Edinburgh firm's merger paves the way for better support to women in need
The Royal Society for the Support of Women of Scotland (the Society) and the E Mclaren Fund for Indigent Ladies (the Fund) have united in a move that secures the legacy of both institutions while expanding the scope of aid available to women in later life.
The merger ensures that all beneficiaries of the Fund will continue to receive grants under their existing terms, while also gaining access to the enhanced services and broader support available through the Society, including higher levels of grants for some and access to a caseworker.
As a result of the merger, combined assets as of July 2025 total just under £56 million, representing Scotland's largest sources of charitable financial support specifically for older women.
Andrew Tweedy, Chief Executive of the Society, said: 'This merger represents the best of both worlds. We are preserving the values and intent of the Fund while broadening the safety net for women who need it most.
'The Society's caseworker team brings deep expertise and resources that will be of immediate benefit to the Fund's beneficiaries.'
The Society, founded in 1847, last year distributed more than £1.23 million in grants to 831 women across Scotland. It traces its roots to the plight of unmarried daughters of gentlemen left destitute in later life – a cause immortalised in the novels of Jane Austen and the Brontë sisters. Though times have changed and the Society has evolved in response, the social vulnerability of older women remains starkly relevant.
By comparison, the Fund, established during the First World War in 1917, has been supporting around 100 women annually – and initially had a focus on supporting the widows or daughters of officers who served in Scottish regiments – with grants totalling more than £90,000 last year.
Graeme Kidd, Chair of the Fund, said: 'We recognised the importance of finding a partner that would not only honour the intent behind the Fund but also offer a stronger, modernised support model.
'The Society has proven itself a natural fit and a willing and proactive partner, and this move protects the dignity and future of the women we serve.'
The merger is underpinned by a shared ethos. Both organisations have long adopted a 'cash first' approach to aid – a method now increasingly mirrored by statutory bodies. By providing direct financial support rather than goods or vouchers, recipients retain autonomy and dignity in managing their needs.
Beyond the vital financial payments, the Society has developed a more holistic support system, working closely with partner agencies and tailoring its assistance to the evolving circumstances of each beneficiary.
The merger also allows for significant efficiencies. Combining operations reduces administrative costs and ensures that a larger share of assets goes directly to those who need it. The historic move not only guarantees continuity for current beneficiaries, but also ensures that future generations of vulnerable women will continue to be supported through a sustainable and robust framework.
Andrew Tweedy added: 'This is a win for everyone. Beneficiaries of the Fund receive more comprehensive support, our combined operations become more efficient, and we can now help more women across Scotland. At a time of rising hardship for older women, this consolidation is both timely and transformative.'
The Society has already begun outreach to beneficiaries of the Fund to assure them that their support will remain uninterrupted and that additional services are available should they wish to access them.
The Royal Society for the Support of Women of Scotland HQ in 1912
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Reporter
11 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Controversial ‘open space' housing plans revealed
Fresh plans for housing on a grassland originally set aside for a public park for residents in Wallyford have been lodged with East Lothian Council. Taylor Wimpey's plans to create more than 90 new homes at the edge of the estate include 84 houses – over half of which will have four bedrooms – and nine two bedroom flats with no affordable housing included. They come more than a year after councillors refused to grant permission for around 150 new homes on the land, which had originally been earmarked as open space. At the time developers of the overall site which has seen hundreds of homes already built around it East Lothian Development Ltd (ELDL) argued that the estate provided lots of open space across the site and did not need the additional park land. Councillors described the move as 'a step too far' and 'too much icing on the cake', however Scottish Ministers backed an appeal by the company overturning the decision and approving the plans. Now Taylor Wimpey have submitted their proposals for a smaller number of homes on the site which will go before the council's planning committee next week. A report to councillors recommending they back the new plans says: 'In his decision letter, the (Scottish Government) reporter concluded that he was satisfied that the other open space areas to be provided over the whole Wallyford/Dolphingstone expansion area were adequate to serve future residents of the expansion area without the need for the whole of the land of the appeal site to be provided for the large, consolidated area of open space, and granted planning permission in principle for a residential development of it, with a small part of the appeal site accommodating an open space area. 