Springfield School Committee approves $670 million budget
The budget, which will cover fiscal year 2026 that begins in July, calls for an about $43.6 million increase over this year's spending, which is an about 7% increase, said Patrick Roach, chief financial officer for the school.
But overall, when grants which are mostly from the federal government, are included, the budget will actually decrease by about 7%. That reduction is mainly because federal pandemic relief money known as ESSER funds, has run out this year.
'We spent our ESSER funds on one-time (expenses) so there are no cuts,' he said.
That money was spent on a wide variety of different things including playgrounds, high school fields, an amphitheater and improving ventilation and adding air condition in schools.
Mayor Domenic J. Sarno, who serves as chairman of the School Committee, said he continues to be concerned about possible cuts to federal grants the schools do rely on, adding the information changes daily. If that funding is eliminated, the city could lose about $25 million in money that provides free lunch to all children and another $9 million that goes to classroom services.
While the schools may be at risk of losing federal grants, a lot of the increase in general spending has come from the state's Student Opportunity Act legislation passed in 2020 that hiked education spending annually by about $1.5 billion. Most of the funds are earmarked for the state's poorest school districts which includes Springfield, Roach said.
'We have pushed the majority of that money out to the schools,' he said. 'We also use it to make sure we have money to fund the teacher raises and the other collective bargaining agreements,' he said.
Teachers, who are working on an expired contract, and the School Committee are in negotiations. While the city has offered 3% raises to educators, there have been sticking points about sick time benefits, Roach said.
The School Committee passed the budget in a unanimous vote Wednesday with no members proposing changes. It will now go to the City Council to be approved with the rest of the budget.
Prior to the vote the spending has been reviewed item-by-item in subcommittee, said Christopher Collins, a School Committee member and chairman of its finance subcommittee.
Committee Vice Chairwoman LaTonia Monroe Naylor said she appreciated the work that went into ensuring disabled students are getting the help they need in the budget, especially with the numbers increasing to 27% of the school population.
'There is a really big concern and a lot of really important dollars are focused on that,' she said. 'The (education) chiefs are really taking a really hard look at how do we address the needs of our most vulnerable students.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Geoff Epstein wants to become Framingham's third mayor. Here are his priorities
FRAMINGHAM — He has three key priorities, a clear campaign finance strategy and a name that ... has brought some attention. Geoff Epstein has big plans for Framingham. Epstein, a former School Committee member, hopes to become the city's third mayor. He's facing off against incumbent Mayor Charlie Sisitsky, who's seeking a second four-year term, in the Nov. 4 city election. After filing with the state's campaign finance office in January, Epstein, who also writes The Framingham Observer blog, went on to acquire enough signatures to appear on the ballot in November. In a sit-down interview with the Daily News, Epstein shared his goals if elected, which include investing more in the schools, installing more environmental projects and repairing infrastructure. Mayoral candidate is focused on three main issues Epstein said his top three issues are education, environment and infrastructure. Epstein, who has served on both the Framingham and Newton school boards, says things have gotten worse in Framingham Public Schools over the past four years. While saying the School Department has the best team the city could have, he says it's time to return money to the school system. 'Our schools were promised': Trump administration review holds up $1M in Framingham education grants According to Epstein, Framingham schools have been defunded by $30 million in taxpayer-funded support. He said that because local funding strayed from the trajectory it was on when he was on School Committee, that money has been defunded. 'If it had stayed on the trajectory it was on, the local support, taxpayer-funded support of the schools, it would be at $95 million,' Epstein said. 'If you compute overall, what's the difference between if it stayed on the direction it was going when I was there (on the School Committee)? Thirty million.' According to the schools' fiscal 2026 budget sheet, local funding went from $89.8 million in fiscal 2022 to $84.8 million in fiscal 2023. This was further reduced to about $80 million in fiscal 2024 before rising to $86.7 million in fiscal 2025. For the current year, the school budget has $90.6 million in local contribution funding. Epstein also said MCAS scores have gone down for every grade. "That's unusual, there's something really dire about that," he said. Epstein wants to expand preschool for students in order to increase English language profiency before they start kindergarten. He also wants to boost compensation for classroom aides, as well as address the city's teacher retention rate. 