
Can suspending a cage-free egg law solve the soaring price problem? Nevada takes a crack at it
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Back when egg prices remained securely under $2 a dozen in 2021, Nevada joined several other states concerned about animal welfare in requiring cage-free eggs.
Now four years later, a dozen eggs costs an average of nearly $5 in the U.S. because of the lingering bird flu, so Nevada passed a law the governor signed Thursday that will allow the state to suspend that law temporarily in hopes of getting residents some relief at the checkout counter.
But it is not quite that simple, which is why the other six states with the same laws are so far reticent to follow suit.
By relaxing the rule, Nevada might get access to additional eggs, but the supply of all eggs remains tight because nearly 159 million birds have been slaughtered since the bird flu outbreak began in 2022 to help limit virus spread. The virus prompts the slaughter of entire flocks anytime it is found.
It is not clear dropping cage-free laws will have a significant effect on egg prices that have peaked at an average of $4.95 per dozen because the farmers who collectively invested several billion dollars in making the switch can't easily go back to raising chickens packed together in massive barns that they already spent the money to convert.
Even if all the cage-free laws went away, big corporations like McDonald's and Sodexo remain committed to buying only those kind of eggs, ensuring strong demand for cage-free eggs.
University of Arkansas agricultural economist Jada Thompson said opening up Nevada to all kinds of eggs 'could ease egg prices in Nevada very slightly,' but that it might make prices worse elsewhere because supplies are so tight.
Nevada tries to counter high egg prices
But Nevada is going to give it a try even if California, Massachusetts, Washington, Oregon, Colorado and Michigan don't seem to be considering it. Arizona, Rhode Island and Utah also have cage-free laws on the books, but theirs won't take effect for at least a couple more years.
Democratic Assemblymember Howard Watts III, who raises chickens in his Nevada backyard, advocated for the 2021 bill to promote the 'standard of humane treatment' of the animals. But the ongoing bird flu outbreak in the U.S. has caused egg prices to to hit a record high, and cage-free eggs are generally even more expensive.
'One of the things that was not foreseen at that time was this major animal disease outbreak,' Watts testified Tuesday. 'As a result, there was no regulatory flexibility to suspend those requirements in the event of a major supply chain disruption.'
Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo approved the legislation Thursday. Nevada Department of Agriculture Director J.J. Goicoechea is expected to authorize the 120-day suspension of the cage-free egg requirements within a day, according to Goicoechea's spokesperson Ciara Ressel.
'We anticipate 30 days before we can see an impact at the grocery stores,' Ressel said.
This month's jump in egg prices was the biggest since the nation's last bird flu outbreak in 2015. The previous high was set two years ago when eggs were selling for $4.82 per dozen on average.
The average prices mask just how bad it is in some places. Some Californians these days are shelling out $12.99 for a dozen, or more than a buck an egg. Some New York shops even started selling bundles of three eggs to help people who can't afford a full dozen.
Nevada resident Nancy Wong said she has been 'outraged' by egg prices in the state. 'We have gone to the store and eggs have been either rationed or completely out,' she said.
A minority of eggs are produced on cage-free farms
The concern with the cage-free requirements is that only about 121 million of the 304 million chickens laying eggs nationwide are raised on cage-free farms, so the supply is limited.
Many of the eggs those hens produce are promised to restaurant chains like McDonald's and Panera, food service giants like Sodexo and Aramark and grocers under long-term contracts that help keep prices down. But even when they do have to pay a premium, grocers sometimes lose money on eggs by selling them cheaply to try to get shoppers in the door.
The number of cage-free chickens has steadily increased in recent years because of the laws and the pressure from the companies buying eggs, increasing exponentially from just 38 million at the start of 2017. But the United Egg Producers trade group has estimated it would take at least 226 million cage-free hens to meet all the demand for those eggs, and more customers are clamoring for them, so the supply is tight.
The total flock of chickens nationwide used to number above 330 million before the bird flu outbreak began.
Even as more egg farmers were converting to cage-free setups over the past decade, prices stayed between $1.40 and $2 per dozen most of the time with only the normal seasonal price spikes around Easter and Thanksgiving until this current bird flu outbreak began in early 2022.