'All of the 84 houses and 9 flats to be erected on the site would be for private sale. The houses would comprise of 15 different house types, with 42 being terraced, 6 being semi-detached and 36 detached. 'Of the 84 houses, 44 would have 4 bedrooms, 24 would have 3 bedrooms and 16 would have 2 bedrooms. The 9 flats would all have 2 bedrooms.' The report notes that following the Scottish Ministers decision councillors cannot refuse consent for the housing but can have a say on determining the design, landscape and appearance of the site. By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Richest Scottish households have one fifth of country's wealth
With the figures showing the wealthiest 2% of households have almost a fifth (18%) of wealth in Scotland, campaigners said the data highlighted 'the vast scale of unfairness in Scotland today'. The report looked at wealth in Scotland – which includes the physical wealth of households' belongings, as well as savings and investment, property and pension wealth. The latest data, for the period 2018 to 2020, showed median household wealth in Scotland stood at £214,000 – with this down from £242,700 in 2016 to 2018 and £250,700 in 2014 to 2016. READ MORE: Palestinian journalists 'reporting on own extermination' call for action The report, which was published by the Scottish Government, noted: 'A typical household in the wealthiest 10% of households had £1.7 million in total wealth, whereas a typical household in the least wealthy 10% of households had £7,600.' It added: 'The least wealthy households rarely own property or have any private pension savings. Their wealth is mainly made up of the value of their possessions such as cars, furniture and clothing.' The report also noted that wealth can 'vary a lot by age', saying that 'younger households are less likely to have much or even any pension or property wealth, and most of their wealth is made up of the value of their belongings (physical wealth)'. It added: 'In general, people start building up wealth once they start receiving a salary, buy some goods, maybe save some money, and pay into a private pension scheme such as a workplace pension. 'Many buy a home, and through paying off their mortgage they build property wealth.' Meanwhile when people retire, the report said that 'pension wealth gets drawn upon and used up, while some people also downsize their homes and reduce their property wealth'. However campaigners at Tax Justice Scotland – which wants Holyrood's powers to be used to deliver greater equality – insisted changes are needed to 'share wealth more fairly'. Speaking on behalf of the group Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) – Scotland's largest trade union body – general secretary Roz Foyer said: 'These figures show the vast scale of unfairness in Scotland today. Roz Foyer (Image: free) 'Whilst those at the top accumulate more wealth, more than one in five children grow up in poverty and our public services are starved of the investment they urgently need. This cannot go on.' Foyer demanded: 'We need urgent tax reform to help share wealth more fairly and to distribute resources right across the country. READ MORE: Gordon Brown's had a good idea. But it won't fix the problem he created 'Over time, public finance pressures mean that most of us may need to pay a bit more, but this data makes clear this must start with those at the very top. 'In Scotland, that means parties must set out clear plans to scrap Council Tax and replace it with a fairer, modern property tax. 'At the UK level, we also need common sense wealth taxes that ensure the richest pay their fair share.' She insisted: 'It's time for our political leaders to step up with serious tax plans to help close this growing wealth gap and to invest in creating a fairer, more prosperous future for all of us.' Scottish Green equalities spokeswoman Maggie Chapman criticised the 'obscene inequality in these statistics', adding: 'There is a small number of people who are very well off, and a far greater number who have very little.' She added: 'Scotland has a very long way to go if we are to build a fairer society, and this must be a clarion call for change.' Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie said that 'so many people are finding that there is nothing left at the end of the month'. He said: 'People are paying the price for the SNP's incompetence and Liz Truss and the Conservatives crashing the economy.' Shirley-Anne Somerville (Image: PA) Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'As a result of Scottish Government policies, the poorest 10% of households with children are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-2026.' However, she added: 'Inequality is still too high, with too many economic powers left in the hands of the UK Government which has too often sought to balance the books on the backs of the poorest. 'With the full powers of independence, Scotland could do more to take a different approach from the UK status quo, and take decisions which would make Scotland the fairer, more equal country that we want to see.'
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
If Scotland is so poor, why does Westminster resist independence?
