Surge in cedi currency eases Ghana's foreign debt burden
Ghana's cedi currency has jumped more than 40% versus the US dollar this year, far outperforming its African and emerging market peers, shrinking the cost of the country's foreign debt and giving it more fiscal breathing room.
The rally, which has surprised some investors, is another much-needed boost for the West African nation as it claws its way back from debt default and a punishing economic crisis.
In all the cedi has gained 42% against the dollar since January, changing hands near 10.20 to the greenback on Wednesday morning according to LSEG data.
"We have reduced our total debt over the last five months by almost 150-billion cedis [R260.78bn] which is very significant," Ghanaian President John Mahama told a session during the African Development Bank annual meeting in Abidjan this week, citing the cedi strength.
"If that trajectory continues, the target of reaching 55-58% debt sustainability by 2028 will be reached by the end of this year. And that means that it begins to give us fiscal space to begin to invest in the most productive sectors of the economy."
While the dollar has also been under pressure this year, the cedi's performance stands in stark contrast to other African currencies.
Investment bank JPMorgan, in a note to clients, said the gold windfall — with prices having chalked up 28 record highs by April — was a tailwind for the cedi.
Tellimer's Hasnain Malik, in a note, said the country's on-track International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, as well as restrictive monetary policy, have also helped the "extraordinary spike".
Lutz Röhmeyer, head of portfolio management at Capitulum Asset Management, said local Ghanaian holders of dollar debt exchanging their money back into cedis was also helping the gains.
On Monday Ghana's central bank governor Johnson Asiama, speaking at the Ghana CEO Summit in Accra, said the central bank had not used its own reserves to support the cedi. He cited tight monetary policy, cleaner FX auctions and stronger remittance flows.
But Malik and Röhmeyer each warned that the rally may not last.
"There are reasons for caution after this spike," Malik wrote in the Tellimer note, citing drops in oil and cocoa prices, IMF forecasts that implied a coming depreciation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Novel carbon credits initiative gives Zimbabwe an edge, but concerns remain over cost barriers
A new blockchain-based carbon credit registry could have 'profound' implications, but the costs are prohibitive and the risks of greenwashing remain. Zimbabwe's establishment in May of a regulatory body and launch of a blockchain-based platform for carbon credits – the first of its kind worldwide – has received plaudits from some experts, who say the move will enhance transparency and also make the southern African country a leader in the burgeoning field. However, some are wary that high costs will deter investment. Carbon credits, also known as carbon offsets, are tradeable units in the form of a certificate or permit that represents the emission, reduction or removal of one metric ton of carbon dioxide or equivalent greenhouse gas into the atmosphere in exchange for a monetary payment. There are two main types of carbon credit, namely compliance credits, which are issued under regulated carbon markets, and voluntary credits, which are largely unregulated. Zimbabwe's digital platform has three components, which include the general website for the Zimbabwe Carbon Markets Authority, which oversees all issues related to carbon credits, and the Zimbabwe Carbon Registry, in compliance with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This requires parties participating in the new market mechanism to have a national registry or have access to a registry to track all the carbon credits generated within their jurisdiction. A third component of the platform, which the Ministry of Environment, Climate and Wildlife says is still under development, is the marketplace that will allow buyers to directly purchase credits from the Zimbabwe Carbon Registry, 'eliminating the need for third-party brokers, thereby ensuring that project developers accrue the maximum benefits possible'. In response to questions on the initiative, permanent secretary in the ministry Tadeus Chifamba told Daily Maverick, 'This is critical in making sure that carbon credits generated in Zimbabwe are of the highest quality and standards and fetch the highest possible price on the international market, thereby maximising benefits for the country and communities.' 'Profound implications' According to global carbon market players, Zimbabwe is ranked the third-largest contributor of carbon credits in Africa, providing nearly 13%, behind Kenya and Gabon. In 2023, the government cancelled carbon credit projects and compelled operators to re-register, demanding up to 50% of revenue, following reports of fraudulent activities by a local project, Carbon Green Africa, which was sponsored by Swiss-based South Pole, one of the world's biggest project development firms. Under the new system, Zimbabwe becomes the first country to do away with the issuance and use of voluntary credits, transitioning to a compliance-only market by 2026, but credits issued in the country can still be used for voluntary purposes, with the proviso that they must comply with the higher quality assurance and accountability measures of the compliance market. Kudakwashe Manyanga is the founder and CEO of the Africa Institute for Carbon Trading and an industry expert. He told Daily Maverick that while the global carbon credit market has largely been voluntary, establishing a robust regulatory framework 'can provide necessary oversight and legitimacy'. 