Pioneering Chicago music streaming service AccuRadio files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
AccuRadio, a leading independent streaming service offering nearly 1,400 music channels, owes SoundExchange, the organization empowered by Congress to collect digital royalties for recording artists, more than $10 million, according to the bankruptcy filing.
'AccuRadio has spent almost 25 years building an innovative and well-loved music streaming service while facing royalty obligations that climbed to levels that seem to suggest the system is rigged, perhaps inadvertently, against small and midsize streamers,' AccuRadio founder and CEO Kurt Hanson said in a news release Wednesday.
Last year, SoundExchange filed a lawsuit against AccuRadio seeking an undisclosed amount of past due digital royalties owed by the music streaming service, a case which is ongoing in Chicago federal court.
SoundExchange did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
In addition to SoundExchange, AccuRadio owes about $200,000 each to ASCAP and BMI, the organizations which collect and distribute royalties for songwriters, composers and publishers, according to the bankruptcy filing.
One of the nation's earliest internet radio services, AccuRadio has grown from three music channels to an array of options curated by programming experts in more than 60 genres, covering everything from adult contemporary and smooth jazz to K-pop and Nordic folk songs. The channels are advertising-supported, like traditional over-the-air radio, with no subscription fees for users.
AccuRadio remains a leading music streaming service with nearly 10,000 average active sessions at any point during the day, according to the latest monthly ranking by Triton Digital. The service reaches more than one million listeners a month, according to Hanson.
Formed in 2003, SoundExchange collects royalties from digital music providers such as Pandora, SiriusXM and other services to pay to the featured artists performing on the recordings.
Over the years, AccuRadio has paid SoundExchange more than $13.5 million in royalties, according to its news release. But the service stopped paying royalties in 2018, according to the SoundExchange lawsuit.
A payment plan was agreed upon in February 2020, but SoundExchange alleged that AccuRadio failed to live up to the agreement, prompting the 2024 lawsuit.
Hanson said months of 'good faith' negotiations with SoundExchange ultimately failed to reach a lawsuit settlement, leading AccuRadio to file for bankruptcy protection.
'We were extremely disappointed that we couldn't reach a negotiated settlement,' Hanson said in the news release. 'Furthermore, AccuRadio resumed full current payments to SoundExchange many months ago and continues to keep current with ongoing obligations.'
In its news release, AccuRadio noted that large traditional radio chains such as iHeartMedia, Cumulus and Audacy have all successfully navigated Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings in recent years.
Ironically, legacy terrestrial radio broadcasters have struggled in the digital age, in large part due to increased competition from music streaming services such as Pandora and Spotify, according to industry experts.
AccuRadio's music streaming service remains fully operational and Hanson said the company intends to follow suit with its larger radio brethren and successfully emerge from bankruptcy as well.
'Filing for bankruptcy protection wasn't an easy decision, especially since our revenues have been consistently improving and we have returned to profitability, but we are confident that AccuRadio will emerge from it healthier and more resilient, and will continue to be an outlet for human-curated music that our listeners desire and cherish,' Hanson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Carvana Expands Same-Day Delivery To The Greater Chicago Area
Carvana Co. (NYSE:CVNA) shares are trading lower on Thursday. The firm has expanded its same-day vehicle delivery service to customers in the greater Chicago area, offering buyers the option to receive their car within hours of placing an order. The move is designed to enhance convenience and speed for local customers as the company builds out its logistics rollout allows eligible Chicago-area residents to purchase a car online through Carvana's platform and have it delivered the same day. Those selling their vehicle to Carvana can also schedule same-day drop-offs once the company's digital appraisal and sales process is complete, the company said in a statement. 