If bird flu outbreaks happen to hit cage-free farms hard, there are fewer eggs out there that can replace the lost ones. For example, out of the nearly 47 million birds slaughtered just since the start of December, more than 3 million of them were on five cage-free farms in California.
Anytime birds must be killed, it takes months for a farm to resume producing eggs because of the time required to dispose of the carcasses, sanitize the barns and raise new chickens until they are about 5 months old and capable of laying eggs.
Other states resist overturning cage-free laws
California won't consider dropping its cage-free law in part because the rule came from a measure voters passed in 2018, so voters would have to approve any major changes.
But there doesn't seem to be much support for changes in other states either.
Michigan state Rep. Jerry Neyer, a dairy farmer and chair of the state House Agriculture Committee, said the idea that new cage-free laws are driving up egg prices is a 'misconception.' The Republican added that most farms already adapted to comply with the law, so dropping the mandate wouldn't cut costs.
A bill to repeal Colorado's cage-free requirements, which just took effect on Jan. 1, was killed in its first committee vote last month. The sponsor, Republican state Rep. Ryan Gonzalez, argued that while the avian flu was a major factor in prices, the cage-free rules played a significant role. But the majority of lawmakers on the panel appeared skeptical.
Jonathan Kuester, who runs the small Historic Wagner Farm with about 200 Red Star hens in Illinois just outside Chicago, said he doesn't think cage-free practices are the cause of the egg shortages.
He acknowledged his farm is more vulnerable to a bird flu infection than a traditional farm where chickens are confined inside a barn that can be better protected. Kuester's birds roam free, where they might interact with ducks and geese that are the main carriers of the disease.
'The egg shortage that people are seeing is a result of some fairly large flocks being euthanized, and so fewer chickens are currently laying than were three or four months ago,' Kuester said. 'There's been a little bit of a panic, too. People are suddenly buying eggs as quickly as they can, and so you see that shortage.'
___

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
PhRMA bolsters its lobbying lineup
Presented by Recycled Materials Association With Daniel Lippman PhRMA HIRES RUBIN TURNBULL: Florida transplants Rubin Turnbull & Associates have registered to lobby for the brand name drug lobby PhRMA. The trade group retained Rubin Turnbull in March to lobby on a range of issues related to the drug industry, according to a newly filed disclosure. — It's the third new outside lobbying hire for PhRMA this year, after the organization hired DLA Piper and GOP lobbyist Doug Schwartz of HillNorth at the beginning of January. — PhRMA's latest hire came about a month into vocal industry skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s tenure atop the Health and Human Services Departmen. He has heaped criticism on vaccines and blamed drug industry lobbying for contributing to chronic disease among children in a report last month. — The industry already has no shortage of lobbying prowess, of course, with more than 40 other outside firms on retainer and lobbying outlays of $12.9 million just in Q1 of 2025 — a quarterly record. MORE IRA TAX CREDIT LOBBYING: Energizer Holdings has brought on Washington Council Ernst & Young for help salvaging an Inflation Reduction Act incentive for advanced manufacturing of products like batteries and battery components. — Tommy Brown, who worked in Treasury's legislative affairs office during the Biden administration, will work on the account along with Bob Schellhas, Evan Giesemann and Ryan Abraham, who was the Democratic tax counsel on the Senate Finance Committee during negotiations on the 2017 GOP tax bill, according to a disclosure filing. — The battery behemoth previously had just one other outside lobbying firm — Holland & Knight — on its roster. — Meanwhile, the Residential Solar Association retained a team of lobbyists at Becker & Poliakoff that includes a former chief of staff to Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) to help save the IRA's residential clean energy credit and the clean electricity investment credit, according to a disclosure filing. TGIF and welcome to PI. Send K Street tips and gossip. You can add me on Signal, email me at coprysko@ and be sure to follow me on X: @caitlinoprysko. NEW BUSINESS: Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck has signed more than a dozen new clients, including chrome and nickel mining giant Corex Holdings, insulin management software company Glytec, and the philanthropy Daniels Fund. — Florida-based grocery chain Publix, meanwhile, has hired Ballard Partners to lobby on labor issues, compliance with environmental regulations and PBM reforms, according to a disclosure. — And Moody's Corp., the parent company of the credit rating service that downgraded the creditworthiness of the U.S. last month — eliciting brushback from the White House — has hired Republican firm CGCN Group. CGCN's Sam Geduldig, Ja'Ron Smith and