
Between the eagle and the dragon
NO TACO Theory was on his table, but renowned economist Prof Jeffrey D. Sachs thinks that when it comes to the crunch, US President Donald Trump will backtrack on his tariff policies.
'TACO' stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out', and like the Wall Street traders trading the acronym for laughs, Prof Sachs believes that the US president cannot keep his trade policy as he had announced it on April 2.
'You know, all of the world is confronting this sudden change of the United States' trade policy. But I personally don't believe that the tariffs are going to stick the way that they were announced. Already a lot has been rolled back,' he explains.
For one, he adds, he is confident that the courts in the US will find some of the trade policy illegal because it was 'based on declarations of emergencies that don't really exist.'
Last Wednesday, the country's Court of International Trade ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority and blocked his tariffs from going into effect. According to the trade court, the emergency law invoked by Trump did not give him unilateral authority to impose tariffs on the world's countries. And although the court then allowed the US administration to keep collecting tariffs while the White House appeals against the ruling, many investors, as AFP reported, feel that Trump 'does not have a very high tolerance for market pressure and will be quick to back off when tariffs cause pain.'
For Prof Sachs, the question lies on whether Trump has the authority to introduce tariffs all by himself; in his view, that is the job of the US Congress.
Good neighbours
Prof Sachs was in Malaysia to speak in a special dialogue titled 'Asean amidst the shifting global order', hosted by Sunway University founder and chancellor Tan Sri Sir Dr Jeffrey Cheah ahead of the 46th Asean Summit last week.
The dialogue was attended by ambassadors, high commissioners, senior bankers, corporate leaders as well as political and government leaders such as Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming and Subang Jaya state assembly person Michelle Ng.
The dialogue was attended by ambassadors, high commissioners, senior bankers, corporate leaders as well as political and government leaders such as Housing and Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming and Subang Jaya state assembly person Michelle Ng.
During his keynote address, Prof Sachs underscored Asean's pivotal role as a regional bloc in navigating geopolitical uncertainties, highlighting the urgency of regional cooperation in areas such as climate action, economic resilience and multilateral diplomacy.
Calling on leaders to harness Asean's collective strength to foster peace, sustainability and long-term prosperity, the Sir Jeffrey Cheah Honorary Distinguished Professor in Sustainable Development at Sunway University and president of the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network (UN-SDSN) says: 'Asean needs to do two basic things: one is to strengthen the relations within the Asean group, and the second is to strengthen Asean's relations as a group with other partners.
'China will be a major partner, and the GCC (the Gulf Cooperation Council), will be a major partner. So, these are two major economic partnerships for Asean.'
He notes that Asean is not alone in the tumult of the changing global trade.
'Every place I travel to, I hear the same question. And most of the world simply wants to go on with a rule-based trading system under the WTO (World Trade Organisation) and get the US to go back to that rule-based trading system.
'Most importantly, whatever actions the US takes, which will be detrimental to the US itself, should not impede trade among the rest of the world's countries. No other region should follow the US into this kind of protectionism,' he says.
Crucially, he stresses, the US should not try to make Asean choose between it and China.
'That would be unfair, but if Asean were forced to choose, you would choose your neighbour, China, obviously.
'Of course, Asean countries should have good relations with all parts of the world. The goal should be openness to all. So the idea should not be an alliance. The idea should be that Asean, which is a very open region in terms of trade, should be able to trade with the US, and with Europe, with China, and so forth.
'But Asean cannot do without good economic relations with China. That's not even imaginable. So the US should not force or try to force Asean into making choices.
'And if the US tries to put on secondary sanctions that impede Asean's economic relations with China, they would have to be resisted, actually.'
As Prof Sachs puts it, 'neighbours need to trade with each other and neighbours need to have common infrastructure.'
'So, at the same time, Asean should work closely with China on physical infrastructure and connectivity.
'The Belt and Road Initiative is a very important, positive initiative. It says, put in fast rail, put in renewable energy, put in digital systems. That's to everybody's mutual benefit.'
Ultimately, we need to keep calm, he stresses.
'Keep calm. Don't get into a conflict. We don't want to be in the middle of any conflict.
'There is no reason for a conflict at all, fundamentally. It's a waste of time.'
Prof Sachs fully believes that despite the disruptions, turmoil and risks, there are reasons to be optimistic.
'The world is disrupted and changing rapidly, and it is changing in frightening ways on the surface. But I want to argue that below the surface, the deeper trends are positive. And not only positive, but powerful as well.
'For one, the notion of sustainable development, which Sunway University champions, is on the right track.
'There is a lot of work to do, but we are on the path that I believe the world is going to achieve the goals. The world needs to achieve it; it can achieve it, and that combination of both need and capacity, to my mind, suggests that we are going to find our way forward.'
'A cultural revolution'
At the core of the shifting global order is an important fact, Prof Sachs stresses: Asia has ended a long period of domination by Europe and the US in the global economy, and the world is now multipolar.
'Asia has restored its place as the centre of gravity of the world economy – the place that Asia has had for most of the last 2,000 years, actually, with the interruption of the period during the Industrial Revolution and Western imperialism.
