Azerbaijan's demolition of monument to Russian painter is ‘unfriendly act'
The monument in the town of Khankendi, known as Stepanakert in Armenia, was demolished on July 29 – on the artist's birthday – according to the Agency for the Development of Tourism and Culture of Karabakh.
Mikhail Shvydkoy, the Russian president's special representative for international cultural cooperation, expressed deep regret over Azerbaijan's decision, calling it a violation of cultural respect.
'Such actions by the Azerbaijani side cause regret and deep rejection,' he said in a statement on Thursday. 'Instead of removing the monument without warning, Baku could have informed Moscow. I'm confident the issue could have been resolved in a civilized manner, such as relocating it to Russian soil.'
According to the official, the move contradicts not only 'the spirit of alliance, partnership, and good‑neighborliness between our countries and peoples' but also 'common sense.'
Aivazovsky was a Russian artist of Armenian origin, born in Feodosia, Crimea, in 1817. He became famous for painting dramatic seascapes and ocean scenes. His mastery of light, water, and atmosphere earned him acclaim as one of the greatest marine painters of the 19th century.
The statue, created by Russian sculptor Sergey Shcherbakov, was erected in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region in 2021. Baku claimed that the installation of the bust 'by Russian peacekeepers on our territory without the consent of the Azerbaijani side was illegal.'
'The dismantling of such so-called monuments, erected during the occupation of Azerbaijani territories, is logical, fair, and in accordance with the law,' Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry said on Thursday.
Russian peacekeepers were deployed to Karabakh in 2020 after Azerbaijan reclaimed parts of the area in a brief war with the local Armenian militia. In September 2023, Azerbaijan fully recaptured the breakaway region.
Tensions between Moscow and Baku have been rising following the deaths of two Azerbaijani nationals suspected of being gang members during a police raid in the Russian city of Yekaterinburg in June. In response, Azerbaijani police raided the local office of the Russian news network Sputnik, detaining two journalists along with several other Russian nationals. Baku also suspended multiple Russia-related cultural events.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
All eyes on the Trump-Putin summit – but the US-Russia rift runs deep
All eyes may be on the scheduled meeting between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, set for August 15 in Alaska – which is likely to be critical for Ukraine. But fears are growing that tensions between Russia and the West are far from resolved. Recently, with American 'mediation' – if not outright pressure – Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a preliminary peace agreement that went largely unnoticed in Greece. In reality, it marks Armenia's official capitulation after its defeats in recent wars with Azerbaijan. The consensus is that the big winner is Türkiye, which has been openly backing Azerbaijan – and still is. The peace deal, signed in Washington on August 8 with the help of US President Donald Trump, is widely seen as a geopolitical win for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Ankara, which supported Baku in its 'blitzkrieg' in Karabakh, stands to gain the most – first and foremost by securing a direct land link to Azerbaijan via Nakhichevan. That said, the geopolitical and geoeconomic benefits for American interests are hardly smaller. Following the US-Turkish-engineered deal in the Caucasus, observers expect Washington to push similar plans elsewhere in the post-Soviet space. Georgia and Moldova top the list of likely next targets. Both countries have their own 'thorny' territories – self-declared autonomous regions, Kosovo-style, lacking international recognition and hosting Russian military bases. Kosovo itself, of course, is recognized by most of the West, though it technically still lacks full independent-state status. Notably, Greece, Romania, Cyprus, and Spain refuse to recognize it, while Serbia still considers it part of its territory. The hottest flashpoint inside Europe – especially with elections in Moldova this September – is Chisinau's ambition to 'reintegrate' Transnistria. In recent years, disputed elections have brought pro-Western governments and a pro-Western president to power in Moldova. Now, at least on paper, Chisinau could call on Kiev for help and attempt a military solution to the Transnistria question. No one can rule out such a move – especially with Russian forces largely tied down in the Ukraine conflict. Parliamentary elections are adding to the tension. The country is split almost evenly for and against pro-Western President Maia Sandu and her PAS party. A new military adventure could serve as the perfect pretext to shift the domestic political climate – and to escalate the broader standoff between Europe and Russia. If another European war were to break out – this time over Moldova – NATO member Romania would almost certainly side with Chisinau. As Romania's ally, Greece would face a hard choice: back Bucharest (and by extension, Moldova) or keep its distance from another European conflict? In the case of Ukraine, Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis's government took no such distance – instead, openly declaring that Greece was 'at war with Russia.' Whatever Athens decides will depend in part on Türkiye's stance toward this – for now – hypothetical scenario. Ankara would likely get involved indirectly, if only to boost its geopolitical influence in the region and its standing within NATO. It has done so repeatedly in recent years – in Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, and beyond. Türkiye's and Azerbaijan's