Banning phones in schools does not improve grades or mental health, new study finds
Restricting mobile phones at school does not improve grades or mental wellbeing, a landmark new study has found.
The Conservative government put out formal guidance on how to ban mobile phones in schools almost exactly a year ago. It included advice on how to search students and their bags for devices "if necessary".
But new evidence from the University of Birmingham has found students' levels of sleep, exercise, academic record, and exercise did not differ between schools with and without phone bans.
The study also found restrictive phone policies did not lower the overall time young people spend on their phones each day.
The research, which has been peer-reviewed, compared 1,227 students and 30 different secondary schools.
It appears to contradict a study from last summer that found schools that effectively ban mobile phones see better GCSE results.
"There is no evidence to support that restrictive school phone policies, in their current forms, have a beneficial effect on adolescents' mental health and wellbeing or related outcomes," the study concluded.
It did, however, find that increased screen time impacted the mental health of students, as well as their classroom behaviour, physical activity levels and sleep cycles.
Dr Victoria Goodyear, the study's lead author, told the BBC that school phone bans were not enough to tackle the negative impacts of mobile phone over-usage.
"This approach does not necessarily preclude restrictive school mobile phone policies," the study concluded.
"But these policies would be linked with a wider holistic approach to adolescent mobile phone and social media use."
Read more:
The research comes days after the education secretary branded a Conservative party proposal to ban phones in classrooms a "headline-grabbing gimmick".
Bridget Phillipson said she agreed that mobile phones should not be in lessons, but added the opposition was wrong to say it could only be done by introducing legislation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How the fight against Labour's cruel child VAT raid continues
Those hoping for immediate relief from the courts in relation to the Government's imposition of VAT on school fees yesterday had their short-term hopes dashed. But if you read the judgment and examine what is going on in schools, the Government now has a right mess on its hands. The High Court rightly found that, for the 100,000 or so children in private schools with special education needs who are forced to move into the state sector because they have closed or their parents can no longer afford the fees, their fundamental rights have indeed been interfered with. However, it said that Parliament was entitled to do this because it has very broad powers when it comes to raising new taxes. In this case, what was being sought by the claimants was a 'declaratory remedy' which would have sent the legislation back to Parliament to resolve. So, what happens now? The Chancellor Rachel Reeves and beleaguered Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson are no doubt delighted that they have apparently won. But the truth is, like special needs children themselves, they are not out of the woods. They won by a nose and could yet lose in subsequent contests. The first thing to say is that the special needs system is in total chaos. Since the pandemic, there is a huge backlog of children who do not have 'statements', in other words official education health and care plans, who are in a queue or appealing at tribunals hoping to get one. Local authorities are understandably reluctant to award them, in part because of a questionable previous court ruling, which said they have to pay for taxis for special needs children to get to their school. If you talk to a taxi driver, many of them make a fortune providing this service which, in general terms, seems excessive and incredibly costly. Yet now, parents who previously were paying for their own children's school fees and indeed transport, have had it confirmed that their children have a fundamental right to an appropriate education and their legal claims against local education authorities have now been given additional force. It would have been cheaper and simpler if VAT had not been imposed on school fees and they stayed where they were. Second, thousands of parents were waiting for this judgement, having either given provisional notice to leave private schools or waiting to decide whether to embark on that costly journey in the first place next term. So far, 11,000 children have left private schools because of this measure. My guess is that twice that number, will now not turn up next term. Put all this together and the new taxes on education will raise very little money and might even lose revenue. The reality is that Labour have created a giant and costly mess. An appeal is likely. There is no tax on education in any civilised country and, sooner or later, we must hope that a future government will reverse this cruel and costly measure. George Trefgarne is a parent and supporter of the 'Education Not Discrimination' group Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LILLEY: Carney's public safety minister can't skip terror file
Is it wise to have a minister of Public Safety who has to recuse himself from files related to banned terrorist groups? The obvious answer is no, that's an untenable position and shouldn't be allowed to happen. Welcome to Canada in 2025, though, where Gary Anandasangaree is the minister in charge of the terrorism file but has to step out of the room for any decisions related to two banned terror groups. As first reported by Global, Anandasangaree can't be part of decisions on Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) or the World Tamil Movement (WTM). The LTTE, or Tamil Tigers, were part of a deadly civil war in Sri Lanka, engaging in assassinations and suicide attacks. The World Tamil Movement was a group set up in the 1980s to serve Toronto's large and growing Tamil community but was designated a terrorist group by the federal government for their funding of the LTTE. Why did Anandasangaree recuse himself? That's unclear, to be honest. He was asked about this by Conservative MP Frank Caputo in the House of Commons on Thursday but didn't offer much in the way of detail. 