logo
From Junior Apprentice to medicinal cannabis entrepreneur

From Junior Apprentice to medicinal cannabis entrepreneur

BBC News22-04-2025

At just 17 years old, Arjun Rajyagor was told by Lord Alan Sugar he had "natural business flair combined with intelligence" and could be "the best at whatever he wants to do".The Maths whizz-kid from Essex had been awarded £25,000 for winning the first series of the BBC's Junior Apprentice in 2010.Now 32, he has not disappointed, having found success with his medicinal cannabis business.He cares for his chronically ill mother and the family explored it as a treatment when it was legalised in 2018.Arjun said Lord Sugar still showed interest in his life and career."Lord Sugar's always there should I ever need business advice or I want to make a call to understand how something works."It's always nice to know that I've got him in my corner.
From 1 November 2018, specialist hospital doctors have been able to prescribe medicinal cannabis products in a limited number of circumstances where other medicines have failed.Treatments can be prescribed in cases including severe and rare forms of epilepsy in children, adults with vomiting or nausea caused by chemotherapy, and adults with muscle stiffness and spasms caused by multiple sclerosis.Approved products include Epidyolex, which is a highly purified liquid containing cannabidiol (CBD).It does not get patients high because it does not contain tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).Arjun's business, which was incorporated in 2023, is known as a software as a service (SaaS) platform.It offers doctors an internet cloud they can use to speed up the prescription process.Arjun, from South Ockendon, says 10,000 prescriptions go through his platform each month.He says growing up in his parents' post office taught him about the "balance" in business, but he said his mother's health was the reason for his latest venture.He told the BBC: "My mum (Usha) is not well, she's been bedridden for the last 15 years or so and is a chronic pain patient, and as a primary carer, I was kind of looking for something to help her, and when medicinal cannabis was legalised in 2018, it was something we decided to explore, because we tried everything else, and there were no other options available to us really."
During the Junior Apprentice series, Arjun wore a cupcake outfit for eight hours during a selling task."You get dropped into some of the most complicated, but most interesting problem spaces and told to sink or swim. Which I guess is a good representation of what life can be like at times," he explained."It did teach me that when it comes to business, there is nothing that is below your pay grade."In the final task he had to market a bottle of water.He was already running a computer repair business from home when he was "hired" by Lord Sugar.He recalls being "recognised on the street" and being asked for pictures afterwards."I remember Year 7 students who'd just come in [to school] - kind of in awe looking at me and I was a really weird."
Junior Apprentice ran for three seasons before being axed in 2012, but Arjun says he still occasionally touches base with his fellow candidates via a WhatsApp group."I'll check on everyone at least once a year to check what they're up to."
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm proof you can REVERSE your age: For decades BRYONY GORDON lived on a diet of cocaine, booze and cigarettes - but after getting sober, this is how she successfully lowered her biological age
I'm proof you can REVERSE your age: For decades BRYONY GORDON lived on a diet of cocaine, booze and cigarettes - but after getting sober, this is how she successfully lowered her biological age

Daily Mail​

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

I'm proof you can REVERSE your age: For decades BRYONY GORDON lived on a diet of cocaine, booze and cigarettes - but after getting sober, this is how she successfully lowered her biological age

For the first 37 years of my life, I treated my body like a pharmaceutical dustbin. If I saw something that promised to deliver me a quick, cheap high, I couldn't stay away from it. As a child, it was the sugary sweets that I knew I wasn't allowed – but craved anyway – stealing pick'n'mix from Woolworths to shovel into my mouth when I thought nobody was looking.

Restrict shop-bought baby food, government tells parents
Restrict shop-bought baby food, government tells parents

