Remanding VP Sara's impeachment case to House 'unnecessary' — Tito Sotto
Vice President Sara Duterte attends a legislative inquiry into her office's use of public funds at the House of Representatives in Quezon City on November 25, 2024. REUTERS/Eloisa Lopez
Senator-elect Vicente "Tito" Sotto III questioned Wednesday the move of the Senate to return to the House of Representatives the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte.
Sotto, a former Senate president, said remanding the case to the House of Representatives of the 19th Congress was "unnecessary" as the latter was the one which filed the impeachment.
"The HOR of the 20th Congress is the proper body to be asked by the Senate Impeachment Court of the 20th Congress if they so desire," Sotto told reporters in a Viber message.
"The better term is ratification of the articles of impeachment filed by the HOR (House of Representatives) of the 19th Congress. It can be by simple resolution," Sotto added.
Sotto also pointed out that there is a presumption of regularity in the performance of official functions.
"The plenary is not supreme, the Constitution is; and ultimately, the sovereign is—the People," Sotto stressed.
He also said the declaration of unconstitutionality "is the exclusive domain of the Supreme Court, not the Senate or the impeachment court."
During a plenary session on Tuesday, Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa made a motion seeking that the verified impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte be dismissed "in view of its constitutional infirmities and questions on the jurisdiction and authority of the 20th Congress."
Escudero then ruled that the impeachment court should first be convened first before acting on any motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint.
When the impeachment court was convened, senators debated on Dela Rosa's motion for hours.
Senator-judge Alan Peter Cayetano then moved to amend Dela Rosa's motion that the articles of impeachment be returned to the House of Representatives instead without dismissing or terminating the case until such time that:
The House of Representatives certify to the non violation of Article XI, Section 3, paragraph 5 of the Constitution, which provides that "No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within one year; include the circumstances on the filing of the first three impeachment complaints"; and
The House of Representatives of the 20th Congress communicates to the Senate that it is willing and ready to pursue the impeachment complaint against the Vice President.
The Senate, sitting as an impeachment court, eventually voted to remand to the House of Representatives the articles of impeachment, with a vote of 18 affirmative, five negative, and no abstentions.
Escudero, as the presiding officer of the impeachment court, also issued a writ of summons to Duterte, giving her a non-extendible period of 10 days from receipt of the summons to answer.
The Office of the Vice President confirmed receipt of the writ of summons issued by the Senate impeachment court at 11:05 a.m. Wednesday. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate OKs priority bills before adjourning sine die
Several legislative priorities of the Marcos administration were ratified by the Senate before the 19th Congress adjourned sine die on Wednesday night. These included the bicameral conference committee reports on the Enhanced Fiscal Regime for Large-Scale Metallic Mining Act and the Accelerated and Reformed Right-of-Way (ARROW) Act, which were both listed as 'top priority' measures of the Legislative-Executive Development Council (LEDAC). The ratified bicam report on the Enhanced Fiscal Regime for Large-Scale Metallic Mining Act came from Senate Bill No. 2826 and House Bill No. 8937. According to Senator JV Ejercito, the reconciled version allows a five percent royalty based on gross output on mines operating within mineral reservation and a 5-tier royalty rate ranging from one percent to five percent based on margin from metallic mining operations for those outside mineral reservations. With the reforms in large-scale mining, the senator believes the government would benefit from an additional P6 billion worth of revenues. Senator Risa Hontiveros, however, opposed the measure, saying that it rejected amendments on increasing royalties for indigenous communities affected by mining, and imposing an export tax to fund the National Industrialization Program. Meanwhile, the ARROW Act was ratified by the upper chamber through the bicam report on the disagreeing provisions of Senate Bill No. 2821 and House Bill No. 6571. Senator Mark Villar, sponsor of the bill in the Senate, said that the measure is important in addressing the right-of-way issues that delay government infrastructure projects. 