'A blockchain-based system can help ensure that carbon credits are genuinely produced, verified and retired, thereby increasing the integrity of the market and potentially attracting more participants. The implications for Zimbabwe could be profound. 'By implementing a well-regulated carbon market with a transparent registry, Zimbabwe is likely to attract both local and international investments in carbon reduction projects. Investors are increasingly seeking assurance that their contributions lead to tangible environmental benefits. A credible carbon registry could enhance Zimbabwe's attractiveness as a destination for climate finance, positioning the country as a leader in sustainable development in the region.' Mnanyanga, however, said the high fees associated with participating in the market were prohibitive and could sideline community-based projects, which he said often lacked adequate funding. The Statutory Instrument on Carbon trading regulations [ S.I. 48 Carbon Trading (General) Regulations of 2025 ] sets out various fees required for participation in the industry. For instance, there are three project categories. The registration fee for the biggest project is US$20,000, the second-biggest is $15,000 and the third-biggest is $10,000. There are other fees, including a first-time registration fee as a project developer, which is set at $5,000 for foreigners and $2,500 for locals. Greenwashing risks Michael Musgrave, of Newt Natural Capital, an advisory firm, is an academic and expert in carbon finance. He agrees that the costs involved in Zimbabwe's new system are prohibitive and says that in an industry which does not yet have many experts, overregulation is not the answer to ensuring that problems like greenwashing – a practice in which corporates may make unsubstantiated claims that their products are environmentally friendly or have greater positive environmental impact than they really do – do not occur. 'There are barriers in place in terms of regulation and certification, and government regulations introducing another layer of costs just make carbon credits less viable. The problems around monitoring, reporting and verification are not unique to Zimbabwe or Africa; they are problems that every carbon project experiences and we need as an industry to solve the problems globally, or at least on the continent, by training or upskilling people and having more expertise applied to the implementation of these projects, not by introducing more regulations. 'I really don't see that as a way of reducing greenwashing. There is a role for government to play, but I think it is a small regulatory role that should be well thought out and avoid the approach of just saying, 'well, everybody else is making money and we are not making money and therefore we will introduce regulations that enable us to make money. The justification is that they are looking out for the interests of Zimbabweans, but this is hardly the case.' The Centre for Natural Resource Governance is a local environmental advocacy group. In its statement on the latest development, the civic organisation also bemoaned that upfront fees required to establish and maintain carbon credit projects could be a hurdle for Zimbabwean businesses and organisations, saying that a lack of financial resources might limit their ability to invest in renewable energy projects or implement carbon emissions reduction strategies. 'Despite the potential financial windfalls that can accrue from carbon trading, we must state that it remains a false solution to climate change and is subject to manipulation by the private sector. Governments can also generate massive revenues for and on behalf of communities without ever ensuring the benefits extend to the communities,' the organisation said. 'National asset' Permanent secretary Chifamba dismissed concerns that the costs were a barrier to entry and that local communities were disadvantaged, saying the regulations actually protected communities 'from prejudice of the past', under the voluntary trade, which he said lacked transparency. 'It costs money for the government of Zimbabwe to assess proposed projects before approval or rejection in line with internationally set environmental integrity, social safeguards and sustainable development guidelines. The government cannot be expected to take money from treasury to subsidise profit-making project developers. 