporting the lowest rates.
Transgender women and men were more likely to report being targeted due to their gender or sexuality.
More than half of those surveyed said they had experienced sexual violence in childhood and adulthood.
The majority of people who disclosed said the experience had been before they were 18 or more than five years ago.
The findings suggested many LGBTQI people were carrying a significant burden of sexual violence, often for a long time, lead investigator Michael Salter said.
"This is important from a service provision point of view … people have been carrying something with them for a long time and need sensitivity to that," he said.
There were also elevated incidents in the previous 12 months among cisgender men and transgender women surveyed.
"This suggests people who engage sexually with cisgender men in their adult life are more at risk of sexual violence," Professor Salter said.
Fewer than 40 per cent of cisgender men disclosed their experiences of sexual violence.
However, those who did were most satisfied with the response compared to other members of the LGBTQI community.
The survey also highlighted the proactive stance of most LGBTQI people in intervening in situations of sexual risk and danger to others.
This strongly suggested that community norms were a pivotal resource to include in future sexual violence prevention efforts.
The survey indicated policymakers needed to do more to ensure that sexual violence intervention and prevention measures acknowledged people were part of the LGBTQI community, Prof Salter said.
"We also need to hold space for young people figuring out their gender identity and sexual orientation," he said.
"We currently don't do enough for kids who experience sexual violence if we don't support them therapeutically and they accumulate compounding traumas."
Lifeline 13 11 14
Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
30-07-2025
- The Advertiser
Fears for vulnerable children as social media ban grows
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban. The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure. While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees. "This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP. "We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them." This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said. Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges . From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube. Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million. Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media. "It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP. "But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey." The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account. Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices. "They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said. "Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry." Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban. The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure. While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees. "This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP. "We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them." This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said. Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges . From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube. Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million. Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media. "It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP. "But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey." The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account. Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices. "They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said. "Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry." Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban. The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure. While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees. "This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP. "We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them." This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said. Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges . From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube. Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million. Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media. "It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP. "But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey." The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account. Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices. "They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said. "Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry." Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban. The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure. While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees. "This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP. "We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them." This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said. Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges . From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube. Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million. Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media. "It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP. "But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey." The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account. Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices. "They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said. "Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Perth Now
30-07-2025
- Perth Now
Fears for vulnerable children as social media ban grows
Limiting children's access to social media could inadvertently harm marginalised children, an expert has warned, as YouTube is roped into Australia's ban. The federal government's decision to include the video-sharing platform in its social media ban for under-16s has renewed focus on the measure. While it has been broadly celebrated by the coalition and Labor, who say it will protect children from the harms of social media, youth mental health foundation Headspace disagrees. "This is seen as a solution and it may be helpful, we don't know. But it may cause harm as well," national clinical advisor Simon Dodd told AAP. "We've talked to young people and they value social media. They value the connections it gives them." This was particularly true for those who struggled to find physical community in parts of regional or rural Australia, and for LGBTQI youth, who use social media platforms to find support and stay safe, Mr Dodd said. Mental health is complicated as there are many factors that can impact it, including a person's social environment, and focusing on one measure as a solution risks missing opportunities to address young people's challenges . From December, people under 16 will no longer be able to create accounts on social media platforms such as Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook ,TikTok and now YouTube. Platforms that fail to conform with these rules face fines of up to $49.5 million. Eating disorder not-for-profit Hide N Seek warned YouTube could be home to harmful content such as extreme videos about body transformations or "what I eat in a day" media. "It can be extremely damaging, extremely damaging for children who are still developing their sense of self," founder Jaimee Krawitz told AAP. "But YouTube also hosts supportive, recovery-focused communities and educational content that can be part of a young person's healing journey." The changes will still allow children to access YouTube Kids or view videos accessible without an account. Though he recognised regulation was part of the answer to making online spaces safer, Mr Dodd has also urged the government to centre on young people's voices. "They have consistently told us they get the complexities of the social media environment and understand it better than many of the adults who are trying to legislate something that is difficult to manage," he said. "Without genuine consultation, this will result in young people feeling less trust in government and that is a real worry."
Perth Now
28-07-2025
- Perth Now
'Butchers': GP ban upheld after abortion, race rants
A doctor who posted dozens of anti-abortion rants online and described medics who carry out the procedures as butchers will remain banned from practice. Jereth Kok was suspended in 2019 for professional misconduct in relation to the online posts that also described abortion doctors as "contract killers", equated abortion to murder and described being transgender as a mental health issue. He is also accused of posting racist comments online about Chinese people and Islam. The Victorian Civil and Administration Tribunal found Dr Kok engaged in professional misconduct, between May 20, 2010 and October 15, 2021, when he posted and published on social media and internet forums. He maintains that many posts were satirical or taken out of context. The tribunal last week upheld his ban. It found that Dr Kok's posts were "disrespectful" and "not sufficiently balanced", despite acknowledging that many were political or religious in nature and unrelated to his clinical practice. In one of his many posts, the general practitioner said "the Royal Women's Hospital happens to be Melbourne's premier publicly funded baby-killing facility". The Medical Board of Australia said the comment denigrated, demeaned and slurred medical practitioners at the hospital who provided abortion treatment to patients. While Dr Kok accepted that his commentary was "discourteous" to people who worked at the hospital, he submitted he was expressing his views and beliefs about abortion in a discussion on a Christian website. In another comment to an online story about doctors performing abortions, Dr Kok suggested the author should replace the word doctor with "butcher". He later told the tribunal that he would avoid this type of language in future, but said he had strong views about abortion being immoral as a Christian and believed he was required to speak out about the issue. He also referred to treatment of gender dysphoria as "medical butchery". Other posts were found to have denigrated, demeaned and slurred medical practitioners who recognise and treat gender dysphoria, perform abortion treatment and those who followed COVID-19 public health orders. He was also found to have expressed sentiments of violence and made derogatory statements towards racial and religious groups, LGBTQI+ people and legitimised anti-vaccination during the COVID pandemic. Political party Family First on Monday slammed the decision - calling it a "gross injustice and chilling attack on freedom of speech". Family First's national director Lyle Shelton said the party will fight to repeal similar anti-free speech laws in all states starting with fielding candidates at upcoming elections in South Australia, Victoria and NSW. "Dr Kok has harmed no patient. His only 'crime' was to express his views online — many of them satirical or Christian in nature — and for that, he has been punished with the loss of his medical career," Mr Shelton said. "We will not sit by while the state tramples conscience, truth and freedom. "Dr Kok's case must be the turning point." The matter is expected to return to the tribunal for an administrative mention in September. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578 beyondblue 1300 22 4636