'Many projects have failed to meet their target completion dates due to unresolved right-of-way delays. Given these challenges, we welcome the amendment of the existing right-of-way law. The ARROW Act introduces key reforms to make the law more responsive to the evolving infrastructure landscape,' Villar said. The Senate also ratified the bicam report seeking to extend the term of barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) officials to four years. The report also postpones the 2025 Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections from December 2025 to the first Monday of November 2026 Also ratified by the Senate on Wednesday night were bicam reports on the following: Judiciary Fiscal Autonomy Act (Senate Bill No. 2982 and House Bill No. 11358); An Act amending Sections 134 and 168 of Republic Act No. 8424, otherwise known as the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended (Senate Committee Report No. 581 and House Bill No. 10535); Philippine Nuclear Energy Safety Act (Senate Bill No. 2899 and House Bill No. 9293); and Career Progression System for Public School Teachers and School Leaders Act (Senate Bill No. 3000 and House Bill No. 10270) — BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate 'killed' wage hike bill, says House spokesperson
'Let's not sugarcoat it—the Senate killed the P200 wage hike bill. Last night was the final session of the 19th Congress. No bicam, no compromise, no wage hike,' Abante said. A spokesperson for the House of Representatives on Thursday blamed the Senate for the failure of the 19th Congress to pass a legislated wage hike despite passage of the measure in both houses. In a video message, House spokesperson Atty. Princess Abante claimed that the Senate 'killed' the House bill that would grant a P200 wage hike, which was approved by the lower chamber on third and final reading last Wednesday, June 4. The Senate passed a P100 wage hike law more than a year earlier in February 2024. 'Let's not sugarcoat it—the Senate killed the P200 wage hike bill. Last night was the final session of the 19th Congress. No bicam, no compromise, no wage hike,' Abante said. 'And the reason is simple—ayaw ng Senado makipag-usap. Ang gusto nila, tanggapin na lang ng tao ang P100 nila. Bakit? Bakit binabarya ng Senado ang mga manggagawa?' (And the reason is simple—the Senate does not want to talk about it. What they want is for the people to accept their P100 wage hike version. Why is the Senate being stingy to the workers?) The 19th Congress adjourned sine die on Wednesday night. The legislated increase in the minimum wage needs to be refiled and again go through the legislative process in the 20th Congress. Sen. Joel Villanueva, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor, Employment and Human Resources Development, wrote the House a letter and asked that it adopt Senate Bill No. 2534, or the "P100 Daily Minimum Wage Increase Act of 2024," as approved by the Senate on third reading in February 2024, in substitution of House Bill No. 11376, as approved by the House on third reading on June 4. Rizal Rep. Fidel Nograles, the chairman of the House Committee on Labor on Employment, in a letter addressed to Villanueva, asked for the immediate convening of the bicameral conference committee on June 11 to reconcile both versions of the wage hike bill before the 19th Congress adjourns sine die. 'The House strongly prefers a transparent and deliberative bicameral process, rather than being bamboozled into accepting the Senate version wholesale, without discussion or compromise,' Nograles said. Abante said the bicam conferees from the House were 'ready to sit down, they were ready to defend the P200 proposal, and fight for labor, only to find out that the Senate had no intention of meeting at all.' 'We were ready to deliberate. We came in good faith. But what the Senate gave us was a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum. Wala silang balak makipag-usap. Ang gusto nila, susunod lang kami sa gusto nila. [The Senate had no intention to talk with us, what they wanted was for us to follow what they wanted]. That's not how democracy works,' the House spokesperson said. She also maintained that the House bill was not a reckless proposal, but a 'responsible, well-considered measure.' 