'Additionally, the export of carbon credits should be recognised as the export of any other asset, such as gold, diamonds or platinum and should be subject to royalties and export taxes by the government. These are national assets which belong to all Zimbabweans and there should be a mechanism to ensure that treasury or a designated national fund set out for the purposes of addressing climate change benefits from a certain percentage of the share of proceeds,' he said. Dr Francis Vorhies, the director of Stellenbosch University's African Wildlife Economy Institute and a research associate at the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit at Oxford University, told Daily Maverick that the distribution of revenue from carbon credits was a domestic issue. He believed that in Zimbabwe, the arrangements between government, business and landowners, as well as local communities, could be discussed and debated robustly for the benefit of all parties. Dr Vorhies said that while the initiative could give Zimbabwe a competitive edge because of its technical sophistication, which could guarantee transparency, Zimbabwe's global image could be a setback. 'The country does not have the best of reputations for doing business, and so investors may fear that such a state-run mechanism risks being too burdensome and too costly, and thus stay away.' DM
TimesLIVE
15 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
DaVinci Institute honours its doctoral graduates
The DaVinci Institute held the president's dinner on May 28 to recognise the outstanding achievements of doctoral students who are making a meaningful impact in their industries and communities. The gathering was hosted by the business school's president, Prof Edward Kieswetter, to introduce doctoral graduates to society as leaders whose research holds the potential to change industries, communities and the world. The institute said its doctoral graduates were expected to make significant contributions to society and industry, addressing real-world challenges with innovative solutions. The graduates are: Vincent Blennies, who is redefining how JSE-listed companies manage innovation; Mohamed El Mongy, who is bringing a regenerative model to the Nile Basin that is rooted in African perspectives; Portia Heynes, who addresses unemployment with a stakeholder-aligned employability framework; Skhumbuzo Clement Mtetwa, who pioneers a training approach for digital learning in universities; Kholekile Ntsobi, who offers a practical township economic model inspired by Hammarsdale; and Goni Saar, who enhances cybersecurity readiness for Zambian SMEs through a locally grounded framework. Kieswetter said the National Development Plan (NDP) 2030 seeks to produce more than 100 doctoral graduates per million of the population per year by 2030.
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
This is where we would be if SA sustained an economic growth rate of 4.5%
It is enough to make you weep when you read how much better off South Africa could have been with economic growth of 4.5%. If South Africa had sustained an economic growth rate of 4.5% per year, in line with its emerging market peers, its GDP would have been just under R12 trillion in 2024 instead of the actual R7.5 trillion. Government revenue could also have been around R800 billion higher than it is. Investment strategist at Investec Wealth and Investment International, Osagyefo Mazwai, notes that although South Africa has grown over the last 15 years, averaging economic growth around 1% a year, the population has grown at a higher rate of around 1.3%. He points out that there has been a structural break in South Africa's economic performance compared to the rest of the world, with a stark dislocation in gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. 'In essence, people are worse off than they were in 2010, suggesting that economic policy has been ineffectual in addressing poverty, unemployment and inequality. 'On a per capita basis, the rest of the world is 50% richer than the average South African. Growth of 1% will not lead to the envisaged goals of lifting people out of poverty and meaningfully addressing the problems of unemployment and inequality.' This chart compares nominal GDP over the period with what it would have been if the South African economy grew at 4.5% a year to illustrate the point on the opportunity cost of foregone growth in policy formation and execution: ALSO READ: Experts say no way SA can achieve economic growth of 3% this year How does economic growth of R12 trillion sound? Mazwai says if the economy grew at 4.5%, South Africa's nominal GDP would have been just below R12 trillion in 2024, a significant number, especially considering the benefits that could have been derived from a vastly larger GDP. He points out that South Africa's economic growth rates similarly had an effect on government revenue. 'Government revenue in 2024 alone could have been around R800 billion higher, while just a few weeks ago, South Africa faced a budget impasse due to a shortfall in funding, needing to raise R75 billion in the medium term to cover the shortfall. 'That shortfall is insignificant considering how much more could have been raised had the economy grown more in line with emerging market peers. 'The cumulative figure of revenue foregone is scary, at around R5 trillion over the last 15 years. 