'Urgency of climate change': Framingham State unveils its latest sustainability initiative "Teacher morale is low, so you've got a situation where students are not performing well and the teachers are leaving, which is very unusual, Epstein said. "The school school system is trending down because of that." For the environment, he wants to expand solar installations on public buildings, something he said the city should have begun awhile ago. "We should have gone gangbusters on that and installed them," Epstein said, adding that installing solar panels at schools and parking lots would generate up to $3 million in utlity savings. "I thought that was a natural thing that should obviously be done and wasn't; if I get elected mayor, we'll try and do 10 solar installations a year, which you can actually do." Lastly, Epstein wants to address what he says is a backlog of roof and road repairs, along with water and sewer infrastructure. He pointed out that a year ago, Department of Public Works Director Robert Lewis called the city's water and sewer infrastructure a "ticking time bomb" during a City Council public hearing. "We're not alone, other communities are trying to deal with this, but we have not invested properly in it," Epstein said. "It's Governance 101, invest in your infrastructure." Epstein talks campaign finance On his website, Epstein said he needs $30,000 in donations to run an effective campaign. He said that the big money in campaigning comes from getting the word out through mailers, yard signs and social media. "Suppose you're targeting 10,000 voters, it costs about $1 for each one," he said. "If you send out a mailer, it's $10,000 for a mailer; if you do two, it's $20,000. You can run a district race for about $3,000 — I've done that and that's what it takes. This is nine districts, so it scales up to about $30,000." As of Aug. 6, Epstein has raised $10,838, with about $5,000 of his own money. By comparison, Sisitsky has raised $42,763 since Jan. 1. 'Isn't just about property': Why Nobscot residents take dim view of new housing proposal "I'm supporting Geoff because he has the technical confidence to analyze the finances of Framingham and to analyze administrative systems the city uses," said Carol Spack, who is running for City Council in District 2. "Geoff will bring, at the top, a philosophy and value system Framingham needs to be a town where government is committed to public service." Epstein also is declining to take donations from real estate developers, claiming they have undue influence on city officials. He pointed to J&Co., the developers behind the controversial Nobscot development, and other developers donating to local campaigns. "I feel like when developers pay you $1,000, they expect something back," Epstein said. About his name... While Framingham residents have known about Epstein for awhile, his campaign recently picked up some viral attention after the name of a certain American financier and child sex offender — the late Jeffrey Epstein — again became part of the news cycle. Epstein's campaign was soon picked up by Politico's Massachusetts Playbook, the New York Post, HuffPost, NewsNation and WBZ's TikTok with reporter Matt Shearer. The Framingham mayoral candidate, who pronounces his last name "ep-stine" as opposed to "ep-steen" has no interest in running from his name. "He was a pretty dark guy and did some terrible things," Epstein said. "You just have to take it as it comes and laugh about it, and that's the approach I've taken because it is my name. I like my name. It's nothing to do with him, but also, I believe with any trouble that comes with any discomfort, you got to talk about it." Framingham election to be held in November Framingham's city election is Nov. 4. The deadline to register to vote is 5 p.m. on Saturday, Oct. 25, if in person and 11:59 p.m. that day if online. All public officials are sworn in on Jan. 1. This article originally appeared on MetroWest Daily News: Geoff Epstein outlines priorities in campaign for Framingham mayor Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
18 hours ago
- New York Post
Mayor Eric Adams deserves credit for his stunning housing wins
It's odd how little credit Mayor Eric Adams gets for his relentless, steady and successful drive to get more housing, including more affordable homes, built in New York City. In under four years, he's arguably done more than his predecessors achieved in the previous two decades, winning changes that will make a huge difference in the long term rather than offering empty promises of instant miracles. The latest: The City Council just OK'd Adams' plan to rezone Midtown South, opening the door for nearly 10,000 new housing units, 2,800 of them affordable, in an area that was largely zoned for (outdated) industrial uses. Advertisement Some of those units will come from converting commercial space to residential, an obvious next step for older, vacant office buildings. All told, Adams' rezoning push starting in 2021 has cleared the way for 100,000 new units to be built across the city, with 30,000 more on the way if the City Council approves his plans for Jamaica and Long Island City. Advertisement That's more housing gained via zoning changes than added in the Bloomberg and de Blasio years combined. Another unheralded gain, from years of steady effort and deft alliances: getting the Legislature to lift the floor-area-ratio cap of 12, which arbitrarily restricted the height of residential buildings. Between the mayor's massive City of Yes package, which the council approved last year, and other efforts, including the preservation of about 134,700 existing units, City Hall