success in Karabakh – at the expense of Armenia and Russia – has emboldened Ankara in other arenas of foreign policy. Erdogan has repeatedly stated that Türkiye will not give up 'a single inch of land once Turkish soldiers have set foot on it.' History suggests those are not idle words. The United States is clearly playing a bigger game across the post-Soviet geopolitical chessboard. By closing the chapter on the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict in the Caucasus – a confrontation dating back to the collapse of the USSR – Washington has engineered a settlement tailored to its own strategic script. Next up are other 'frozen conflicts' in the former Soviet Union. Georgia wants to peacefully 'reintegrate' Abkhazia and South Ossetia, two breakaway territories in the Caucasus that split from Tbilisi after bloody conflicts – the first in the early 1990s, the second in 2008. They are, in effect, the 'Kosovos' of the Caucasus. In Moldova, the president and government have made deepening ties with the US and NATO a top priority. Like Kiev in years past, Chisinau sees this as its ticket to security guarantees against Moscow – and, more importantly, as its 'golden opportunity' to retake Transnistria. A Karabakh-style 'blitzkrieg' would be hard to pull off against territories hosting Russian military bases. But Washington doesn't seem in a rush – even if events are moving at a dangerously fast pace. It hasn't gone unnoticed that NATO military exercises have included scenarios simulating a crisis in these 'Kosovos' of Georgia and Moldova. One telling example: Agile Spirit 2025, the 12th such exercise hosted jointly with Georgia, ran from July 25 to August 6 with participants from 13 countries – including the US, Türkiye, Poland, Germany, Italy, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Lithuania, and Ukraine – not counting observer nations. Adding fuel to the speculation, online rumors claim that during joint 'Fiery Shield-2025' drills with the US and Romania, which began August 4, Moldovan troops fired at targets depicting Russian soldiers. Military ties between Greece and Romania – and between Greece and Moldova – have been strengthening. On June 26, 2025, Greece's chief of the Hellenic National Defense General Staff, Dimitris Choupis, awarded Moldova's deputy chief of the General Staff, Brigadier General Sergiu Cirimpei, the Medal of Merit and Honor. Diplomatic contacts are also on the rise. Deputy Foreign Minister Charis Theocharis recently visited Moldova, adding to a string of earlier meetings. Finally, the former US ambassador to Athens and later Biden-era deputy secretary of state for energy, Geoffrey Pyatt, has repeatedly emphasized the 'Vertical Gas Corridor' – a network that would allow bidirectional flows from south to north, specifically from Greece through Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Moldova, and Ukraine, via both existing and new European natural gas and LNG infrastructure.
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
Armenia and Azerbaijan publish US-brokered peace agreement (FULL TEXT)
Azerbaijan and Armenia have published the full text of a peace agreement initialed by their foreign ministers in the presence of the two nations' leaders, as well as US President Donald Trump, during a meeting in Washington last week. According to the document, the two neighbors renounce all territorial claims against each other, will avoid the use of force, and start developing their bilateral relations. The two post-Soviet states had been locked in a territorial dispute over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh since the late 1980s. The predominantly ethnic-Armenian-populated region broke away from Baku in the early 1990s following a war. The dispute led to intermittent fighting over the decades, until Baku regained control over the disputed territory in a military campaign in 2023. Below is the full text of the peace declaration published by the Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign on Establishment of Peace and Inter-State Relations between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of AzerbaijanThe Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan (hereinafter, the Parties), Realizing the urgent necessity of the establishment of a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region; Desiring to contribute to that end through the establishment of inter-state relations; Being guided by the Charter of the United Nations, the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (1970), the Final Act of the Helsinki Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (1975), and the Almaty Declaration of 21 December 1991, and aiming to develop relations on the basis of norms and principles enshrined therein; Expressing their mutual will to establish good-neighborliness between them; Have agreed to establish peace and inter-state relations between them on the basis of the following: ARTICLE I Having confirmed that the boundaries between the Soviet Socialist Republics of the former USSR became the international borders of respective independent states and have been recognized as such by the international community, the Parties recognize and shall respect the sovereignty, territorial integrity, inviolability of international borders and political independence of each other; ARTICLE II In full compliance with Article I, the Parties confirm that they do not have any territorial claims to each other and shall not raise any such claims in the future. The Parties shall not undertake any act, including planning, preparing, encouraging and supporting such acts, which aim to dismember or impair, totally or in part, the territorial integrity or political unity of the other Party; ARTICLE III The Parties, in their mutual relations, shall refrain from the use of force or the threat of use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations. They