This from a Westminster government that has run a deficit for my entire life, hence the continual increase in borrowing. In 2010, when the Tories came to power, the debt was £1.3 trillion. Under their governance, it's now reached well north of £2 trillion, despite the years of austerity that decimated our public services and which may take a generation or more to repair. WATCH: Expert debunks everything you've been told about Scottish 'deficit' Westminster has trashed the economy and then has the temerity to apportion 'our share' of that debt accrued to we Scots who had no influence in its creation. We Scots are paying for vanity projects we can never benefit from, nor do we have any influence over the political choices that waste money wholesale across the economy, while having also to bear continually higher interest rates, low wages, energy poverty and housing crises. GERS is a manufactured illusion designed to portray Scotland as bad and weak. This is the same bad and weak Scotland that English-dominated Westminster is desperate to hold on to. Why? Because we know they have long taken Scotland's resources and poured them into the UK financial cesspit to prop it up, and fully intend to do so going forward. It's they who can't afford Scotland's independence, not us. Common sense reveals that if these GERS figures were correct, Scotland would be independent by now, and Westminster would be driving it. READ MORE: Scottish Secretary Ian Murray reacts to latest GERS figures Independent, with full political and economic control, we could divest ourselves of the UK's sick economy of Europe that's long lived off its size and reputation rather than ability and strength, and build a stronger future for our descendants. Independence now is our imperative. Don't we urgently need an indy road map drawn with courage and determination rather than a seemingly cosy wee 'vote for us and we'll see what we can do' promise with the indy can kicked farther down the road? Jim Taylor Scotland THERE has been a significant increase in the number of people complaining about various plans or the lack of. Each inventor assumes that their specific plan is infallible and can produce the outcome we all seek. This is putting the cart before the horse. The problem most authors make is to not take account of the forces arrayed against us or the practical realities of plans being implemented. In most cases we probably need a combination of plans rather than just one. The circumstances at the time will dictate which plan or plans can or cannot be used. Creating plans is valid, and each of them goes on a shelf ready to be used when the time and circumstances are appropriate, as with preparing for contingencies like defence or pandemics. None of them have on their own any degree of certainty, and it remains essential that flexibility in argument and implementation is maintained. READ MORE: GERS figures show Scottish Government revenue growing faster than spending Fundamentally though, the prerequisite for pursuing any of the plans is a reliable majority of voters to start the process off. We can have as many plans as we like, but without that recognisable majority none of them can ever get off the ground. None of the plans actually recognises the need to convince people, probably because the only people who devise them speak to the already converted. If that enthusiasm and dedication were directed at those who are not converted, we would stand a much better chance of success. Internal arguments about plans get in the way of the primary need to convince a solid and consistent majority. Without that majority support, it doesn't matter whether it is Alex Salmond's ghost, John Swinney, Kenny MacAskill or somebody else leading the charge with whichever masterful plan is valid at the time. Arguing about who has the best and infallible plan is a futile waste of time and effort. Nick Cole Meigle, Perthshire OH how I really wish I shared Stan Grodynski's optimistic attitude to the leadership of the SNP in his recent letter headed 'An emphatic win for the SNP will mean no excuses for inaction' (Aug 13). I assume to help achieve this 'emphatic win' independence supporters will be asked to vote SNP on both ballot papers in May 2026. That election is now less than nine months away. A week is indeed a long time in politics, but my gut feeling is that we are heading for a result, at best, similar to the 2021 election – the SNP as the largest party but without an overall majority and another coalition with the Greens a very distinct and unfortunate possibility. READ MORE: The two plans for achieving independence are surely not incompatible I see little current evidence that Alba or any other of the small parties which support independence will reach the threshold required to turn list votes into list seats. To do so now would need the SNP to approve of their supporters voting for another independence-supporting party on the list. I see no chance of that happening any time soon. In addition, a potentially lacklustre and possibly poorly financed SNP campaign will see hundreds of thousands of independence supporters simply staying at home. The million or so SNP supporters who do vote may see their list votes result in a few extra SNP and Green candidates elected while the Unionist parties, now including Reform UK, will fill up the remaining large number of available list seats. It will be Groundhog Day – May 2021 all over again. If the SNP do really well and achieve a majority of MSPs, sadly I fear post-May 2026 there may suddenly appear a vast myriad of 'excuses for inaction'. The most obvious of which will be 'Keir Starmer just telt us NO'. The political ball will then be firmly bounced back into the SNP's court. The new SNP leader (assuming John Swinney has left the post) will have to decide on some very uncharacteristic radical action or meekly accept five more years of Donald Dewar devolution. Brian Lawson Paisley
