Walmart hikes annual forecast as low price focus draws shoppers
Consumer sentiment has weakened due to fears of higher inflation, hitting the bottom lines of some retail chains, but Walmart's sales have remained resilient. Its shares, however, dipped 2.3% in premarket trading. Walmart raised its full-year sales forecast. Walmart expects annual sales to grow in the range of 3.75% to 4.75%, compared to its prior forecast of a 3% to 4% increase. Adjusted earnings per share are expected in the range of $2.52 to $2.62, compared to its previous range of $2.50 to $2.60. The Bentonville, Arkansas-based chain got a boost from a sharper online strategy as more customers relied on home deliveries. Its global e-commerce sales jumped 25% during the quarter, and it touted that one-third of deliveries from stores took three hours or less.
US sales up more than expected
Walmart's total US comparable sales rose 4.6%, fueled by solid demand for fresh food, pantry and dairy products, and branded and over-the-counter medicines, beating analysts' estimates of a 3.8% increase. The company noted strong customer response to over 7,400 "rollbacks," its term for discounted prices, with 30% more rollbacks on grocery items. Average spending at the till rose 3.1% from an increase of 0.6% last year, but growth in customer visits fell to 1.5% from 3.6% in the year-earlier period. Walmart logged 40% growth in marketplace sales, including electronics, automotive, toys, and media and gaming.
The retailer had warned it would increase prices this summer to offset tariff-related costs on certain goods imported to the US, a move that drew criticism from President Donald Trump. Several other apparel, footwear, and packaged goods retailers have issued similar warnings in response to import tariffs. A day earlier, Target warned of tariff-induced cost pressures, even as it reiterated that price increases would be considered only as a last resort. Two-thirds of Walmart's US sales are of domestically-sourced products, executives had said last quarter, which gave it some insulation from tariffs compared to competitors. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist
Fortis Healthcare still heals portfolios, but valuations are running hot.
Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus gets Rajinikanth fan to script India AI play
IndiGo's GIFT City unit: Simple expansion or is there more to it than meets the eye?
Stock Radar: Rico Auto stock showing signs of bottoming out after about 40% fall from highs; what should investors do now?
GST rationalization: You don't become irrational; 10 stocks, from two sectors, some may get more, some less, some nothing
Focus on core business and ignore the rest: 5 small-caps from different sectors with upside potential of up to 48%
Multibagger or IBC - Part 20: An ICE-to-EV pivot is transforming this small-cap auto ancillary company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
Tapal Ganesh seeks recovery of ₹884 crore from Obulapuram Mining Company for illegal ore extraction
Ballari-based miner and activist Tapal Ganesh has urged the State government to initiate recovery proceedings against Obulapuram Mining Company and its group entities for allegedly extracting 29 lakh tonnes of iron ore worth ₹884 crore from Sandur cluster leases in Ballari district. In a letter of August 18 addressed to the Chief Secretary, Mr. Ganesh has alleged that the mining company, under the leadership of its director and former Minister Gali Janardhana Reddy, illegally mined and transported iron ore from Karnataka while misusing permits from its lease in Andhra Pradesh. 'It has been conclusively established through various inquiries, reports and judicial pronouncements that Obulapuram Mining Company and its group entities have illegally mined and transported approximately 29 lakh tonnes of iron ore, valued at about ₹884 crore, from the Sandur cluster,' Mr. Ganesh wrote. He cited multiple sources to back his claim, including the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) report of 2011 presented before the Supreme Court, the final Lokayukta report on illegal mining in Karnataka and the judgment of the CBI Court in Hyderabad delivered in May 2025 which convicted OMC and its directors of illegal mining. The activist also pointed to FIRs filed by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) of the Lokayukta in 2015, naming Mr. Reddy as accused no 1 and official correspondence from forest officers documenting OMC's operations in the Ballari Reserve Forest. Speaking to The Hindu on Thursday, Mr. Ganesh claimed that the evidence is overwhelming and demanded that the government take immediate steps to recover ₹884 crore, the value of illegally extracted iron ore, from the mining company, MBT Hind Traders and their associates. 'This is not just about revenue loss. It is about protecting Karnataka's natural resources, upholding the rule of law and restoring public trust that has been eroded by illegal mining. The government must start recovery process which should be monitored at the highest level due to its interstate implications, given the mining company's operations across Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka,' Mr. Ganesh said and urged the State government to direct the departments of Mines and Geology, Forest, Revenue and Law to pursue coordinated legal action under the MMDR Act, the Karnataka Forest Act and other applicable laws.
Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
Trump escapes $454M fraud penalty: What the ruling means and what happens next
Donald Trump civil fraud penalty overturned — In a major legal twist, a New York appeals court has thrown out the $454 million civil fraud judgment against President Donald Trump, a penalty that had threatened his business empire. The case, brought by Attorney General Letitia James, accused Trump of inflating property values to secure loans and insurance deals. Donald Trump civil fraud penalty overturned — A New York appeals court has struck down the $454 million judgment against Donald Trump, giving the former president a major legal reprieve. The case, filed by Attorney General Letitia James, accused Trump of inflating property values to secure better loans and insurance. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What the case was really about Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why the appeals court overturned the penalty What happens next Why this matters beyond Trump Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The political stakes FAQs: A New York appeals court has thrown out the nearly half-billion-dollar civil fraud penalty that Donald Trump was ordered to pay earlier this year, reshaping one of the most consequential legal battles facing the U.S. decision, handed down Thursday by a divided five-judge panel in Manhattan, not only spares Trump an immediate financial blow but also raises fundamental questions about how aggressively state officials can police corporate civil fraud case was launched in 2022 by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who accused Trump of inflating his net worth for years to obtain favorable loans and insurance Arthur Engoron, who presided over a three-month bench trial, sided with James last year. In February 2024, he imposed a staggering $454.2 million penalty, plus interest, and barred Trump and his family business from seeking loans from New York banks for three argued that Trump's exaggerations were deliberate, widespread, and showed 'a complete lack of contrition.' He also curtailed the business roles of Trump's adult sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, while placing the Trump Organization under a court-appointed James, the verdict was a marquee win — proof, in her words, that no one, not even a former president, was above the law. But for Trump, it was another in a long series of courtroom battles defining his Appellate Division's ruling was far from unanimous. Two judges agreed that Trump had committed fraud but ruled the penalty excessive under the Constitution's ban on disproportionate two said the trial judge should not have pre-judged Trump's liability before the trial even began, requiring a retrial. A fifth judge dissented entirely, saying the lawsuit should have been split highlights how legally complex the case has become. The majority agreed that James had the authority to sue, but they could not settle on whether Trump's liability had been properly established or whether the punishment was lawful. The result: the $454 million penalty has been wiped away, at least for ruling is not the end of the road. James could appeal to New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, to try to reinstate the penalty. If she does, the fight could stretch well into 2026, keeping Trump's finances under the microscope during an election cycle where his legal exposure is already a major political the court-appointed monitor overseeing the Trump Organization remains in place. That means Trump's business dealings will still be scrutinized, even though the financial penalty and loan restrictions have been its core, the case goes beyond one businessman. It touches on the broader question of how much leeway prosecutors and regulators should have in policing financial misstatements, particularly when those misstatements don't clearly lead to direct losses for banks or James cannot ultimately reinstate the penalty, it could embolden other executives accused of manipulating valuations, reinforcing the idea that such exaggerations are a routine part of real estate and finance rather than punishable fraud. On the other hand, if higher courts side with her, it could expand the power of state attorneys general to impose sweeping penalties even in the absence of clear victim has consistently denied wrongdoing, calling the lawsuit a political witch hunt. The reversal now gives him a powerful talking point: that even New York's appellate judges saw the penalty as overreach. That narrative could resonate with voters who already view his legal troubles as politically the story is not finished. James can still appeal, and Trump is far from free of legal peril, with multiple criminal and civil cases ongoing. For now, though, he has won breathing room in a case that threatened to strip hundreds of millions from his centers on claims Trump inflated property values to get better loans and insurance case could move to New York's highest court if Attorney General Letitia James appeals.
India.com
a minute ago
- India.com
Bad news for IT professionals as Donald Trump may ban H-1B visa for Indians due to....
Bad news for Indians as H-1B visa holders in US are being asked to reveal home address and... H-1B visa system: In a environment where the United States, led by President Donald Trump is taking every step possible to negatively impact the India-US relations, reports have it that the next target of the US President could be the H-1B visa system through which Indian IT engineers make a career in the US. For those unversed, the Donald Trump led US government has imposed a massive 50% tariff on its exports to the United States in a matter of punishment for India due to the import of Russian crude oil. Here are all the details you need to know about the H-1B visa system and why they could be the next target of the US government. Why US may take action on the H-1B visa system next? Media reports suggest that H-1B visas could be the next target, which may be cause of concern for the over 2 lakh Indians who secured such visas in FY 2024. Reports also say that the Make America Great Again Supporters (MAGA) supporters of Donald Trump are driving an online campaign against Indian tech workers, arguing that they take away American jobs amid mass layoffs. 'End Indian H-1B visas to replace American jobs and stop sending money and weapons to the Obama/Biden/Neocon Ukraine Russia war.' politician Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the most prominent voices to have re-started the online campaign against the H-1B visa said on X (formerly Twitter). Story highlights: 1. After Trump imposed massive tariffs on India, there are reports that H-1B visa system can be the next target. Add as a Preferred Source 2. Trump's MAGA supporters are calling for a ban on the visa system. 3. The VISA system is critical as it's used by Indian IT professionals. 4. Donald Trump has imposed 50 % tariff on India. What does Donald Trump think on H-1B visa system? 'We want competent people coming into our country. And H-1B, I know the programme very well. I use the programme. Maître d', wine experts, even waiters, high-quality waiters — you've got to get the best people. People like Larry, he needs engineers, Masa also needs… they need engineers like nobody's ever needed them,' US President Trump had said on the H-1B visa system.
