Poland reinstates border controls with Germany and Lithuania to discourage asylum-seekers
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, whose government recently survived a confidence vote in parliament, announced the restrictions last week. Pressure has been mounting after far-right groups in Poland have alleged that Germany was transporting migrants into Polish territory after they reached Western Europe.
The reinstated controls, which began overnight Sunday, will last for an initial period of 30 days, though authorities haven't ruled out extending them, according to the Polish Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration.
'Illegal migration is simply a crime,' Polish Interior Minister Tomasz Siemoniak said Sunday during a news conference.
The border guard discovered an alleged smuggling operation within minutes of the controls taking effect overnight, officials said. An Estonian citizen was allegedly trying to take four Afghan nationals over the Lithuanian border, according to the Polish News Agency.
'We're doing this for you as well,' Tusk said during a joint news conference with Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof, the news agency reported. 'For the Germans, for the Dutch, for the French — because this is the European Union border.'
The Polish border with Lithuania, which stretches 104 kilometers (65 miles), will see checks in 13 locations. Poland's border with Germany, 467 kilometers (290 miles) long, will have controls at 52 crossing points.
Lithuanian authorities said on Monday they were ready to deal with possible traffic jams at the Polish border.
'If traffic begins to build up, we will start managing the flow … to minimize disruptions and keep checks as brief as possible,' Antanas Montvydas, deputy head of Lithuania's State Border Guard Service told Lithuania radio.
After taking office in May, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who made a tougher migration policy a pillar of his election campaign, ordered more police at the border and said that some asylum-seekers trying to enter Europe's biggest economy would be turned away.
Last week, Merz said that Poland and Germany were in close contact to keep the impact of Germany's border controls 'as low as possible.'
'The protection of borders against irregular migration is an interest that Germany has, that Poland has, that our European neighbors share with us,' Stefan Kornelius, Merz's spokesperson, said Monday. 'We do not want permanent border controls.'
The European Union has a visa-free travel area, known as Schengen, that allows citizens of most member states to travel easily across borders for work and pleasure. Switzerland also belongs to Schengen, although it's not an EU member.
According to the EU, member states are allowed to temporarily reintroduce border controls in cases of a serious threat, like internal security. It says border controls should be applied as a last resort in exceptional situations, and must be limited in time.
'Such measures must undoubtedly be temporary and must achieve results as quickly as possible and be terminated,' Lithuania President Gitanas Nausėda told reporters on Sunday, adding that Poland's decision shows that it is not yet possible to 'ideally control' the external borders.
___
Stefanie Dazio and Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin, Liudas Dapkus in Vilnius, Lithuania, and Rafal Niedzielski in Warsaw, Poland, contributed to this report.
___
Follow AP's global coverage of migration at https://apnews.com/hub/migration
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
33 minutes ago
- Politico
Big Tech looks for some global wins
With help from Aaron Mak Big Tech might have lost its bid to freeze state AI rules, but on the global front, it's finding new opportunities to push back on regulation it doesn't like. Nearly six months after President Donald Trump took office promising to go after 'unfair' overseas digital regulation, the American tech industry has already notched one victory and is pushing for more. Canada folded first: Last week, after Trump threatened to stop trade with Ottawa, Canada agreed to shelve a digital services tax that would have collected billions of dollars from U.S. tech companies. Now, looking to press its case in Europe, half a dozen U.S. tech trade groups signed onto a letter last week urging the White House to take a stand against 'the EU's discriminatory digital regulatory policy.' Europe's Digital Services Act, which aims to curb harmful content online, has already come up as a topic of conversation between American and European negotiators, POLITICO's Ari Hawkins reported. European officials pushed back on reports that the Digital Markets Act, which regulates competition, is on the table, too. No trade deal is set yet, and Trump on Monday announced the tariffs that had been set to snap back this week will once again be postponed as he negotiates deals with U.S. trading partners including Europe. But the environment is giving American tech advocates the sense that the wind is at their backs. 'It's hard for me to see the Europeans just giving it up entirely, but they're going to have to make changes' to their digital rules, said Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at the Consumer Technology Association, which counts Amazon, Meta and Apple as members. His group signed last week's letter to the White House, which named the DSA, DMA, digital services taxes, EU AI Act and the General Data Protection Regulation among 'discriminatory, unreasonable and burdensome regulations and taxes in the EU.' American companies say they're unfairly targeted by European policies. In the latest example, Apple, which faces fines of €500 million, and Meta, which was fined €200 million, are challenging their penalties for breaching the EU's Digital Markets Act. The trade war that Trump opened seems to have created new avenues to push their case, and now the tech industry has other digital measures in its sights. 