logo
Business secretary says critics of UK-India trade deal ‘confused' and ‘British workers are not being undercut'

Business secretary says critics of UK-India trade deal ‘confused' and ‘British workers are not being undercut'

The Guardian07-05-2025
Good morning. Yesterday the government was able to announce some good news – a major trade deal with India.
There is cross-party consensus that trade deals are a good thing, the last Conservative government was working on a trade deal with India too, and at least some Tories were happy to welcome the deal. Oliver Dowden, the former deputy PM, posted this on social media.
Welcome progress with conclusion of UK-India FTA. I remember firsthand Jonathan Reynolds's commitment to the relationship from our cross-party delegation to India!
Builds on significant progress made by previous Conservative government.
Free trade is a win-win for both nations
And Jacob Rees-Mogg, the former business secretary who is on the opposite wing of the party to Dowden, posted this.
Cheaper food and drink including rice and tea, footwear and clothing thanks to a welcome trade deal with India. Exactly what Brexit promised.
But Dowden and Rees-Mogg did not get the memo about the official opposition line. As reported on the blog yesterday afternoon, Kemi Badenoch decided to attack the deal on the grounds that it includes a double contribution convention, which means that Indian workers temporarily living in the UK will not have to pay national insurance contributions for three years – with British workers in India benefiting in the same way. Crucially, Badenoch found an effective means of putting a negative spin on this relatively niche feature of the deal – she described it as 'two-tier' taxation, involving 'tax refunds for Indians not available to us'. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, was quickly making the same argument too, claiming the government was making it 20% cheaper to employ an Indian worker than a British worker. In a video he said the deal was 'appalling', and claimed it showed Labour had 'in a big, big way betrayed working Britain'.
Badenoch has certainly been successful at landing her message with the rightwing papers. Here are some of today's front pages. Telegraph splash Photograph: Telegraph Mail splash Photograph: Daily Mail Times splash Photograph: The Times
Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, has been giving interviews this morning. His main task was to counter the Tory/Reform UK claims and he insisted that this was a routine feature of trade deals, applying to just a sub-category of workers (employees from firms with operations in both the UK and India, seconded temporarily from one country to another), and the British workers were not being undercut. The Tories and Reform UK were 'confused', he said.
He told the Today programme:
There is no situation where I would ever tolerate British workers being undercut through any trade agreement we would sign. That is not part of this deal.
What the Conservatives are confused about, and Reform as well, is a situation where a business in India seconds someone for a short period of time to the UK, or a UK business seconds a worker to India for a short period of time, where you don't pay in simultaneously now to both social security systems …
This is exactly the sort of deal we have with 50 countries already, with the US, Canada, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand.
The Conservatives recently, well a few years ago when they were in government, signed one with Chile for five years. So no, British workers are not being undercut.
Asked whether the agreement meant Indian workers paying less tax than British counterparts doing the same job, Reynolds told the programme: 'No.'
In an interview with Sky News, Reynolds said that the trade deal would generate more than £1bn in extra tax revenues for the Treasury. He said the double contribution convention would cost 'less than a tenth of that'.
Here is the agenda for the day.
8.30am: Rhun ap Iorwerth, the Plaid Cymru leader, gives a speech in Cardiff marking one year to go until the next Senedd elections.
9.45am: Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister, gives a speech to the CyberUK conference in Manchester.
10.30am: John Swinney, Scotland's first minister, gives a speech in Edinburgh on SNP strategy running into next year's Holyrood elections. Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, is also giving a speech this morning, at 10.45am, as is the Scottish Consevative leader, Russel Findley, at 12.30pm.
10.55am: Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker, attends a 'Turning of the Page Ceremony' in the Commons, with the book of remembrance naming MPs killed in both world wars, as part of the VE Day 80th anniversary celebrations.
Noon: Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs.
Lunchtime: Rachel Reeves, the chancellor is visiting a Scotch whisky distillery near Edinburgh to promote the UK-India trade deal (which cuts tariffs on whisky exports to India).
2.30pm: Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Cabinet Office minister, gives evidence to an infected blood inquiry hearing about compensation payment arrangements.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog. Share
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New charges to be applied to electronic items bought on Amazon and eBay
New charges to be applied to electronic items bought on Amazon and eBay