'In all national security decisions, my utmost concern is that of the safety of Canadians,' Anandasangaree said. 'I will support law enforcement and national security agencies who do their work impartially and effectively.' That's a boring boilerplate answer that doesn't tell us much. Neither does the second half of his answer. 'In an abundance of caution, and to ensure that there is no perception of any conflict, I have asked the public safety officials to implement a screen on national security issues relating to the Tamil community,' he added. If Anandasangaree has no ties to the LTTE or WTM, there should be no need to recuse himself from decisions about these organizations. Simply being Tamil, as Gary Anandasangaree is, doesn't mean he can't make informed decisions. Of course, if the Carney government were looking to lift the terrorist designation on the LTTE and WTM, having a minister of Public Safety who was born in Sri Lanka and is Tamil could have a bad look. Is that the reason for Anandasangaree to declare that he won't take part in decisions about these groups? It's an idea that has been pushed by many in the Tamil community for years, noting that the civil war ended in 2009 with the defeat of the Tigers. In April 2022 while campaigning for the leadership of the Conservative Party, Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown said he would lift the ban if elected. It would be a foolish move for Prime Minister Mark Carney to make but in keeping with a longstanding tradition for Liberals that winning over votes of specific ethnic groups is what really matters. Another possibility is the allegation that Anandasangaree has ties to the LTTE. That allegation was made back in 2014 as Anandasangaree was seeking the Liberal nomination in Scarborough-Rouge Park. Stories from diaspora media stated as fact, repeatedly, that Anandasangaree was part of the Tamil Tigers network. Many of those stories were posted to the website of the Sri Lankan government's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and are still available there. That's not proof that Anandasangaree is or was part of the Tigers, nomination races can be nasty affairs and in ethnic diaspora politics, this is especially true. It is equally true that Anandasangaree has to answer more questions on this front and that the Sri Lankan government's actions should also be called into question. Questions about this matter sent to Anandasangaree's office on Thursday resulted in a one-line response regarding LTTE involvement. 'That statement is categorically false,' said spokesperson Alice Hansen. Questions to Carney's office about having a minister of Public Safety having to recuse himself and facing allegations on a Sri Lankan government website were met with bland, general statements. 'Minister Anandasangaree has been a lifelong advocate for his community to ensure it is supported and represented. He has made clear that his utmost concern in all national security decisions is the safety of Canadians,' said the reply. That doesn't quite seem good enough, transparent enough. Either Anandasangaree can do his job fully, or he should be replaced. blilley@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Badenoch calls for end to oil and gas windfall tax
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has called for an end to the windfall tax on oil and gas companies and said new licenses should be issued for drilling in the North Sea. Addressing the Scottish Conservative party conference in Edinburgh, Badenoch said the tax - known as Energy Profits Levy - should be scrapped before its current 2030 expiration. The levy was brought in by the previous Conservative UK government but Badenoch said her party had got this wrong. The Tory leader also claimed that Scotland had "declined" under left wing parties and that the SNP had wasted millions on "independence propaganda". What is the windfall tax on oil and gas firms? UK government to end North Sea windfall tax in 2030 Fears over energy tax rises as business confidence falls The Energy Profits Levy was introduced in May 2022 after oil and gas companies recorded skyrocketing profits due to a sharp rise in energy prices, in part due to the war in Ukraine. It has since been both extended and increased, with the current scheme due to end in 2030. The oil and gas sector says the windfall tax is holding back investment. Badenoch told the Scottish Conservative conference that as part of renewing her party she would be "standing up for our oil and gas". She claimed the windfall tax on the sector is wrong as "for months there has been no windfall to tax". The Tory leader said: "The strikes overnight in the Middle East remind us of how vital it is that we can rely on our own energy security, our own natural resources." Badenoch said Labour's extension of the tax is "killing the oil and gas industry". To applause from the conference, she said a Tory government would "scrap the ban on new licences". Scottish Conservatives leader Russell Findlay earlier said it would be a "complete act of national self-harm" not to continue drilling for oil and gas in the North Sea. He told the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme: "We are the party who completely support the North Sea oil and gas industry. "The SNP in Edinburgh are completely hostile to any form of new exploration, and it's exactly the same with Sir Keir Starmer and Ed Miliband in London. "They want to leave this oil and gas in the North Sea and import oil and gas from further afield. It makes absolutely no sense." Responding to Badenoch, Simon Francis of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition said her comments were "out of touch", adding: "Even with the windfall tax in place, the energy industry made over £115bn in profits in 2024 alone. "Meanwhile, average household energy bills remain hundreds and hundreds of pounds higher than they were before the energy crisis started." SNP MSP Kevin Stewart said: "The Tories wrecked our economy, presided over soaring household bills and ripped Scotland from the EU against our will." Dame Jackie Baillie, the deputy leader of Scottish Labour, claimed the Tories are on the side of oil and gas companies "rather than working Scots".
