Asian banks see big boost to wealth business as currencies rally
Asian currency rally boosts demand for wealth, forex products
Trump's tariffs push investors from U.S. assets to Asia
Currency volatility drives demand for Asia banks' forex services
By Selena Li, Yantoultra Ngui and Anton Bridge
HONG KONG/SINGAPORE, May 8 (Reuters) - A sharp rally in Asian currencies is set to boost demand for wealth and forex products as clients seek alternatives to U.S. dollar-denominated assets and demand for hedging grows amid trade tariff uncertainties, bankers and analysts say.
The rally in the currencies since last week, starting with the Taiwan dollar and spreading outwards to those of China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and South Korea, sounds a warning for the greenback, and is seen as an "Asian crisis in reverse".
"Most of our clients are Asian, so if their own currency is growing, that gives them more purchasing power for wealth management products," Tan Su Shan, chief executive of Singapore's biggest bank DBS Group, said on Thursday.
A strong Singapore dollar would help bring a "pool of wealth" into the leading global wealth management hub said Leong Yung Chee, the chief financial officer of its United Overseas Bank or UOB.
Singapore's currency has risen more than 4% since U.S. President Donald Trump hiked tariffs on April 2.
"We hope to benefit from that in terms of the wealth management of some businesses that we do for retail clients," Leong said, during the bank's earnings briefing on Wednesday.
The expectations underscore how President Donald Trump's trade policies are pushing investors out of U.S. assets and moving their money into Asia, amid growing questions about the status of the greenback as a safe haven.
A weaker dollar is expected to cloud demand for popular U.S. fixed-income assets among wealth management clients in Asia, who may now be more open to investing in local currency denominated assets, analysts said.
The return of assets to Asia will further bolster the allure of the region as a leading global wealth hub.
Between 2025 and 2028, Asia is set to account for nearly half of all new high-net-worth individuals, or those with more than $10 million in assets, according to Knight Frank's 2025 Wealth Report issued in March.
The Asian currency swings have not yet hugely influenced investor sentiment, said Morningstar senior analyst Michael Makdad. However, over the long term, currency trends could affect flows as investments are allocated out of U.S. assets.
In Taiwan, a substantial portion of household financial assets has traditionally been allocated to life insurance products that invest heavily in dollar assets, and a leap of 8% in its currency within two days sent tremor across the sector.
"If Taiwanese life insurers struggle to generate attractive returns from U.S. fixed-income investments, it may open the door for banks to offer more alternative wealth management solutions instead," Makdad said.
Chinese exporters have accumulated a substantial amount of money in US-dollar-denominated assets, previously on the expectation of the yuan getting weaker, said Christopher Beddor, deputy China research director of Gavekal Dragonomics.
If currency expectations shift and the interest-rate gap narrows, there could be "a quite meaningful amount of money suddenly flowing into yuan-denominated Chinese bank accounts", he said.
"We're not there yet, but it's in the back of the mind for many investors."
The heightened volatility in currency markets is also expected to drive demand for regional banks' forex services, bankers said, though local clients' exports made less competitive by stronger currencies is a concern.
"They will provide both tailwind and headwinds," said DBS's Tan. "A stronger currency does affect their ability to export. It will affect their cost curves as well, and so the impact will depend on whether you're a net exporter or importer."
In Japan, banks may benefit from corporate clients looking beyond usual hedging tools to reduce foreign exchange risks.
Japanese firms have generally gone for the simplest hedging strategy - selling dollars and buying yen - but the urgency of the tariff situation is prompting them to consider other derivatives, said Noriaki Masuda, deputy manager in the transaction banking department of Mitsubishi UFJ Bank.