shall not allow any third Party to use their respective territories for using force against the other Party inconsistent with the UN Charter; ARTICLE IV The Parties shall refrain from intervening with the internal affairs of each other; ARTICLE V Within _____ days after the exchange of instruments of ratification of this Agreement by both Parties, the Parties shall establish diplomatic relations between them in accordance with the provisions of the Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations (1961 and 1963, respectively); ARTICLE VI In full compliance with their obligations under Article I of the present Agreement, the Parties shall conduct in good faith negotiations between the respective border commissions in accordance with the agreed upon regulations of the Commissions to conclude the Agreement on delimitation and demarcation of the state border between the Parties; ARTICLE VII The Parties shall not deploy along their mutual border forces of any third party. The Parties, pending the delimitation and subsequent demarcation of their mutual border, shall implement mutually agreed security and confidence-building measures, including in the military field, with a view to ensuring security and stability in the border regions; ARTICLE VIII The Parties condemn and shall combat intolerance, racial hatred and discrimination, separatism, violent extremism and terrorism in all their manifestations within their respective jurisdictions, and shall uphold their applicable international obligations; ARTICLE IX The Parties undertake to address the cases of missing persons and enforced disappearances taken place in the armed conflict which involved both of the Parties, including through the exchange of all available information about these persons, directly or in cooperation with relevant international organizations, as appropriate. The Parties, hereby, acknowledge the importance of investigating the fate of those persons, including searching for and returning the remains as appropriate and ensuring that justice is served in relation to these persons through proper investigations, as a means of reconciliation and building confidence. Corresponding modalities, in this regard, shall be negotiated and agreed upon in detail in a separate agreement; ARTICLE X In order to establish cooperation in various fields, including economic, transit and transport, environmental, humanitarian and cultural, the Parties may conclude agreements in respective areas of mutual interest; ARTICLE XI The present Agreement does not infringe upon the rights and obligations of the Parties under international law and treaties concluded by each one of them with other UN Member-States. Each Party shall ensure that none of the international engagements now in force between it and any third party undermine its obligations taken under this Agreement; ARTICLE XII The Parties in their bilateral relations shall be guided by international law and this Agreement. None of the Parties may invoke the provisions of its internal legislation as justification for its failure to perform the present Agreement. The Parties, in accordance with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), shall refrain from acts that would defeat the object and purpose of this Agreement prior to its entry into force; ARTICLE XIII The Parties guarantee the full implementation of this Agreement and shall establish a bilateral commission to oversee implementation of the present Agreement. The Commission shall work on the basis of modalities to be agreed upon by the Parties; ARTICLE XIV Without prejudice to their rights and obligations under international law and other treaties which bind them in their mutual relations, the Parties shall strive for settling any dispute with respect to the interpretation or application of this Agreement through direct consultations, including within the Commission referred to in Article XIII. Should such consultations not yield result acceptable for both Parties within 6 months, the Parties shall seek other means of peaceful dispute settlement; ARTICLE XV Without prejudice to Article XIV, the Parties shall withdraw, dismiss, or otherwise settle any and all interstate claims, complaints, protests, objections, proceedings, and disputes related to the issues existed between the Parties before the signing of this Agreement in any legal forum within one month from the date of entry into force of this Agreement and shall not initiate such claims, complaints, protests, objections, proceedings, and shall not be involved in any manner into such claims, complaints, protests, objections, proceedings initiated against the other Party by any third-party. The Parties shall not take, encourage or be involved in any manner in any hostile action against each other contrary to the present Agreement in diplomatic, information and other fields and shall conduct regular consultations to this end; ARTICLE XVI The Agreement shall enter into force after the exchange of instruments notifying about the completion of the internal procedures in line with the national legislations of the Parties. This Agreement shall be registered in conformity with Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations; ARTICLE XVII The present Agreement is concluded in the Armenian, Azerbaijani and English languages, with all three texts being equally authentic. In case of divergence as to the meaning of a provision under any of the authentic texts, the English text shall prevail.
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
Ex-Soviet states renounce territorial claims
Armenia and Azerbaijan have agreed to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity as part of a peace declaration signed in Washington on Friday, the text of the document published by both nations suggests. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