'Canada walking back the DST was an example of how everything is on the table in these trade negotiations,' said Daniel Castro, vice president at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a nonprofit whose supporters include the CTA, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Meta. To some extent, European tech groups are joining the push to defang the digital rules coming out of Brussels. More than 40 leaders of Europe's biggest corporations, including French AI powerhouse Mistral and the Dutch chipmaking equipment manufacturer ASML, urged Brussels in a letter last week to pause the EU AI Act for two years. They pointed to the challenges pointed out by Mario Draghi, the former European Central Bank chief, whose seminal report last September found Europe lagging in productivity. He blamed Europe's financial markets, costly energy, fragmented R&D and polarized politics. The push against the AI Act, from both sides of the Atlantic, seemed to land with a receptive audience. European Commission tech chief Henna Virkkunen told Politico last month she would not rule out postponing some of the AI Act. Nick Moës, executive director of The Future Society that favors tech regulation, said the push was 'emblematic of significant lobbying going on to try to water down or delete obligations and requirements imposed upon industry players developing AI.' But other tech regulations may be harder to crack. In late June, The Wall Street Journal reported the U.S. Trade Representative's office had compiled a draft trade agreement with the EU that included a list of tentative deals with Brussels, including a dialogue on the Digital Markets Act. According to the report, American companies would be exempt from DMA enforcement while talks went on. A senior member of the European Parliament told POLITICO's Jacob Parry the WSJ report 'is bullshit' and that 'DMA is not up for discussion.' Brzytwa, of the CTA, said he could see policymakers in Brussels struggling to outright repeal tech regulation that had been carefully crafted over years – but the enforcement might be lightened. 'What we're hopeful for is it becomes less burdensome on companies with respect to fines,' he said. Brzytwa said he saw the White House taking an expansive view of what might be possible on the global front. In Trump's first term, he ordered investigations into individual policies that burdened American companies. Now, however, Trump was targeting a wide range of digital policies. 'His aperture in terms of the issue set has broadened,' Brzytwa said. 'We haven't seen anything in writing but all the tea leaves seem to indicate…the issues we're citing are on the table.' Communications systems blamed for flood disaster As deadly floods devastate Texas, alleged failures in emergency communications infrastructure may have been a driving force of the destruction. Over the weekend, flash floods coursed through central Texas, resulting in the deaths of at least 80 people. Dozens of people are also missing. Some local officials have accused the National Weather Service (NWS) of making faulty forecasts, which the agency has disputed. Yet, emergency preparedness experts say that gaps in the technical measures to disseminate warnings are really to blame. 'The crux of this disaster is a failure of the last mile of communication,' Tom Fahy, legislative director for the NWS employee union, told POLITICO. Such alerts were transmitted wirelessly to handheld devices, and to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Weather Radio. However, the messages can't reach people who don't have access to a cellphone or reliable service, or who've disabled such notifications on their devices. A summer camp where 11 people are missing notably had a policy against touchscreen devices that could've received weather alerts. In addition, people may miss radio communications if they don't happen to be listening at the right moment. Other counties in Central Texas have tried to solve this problem by installing outdoor weather sirens. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Hamilton Spectator
37 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Migrants deported from US to Salvadoran prison remain under US control, Salvadoran officials tell UN
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government of El Salvador has acknowledged to United Nations investigators that the Trump administration maintains control of the Venezuelan men who were deported from the U.S. to a notorious Salvadoran prison, contradicting public statements by officials in both countries. The revelation was contained in court filings Monday by lawyers for more than 100 migrants who are seeking to challenge their deportations to El Salvador's mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. The case is among several challenging President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. 'In this context, the jurisdiction and legal responsibility for these persons lie exclusively with the competent foreign authorities,' Salvadoran officials wrote in response to queries from the unit of the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The U.N. group has been looking into the fate of the men who were sent to El Salvador from the United States in mid-March, even after a U.S. judge had ordered the planes that were carrying them to be turned around. The Trump administration has argued that it is powerless to return the men, noting that they are beyond the reach of U.S. courts and no longer have access to due process rights or other U.S. constitutional guarantees. But lawyers for the migrants said the U.N. report shows otherwise. 