Wales Online

time29 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

New charges to be applied to electronic items bought on Amazon and eBay

New charges to be applied to electronic items bought on Amazon and eBay New rules are coming in a bid to protect the environment New charges will be applied to online electronics Online marketplaces must now report the electronic items they sell to UK consumers as part of new rules aimed at ensuring more firms share the burden of recycling costs. Currently, UK firms such as Currys, Argos, Apple Retail UK, Tesco, and Microsoft contribute to an Environment Agency fund for the collection and treatment of products like washing machines, radios and vacuum cleaners. ‌ However, foreign companies selling electronics to British shoppers via online platforms like Amazon and eBay have avoided this expense. As of Tuesday, these firms must now register with the Environment Agency and report sales of household electrical products made by sellers in the UK. ‌ This data will then be used to calculate the amount of recycling companies must finance annually. The online platforms will start paying this money from January 2026. ‌ The Environment Department (Defra) said the funds generated will go towards improving recycling of items collected by local authorities, and help drive investments in waste services and infrastructure. Additionally, vapes will no longer be lumped with 'toys, leisure and sports equipment' from Tuesday but instead will be recognised in a new category of electrical waste. This move, according to ministers, will ensure vape suppliers are responsible for financing the disposal and treatment of their products as waste. Environment minister Mary Creagh said the new rules aim to 'level the playing field' for British businesses who are already shouldering the costs and therefore at a disadvantage to online rivals based abroad. More widely, it is hoped the regulations will support Government ambitions to tackle the country's throwaway culture and the growing amount of waste littering communities, nature and the oceans. Ms Creagh said: 'We are committed to moving towards a circular economy in which we keep electricals from laptops to toasters in use for longer. ‌ 'Ensuring online marketplaces pay their share for managing the cost of the electrical waste they generate will increase recycling and level the playing field for UK-based retailers, boosting growth and making the system fairer.' Paula Coughlan, chief people, communications and sustainability officer at Currys, said: 'It is important that the responsibility to safely dispose of electronic waste is shared fairly, and we're pleased the Government has listened to us and other industry leaders. 'We believe with the right skills and infrastructure in place, the UK can build a thriving circular economy – enabling lasting and sustainable change.' ‌ John Boumphrey, UK country manager at Amazon, said: 'We welcome the Government's focus in this critical area and look forward to continuing our work with the Circular Economy Taskforce to drive further innovation, supporting the UK's transition to a more circular economy. 'We believe retailers have an important role to play in reducing waste, which is why we prioritise reselling, refurbishing, donating or recycling products wherever possible.' Scott Butler, executive director of circular economy campaign group Material Focus, said: 'We welcome the new vape category announced today, which provides a further opportunity to tighten up the environmental enforcement of vapes. By understanding how many vapes are being sold, Defra can set targets to ensure that vape producers make their fair contribution to the costs of recycling these products.' Article continues below E-waste is the fastest-growing waste stream in the world, according to the UN. Meanwhile, estimates by Material Focus found more than 100,000 tonnes of electricals are binned across the UK every year. The new rules come as part of wider Government efforts to generate a circular economy in which electricals are kept in use for longer. Ministers have convened a taskforce of experts to help develop a circular economy strategy for England, which will include a roadmap to increase the reuse and recycling of electrical equipment.

‘I'm on the right side of history': The east London priest risking prison time to support Palestine Action
‘I'm on the right side of history': The east London priest risking prison time to support Palestine Action

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘I'm on the right side of history': The east London priest risking prison time to support Palestine Action