Scott Riplinger began working on April 30 to provide 'education on economic trends impacting the global economy,' according to a disclosure filing. MORE TRUMP FALLOUT IN BIG LAW: 'Seven partners at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, a prominent law firm that cut a deal with President Trump to head off a potentially crippling executive order, announced on Friday that they were departing to join a firm that helped successfully challenge one of Mr. Trump's orders in court,' The New York Times' Mike Schmidt and Maggie Haberman report. — 'The decision by the partners, who are leaving Willkie Farr to join the law firm Cooley, is the latest of several high-profile departures of lawyers from firms that cut deals with the president. Cooley represented Jenner & Block in that firm's legal efforts to challenge an executive order rather than settle with the president. Last month, a federal judge struck down the executive order against Jenner, saying it was 'doubly violative of the Constitution.'' — 'Two of the partners leaving Willkie led its San Francisco office: Benedict Y. Hur and Simona Agnolucci, who served as a member of the firm's executive committee. Both are litigators and have told others they were extremely disappointed that the firm capitulated to Mr. Trump, according to two people briefed on the matter.' — Those departures are the 'latest reshuffling amid the fallout from the executive orders. In just the past month, six top partners at the law firm Paul Weiss, the first firm to cut a deal with Mr. Trump, decided to leave. Four of them started their own law firm, while another joined one of the other firms that has successfully fought Mr. Trump in court.' CVS TROUBLE ON THE BAYOU: 'Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill announced Thursday she is investigating whether pharmaceutical giant CVS improperly used customers' personal information to send out text messages lobbying against a proposed state law' that would have prohibited companies like CVS from owning both PBMs and drug stores, per the Associated Press' Sara Cline and Jack Brook. — 'Murrill also said she plans to issue a cease-and-desist letter to the company to stop the messages. As lawmakers debated a now-failed bill on Wednesday they held up screenshots of text messages sent by CVS.' — 'Last minute legislation in Louisiana threatens to close your CVS Pharmacy — your medication cost may go up and your pharmacist may lose their job,' one text obtained by The AP read. The company's texts 'to Louisiana residents included a link to a draft letter urging lawmakers to oppose the legislation that someone could sign with their email address and send to legislators.' ANNALS OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE: 'The House Ethics Committee is launching a subpanel to review its guidance on campaign activities,' POLITICO's Hailey Fuchs writes. A new working group led by Texas Reps. Nathaniel Moran, a Republican, and Sylvia Garcia, a Democrat, will 'review and make recommendations to improve, clarify, and modernize the Committee's guidance regarding campaign activity by House Members, officers, and employees,' according to the panel. — 'It's unclear what prompted the committee to create a new body tasked with improving resources around campaign activity rules. A spokesperson for the Ethics Committee did not respond to a series of questions about the working group.' — 'However, a number of lawmakers have been dogged by allegations in recent years that they violated rules around campaigning — including, for example, accepting a campaign donation in connection to some kind of official action as a lawmaker.' FOR YOUR RADAR: 'As the Trump administration considers approving a proposed merger between two of the world's largest advertising agencies, Omnicom Group and Interpublic Group, regulators may impose unusual conditions,' per NYT's Lauren Hirsch, Benjamin Mullin, Kate Conger and Tiffany Hsu. — 'A proposed consent decree would prevent the merged company from boycotting platforms because of their political content by refusing to place their clients' advertisements on them, according to two people briefed on the matter.' — 'The restrictions being discussed by the Federal Trade Commission as part of its merger review are part of an effort by the Trump administration to use federal agencies to root out what it considers political bias in corporate America against conservative voices and causes.' — Omnicom has faced scrutiny from Republicans in Washington for its participation in the advertising coalition Global Alliance for Responsible Media, which launched in 2019 in an effort to persuade social media companies to tighten up their content moderation policies. — The group came into the spotlight more recently for recommending a pause for advertising on X following Elon Musk's takeover of the company, triggering an antitrust lawsuit from Musk and prompting the alliance to shut down not long after, though the alliance maintained it had done nothing wrong. Jobs report — Patrick McGill is now director of client services at StackAdapt. He previously was lead associate account director at Trade Desk. — Joe Grogan and John Czwartacki have launched Public Policy Solutions. Grogan