'El Salvador has confirmed what we and everyone else understood: it is the United States that controls what happens to the Venezuelans languishing at CECOT. Remarkably the U.S. government didn't provide this information to us or the court,' American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Lee Gelerent said in an email. Skye Perryman, CEO and president of Democracy Forward, said the documents show 'that the administration has not been honest with the court or the American people.' The ACLU and Democracy Forward are both representing the migrants. Administration officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The administration in March agreed to pay $6 million for El Salvador to house 300 migrants. The deal sparked immediate controversy when Trump invoked an 18th century wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act, to quickly remove men it has accused of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. In a related case, the administration mistakenly sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the same prison, despite a judge's order prohibiting the Maryland man from being sent to El Salvador. The administration initially resisted court orders to bring him back to the U.S., saying he was no longer in American custody. Eventually, Abrego Garcia was returned to the U.S., where he now faces criminal charges of human smuggling while legal battles continue. Last month, a coalition of immigrant rights groups sued to invalidate the prison deal with El Salvador, arguing that the arrangement to move migrant detainees outside the reach of U.S. courts violates the Constitution. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
Are tariff rates going up? What to know about Trump's July 9 deadline
President Donald Trump's administration says higher rates will now go into effect Aug. 1. Here's where trade negotiations stand. U.S. consumers might have a few more weeks before feeling the full force of President Donald Trump's tariffs, even as a July 9 deadline looms. Trump in April announced a baseline 10% tariff, as well as targeted tariffs on dozens of countries. After stocks tanked and the bond market rebelled, Trump reversed course and said he would pause the sweeping tariffs for 90 days, giving countries until July 9 to negotiate rates. The flat 10% rate remained in effect. But that goalpost seems to have been pushed back. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters on July 6 that Trump is 'setting the rates and the deals right now," with new tariff rates set to kick in on Aug. 1. "I think we'll have most countries done by July 9. Either a letter or a deal," Trump said on July 6. By July 7, Trump posted letters to the leaders of various countries, like Japan and South Korea, announcing tariffs and warning of further increases if they raise tariffs on the United States. Here's where the country's trade deals stand so far. Where do tariffs stand today? After announcing a 90-day pause on the April 2 tariffs, the Trump administration said it would use that time to launch dozens of deals with trade partners. "We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days. It's possible," White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said in April. So far, the Trump administration has announced two trade deals: The U.S. and China in May also agreed to lower tariff rates during a 90-day pause. The administration has hinted at more deals on the horizon amid ongoing discussions. The EU's top trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, recently met with officials in Washington, and the Japanese government said its tariff negotiator held 'in-depth exchanges' with Lutnick over the phone in early July, according to Reuters. Talks with South Korea are also set to continue the week of July 7, according to Reuters, with President Lee Jae Myung's national security adviser visiting Washington. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on July 7 told CNBC that the administration would make 'several' more trade announcements within the next 48 hours. 'I think what President Trump is concerned about is the quality of the deals, not the quantity,' he said. Trump threatens countries aligned with BRICS On July 6, Trump said countries that align with BRICS policies could face an additional 10% tariff. The group of nations includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Ethiopia, Egypt, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates. Trump's threat comes shortly after the countries issued a joint statement warning that tariffs could hurt global trade. The countries also condemned military strikes on Iran. What does this mean for Americans? Because importing U.S. businesses will be paying Trump's tariffs, economists have warned that U.S. consumers will likely see higher prices as companies pass along those higher rates to customers. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell last month said he expects to see more price hikes this summer after tariffs have more time to work through the distribution chain. "The cost of the tariff has to be paid, and some of it will fall on the end consumer," he said. "That's what businesses say. ... So we know that's coming." Trade war escalates again: Trump says 25% tariffs coming for Japan and South Korea Trump sends tariff letters to countries During a July 6 appearance on CNN's 'State of the Union,' Bessent said the U.S. would send letters threatening to hike tariffs if trading partners fail to reach an agreement, with roughly 100 letters sent to smaller countries that don't trade much with the U.S. The letters are "saying that if you don't move things along, then on Aug. 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level," Bessent said. Here are where the April 2 tariffs stood for some of the country's largest trading partners: Letters started going out on July 7. That afternoon, Trump shared letters threatening 25% tariffs on goods from Japan and South Korea starting Aug. 1 if the countries do not agree to a trade deal. According to the Commerce Department, 4.9% of the U.S.'s machinery and mechanical appliance imports originated from South Korea as of 2022, as well as 8.3% of its transportation equipment and 4.9% of its base metals, iron, steel and tools. U.S. imports from South Korea totaled $115.4 billion, up 21.3% from the previous year. As for Japan, the country accounted for 6.2% of the U.S.'s machinery and mechanical imports in 2022. Nearly 4% of total U.S. exports were sent to Japan that year, while 4.6% of total U.S. imports were from Japan. Trump revealed new tariff rates on goods from an additional five countries later in the day, including: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said there will be dozens of additional letters sent in the coming days.