Company profitability will be affected when exchange rates fluctuate sharply, Masuda said, adding, "There may be cases where companies will be forced to restructure business distribution or raise prices." (Reporting by Selena Li in Hong Kong, Yantoultra Ngui in Singapore, Anton Bridge and Miho Uranaka in Tokyo, Ziyi Tang in Beijing; Editing by Sumeet Chatterjee and Clarence Fernandez)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
KKR-backed IVI to buy ART Fertility Clinics for $450 million
KKR-backed IVI RMA Global, a US-based leader in infertility treatment, is set to acquire ART Fertility Clinics for $400-450 million, according to people familiar with the matter. The acquisition marks a significant step in IVI RMA's global expansion, adding India to its presence in over 15 countries and more than 190 clinical offices across the US, Europe and Latin America. Both parties are in the final stages of documentation for a shareholders' agreement and are hoping to wrap up the transaction by June end. As with private hospitals, the IVF industry in India too is witnessing consolidation as several private equity funds have been aggressive with acquisitions. In 2023, Swedish fund EQT Partners acquired a significant majority stake in Indira IVF, the largest provider of fertility services in India and top five globally in terms of annual IVF cycles, at a $1.1 billion ('9,000 crore) valuation. ART Fertility Clinics began in 2015 as IVI Middle East, an international arm of IVI RMA Global. In 2020, IVI RMA divested the business to Gulf Capital, which rebranded it as ART Fertility Clinics. Since then, the brand has rapidly grown, expanding across West Asia and India. Live Events With clinics in Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Al Ain in the UAE as well as 11 centres across India, ART Fertility has established itself as a high-performance network in reproductive medicine. The Indian expansion began in 2021, backed by a $30 million investment from Gulf Capital. ART Fertility operates in big Indian cities including Mumbai, Noida, Ahmedabad, Chennai, Hyderabad, Gurgaon and Faridabad. Led by Suresh Soni, former co-founder and CEO of Nova IVF Fertility, ART Fertility reports a pregnancy success rate of 70% and has recorded over 5,000 successful pregnancies in under nine years. According to sources, ART Fertility posted revenue of $100-120 million in FY25, with an estimated Ebitda of $35 million. "For an Indian healthcare player, a $25-35 million ebitda which is borderline ebitda positive coming from the Middle East would add no value," said a fund manager at a Mumbai-based private equity firm that operates a pan-India IVF chain. "However, IVI being a US player where multiples are low, adding a Middle East business works well." IVI RMA trumped a rival bid by Temasek-backed Cloudnine Hospitals. A KKR spokesperson declined to comment. IVI RMA and ART Fertility did not respond to queries. Moelis is the advisor in the transaction. India is rapidly emerging as one of the world's fastest-growing markets for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). However, the sector has scope for expansion at 210 IVF cycles per million people, compared with 1,200 in the US and over 2,000 in Europe. Infertility affects approximately 15% of Indian couples, a figure expected to rise due to lifestyle factors such as poor diet, stress, late marriages, and pollution. According to EY, India's IVF market is expected to grow from $793 million in 2020 to $1.45 billion by 2027, at a projected CAGR of 15-20%. India sees around 300,000 IVF cycles annually, with projections suggesting this could grow to 500,000-600,000 cycles by 2030. About 30% of the market is controlled by 10-15 organised players, while the remaining is fragmented among smaller, unorganised clinics. Key players in India's fertility sector include Indira IVF, Nova IVF, Oasis IVF, Bloom Fertility Centre, Bengaluru-based Milann, Morpheus IVF, Ridge IVF, Akanksha IVF and Bourn Hall Clinic. Nova IVF, the second largest player in India, is owned by Asia Healthcare Holdings (AHH), the single specialty hospitals platform backed by GIC and TPG. Similarly, homegrown PE fund Kedaara Capital owns a minority stake in Oasis Fertility, while Brussels-based fund Verlinvest owns a controlling stake in Ferty9 F, a premier chain of fertility clinics in the AP/Telangana region.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will visa delays and border fears keep international fans away from the Club World Cup in the US?
As the U.S. prepares to host the FIFA Club World Cup, concerns about international travel, fan safety, and economic uncertainty are casting a shadow over the event. Expanded from seven to 32 teams, the tournament faces slow ticket sales and anxieties fueled by strict immigration policies and travel bans. These factors raise questions about whether the U.S. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New York: As the United States readies for the FIFA Club World Cup , concern over such things as international travel, fan safety and even economic uncertainty threaten to diminish enthusiasm for the United States will see the arrival of 32 professional club teams from around the globe to 11 cities for the tournament. There's a $1 billion prize Club World Cup is considered in many ways to be a dress rehearsal for the big event, the 2026 World Cup to be hosted by the United States, Canada and there seems to be little buzz for the Club World Cup at home or abroad. The expansion of the field from seven to 32 teams has diminished the exclusivity of the event, and ticket sales appear the same time, the tournament is being played amid reports of foreign tourists being detained and visa processing delays. Chaotic U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities and President Donald Trump's travel bans aren't exactly reassuring international fans , travelers, visa woesTrump's policies appear to have already impacted travelers. The National Travel and Tourism Office released data showing visitors to the U.S. from foreign countries fell 9.7% in March compared to the same month last year. The travel forecasting company Tourism Economics has predicted that international arrivals would decline 9.4% this U.S. Travel Association, a nonprofit group that represents the travel industry, has urged the Trump administration to improve such things as visa processing and customs wait times ahead of a series of big sporting events on U.S. soil, including the Club World Cup beginning June 14, the Ryder Cup later this year, next summer's World Cup, and the 2028 Los Angeles President Geoff Freeman said, for example, that the wait in Colombia for a visa interview appointment is upwards of 18 months - already putting the 2026 World Cup out of reach for some travelers. He said his organization is working with the White House's World Cup Task Force to address issues."They (the task force) recognize how important this event is: success is the only option. So we're eager to work with them to do whatever it is we need to do to ensure that we can welcome the millions of incremental visitors that we think are possible," Freeman said. "But these underlying issues of visa and customs, we've got to address."Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing last month, suggested consular staff could be put on longer shifts and that artificial intelligence could be used to process visas."We want it to be a success. It's a priority for the president," said the Trump administration may have added to the concerns for international visitors by issuing a ban on travelers from 12 countries, with restrictions on travel from nine more countries. Iran, one of the countries named, has qualified for the World proclamation included an exemption for "any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state."It did not mention fearsThere are signs current immigration policies were already impacting soccer fans and spurring worries over safety. A Latin American supporters group in Nashville stayed away from a recent Major League Soccer game because of ICE activity in the city. The city's Geodis Park is set to host three Club World Cup Navarro, who offers travel advice to followers on his social media platforms under the moniker TravelFutbolFan, said the World Cup Task Force announcement did not allay fears about travel, especially when Vice President JD Vance said, "We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home. Otherwise, they'll have to talk to (Homeland Security) Secretary (Kristi) Noem."That insinuated fans visiting the United States for the World Cup could use it to stay in the country, which is nonsensical, Navarro maintained. For many countries, fans traveling to the World Cup - an expensive travel plan with hiked flight and hotel prices - are broadly viewed as higher-spending and lower-risk for host nation security put the onus on FIFA "They must know that there is an anxiety among international travelers wanting to come in. They must know there's an anxiety among the U.S. fan base that is multicultural and wanting to go to all these places. Are they going to? Are they going to be harassed by ICE?" Navarro said. "There is just a lot of uncertainty, I would say, too much uncertainty, that the fan base doesn't want to think about."If you build it, will they come?It remains to be seen how outside factors will ultimately impact the Club World Cup, which is not the global spectacle or draw that the World Cup sales, which were based on a dynamic pricing model, appear to be slow, with lowered prices from earlier this year and a slew of recent promotions. For a match between Paris Saint-Germain and Botafogo at the Rose Bowl on June 19, there were wide swaths of available seats going for $33.45.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Singapore casts tax shadow on India bets, shuns shell companies
Mumbai: Singapore is intensifying scrutiny of companies and investment entities, a move that could ignite new tax disputes. This development particularly impacts many MNCs and international funds that use the Asian financial hub as a base to invest in and acquire companies in India. The catalyst for these potential disputes is a recent series of advance rulings by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS), which define and endorse what constitutes ' economic substance '. If a Singaporean entity fails to meet the conditions emphasized by the tax administrator and thus cannot prove it has adequate 'substance,' the Indian Income Tax (I-T) department could levy higher taxes. This could involve claiming tax on certain stock sale transactions or demanding increased tax on earnings from dividends and loan interest paid by an Indian company. Dealmakers and businesses are closely monitoring this situation. "These advance rulings are the first to evaluate economic substance factors since their inclusion in 2024 as Section 10L of Singapore's Income Tax Act for taxing gains from the sale of foreign assets. These factors could be used by Indian tax authorities to determine whether a Singapore-based entity is merely a conduit, particularly when applying the Principal Purpose Test (PPT)," explained Ashish Karundia of the CA firm Ashish Karundia & Co. (A PPT is a provision that allows denial of treaty benefits). According to Girish Vanvari, founder of the tax and regulatory advisory firm Transaction Square, the implications are far-reaching due to the change in law prioritizing substance and economic reality over legal form. "For tax professionals and business leaders, this means a necessary recalibration of how Singapore is used in cross-border structuring -especially in relation to Indian operations. So, if you're using Singapore as a holding or IP base for India-related investments, it's time to revisit the structure. The days of relying purely on treaty protection without operational presence are over," said Vanvari. Many foreign investors betting on India utilize Singapore to leverage the tax treaty between the two countries. A common structure involves one of their arms in a tax-friendly jurisdiction setting up a company in Singapore (say, S1), which in turn owns another company in Singapore (say, S2). In this two-layered structure, S2 serves as a vehicle to invest in India. Typically, when exiting an Indian investment, S1 might sell the shares of S2, which holds shares in an Indian company; alternatively, S2 would directly sell its interest in the Indian company. THE PARAMETERS The IRAS underscored that economic substance would require: (a) a company to have adequate human resources with the necessary qualifications and experience; (b) have a premise in Singapore; (c) take key business decisions there; and (d) incurs expenditure. If S1 or S2 does not fulfil these criteria, they would come under the lens of the tax authorities in either Singapore or India. How? Here are the possible situations: · Say, S1 sells shares of S2 (both local entities) and if India demands tax on the 'indirect transfer' by invoking India's domestic tax regulations, companies like S1 have till now argued that under the treaty India has no right to tax gains from indirect transfers. However, in future, the I-T department could assert that the treaty holds only if S1 has substance. But if it doesn't (as per Singapore's terms), S1 cannot avail treaty benefits and must pay tax to India. Here, I-T would challenge that S1 was formed primarily to escape tax. · If S2 directly sells shares of the Indian company, there's no capital gains tax if the shares were bought before 2017 (under a grandfathering provision introduced when the treaty was amended). However, if S2 lacks substance, I-T may demand tax on the grounds that treaty relief can be denied to a shell outfit. · Suppose, S1 sells stocks it directly holds of another company in a third country. S1 can avoid tax in Singapore if it can demonstrate substance. However, if S1 fails the substance test (and is taxed by Singapore), then India would also have strong grounds to demand tax from S1 when it sells shares of S2. · Also, there's an increased risk of double taxation - with India taxing based on source and Singapore taxing based on substance.