'Because what has happened is that a world that was profoundly divided by power and technology is now truly a multipolar world; one in which the US and Europe, no doubt, remain very sophisticated and powerful societies, but no longer the dominant societies of the world.
'We've entered the age of multipolarity. That's a big challenge, but it's also a wonderful fact and great opportunity.'
Prof Sachs says the US is going through a 'Cultural Revolution', which he believes could last around 20 years.
As he points out further, the US market for imports is only about 13% of world imports now.
'So you could close off the US market entirely, and the rest of the world would figure out how to get along pretty well.
China, in the meantime, will play a huge, important and positive role for this region, he notes.
Still, it is not the end of US' role in the world, says Prof Sachs.
'We are in what I call America's Cultural Revolution. That's not a good thing. Cultural revolutions do not go well. They set back China for 20 years.
'But the US is not lost lost forever. We just need to get through our cultural revolution.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Exclusive-Iran poised to dismiss US nuclear proposal, says Iranian diplomat
FILE PHOTO: An Iranian newspaper with a cover photo of Iran, Oman and U.S. Flags, is seen in Tehran, Iran, May 11, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS/File Photo DUBAI (Reuters) -Iran is poised to reject a U.S. proposal to end a decades-long nuclear dispute, an Iranian diplomat said on Monday, slamming it as a "non-starter" that fails to address Tehran's interests and leaves Washington's stance on uranium enrichment unchanged. "Iran is drafting a negative response to the U.S. proposal, which could be interpreted as a rejection of the U.S. offer," the senior diplomat, who is close to Iran's negotiating team, told Reuters. The U.S. proposal for a new nuclear deal was presented to Iran on Saturday by Oman's Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Albusaidi, who was on a short visit to Tehran and has been mediating nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington. But after five rounds of talks between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to resolve the nuclear standoff, many issues remain unresolved. Among clashing red lines is Iran's rejection of a U.S. demand that Tehran commit to scrapping uranium enrichment, viewed as a potential pathway to developing nuclear bombs. Tehran says it wants to master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and has long denied accusations by Western powers that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons. "In this proposal, the U.S. stance on enrichment on Iranian soil remains unchanged, and there is no clear explanation regarding the lifting of sanctions," said the diplomat, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. Tehran demands the immediate removal of all U.S.-imposed curbs that impair its oil-based economy. But for the U.S., the removal of nuclear-related sanctions should be done in phases. Dozens of Iranian institutions vital to Iran's economy, including its central bank and national oil company, have been sanctioned since 2018 for, according to Washington, "supporting terrorism or weapons proliferation". Trump's revival of a "maximum pressure" campaign against Tehran since his return to the White House in January has included tightened sanctions and threats to bomb Iran if current negotiations yield no deal. During his first term, Trump in 2018 ditched Tehran's 2015 nuclear pact with six powers and reimposed sanctions that have crippled Iran's economy. In return, Tehran has rapidly violated the 2015 nuclear pact's curbs on its nuclear programme. The 2015 deal required Iran to take steps to restrict its nuclear program in return for relief from U.S., EU and U.N. economic sanctions. The diplomat said the assessment of "Iran's nuclear negotiations committee", under the supervision of the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was that the U.S. proposal is "completely one-sided" and cannot serve Tehran's interests. Therefore, the diplomat said, Tehran considers this proposal a "non-starter" and believes it unilaterally attempts to impose a "bad deal" on Iran through excessive demands. Two Iranian officials told Reuters last week that Iran may pause uranium enrichment if the U.S. releases frozen Iranian funds and recognises Tehran's right to refine uranium for civilian use under a "political deal" that could lead to a broader nuclear accord. (Writing by Parisa Hafezi, Editing by William Maclean)


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
US appeal court allows Donald Trump's tariffs to stay in effect
A US federal appeal court has temporarily halted a lower-court ruling against President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' reciprocal tariffs, as well as a separate set of fentanyl-related levies on China, Mexico and Canada, the latest in a string of twists that leave the state of global trade hanging in the balance. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington said in an order Thursday afternoon that it would grant the Trump administration's request for an immediate stay, stating 'the judgments and the permanent injunctions entered by the Court of International Trade in these cases are temporarily stayed'. A three-judge panel at the New York-based trade court ruled on Wednesday that Trump overstepped his authority by imposing hefty levies on all American trading partners in April and the fentanyl-related duties on China, Mexico and Canada. The trade court's ruling came after lawsuits were brought by 12 US states, led by Oregon, and five American businesses. The appeal court has given the plaintiffs until June 5 to submit their responses. The Trump administration can file a reply by June 9, after which the court will deliver its final decision. Shortly after the appeal court's order, Trump slammed the trade court's decision, claiming it ruled 'against the United States of America on desperately needed tariffs'. 'Fortunately, the full 11 judge panel on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has just stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade', he said on social media. Despite that, Trump said he hoped that the Supreme Court will 'quickly and decisively' reverse the trade court's decision, which he denounced as 'horrible, country threatening'. 