is a Trump OMB and Domestic Policy Council alum. Czwartacki is a Trump OMB and CFPB alum. — Jesse Binnall and former Rep. John Sweeney (R-N.Y.) have launched King Street Solutions, a boutique government affairs firm. Binnall currently is a partner at Binnall Law Group. — NCTA announced two major retirements: Rick Chessen, senior vice president of legal and regulatory affairs and chief legal officer, and Mark Bell, senior vice president of creative services. Chessen will be succeeded by Russ Hanser, who joined NCTA in 2024 by way of the Commerce Department. Kristin Buch, who joined NCTA in 2012 and currently serves as NCTA's veep of creative services, will ascend to Bell's role. — Anthony DiGrado is joining ClearPath as a senior manager. He was previously the director of public affairs at the Plastics Industry Association. — Liya Rechtman has joined Evergreen Action as senior transportation policy lead. She previously worked as an environmental protection specialist at DOT. New Joint Fundraisers Frontline Organizing for Representation, Change & Equity (FORCE) PAC (Reps. Emilia Sykes, Steven Horsford, Jahana Hayes, Don Davis, Janelle Bynum) New PACs CITIZENS FOR A HEALTHY NEW MEXICO (Hybrid PAC) Nezarus (PAC) Rising Dems (Hybrid PAC) New Lobbying REGISTRATIONS Agios Pharmaceuticals: Agios Pharmaceuticals Asha Strategies LLC: Nigerian Physician Advocacy Group Ballard Spahr LLP: Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean As Barker Leavitt, Pllc (Ska Mr. James C. Barker): Advantage Capital Boundary Stone Partners: The Ray Breakaway: Arnall Golden Gregory (On Behalf Of The Local Housing Administrators Coalition) Breakaway: National Rental Home Council Breakaway: Pretium Breakaway: U.S. Mortgage Insurers Capitol Hill Consulting Group: Acadiana Regional Airport Capitol Hill Consulting Group: United Network For Organ Sharing Cgcn Group, LLC: Moody's Corporation Crossroads Strategies, LLC: The Law Offices Of Christopher E. Chang On Behalf Of Mr. Jerry Wang Ernst & Young LLP (Washington Council Ernst & Young): Energizer Holdings Inc. Fierce Government Relations: Haas Automation, Inc. Invariant LLC: American Automotive Leasing Association Invariant LLC: Mysten Labs, Inc. John Watts: California Natural Resources Agency K&L Gates, LLP: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Lot Sixteen LLC: American Physical Society Mike Williams Capitol Strategies LLC (F/K/A Mw Capitol Strategies LLC): Andronaco Industries Mike Williams Capitol Strategies LLC (F/K/A Mw Capitol Strategies LLC): Waterfleet LLC Oculus Strategies, LLC: The Livingston Group, LLC Obob Health Supply LLC O'Neill And Associates: Cora Systems US Inc Rubin, Turnbull & Associates: Phrma Rubin, Turnbull & Associates: Universal Technical Institute Rubin, Turnbull & Associates: USantibotics Strategics Consulting, LLC: Town Of Stanley The Friedlander Group: Logista Advisors LLC The Roosevelt Group: Thermoanalytics New Lobbying Terminations Invariant LLC: Nextdoor Law Offices Of Frederick H. Graefe, Pllc: National Medical Funding Services Richard Sawaya: Halliburton Energy Services
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOP legislators approve $220 million increase for special education, $1.3 billion in tax cuts
Joint Finance Co-Chair Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said at a press conference ahead of the meeting that he would tell advocates who wanted the 60% rate that the state budget has to be 'right-sized' and 'affordable.' (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) After many delays, the Wisconsin Joint Finance Committee met Thursday evening to approve its plan for K-12 education spending that included a 5% increase to special education funding for schools and its $1.3 billion tax plan that targets retirees and middle-income earners. Lawmakers on the powerful budget-writing committee went back and forth for nearly three hours about the plans with Republicans saying they made significant investments in education and would help Wisconsinites while Democrats argued the state should do more for schools. The committee approved a total of about $336 million total in new general purpose revenue for Wisconsin's K-12 schools — only about 10% of Gov. Tony Evers' proposed $3.1 billion in new spending. Special education costs will receive the majority of the allocation with an additional $220 million that will be split between the general special education reimbursement and a subset of high-cost special education services. The special education reimbursement funding includes $77.2 million in the first year of the budget, which will bring the rate at which the state reimburses school districts to an estimated 35%, and $151 million in the second year bringing the rate to an estimated 37.5%. It's well below the $1.13 billion or 60% reimbursement for special education that Evers had proposed and that advocates had said was essential to place school districts back on a sustainable funding path. Education advocates spent the last week lobbying for the additional funding — and warning lawmakers about the financial strain on districts and the resources the students could lose. Ahead of the meeting Thursday, Democrats and a coalition of Wisconsin parents of students with disabilities spoke to the urgent need for additional investment in the state's general special education reimbursement rate. 