'Chicago has long been an important market for Carvana, and we're proud to strengthen our local customer offering with the additional speed and convenience of same-day delivery,' said Jacqueline Hearns, Carvana's senior director of market operations and expansion. She added that the company is continuing to invest and innovate to improve the buying and selling experience for customers in Chicago and nationwide. Carvana's online marketplace allows customers to browse thousands of used vehicles, arrange financing, trade in a car, and finalize purchases entirely online. Its same-day delivery is made possible by an integrated logistics and reconditioning network that enables eligible customers to receive or sell a vehicle in under 24 hours. The company first introduced same-day delivery in Arizona and has since rolled it out to select markets in more than 15 states. According to Benzinga Pro, CVNA stock has gained over 152% in the last year. Investors can gain exposure to the stock via YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (NASDAQ:FIVY). Price Action: CVNA shares are trading lower by 1.77% to $343.69 at last check Thursday. Read More:Photo via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Carvana Expands Same-Day Delivery To The Greater Chicago Area originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
3 charts that show Palantir's astronomical growth over the last five years
Palantir's astronomical rise since its public debut on the New York Stock Exchange in a 2020 direct listing has been nothing short of a whirlwind. Over nearly five years, the Denver-based company, whose cofounders include renowned venture capitalist Peter Thiel and current CEO Alex Karp, has surged more than 1,700%. At the same time, its valuation has broken new highs, dwarfing some of the world's technology behemoths with far greater revenues. The artificial intelligence-powered software company continued its ascent last week after posting its first quarter with more than $1 billion in revenue, reaching new highs and soaring past a $430 billion market valuation. Shares haven't been below $100 since April 2025. The stock last traded below $10 in May 2023, before beginning a steady climb higher. Retail investors are a key part of the stock's strength. Last month, retail poured $1.2 billion into Palantir stock, according to data from Goldman Sachs. Here's a closer look at Palantir's growth over the last five years and how the company compares to megacap peers. Government contracts have been one of Palantir's biggest growth areas since its inception. Last quarter, the company's U.S. government revenue grew 53% to $426 million. Government accounted for 55% of the company's total revenue but commercial is showing promise. Those revenues in the U.S. grew 93% last quarter, Palantir said. Still, one of the company's oldest customers is the U.S. Army. Earlier this month, the company inked a contract worth up to $10 billion for data and software to streamline efficiencies and meet growing military needs. In May, the Department of Defense boosted its agreement with Palantir for AI-powered battlefield capabilities by $795 million. "We still believe America is the leader of the free world, that the West is superior," Karp said on an earnings call earlier this month. "We have to fight for these values; we should give American corporations, and, most importantly, our government, an unfair advantage." The U.S. has been a key driver of Palantir's growth, especially as the company scoops up more contracts with the U.S. military. Palantir said the U.S. currently accounts for about three-quarters of total revenues. Commercial international revenues declined 3% last quarter and analysts have raised concerns about that segment's growth trajectory. Over the last five years, U.S. revenues have nearly quintupled from $156 million to about $733 million. Revenues outside the U.S. have doubled from about $133 million to $271 million. Palantir's market capitalization has rapidly ascended over the last year as investors bet on its AI tools, while its stock has soared nearly 500%. The meteoric rise placed Palantir among the top 10 U.S. tech firms and top 20 most valuable U.S. companies. But Palantir makes a fraction of the revenue of the companies in those lists. Last quarter, Palantir reported more than $1 billion in quarterly revenue for the first time, and its forward price-to-earnings ratio has surged past 280 times. By comparison, Apple and Microsoft posted revenue of $94 billion and $76 billion during the period, respectively, and carry a PE ratio of nearly 30 times. Forward PE is a valuation metric that compares a company's future earnings to its current share price. The higher the PE, the higher the growth expectations or the more overvalued the asset. A lower price-to-earnings ratio suggests slower growth or an undervalued asset. Most of the Magnificent Seven stocks, except for Nvidia and Tesla, have a forward PE that hovers around the 20s and 30s. Nvidia trades at more than 40 times forward earnings, while Tesla's sits at about 198 times. At these levels, investors are paying a jacked-up premium to own shares of one of the hottest AI stocks on Wall Street as its valuation has skyrocketed to astronomical heights. "This is a once-in-a-generation, truly anomalous quarter, and we're very proud," Karp said on an earnings call following Palantir's second-quarter results. "We're sorry that our haters are disappointed, but there are many more quarters to be disappointed."