'Backroom 'hustlers' must not be allowed to destroy our nation!', he said. The Trump administration argues that the legality of the president's emergency declaration on tariffs should not be subject to judicial review, characterising it as a foreign policy matter and a 'political question'. The relief means Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' on all America's trading partners, announced in April under emergency powers, can take effect on July 7. A 10 per cent universal tariff will remain in place – along with an additional 20 per cent tariff on China, Canada, and Mexico – to force action from those countries on fentanyl production and trafficking. Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center, a US non-profit firm that is fighting the case for the American businesses, called the order 'merely a procedural step as the court considers the government's request for a longer stay pending appeal'. 'We are confident the Federal Circuit will ultimately deny the government's motion shortly thereafter, recognising the irreparable harm these tariffs inflict on our clients,' said Schwab. 'This harm includes the loss of critical suppliers and customers, forced and costly changes to established supply chains, and, most seriously, a direct threat to the very survival of these businesses.' Earlier in the day, the Trump administration said it would go to the US Supreme Court as soon as Friday if a lower court did not pause the trade court's decision from late Wednesday. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt slammed the ruling as 'judicial overreach' and urged the Supreme Court to intervene. Trump, Leavitt argued, had used his 'full and proper legal authority' in ordering the 'Liberation Day' tariffs on April 2 to 'address the extraordinary threat to our national security and economy posed by large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits'. 'America cannot function if President Trump, or any other president for that matter, has their sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges,' the press secretary said. 'These other countries should also know and they do know that [Trump] reserves other tariff authorities, Section 232, for example,' she continued, citing the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 that authorises an American president to adjust imports if they are determined to be a threat to national security. Since the court ruling blocking the tariffs, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had 'already heard from countries around the world this morning who said they intend to continue with these negotiations', Leavitt added. Meanwhile, a second federal judge on Thursday ruled that the president's universal tariffs were 'unlawful' and issued an injunction. That decision was narrow in scope, applying only to the two companies that brought the lawsuit, and it limits the government's ability to collect tariffs from them. In comments shared before the appeal court temporarily reinstated Trump's tariffs, Wendy Cutler of the Asia Society Policy Institute, a US-based think tank, said the president's setback 'may lead trading partners to avoid putting meaningful concessions on the table until more legal clarity is forthcoming from US courts'. Cutler believed trading partners 'should not expect a major backing off by the administration on its determination to seek balance and overcome unfairness in our trading relationships'. Aside from emergency powers, Cutler added, the Trump administration had an 'arsenal of other legal tools it could use, including Section 301, Section 232 and Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to address its concerns with trading partners', citing a law that gives a US president more power in trade agreements and tariffs. For businesses, 'the uncertainty probably will not be resolved soon', according to Michael Klein of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in Massachusetts. 'This uncertainty is making companies pause their activities and rethink their longer-term strategies,' Klein said. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Asean currencies seen strengthening this year as US dollar weakens
KUALA LUMPUR: ASEAN currencies are expected to appreciate further this year as global investors diversify away from heavy US exposures, said Maybank Investment Bank Bhd (Maybank IB) today. The investment bank noted that all major ASEAN currencies - including the ringgit, Singapore dollar, Indonesian rupiah and Thai baht - are likely to strengthen in 2025. "However, while this may occur, we are not yet convinced there is sufficient evidence of a real structural shift away from the US dollar,' the bank said in a research note. Maybank IB said President Donald Trump's protectionist stance, speculated preference for a weaker dollar, and tax proposals have contributed to recent declines in the greenback. Market volatility, which had surged across asset classes, has only recently begun to ease. The bank said Trump's unpredictability may continue to inject volatility into financial markets. Unlike in previous bouts of risk aversion, the US dollar has been most visibly punished, in line with the prevailing 'Sell America' narrative. "We suggest continuing to sell the US dollar on rallies if the US continues to push its agenda of tariffs," it said. Maybank IB said even as the "Sell America' theme fades, the dollar's downtrend could persist well into the second half of 2025, driven by a slowing US economy, expected Federal Reserve rate cuts, and the potential for global growth to exceed currently pessimistic forecasts. "We see a possibility of a virtuous circle for Asian currencies, especially with a bearish US dollar allowing regional central banks to cut interest rates further to boost growth, which could in turn be positive for regional currencies,' it added. The investment bank cautioned the market to watch for any signs of trade deals that could be short-term positives for the US dollar and negatives for safe havens such as gold, the Swiss franc, and, to some extent, the Singapore dollar and Thai baht, given the latter's link to gold. "Any bounce in the US dollar should be seen as a short-term unwinding of short positions rather than a bullish reversal to chase,' it added. Maybank Investment Bank also noted that ASEAN's efforts to reduce reliance on the US dollar remain limited. "Adoption of local currencies for trade invoicing remains low, while central banks appear only to have engaged in some diversification of their reserves and assets. "There have been increasing inflows into bonds, but we do not believe this is driven by ASEAN's own desire to exit the US dollar or US assets,' it added. - Bernama