'Everywhere we've gone in the state of Wisconsin, whether it's rural school districts, urban school districts, whether it's school districts that have passed referendums and those that haven't, they all say the same thing — 60% primary special education funding is absolutely necessary for our schools to succeed,' Rep. Tip McGuire (D-Kenosha) said at the press conference. 'You can see that we have had a cycle of referendum throughout Wisconsin, and that cycle has to end.' The special education reimbursement peaked at 70% in 1973, according to the Wisconsin Policy Forum. After falling to a low of 24.9% in 2015-16, the state's share of special education costs has been incrementally increasing with some fluctuations. The Republican proposal represents, at maximum, about a 5% increase to the current rate by the second year. According to budget papers prepared by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the investment lawmakers made last session was meant to bring the rate to 33.3%, but because it is a sum certain rate — meaning there was only a set amount of money set aside, regardless of expanding costs — the actual rates have been 32.4% in 2023-24 and an estimated 32.1% for 2024-25. Joint Finance Co-Chair Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said at a press conference ahead of the meeting that he would tell advocates who wanted the 60% rate that the state budget has to be 'right-sized' and 'affordable.' 'The governor's budget has always [had] reckless spending that the state can't afford, and so we're choosing to make key investments and priorities, and these investments today will be some of … the largest investments you'll see in the budget,' Born said. The committee also added $54.5 million to bring the additional reimbursement rate for a small number of high-cost special education services to 50% in the first year of the budget and 90% in the second year. The high-cost special education program provides additional aid when costs exceed $30,000 for a single student in one year. According to DPI, in 2025 only 3% of students with disabilities fell in the high-cost special education category. In 2024-25, the program only received $14.5 million from the state. Evers had proposed the state invest an additional $18.5 million. Republicans on the committee insisted that they were trying to compromise and making a significant investment in schools — noting that education likely will continue being the state's top expenditure in the budget. Meanwhile, Democrats spoke extensively about the need for higher rates of investment, read messages from superintendents and students in their districts and said Republicans were not doing what people asked for. 'High needs special education funding only reaches about 3% of Wisconsin's special education students,' Rep. Deb Andraca said. 'You're getting a couple good talking points, but you're not going to get the kinds of public schools that Wisconsin kids deserve.' During the committee meeting, Sen. Julian Bradley (R-New Berlin) criticized Democrats for saying they would vote against the proposals. He said Democrats would vote against any proposal if it isn't what they want. 'If we all voted no, we would return to base funding, which was good enough by the way for the governor last budget because he signed it,' Bradley said. 'There would be no increases, but instead we've introduced a motion which will increase funding.' McGuire responded by saying he wouldn't vote for a proposal that is 'condemning the state to continuing the cycle of referendum,' which he said Republicans are doing by minimally increasing the special education reimbursement rate and not investing any additional money in general aid. 'Wisconsinites across the state are having to choose between raising their own property taxes' and the schools, McGuire said. The Kenosha School District, which is in McGuire's legislative district, recently failed to pass referendum to help reduce a budget deficit. School leaders had said a significant increase in the special education reimbursement would prevent the district from having to seek a referendum again. 'They had a $19 million budget gap, and if this state went to 60% special education funding, you know roughly where we promised we would be, that would've gone down to $6 million,' McGuire said, '…$13 million of those dollars are our responsibility. That's been our failing, and we should live up to that.' 'What are we arguing about? We're putting more money in,' Sen. Patrick Testin (R-Stevens Point) said.'I would think that when this gets to his desk, Evers would sign this because it is a bigger increase than any of what he proposed while he was state superintendent.' McGuire said the investment in the high-cost special education is also good, but only applies to a small number of schools and students. 'You know, what would benefit all school districts in the state and will benefit all students who need special education? The primary special education reimbursement rate, which you put at 37.5[%], but everyone says should be at 60[%].' McGuire said. 