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social Security at 90: Where the program stands and how to fix it
Social Security is a vital source of income for millions of Americans, but after 90 years, the program faces significant financial challenges that could reshape it for future generations. If Congress fails to act, retirees could see their monthly checks cut by 23 percent in less than a decade — slashing thousands of dollars from the average person's annual benefits. Lawmakers are unlikely to let that happen, but so far, they've opted to kick the can down the road, avoiding politically unpopular solutions and complicating eventual fixes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) signed Social Security into law on Aug. 14, 1935, as a way to give 'some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age.' Here's what to know about the state of the program 90 years later: How many people receive Social Security? Nearly 70 million people received Social Security benefits in July, with the average check totaling $1,863. Retired workers made up the largest share — roughly three-quarters, or about 53 million. The program also supports other groups: Nearly six million people received survivor benefits last month, while more than eight million collected disability insurance. Most people aged 65 and older receive the majority of their income from Social Security, making it a vital lifeline for millions of adults — and children — who would otherwise fall below the poverty line. Without Social Security benefits, 37 percent of older adults would have had incomes below the official poverty line in 2023 — instead, only 10 percent did, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. More Americans now expect to rely on Social Security than in the past. In a recent Gallup poll, 37 percent of non-retirees said it will be a 'major source' of income in retirement — up from 28 percent two decades ago. When Social Security benefits could be cut Social Security isn't going away, but in less than a decade, millions of Americans could see their monthly retirement checks shrink if Congress doesn't intervene. The program's retirement trust fund is expected to run out by 2033, at which point Social Security would only be able to pay 77% of promised benefits. For today's average retired worker, that would mean a cut of about $460 a month — more than $5,500 a year. That said, experts caution against claiming Social Security benefits early out of fear that the program may not be around in the future, as doing so results in permanently lower monthly checks. Federal lawmakers are expected to act before the cuts take effect, but the main concern is that the longer they wait, the more complicated the fix will become. Social Security is so widely supported that, until now, politicians have largely avoided moves that could prove unpopular with voters. The last major overhaul came roughly 40 years ago when the federal government gradually raised the full retirement age from 65 to 67. When that happened in 1983, Social Security insolvency was just months away. Why Social Security is facing a financial shortfall The program's financial shortfall largely stems from the nation's changing demographics, which have resulted in fewer workers supporting more retirees. In 2010, there were 43 million people age 65 and older, and by 2024, that number had grown to 59 million, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. At the same time, the number of workers contributing to the program has fallen — from 2.9 covered workers per beneficiary in 2010 to 2.7 in 2024 — a ratio projected to decline further to 2.3 by 2044, the foundation said. That imbalance is a concern because Social Security is primarily funded through a payroll tax, which accounts for about 90 percent of the trust fund's income. Fewer workers mean less payroll tax revenue. The good news is that the demographic shift isn't a surprise, giving policymakers time to prepare. The bad news is that it's not easily reversed, and major policy changes may be needed to shore up the program for generations to come. Something else to keep in mind: Despite raising the income cap over time, a smaller share of wages is now subject to the payroll tax compared to the '80s and '90s. The portion of wages and salaries covered by the payroll tax has fallen to about 82 percent, down from 90 percent in 1983, according to the Tax Foundation. Part of that is due to a rise in employer-provided benefits, like health insurance, which is tax-deductible, and thus faces neither the income nor payroll tax, the Tax Foundation said. What can be done to fix Social Security? Lawmakers have a few options: increase Social Security revenue, reduce costs or, most likely, some combination of both. Democrats want to raise more money by making high earners pay Social Security taxes on income above the current cap. For 2025, the tax only applies to the first $176,100, so any earnings above that aren't taxed. Gradually increasing the payroll tax rate is another way to raise revenue. Right now, the Social Security tax rate is 12.4 percent total — split evenly between employees and employers at 6.2 percent each. The combined rate has been steady since 1990. While raising taxes is rarely popular, polling suggests boosting revenue is generally more acceptable to the public than cutting benefits. A 2024 Pew Research survey found that wide majorities of both Republicans (77%) and Democrats (83%) do not support Social Security benefit reductions. President Trump has repeatedly promised not to cut Social Security benefits and even suggested eliminating federal income taxes on retirement checks — though that move would worsen the program's financial shortfall. Like his predecessors before him, Trump has offered little concrete policy direction for fixing Social Security. Tech billionaire Elon Musk's efforts to root out widespread waste, fraud and abuse fell short of expectations and sparked significant confusion. Earlier this year, Brookings released a bipartisan blueprint for fixing Social Security. The proposal included tax-based revenue boosts like increasing the maximum taxable ceiling and raising the payroll tax from 12.4 percent to 12.6 percent. It also suggested benefit reductions, like increasing the retirement age for high earners, among other changes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