counts the number of units added to or kept in the Big Apple's housing supply under Adams at about 426,000. Yes, that includes the totals from proposals that still need to go through the approval process — and a good chunk, like those enabled through rezoning, won't be fully realized for years. Advertisement It doesn't help when lefty ideologues sabotage projects like the Brooklyn Marine Terminal, which would offer 6,000 new units, because they'd rather have no new housing than let any market-rate apartments get built on public land. But the mayor's full-court press means he's already changed the city's long-term housing landscape for the better even if some plans fall through — and he could do even more in a second term. We know: 'Methodical' doesn't match the Adams' image, but perhaps that's because so little of the local media pays attention to day-in-day-out reality; it's so much easier to fawn over, say, Zohran Mamdani's flashy promises to freeze rents. Advertisement Even though the mayor's strategy, unlike Mamdani's, works. Freezing rent on rent-regulated apartments would force more landlords to abandon their buildings altogether or allow units to fall into disrepair, making the city's housing situation worse. Meanwhile, Adams is dramatically boosting supply, which will organically push rents lower over time. In a city where hysterically anti-development progressives constantly do their best to thwart common-sense housing fixes, Adams' success in ushering in lasting change is stunning. And though the fruits of his labor will take time to fully appear, generations of New Yorkers will benefit. As the mayoral race exits the summer 'silly season,' perhaps voters will start to realize who's actually delivering the housing solutions New York needs.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Monaco billionaire developer says he's bailing on Carmel-by-the-Sea, a 'strange community'
Patrice Pastor spent big bucks on Carmel-by-the-Sea, in part because of cherished childhood memories, vacationing with his father in this charming, if quirky, coastal town. But after snapping up more than $100 million in properties in the area in recent years, the Monaco billionaire has grown increasingly infuriated by delays on his development projects, including a mid-sized retail and residential development that he has been trying to get approved. After six years of hold-ups and redesigns on that project — due, he said, to townsfolk endlessly nitpicking his plans — he has decided to bail on Carmel. "It's time to leave this strange community, if you can call it a community," Pastor said in a statement after the City Council this month delayed taking any action on the development, which he named the JB Pastor project in honor of his great-grandfather. City officials, he wrote, have used "reasons that are akin to a schoolyard" to stand in his way, and it is time, he said, to "reconsider my investment in Carmel." Read more: Why is a Monaco billionaire buying so many properties in Carmel and Big Sur? In Carmel-by-the-Sea, development — including upgrades to private homes — is notoriously slow. This wealthy Monterey County enclave strictly regulates architecture to maintain the much-vaunted "village character" of a place filled with cottages, courtyards and secret passageways. Residents in the one-square-mile town, population 3,200, have long sought to keep out the so-called trappings of city life. They have no street addresses, instead giving their homes whimsical nicknames like Almost Heaven and Faux Chateau. And they have no streetlights or sidewalks in residential areas. Over the last decade, Pastor has bought at least 18 properties, including The Hog's Breath Building, the site of the pub once owned by actor and former Carmel-by-the-Sea mayor Clint Eastwood; and the L'Auberge Carmel hotel, which houses a Michelin-star restaurant. In 2023, he paid $22 million for Cabin on the Rocks, the only oceanfront home ever designed by architect Frank Lloyd Wright. Last year, the California Coastal Commission approved his 'visionary plan' to restore public access at Rocky Point, a seaside property he bought for $8 million in nearby Big Sur with views of the picturesque Rocky Creek Bridge. In Carmel-by-the-Sea — where, according to Zillow, the average home price is $2.3 million — Pastor's purchases have become a source of intrigue, and, for some, downright suspicion. Pastor is the scion of a powerful real estate family that built much of mega-rich Monaco, a dense, one-square-mile nation on the French Riviera. His defenders in Carmel-by-the-Sea have questioned whether he has been discriminated against because he is too rich. "We are not treated the same as everyone else," Pastor wrote this month. "I suppose we are now at the point where we need to accept we are not wanted and draw the necessary conclusions." The city has rejected several of Pastor's design proposals, including multiple pitches for a mixed-use development on the site of what locals call The Pit. Pastor bought the massive, unsightly hole in the ground — the site of a downtown construction project whose previous owners ran out of money seven years ago — for $9 million in 2020 and is still trudging through the city's permitting process. Pastor, in his statement, called the delays with that project a "grotesque situation." The latest opposition to his JB Pastor development may have been the final straw. Pastor's most recent plans call for a 12,971-square-foot, two-story complex on Dolores Street that includes eight upstairs