Dr Sally Mann is usually found at the east London church where her family have worshipped for five generations. But on Saturday, striking images of the baptist minister emerged. Swarmed by police officers and standing alone, footage shared on social media shows the moment she was arrested at the pro- Palestine march held in Parliament Square. Wearing a black shirt and white collar, she nods and silently accepts her arrest before she is escorted away, surrounded by a sea of police uniforms. She is one of 532 people arrested by the Metropolitan Police at the largest gathering of Palestine Action since it was proscribed as a terrorist group last month. Of those, the 55-year-old is younger than the average age of those detained, with figures showing half were aged 60 or above. Speaking to The Independent on Monday, she said she is prepared to accept a prison sentence for her actions. 'I am aware there will be repercussions in my life if I am successfully convicted but I felt completely at peace with both my actions and my decision,' she said. 'It's the right side of history. Even if I knew I was going to prison for this I would do it.' She said despite not taking part in previous Palestine Action protests, she was moved protest on Saturday because of her faith. 'I believe Jesus actually meant what he said and he modelled non-violent resistance to oppressive power,' she continued. 'I see myself as a minister more than an activist but I have always felt compelled by my faith to try to build a community that is built on peacemaking.' After reading the protest briefing from Defend our Juries, who organised the demonstration, Dr Mann said she felt certain the protest would be the kind of non-violent action she feels 'committed' to be part of. 'On Saturday I got up early and went to St James' Park because I wanted to be very calm,' she told The Independent. 'I sat quietly and prayed. Then I headed over to Parliament Square.' Dr Mann said during the main protest, though people around her had been arrested, she was not. But after the scheduled end she continued holding her placard stating: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. Within ten minutes, she said she was arrested. 'Other people very near me had been arrested, including some who really did look very elderly and vulnerable, and I thought it would be better for them if they arrest more,' she explained. 'So I just decided to stand with my sign. I wanted to be arrested for this because I want to stand in solidarity with those who had been and I did feel the numbers mattered.' Her arrest was captured on video - a powerful image of her nodding silently as she is escorted away by at least a dozen officers has accumulated thousands of likes on social media. 'The numbers who turned up to arrest me were extraordinary,' she said. 'I think there were a dozen officers arresting me and actually, had they asked me to walk onto the van I would've just gone on my own. I was completely ready to be arrested.' She told The Independent she was put in a van with six police officers to two protesters and was put in line to be processed. 'It was actually very peaceful,' she said. 'It was a very low risk for me. I had moral certainty and legal ambiguity about what would happen to me, but prepared if a custodial sentence does come I am completely prepared for that. I just think it looks less and less likely now.' But she said her arrest, along with that of elderly protestors, shows the 'absurdity' of proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist group. 'I would say to Yvette Cooper, who do you think you're protecting by proscribing me as a terrorist?',' she said. Also arrested under terrorist legislation was 74-year-old NHS doctor Paul O'Brien. He said the Palestinian cause was 'incredibly important' to him, but that the risk of arrest did make him think harder about attending than at previous protests. 'I thought the proscribing was really, really wrong and felt so disappointed in the majority of the MPs in Labour and the Tories for supporting it,' he said. 'But it did make me think harder about going out.' He was also detained later in the day and described his experience as 'bizarre'. 'It was just odd, all these people who have been arrested under terrorist legislation and we looked the most unlikely terrorists,' he said. 'Half of us can hardly walk. It was quite funny. Even for a terrorist offence we were automatically bailed, they know it's so bizarre.' He added he thought the protest would be a 'memorable' day for many. 'Once you're arrested for a terrorist offence, it's an extraordinary thing to happen in your life,' he continued. 'What happened on Saturday was historic, I think it's going to grow.' In a statement released on Sunday, a Metropolitan Police spokesperson said the majority of the arrests made were for 'displaying an item (in this case a placard) in support of a proscribed organisation (in this case Palestine Action) contrary to Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000'. 'Over the coming days and weeks, officers from the Met's Counter Terrorism Command will work to put together the case files required to secure charges against those arrested as part of this operation,' they added.

Two thirds of Britons back removal of Duke of York's titles
Two thirds of Britons back removal of Duke of York's titles

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Two thirds of Britons back removal of Duke of York's titles

Two thirds of Britons believe the Duke of York should be stripped of his remaining royal titles, according to a new poll. Research by YouGov found that 67% of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie this month delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex obsessed, a 'useful idiot' and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Some 13% opposed the removal of his titles and 21% were unsure, the survey showed. Three years ago, 62% believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67% in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just 5% have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex who has a 20% positive rating and the Duke of Sussex at 28%. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The duke stopped using his style of His Royal Highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store