'But instead of a dialogue, ang binalik sa amin ay tahimik na pagtanggi at pagmamadali. The people deserve accountability. Hindi ito pagkukulang ng Kamara. Ginawa namin ang aming trabaho namin, pero ang Senado, iniwan sa ere ang manggagawa,' Abante continued. (But instead of a dialogue, the Senate gave us silence and haste. The people deserve accountability. This is not a shortcoming of the House. We did our job, but the Senate left the workers hanging.) GMA News Online sought a comment from Villanueva and Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero regarding the matter, and will update this story once they respond. In an earlier interview, Escudero compared the House's wage hike bill to its transmittal of the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte. "'Yong impeachment pinadala niyo huling araw na lang ng sesyon namin, ito gan'on din huling mga araw ng mga sesyon naming tapos ayan na naman kayo, mamadaliin niyo na naman kami na parang kami ang may kasalanan," Escudero said. "Pinasa naming itong wage hike na one hundred pesos January o February 2024, mahigit isang taon nilang inupuan ito. Tapos bigla ngayon sila 'yong gigil na gigil at nagmamadali. May proseso kung gusto Talaga nilang i-adopt 'yong bersyon ng Senado. Simpleng mosyon 'yan sa Plenaryo ng Kamara," he added. (You sent the impeachment on the last day of the session. In this case, you sent the wage hike bill in the last few days of the session and again want us to hurry, making it appear that it is our fault. We passed the P100 wage hike in January or February 2024, and they sat on the measure for more than. a year. And now they are pressing us to move in a hurry. If they want to adopt the Senate version, all it takes is a motion in the House plenary.) Villanueva had expressed concern regarding the House's version of the bill as it might get vetoed by President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. if adopted by the Senate. Malacañang said President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase in the minimum wage. Escudero said on Monday that the measures seeking an increase in the daily minimum wage of workers is not a priority of the Legislative-Executive Development Advisory Council (LEDAC). –NB, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
5 hours ago
- GMA Network
Agri chief seeks gradual, strategic return of rice import tariff to 35%
Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel Jr. is seeking for the gradual return of rice import tariff rate from the current 15% back to 35% as an abrupt increase could undermine efforts to bring down the staple's price. In a statement issued Thursday, Tiu Laurel, citing his testimony at the House of Representatives' Murang Pagkain Super Committee hearing last Wednesday, said that he recommended to the Tariff Commission that future increases in the rice import duty should be 'strategically timed to minimize its impact on both local and global markets.' 'Our suggestion is a gradual returning to the 35% duty,' Tiu Laurel said. The Agriculture chief warned that an abrupt 20-percentage-point hike could disrupt the rice market and undermine government efforts to stabilize prices since last year. 'A sudden increase could shock not only the local market but also ripple across the global rice trade,' he said. Tiu Laurel said the Philippines, as one of the world's major rice importers, plays a significant role in global rice pricing due to its demand-supply as well as regulatory dynamics. To recall, President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr., under Executive Order 62 issued in June 2024, lowered tariff rates for rice to 15% until 2028 from 35%. The current 15% tariff, a temporary in response to El Niño and India's rice export ban last year, remains under review. Marcos' decision to reduce the rice tariff triggered a series of initiatives, including the introduction of a maximum suggested retail price (MSRP) on 5% broken imported rice. These measures brought down rice prices and contributed to significantly slowdown inflation. Rice inflation clocked in at -12.8% in May and is expected to average at a negative rate for the whole of 2025. 'To minimize the impact on the local market, we propose timing the tariff hike to coincide with the harvest seasons of our major suppliers—around late September for Vietnam and December for Pakistan,' Tiu Laurel said. Vietnam remains as the Philippines' largest rice supplier, although Marcos has directed efforts to diversify sources—including India and Pakistan—to ensure more stable and affordable imports, according to the DA chief. While global rice prices remain lower than last year, they have recently begun to rise again, a trend analysts view as a market correction, said Tiu Laurel. Nonetheless, the DA still plans to lower the MSRP on imported rice by P2 per kilo, reducing it to P43 starting July 1. Since the MSRP was introduced in January, it has been reduced several times from the original P58 per kilo, in response to declining global prices and the reduced tariff. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