apartments, roughly 5,100 square feet of ground-level retail space, and a dozen parking spaces. Plans submitted to the city in 2021 called for the demolition of a former bank annex once used as a community room. Because it was less than 50 years old, it did not qualify as a historic structure — but after it turned 50 in October 2022, the Carmel Historic Resources Board voted to add it to the city's historic resources list. Pastor agreed to build around the annex. Then, another issue arose: The project would require the removal of a small concrete wall, decorated with exposed aggregate and inlaid rocks, built in 1972 by a man local historians dubbed the 'father of stamped concrete.' In the fall of 2023, the City Council said the wall was too important to be moved and sent Pastor's company back to the drawing board. This April, the city's Planning Commission approved the project, marking a major milestone. Two weeks later, 11 residents and business owners filed an appeal. They argued that the development, which includes three buildings, exceeds the city's limit of 10,000 square feet. Each building is smaller than that. But the opponents said that since two buildings are connected by a second-story exterior walkway they should be considered a single structure — one bigger than 10,000 square feet. They also argued that the site would not have enough parking and that planned rooftop gardens would not meet the city's landscaping requirements because they would not be on the ground floor. "The plans that were submitted and approved in April are still outside of the guidelines and the rules of the city's codes," Courtney Kramer, one of the appellants, said during a City Council meeting Aug. 4. She said it was frustrating to residents who have "been through excruciating renovation projects and followed the rules" to see certain projects get a pass. City codes, she said, "need to be applied consistently in order to preserve this village in the forest." During the six-hour meeting, the City Council delayed making a decision on the appeal, putting everything on hold again. Ian Martin, one of the appellants, said in an interview Friday that the push-back against Pastor's projects is "absolutely nothing personal at all" and that longtime locals also go through the same long process. "Of course, Clint Eastwood was so frustrated with the planning process that he ran for mayor," Martin said. "Pastor is not being singled out." Eastwood, who was mayor in the 1980s, ran for office after fighting with the City Council over what he said were unreasonable restrictions on the design of an office building he wanted to erect. Pastor now owns that building. Martin said that of the 11 appellants, two are former City Council members and three, including himself, are former planning commissioners. They are "very well versed in the general plan and the municipal code and the design guidelines," he added. The group, he added, is "not opposed to the project." They just believe it has to play by the rules. Chris Mitchell, managing director of Esperanza Carmel LLC, the local branch of Pastor's international real estate company, said in a statement that "this process has made a mockery of the city's own rules." "Our project was reviewed for six years, redesigned five times, and approved by the Planning Commission and City staff," he wrote. He called the appeal a "last-minute" political maneuver and stall tactic. "The message from City Council is clear: it doesn't matter how much you follow the rules, if your business is not wanted here, you won't be treated fairly,' Mitchell wrote. The city administrator, city clerk and members of the City Council did not respond to requests for comment. Read more: There are no street addresses in Carmel-by-the-Sea. Some say it's time to change Karyl Hall, co-chair of the Carmel Preservation Assn., said Pastor has bent over backward to listen to the community and to design — and redesign — his projects with the town's traditional architectural styles in mind. Hall, a retired research psychologist, is an adamant supporter, albeit a surprising one. Hall believes modern architecture — which she describes as "Anywhere, USA" buildings with sterile facades and box-like structures — poses an existential threat to Carmel-by-the-Sea. She co-founded the preservation association in response to the first proposal for The Pit: a contemporary design approved by the Planning Commission for the previous owners that she called "the ice box." Hall said she was heartened by Pastor, who proposed more traditional buildings. In an interview Thursday, she said some in town believe "that one person who owns so many properties is kind of scary." But the billionaire, she said, has been treated unfairly. 'The one thing we can always count on with him, which is why I've been supportive, is he's done quality work and he's done work that reflects Carmel's character," Hall said. "You can't say that about most of the developers who move in here. They just want to make big bucks." It remains unclear what Pastor means by "leave" Carmel. Will he halt his ongoing projects? Or sell his properties? Tim Allen, a real estate agent who has handled most of the billionaire's local purchases, said Thursday that Pastor is weighing his options. 'We need new infrastructure. We need new housing — it's mandated by the state. He's building these things," Allen said. "I hope this town rallies around Patrice, or he's gone." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Sign in to access your portfolio