'I don't think this is your intention, but I don't believe that we should be exchanging children who need our assistance for other children who need our assistance. Why can't we just help all of the kids who need our help?' Rep. Tony Kurtz (R-Wonewoc) said that the increase for high-cost special education will have a significant impact on some schools, especially smaller ones, and students, even if it's not many of them. 'To get 90% for them is huge for any of our rural districts. One child, which deserves an education, can break the bank for our small districts,' Kurtz said. 'Is it perfect? No, it's not perfect, but we have to stay within our means.' Committee co-chair Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) echoed Kurtz's comments saying that there will be 'a lot of districts that are going to be awful happy about that.' 'They've been worried about sometimes, a student moves into the district, and it's of incredibly high, high needs,' Marklein said. The committee also declined to include additional general aid for school districts. Republicans on the committee said there was already a $325 per pupil increase to districts' revenue limits built into the budget from last session due to Evers' partial veto. The increase gives districts the option to raise property taxes, though it doesn't require them to, and does not include state funding for the increase. Sen. Romaine Quinn (R-Birchwood) told lawmakers not to forget about the increase, saying the 'insulting part about that is that everyone gets it. There are schools that don't need that,' Quinn said. '72% of my districts spend less than [the schools of] my Democratic colleagues on this panel.' School Administrators Alliance Executive Director Dee Pettack, Wisconsin Association of School Boards Executive Director Dan Rossmiller, Southeast Wisconsin School Alliance Executive Director Cathy Olig and Wisconsin Rural Schools Alliance Executive Director Jeff Eide said in a joint letter reacting to the proposal that lawmakers failed to hear the voices school leaders, parents and community and business leaders. 'While the $325 revenue limit authority exists, it is not funded by the state. Instead, it is entirely borne by local property taxpayers. In addition, school districts will not see the requested support in special education,' the leaders stated. 'Because of the lack of state support in these two critical areas, school districts will be left with no choice but to ask their local taxpayers to step up and shoulder the costs locally, regardless of their ability to pay.' The leaders said the state was investing minimally and school districts will continue to struggle to fund mandated primary special education programs. State Superintendent Jill Underly called the Republicans' proposal 'irresponsible' in a statement Friday and said it 'puts politics ahead of kids and disregards educators and public schools when they need support the most.' 'Our public schools desperately need and deserve funding that is flexible, spendable and predictable,' Underly said. 'This budget fails to deliver on all three. Once again, those in power had an opportunity to do right by Wisconsin's children — and once again, they turned their backs on them.' The committee also approved $30 million for the state's choice school programs, $20 million for mental health services in school, $250,000 for robotics league grants, $750,000 for a single school, the Lakeland STAR Academy (a provision that Evers vetoed last session), $100,000 for Special Olympics Wisconsin, $3 million for public library system aid, $500,000 for recovery high schools and $500,000 for Wisconsin Reading Corps. Republican lawmakers also approved tax cuts of about $1.3 billion for the budget Thursday evening after 8 p.m., including changes to the income tax brackets and a cut for retirees in Wisconsin. Born and Marklein said the cuts would help retirees and other Wisconsinites afford to stay in the state. 'These are average, hard-working people in our state that will benefit from our tax cut,' Marklein said. The income tax change will allow more people to qualify for the second tax bracket with a rate of 4.4% by raising the qualifying maximum income to $50,480 for single filers, $67,300 for joint filers and $33,650 for married-separate filers. This will reduce the state's revenues by $323 million in 2025-26 and $320 million in 2026-27. People currently eligible for the second tax bracket include: single filers making between $14,680 and $29,370, joint filers making between $19,580 and $39,150 and married separate filers making between $9,790 and $19,580. Wisconsin Republicans have been seeking another significant tax cut since the last budget cycle when Evers vetoed their proposals. After the rejection, Republicans started to narrow their tax cuts proposals to focus on retirees and a couple of other groups with the hope of getting Evers' approval. When negotiations on this year's budget reached an impasse, Evers had said he was willing to support Republicans' tax goals, but he wanted agreements from them, too. The proposal also includes an exclusion from income taxes for retirees that would reduce the state's revenues by $395 million in 2025-26 and $300 million in 2026-27. 'This isn't a high-income oriented kind of thing,' Marklein said during the meeting. 