'That is material, considering the fiscal constraints facing South Africa and demonstrates the need to ensure economic growth to boost the fiscal war chest and further enable the capacity of the state to deliver services.' ALSO READ: IMF's bad news about economic growth for SA, thanks to Trump tariffs What economic growth of 4.5% could have meant Mazwai says these statistics put this into perspective: The R5 trillion lost would be enough to clear almost 90% of South Africa's gross national debt and bring the debt-to-GDP ratio down to just below 10%, compared to the currently expected 77% ratio this year. Eskom needs R390 billion over the next decade for transmission lines, a fundamental pillar of creating greater capacity in the energy sector. Electricity is the backbone of any structural improvement, especially considering the government's goals to build domestic manufacturing capacity and create meaningful employment opportunities. The R390 billion would be a drop in the ocean had growth been 4.5% over the last 15 years. Transnet needs R160 billion to upgrade rail and port infrastructure. Our logistics networks are key in connecting the economy across its internal nodes, but also key in building additional capacity to meet the demands of external markets. Again, R160 billion would have been a drop in the ocean had growth been in line with our peers. Eskom has debt of R400 billion. With economic growth at 4.5%, the government could have bailed Eskom out 12 times. Transnet has a debt of R140 billion, and the government could have bailed out Transnet many times, too. Social grants will cost the fiscus around R266 billion this year. With economic growth of 4.5%, these would have been more than affordable and potentially materially higher than what marginalised citizens receive now, also considering that many more people would have been absorbed into the labour market. ALSO READ: Fourth quarter GDP improved but economists say its still not great – here's why With higher economic growth, South Africa would have functioned better Mazwai says these statistics are significant because they show how South Africa could have been in a better position to address the prevailing needs of the state. 'Granted, if the economy was growing at 4.5% the assumption is that Transnet and Eskom and some of the other structural enablers of the economy would have been functioning properly. 'The numbers indicate the potential for vastly greater capacity to invest in the productive elements of the South African economy, such as in infrastructure, education, healthcare and the salaries of teachers, nurses and doctors.' He also notes that business confidence has been unusually correlated with the performance of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the post-pandemic environment, and therefore, SOE reform momentum must be sustained or increased. 'Business confidence is the key leading indicator of economic growth and employment creation. The unemployment rate would be closer to around 20% compared to the current 32.9% had the economy been growing at 4.5%. 'In other words, a third of those presently unemployed, according to the narrow definition of unemployment, would have jobs.' ALSO READ: Absa foresees economic growth of 2.1%, but Trump and budget can disrupt it But there have been some victories so far for the economy However, Mazwai says none of this should detract from some of the victories seen of late, such as: The formation of the government of national unity (GNU) and subsequent political stability and increased policy certainty, although the recent budget impasse showed that these are nonetheless fragile. The increased momentum of Operation Vulindlela in addressing the various structural impediments in the economy. The next steps are critical for addressing water infrastructure and local government inefficiencies. Improvements in the electricity supply and logistics network. Mazwai says there has been some stagnation in the recovery of SOEs, which may be cause for concern, although the worst of SOE performance appears to be behind us. However, he says a reacceleration in trend improvement is important for business confidence to grow. ALSO READ: Economic activity still moving sideways but optimism increases Recovery in PMI could mean higher economic growth 'We recently saw a modest recovery in the S&P Global Purchasing Managers Index (PMI), to a neutral level of 50. There must be a trend improvement in PMIs, which are typically linked to economic outcomes. 'Should PMIs continue to improve, the economy should continue on its path of recovery. This will likely be driven by the continued success of Operation Vulindlela.' Looking at GDP projections, Mazwai says data released so far suggest that while growth was likely weak in the first quarter, a persistent upward trend in PMIs can result in a marked acceleration in growth outcomes. 'PMI improvement will largely be a function of continued improvement in SOE performance. At present, the economy, by our estimates, is tracking at 1.3% for the year, which is well above the 0.6% seen in 2024 and 0.8% in 2023. 'This can then lead to more meaningful employment creation and a trend reversal in GDP per capita from the pattern of decline since 2011.' ALSO READ: World Bank has simple answer to improve South Africa's economic growth What SA can do to keep momentum going to grow He suggests that South Africa follow these steps to keep the momentum going and put South Africa on a firmer growth trajectory:
