logo
Tariff lifeline for ArcelorMittal means higher prices for customers

Tariff lifeline for ArcelorMittal means higher prices for customers

The Citizen08-05-2025
'Safeguard' duties of 13% were imposed at the start of May to shield Amsa's hot-rolled steel products from international competition.
Itac and the IDC both fall under the dtic. In setting steel tariffs, Itac is accused of cossetting its own portfolio. Picture: Supplied
The International Trade Administration Commission of SA (Itac) has announced temporary 'safeguard' duties on some hot-rolled steel products produced by ArcelorMittal SA (Amsa).
The 13% safeguard duties kicked off on 2 May for a year, reducing to 11% and 9% over the subsequent two years, and then to zero.
The safeguard duty is on top of the 10% customs duty already in place, bringing the import protection to 23% in the first year. The total duties on hot-rolled products fall to 21% from May 2026 and 19% from May 2027.
The safeguard duties were gazetted last week and are seen as a lifeline for embattled steel producer Amsa, which has been undercut by low-cost imports from China.
'There's nothing worse than a temporary tariff,' comments Neels van Niekerk, executive chair of International Steel Fabricators.
Hot-rolled steel is used in construction, manufacturing, and engineering and is a key input in mining equipment, water tanks, gas cylinders, and truck trailers.
ALSO READ: IDC saves ArcelorMittal days before furnaces switched off
'Necessary, not punitive' – Itac
'Safeguard measures are designed to address unforeseen surges in imports that threaten or cause serious injury to a domestic industry,' says Itac. 'While these measures are not punitive, they are necessary to ensure fair trade conditions and protect local industries from being overwhelmed by excessive foreign competition.'
Imports now account for about a third of local steel consumption, with Amsa's net realised prices falling to levels last seen in 2015.
This, and Amsa's galloping transport and electricity bill – up 14% to R3.2 billion in 2024 – contributed to its decision to wind down its long steel mills in Newcastle and Vereeniging.
ALSO READ: Government still talking to ArcelorMittal while Seifsa identifies challenges
Perspective
'Effectively, what this means is that customers can expect to pay 13% more for hot-rolled steel products,' says Gerhard Papenfus, CEO of the National Employers Association of SA (Neasa).
'Amsa asked for additional protection and they got it. What South Africa needs right now is steel of the best possible quality, wherever we can get it.
'If we have to import, then so be it. We cannot continue to support industries that cannot compete without more and more protection.'
The Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) provided R1 billion in short-term lending to Amsa, alongside another R380 million loan and an additional R1.68 billion shareholders loan in the hopes of extending the life of its longs business.
However, that may not be enough to rescue Amsa.
'For Amsa Newcastle to survive, it will require a lot more than money,' says Donald MacKay, CEO of XA Global Trade Advisors.
'If the problems they identified are not addressed, they will burn through the money from the IDC and we will be back here [for more money].'
ALSO READ: Concern about SA steel industry: Trump's tariffs and ArcelorMittal closure looming
Market distortion
The steel market is further distorted by the IDC's R14 billion exposure to mini-mills, which use scrap metal as feedstock and compete with Amsa in certain products.
These mills enjoy a substantial pricing advantage through the Preferential Pricing System (PPS), which allows them to secure scrap at 30-50% discounts to market prices.
This means scrap can only be exported after being offered to local mills at a 30% discount.
This is in effect a ban on scrap exports and a R8.5 billion annual subsidy to mini mills – resulting in an estimated 50 000 scrap collectors in SA being forced out of business.
Scrap dealers tell Moneyweb that removing the PPS would allow the 300 000 scrap collectors in SA to earn a decent living rather than transferring this benefit to the mills.
This benefit comes on top of a 20% export duty on scrap.
Mark Fine, head of the Scrap Recycling Coalition, an informal grouping of 48 scrap metal dealers, says these mills produce billets, which are little more than scrap 2.0 and a way to circumvent export restrictions on scrap.
ALSO READ: Did government policy kill SA's steel industry?
Mini-mills say even with the PPS in place, there remains a shortage of scrap in SA, though Fine says this is disproven by the fact that these mills exported more than 400 000 tons of recycled scrap in billet form in the first few months of 2025.
Itac's steel tariff policy has been criticised as self-serving, given the IDC's massive exposure to these mini-mills, some of which are in business rescue.
Itac and the IDC both fall under the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic). In setting steel tariffs, Itac is accused of cossetting its own portfolio.
'If government demand increases, it will be met by product from the mini mills, because the subsidies give them an ability to keep their prices low. Amsa on the other hand, has to pay back the IDC loan, which will be burnt through even quicker this time, given the steep discount they are providing on long products to simply stay in the game.
ALSO READ: Steel producers slam ArcelorMittal's call to end scrap export tax
PPS 'a massive scam'
Fine says the PPS is a legacy of former trade and industry minister Ebrahim Patel and has been fatal for the industry.
'These mini-mills are mostly foreign-owned and they add very little value in the steel chain. Yet they receive this massive transfer of wealth each year, claiming that without the PPS South Africa would face a shortage of scrap.
'That's an absolute lie. These mini mills produce what I call scrap 2.0 which they can then export and make nice profits for themselves because the export restrictions don't apply. This is a massive scam.'
Nampak is reckoned to be losing R115 million a year due to its inability to earn fair market value on its ferrous scrap.
ALSO READ: Cheap IDC funding 'placing the complete steel market at risk'
And Transnet – the country's largest generator of scrap – is reckoned to lose R40-R50 million a month due to the PPS.
That does not count scrap from automotive producers such as VW and Toyota.
Tami Didiza, manager for stakeholder management and communications at Amsa, says a number of these companies have been unable to operate successfully and could have closed had the current dtic policies of scrap intervention through the PPS, Scrap Export Tax and an export ban (which lapsed in 2023) not saved them over the last five years.
'The government intervention to allow a deferral of the wind down of the Amsa longs business provides an opportunity for the fundamental structural issues facing the steel industry to be addressed, and to place it on a sustainable path by removing the market distortions that have been created,' says Didiza.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These are the MOST popular fast foods in South Africa
These are the MOST popular fast foods in South Africa

The South African

time16 hours ago

  • The South African

These are the MOST popular fast foods in South Africa

Fast foods in South Africa are a multi-billion-Rand business annually. However, following the introduction of 30% Trump tariffs this month, a major shake-up is on the cards. While this spells trouble for US-based brands, it does represent great strategic opportunities for other fast foods in South Africa. Interestingly, according to a report by Mordor Intelligence, fast foods in South Africa are a R177-billion industry annually. As of May 2025, there were an estimated 5 982 fast-food restaurants in the country. This accounts for nearly 80% of all food services, reports Daily Investor . Instead of sales, the report analysed the most visible and talked-about fast foods in South Africa. These included McDonald's, KFC, Chicken Licken, Nando's, Roman's Pizza, Debonairs, and Steers. Noteworthy is the fact that full-service, sit-down restaurants like Spur, Wimpy and Mugg & Bean were not included. As such, the most popular fast foods in South Africa are McDonald's and KFC, leading online share of search (SoS) rankings with more than 10% each. Interestingly, Data from Standard Bank customers also revealed how South Africans spend their money on fast foods every month. Pizza, burgers or chicken, which is South Africa's most popular? Image: File Research found that your average customer (earning R25 000 per month) spends roughly R775 monthly on fast foods in South Africa. This is over and above groceries and other food shopping. Interestingly, the higher the earnings, the higher the spending. Earners in excess of R50 000 spend R1 000 per month, and spending can peak at R1 300 per month over the holiday period. Moreover, Mordor says negative sentiment towards brands comes from late deliveries, poor service and/or small portion sizes. More than 70% of consumers say taste consistency and credibility was their strongest driver for fast foods in South Africa. The best-selling combo deals don't exceed the R100 mark. And the 80% of fast-food purchases take place on Fridays and Saturdays, in and around paydays and holidays. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Cape Town's Dial-a-Ride service faces budget cuts, limiting transport for disabled users
Cape Town's Dial-a-Ride service faces budget cuts, limiting transport for disabled users

IOL News

time16 hours ago

  • IOL News

Cape Town's Dial-a-Ride service faces budget cuts, limiting transport for disabled users

Users have expressed concern over changes to Cape Town's Dial-a-Ride service amid budget constraints. Image: Supplied The City of Cape Town said its Dial-a-Ride service is oversubscribed as they experience capacity challenges, with the R28.2 million annual budget being insufficient for the current R40 million operating costs. This has been met with concern by users. The City announced that effective September 8, the service will exclusively transport eligible wheelchair users and those with severe walking impairments, strictly between work and home. "Over the past two decades, the service has expanded to include commuter trips to educational, medical, recreational facilities, shopping centres, and private home visits and the user base grew to include users with other special needs. "Unfortunately, due to budget constraints, the DaR (Dial-a-Ride) service needs to be realigned with its core mandate: namely to transport eligible wheelchair users and those with severe walking impairments, and to limit these trips between the users' homes and places of work,' the City said. It added that due to a current budget deficit amounting to nearly R1 million a month and the operational costs, which is set to continue to increase, they are unable to sustain the service over the longer term without implementing changes. 'The DaR service is over-subscribed due to the expansion of the service beyond its core mandate and the service is experiencing severe capacity challenges where the demand exceeds the available resources,' they City said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Abram Lintnaar from Atlantis is among the commuters affected by changes to the Dial-a-Ride service. Image: Supplied 'The annual budget for the service is R28.2 million, while the annual operating costs amount to R40 million currently.' They also said as of September 8, the service will transport eligible wheelchair users and those with severe walking impairments during peak periods, from Monday to Friday, with minimal services on Saturdays, Sundays, and public holidays for those who need to go to work 'The City is busy engaging users, user groups, and stakeholders to inform them of the amended eligibility criteria, requirements to qualify, and amended service offering." A year ago, the City announced its decision to discontinue the services to Altantis and the issue was raised with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) by a commuter. Abram Lintnaar, 51, from Atlantis, used the service daily to get to his workplace at the Cape Town Society for the Blind and told the Cape Argus that its changes has added financial strain.

Court ruling lifts R660,000 reserve price on property auction in Durban
Court ruling lifts R660,000 reserve price on property auction in Durban

IOL News

time3 days ago

  • IOL News

Court ruling lifts R660,000 reserve price on property auction in Durban

Durban High Court has ordered removal of R660,000 reserve price after two failed auction attempts Image: File The Durban High Court has ordered the removal of a R660,000 reserve price for the sale in execution of a property following two failed auction attempts. The court heard that previous sales in execution held in July 2022 and February 2024 had failed to attract bidders, despite attempts to lower or lift the reserve price during the auctions. The property, with an estimated market value of more than R1 million and forced sale value of R1,050,000, remained unsold due to the R660,000 reserve price barrier. The property owners' financial situation had deteriorated significantly since the court ordered that the reserve price be R660,000 nearly four years ago. Their arrears to the Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd had grown to more than R824,270.16, with R375,773.67 representing arrear instalments. Additionally, the couple owed the eThekwini Municipality R412,842.61 as of March 2024. Judge Robin Mossop SC presided over the reconsideration application brought by Changing Tides, which sought to remove the fixed reserve price that had prevented the successful sale of the couple's immovable property. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Changing Tides asked to be permitted to put up the property at a third sale in execution without a reserve price being fixed. In an affidavit, one of the owner's asked the court to dismiss the application with costs, on the basis that it is procedurally redundant, an abuse of process, and improperly motivated. The court said it would not consider the unsigned affidavit. Judge Mossop said the owners did not say what must be done about the reserve price. 'This is perhaps understandable given the fact that (they) are not represented,' he said. Moreover, Judge Mossop emphasized the procedural nature of the reconsideration process under Uniform Rule 46A(9)(c). "It seems to me that this sub-rule is simply a procedural tool to enable the establishment of a way forward where the fixed reserve price of a property declared specially executable has not been achieved," he stated. The judge clarified that the reconsideration was not an adversarial process. "The reconsideration prescribed by rule 46A(9)(c) is a procedural requirement; it is not a process that can be opposed. It is a process in which the court must consider any relevant evidence put before it, but the process is not an adversarial one," Judge Mossop explained. Considering the mounting financial pressures faced by the owners, Judge Mossop stressed the urgency of disposing of the property. He considered the lapse of time since the order of R660,000 and the worsening indebtedness of the couple. 'It appears to me to be imperative that the property be disposed of as quickly as possible," Judge Mossop ruled. No costs order was made in the matter, meaning each party will bear their legal expenses related to the reconsideration application.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store