BBC News

time18 hours ago

  • BBC News

Restrict shop-bought baby food, government tells parents

Parents should not rely on shop-bought baby food pouches as everyday meals, new government guidance is the first time the NHS website has published advice on commercial baby food, and follows an investigation by BBC Panorama which found baby food pouches from six leading UK brands failed to meet their key nutritional critical of the way companies market their products as healthy options, have welcomed the leading baby food pouches carry labels such as "perfectly balanced for growing babies" or "packed with goodness". 'It's about time' advice introduced The NHS Start For Life website, run by the Department of Health and Social Care, also now advises parents to check food labels and choose products with the least amount of sugar, and to not let babies or children suck directly from food pouches - which can increase their risk of tooth it also says they should not feed snacks to children under one. Baby food snacks - such as puffs and sticks - have grown in popularity in recent weaning expert and author Charlotte Stirling-Reed told the BBC it was "about time that this was addressed... because food pouches and commercial baby foods are used so much by parents. It was a real gap in the NHS advice until now."Dr Vicky Sibson, director of the charity First Steps Nutrition Trust which campaigns for improvements in shop-bought baby foods, told the BBC that without clear advice it can be "confusing for parents" when they see shop-bought products marketed as being "just as good" as homemade foods. In April, BBC Panorama looked at the baby food pouches of six leading companies. The products have become a staple for many households with babies and children up to the age of two or three. They are convenient and have long shelf experts believe the products should only be used sparingly, are not replacements for homemade meals, and can cause children health problems if used as their main source of this was put to some of the leading brands, the market leader Ella's Kitchen told the BBC it agreed with all three other brands featured in the investigation – Heinz, Piccolo, Little Freddie, Aldi and Lidl - said their products were intended as a complementary part of a child's varied weaning NHS Start For Life website also now states that parents should wait until their baby is around six months old before feeding them solid foods, even if labels say the products are suitable from four among the brands investigated by Panorama, the companies Piccolo, Ella's Kitchen and Aldi promote their fruit-based pouches to babies as young as four months, despite the NHS and World Health Organization saying babies should not be given solid food until about the age of six Panorama began its investigation, all three companies said they are rebranding their products as suitable from six months. Baby food regulations 'need updating' Dr Sibson believes the government should now look to introduce stronger mandatory regulations for companies producing commercial baby foods to improve the suitability of the products for young children and regulate how they are marketed to Department of Health and Social Care told the BBC "current laws already set strong standards for baby food and we support action against any products that don't meet them".The British Retail Consortium says companies "take great care to optimise the nutritional composition of these products. All products are clearly labelled so parents can make informed decisions when feeding their baby."

Drinking a soda could be worse than eating a candy bar, researchers find
Drinking a soda could be worse than eating a candy bar, researchers find

The Independent

time18 hours ago

  • The Independent

Drinking a soda could be worse than eating a candy bar, researchers find

Could cracking open a can of soda be worse for you than unwrapping a candy bar? Researchers at Utah's Brigham Young University and institutions in Germany say that drinking your sugar could have a greater negative impact than eating it. They found that drinking sugar was consistently linked to a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Of the 38 million Americans with diabetes, between 90 and 95 percent have type 2. Other sugar sources have a lower risk. 'This is the first study to draw clear dose-response relationships between different sugar sources and type 2 diabetes risk,' BYU nutritional science professor Karen Della Corte said in a statement. 'It highlights why drinking your sugar — whether from soda or juice — is more problematic for health than eating it.' Della Corte was the lead author of the research which was recently published in the journal Advances in Nutrition. The reason for this difference may be linked to metabolic effects. The sweetened beverages contain what are known as isolated sugars, or sugars extracted from fruits and other sources and then added to processed foods. Added sugars are found in energy drinks, lemonade, sports drinks, soda, breads, cereals, yogurt, canned food, and other products. Because of that, there is a greater glycemic impact — an impact on blood sugar — that would overwhelm and disrupt metabolism in the liver, increasing liver fat and resistance to insulin. Insulin is the hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels, and injections are often given to people with diabetes who need it to help their blood sugar levels in a normal range. Whereas, dietary sugars in nutrient-rich foods including fruits and whole grains do not cause metabolic overload in the liver. Instead, they lead to slower responses due to the accompanying fiber, fats, proteins and other beneficial nutrients. To reach these conclusions, the researchers studied data from over half a million people across multiple continents. An analysis of that data found that each addition 12-ounce serving of soda and other sugar-sweetened beverages a day increased the risk for type 2 diabetes by a quarter. 'This strong relationship showed that the increased relative risk began from the very first daily serving with no minimum threshold below which intake appeared to be safe,' the authors said. Furthermore, each additional eight-ounce serving of fruit juice per day led to a 5 percent increased relative risk. However, 20 grams in the same time frame of table sugar and total sugar showed an inverse effect. Generally, a high sugar intake is linked to an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer. But, sugar helps to provide the body with energy and has an 'important role in nutrition,' according to Harvard Medical School.' 'This study underscores the need for even more stringent recommendations for liquid sugars such as those in sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice, as they appear to harmfully associate with metabolic health," Della Corte said. "Rather than condemning all added sugars, future dietary guidelines might consider the differential effects of sugar based on its source and form."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store