'It just helps a lot of average people in the state of Wisconsin, so it's very good tax policy.' Democrats appeared unimpressed with the tax proposal. The Legislative Fiscal Bureau told lawmakers that the income tax change would lead to about a maximum impact of $253 annually for married joint filers, $190 annually for single filers and $127 for married separate filers. 'So roughly $5 a week for a married couple,' McGuire said. McGuire said that Democrats just have the perspective that Wisconsin could invest more in the priorities that residents have been expressing. 'We heard from a lot of people about what they need,' McGuire said in reference to school districts. 'We also know that as they've been attempting to get those funds they've had to go to referendums across the state, and… we think that's harming communities and making it more difficult for people. As a perspective, we believe that that's a good place to invest in dollars.' The committee also voted to provide additional funding for the Wisconsin technical colleges, though it is, again, significantly less than what was requested by Evers and by the system. The proposal will provide an additional $13 million to the system. This includes $7 million in general aid for the system of 16 technical colleges, $2 million in aid meant for grants for artificial intelligence, $3 million for grants for textbooks and nearly $30,000 to support the operations of the system. Evers had proposed the state provide the system with $45 million in general aid Sen. LaTonya Johnson (D-Milwaukee) said the differences between Evers' proposals and what Republicans offered were stark. 'We hear my GOP colleagues talk about worker training all the time and this is their opportunity to make sure that our technical colleges have the resources that they need to make sure that we are training an adequate workforce,' Johnson said, noting that the state could be short by 1,000 nurses (many of whom start their education in technical colleges) by 2030. 'I've never had an employer complain about having an educated workforce, not once, but I have heard employers say that Wisconsin lacks the skill sets and educational skills they need. It seems my Republican colleagues are more concerned with starving our institutions of higher education, rather than making sure they have the resources they need.' Testin said the proposal was not a cut and that Republicans were investing in technical colleges. 'We see there's value in our technical colleges because they are working with the business community … getting students through the door quicker with less debt,' Testin said. 'Any conversations that this is a cut is just unrealistic. These are critical investments in the technical system.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fewer Republicans have ‘very favorable' views of Musk: Survey
Republican attitudes toward tech billionaire Elon Musk appear to have cooled after his bitter public row with President Trump last week, as a new poll found fewer respondents saying they have 'very favorable' views of the former head of the White House's Department of Government Efficiency compared to April. About a fourth of Republicans surveyed in the latest Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll said they have 'very favorable' views of Musk — down from 38 percent of those surveyed in April. But many of them appear to have shifted to a 'somewhat favorable' opinion of Musk, suggesting GOP supporters haven't completely rebuffed the world's wealthiest man. The AP poll found that while 29 percent of Republicans in April voiced mild support for Musk, the number climbed to 38 percent in June. Combined, the 'somewhat' and 'very' favorable opinions remained high and nearly unchanged — 64 percent this month versus 67 percent in April. Ten percent of Republicans said they had 'very unfavorable' views of Musk in both polls; and 'somewhat unfavorable' ratings shifted by just 3 percentage points, from 15 percent in April to 18 percent in June. Musk was a top ally and campaign donor to Trump until a messy falling out rocked the White House, starting with Musk's criticism of the tax and spending megabill that carries much of Trump's domestic policy agenda. Trump and Musk's feud erupted with blistering public digs last Thursday. Both have appeared to tone down the tension, with Musk issuing a mea culpa days after their relationship imploded. 'I regret some of my posts about President [Trump] last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote Wednesday on his social platform X. Similar to Republicans, overall and Democratic views of Musk also showed little change, with majorities continuing to view him unfavorably. About a third of all adults surveyed this month said they have 'very' or 'somewhat' favorable opinions of Musk, while 32 percent held favorable opinions in April. Ten percent of Democrats surveyed said they had 'very' or 'somewhat' favorable views of Musk in June, compared to 9 percent in April. The AP poll was conducted June 5-9 and included results from 1,158 adults across all 50 states and Washington, D.C. The margin of error is 4 percentage points. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.