Ukraine gas reserves are at lowest level in 11 years, analyst ExPro says
Ukraine has been forced to ramp up gas withdrawals from storage and increase imports this winter and spring after Russian missile attacks damaged production facilities in the east of the country.
ExPro noted that storage facilities, whose capacity exceed 30 bcm, were less than 20% full, compared to 31.7% at the same date in 2024, when they held 8.8 bcm of gas.
It said that since the beginning of the current injection season in mid-April, 610 million cubic meters of gas had been pumped into storage facilities, including 258 million in April.
"Injection volumes in May 2025 are higher than in May last year. Overall, more than 350 million cubic metres of natural gas have been injected into storage facilities since the beginning of the month, 33% more than in the same period last year," ExPro said.
The company forecast that Ukraine could have about 6.6 bcm of gas in reserve by the end of May.
The former head of the Ukrainian gas transit operator, Serhiy Makogon, said last month that the country needed to import up to 6.3 billion cubic metres of gas for the 2025/26 winter season as reserves have fallen to a record low due to war-related damage to some facilities.
He said Ukraine would need up to $3 billion for gas purchases.
Ukraine's state oil and gas firm Naftogaz has said it was in talks with the government and international financial institutions to raise 1 billion euros ($1.1 billion) to purchase over 2 bcm of gas for the 2025/26 heating season.
Naftogaz has said it also contracted 300 mcm of American LNG with deliveries from Poland's Orlen (PKN.WA), opens new tab.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tesla almost halves UK monthly lease fee as sales slump, The Times reports
Aug 18 (Reuters) - British motorists can now lease a Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab electric vehicle for just over half of what they would have paid a year ago, The Times reported on Monday, citing industry sources. Tesla has been forced to offer discounts of up to 40% to car leasing companies to shift more units, the report said. The discounts are also due to the lack of storage space for Tesla vehicles in the UK, the report said. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report. Tesla did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Tesla's July sales in the UK fell about 60% to 987 units in July, according to the latest data from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT). British new car registrations overall fell about 5% year-on-year in July, according to the SMMT. Battery electric vehicles are now projected to account for 23.8% of new registrations in 2025, slightly up from SMMT's previous forecast of 23.5%.
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Putin won in Anchorage. Now Zelenskyy and Europe are in an even more perilous position
Donald Trump portrays himself as a hard-nosed dealmaker. Yet in the run-up to Friday's summit with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, his claim that the Russian leader held him in high regard and was therefore serious about ending the war in Ukraine sounded naive. Putin doesn't let sentimentality shape his political and military decisions. Nor has he disavowed his longstanding claim to four Ukrainian provinces: Donetsk and Luhansk, which together comprise Ukraine's eastern Donbas region, and Zaporizhzhia and Kherson in the south. Despite Russia's overwhelming numerical advantage in troops and weaponry, Putin occupies only one province, Luhansk, almost entirely. Yet he persists. In the days before his meeting with Putin, Trump said the Russian economy 'stinks' and that falling oil prices would cause Russia's war to run aground. The war has certainly placed severe strains on Russia's economy, including high inflation and interest rates, labour shortages and a lack of investment by private businesses. Earnings from oil sales, a key source of state income, have also shrunk by 18% this year due to falling prices. There has even been talk of a recession. But these pressures have not prompted Putin to reassess his war plans. He ignored Trump's proposal for a 30-day ceasefire, which Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, accepted right away. Likewise, he was unfazed by Trump's threats to impose additional sanctions – with 'severe consequences', as he put it just before the summit – if Russia did not relent. Trump returned from Anchorage empty-handed for other reasons. Successful summits require painstaking advance work by leaders' subordinates; this one was arranged in haste. Given the rush, it was unsurprising that the Anchorage talks ended hours ahead of time. (The working lunch the two delegations were to have was cancelled.) During his post-summit press conference, Trump gamely praised Putin's goodwill and said that they had agreed on 'many points' during discussions that he described as 'productive'. Yet he failed to identify a single point of agreement and, atypically, didn't stay to answer reporters' questions. Putin came out ahead in Anchorage. He didn't agree to Trump's pet proposal for a ceasefire. It was Trump who ended up accepting Putin's position that a ceasefire must be preceded by a comprehensive peace agreement that addresses the 'root causes' of the war. Putin did show some flexibility by agreeing to freeze the frontline if Ukraine were to withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, and thus the entire Donbas, enabling Russia to acquire lands it has failed to conquer despite more than 40 months of fighting. Yet this offer could prove to be a trap. If Zelenskyy, who arrives in Washington for talks with Trump on Monday, refuses to do this, Putin may be able to look on as Trump tries to coerce the Ukrainian leader, forcing Europe to take sides. If Trump fails, Putin can paint Zelenskyy as the real obstacle to peace. Trump had declared that there would be no future talks if the summit failed – which it did, as he couldn't obtain a ceasefire, his main objective – yet in Anchorage, he spoke of follow-up meetings. Putin concurred, mischievously suggesting Moscow as the venue, but without indicating that he was open to including Zelenskyy and European leaders. By agreeing to further negotiations and keeping Trump's hopes for a peace deal alive, Putin may have ensured that the efficacy of additional US sanctions on Russia remains untested. By simply showing up in Anchorage, Putin demonstrated that the western policy of isolating him won't work. Zelenskyy and European leaders are undoubtedly relieved that the duo didn't unveil a deal to end the war by partitioning Ukraine. Still, Trump's readiness to accept Putin's insistence on this bilateral meeting after US efforts to include Zelenskyy failed had already sown more mistrust between Washington and Europe. Now Trump has embraced Putin's view that there can be no ceasefire without an overall agreement that addresses all aspects of the conflict. He has also in effect endorsed Putin's call for Ukraine to cede Donbas in exchange for a freeze of the frontline. These shifts will increase Ukraine and Europe's distrust of Trump – to Putin's advantage. Putin's confidence in Russia's eventual victory has been bolstered by Trump's decision, taken well before the summit, to cease direct weapons deliveries to Ukraine – assistance that totalled $65.9bn while Joe Biden was the US president. Russia will continue bombing Ukraine's cities, and its ground troops will keep pushing to grab even more land. In this respect, the summit has changed nothing. What has changed since Trump's return to the White House, though, is the US's role in the war. Ultimately, Trump believes that Russia's invasion does not threaten the US so it's up to the Europeans to support Ukraine's defence, a point JD Vance reiterated shortly before the summit. European countries have been increasing its defence spending and military support to Ukraine. But it had better be prepared to do even more and summon the unity to stay the course. Meanwhile, the lure of additional talks with Putin will keep alive Trump's illusion that continued diplomatic engagement with Russia and his self-proclaimed deal-making skills will eventually end the war – clearing the path to the Nobel peace prize he covets. Rajan Menon is a professor emeritus of international relations at the City College of New York and a senior research scholar at Columbia University's Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
US tariff collection falls short as implementation issues bite
The United States is collecting fewer duties than expected from exporters in the UK and elsewhere, as the country's border agency grapples with the biggest rise in tariffs in more than a century. Between April 5 and June 30, when the UK's trade deal with the US came into force, the vast majority of British exports to the US faced a minimum 10 per cent tariff. However, data from the US Census Bureau analysed by The Times showed that the country's Customs and Border Protection agency (CBP), responsible for administering President Trump's tariffs, collected duties equivalent to an average tariff rate of 6.2 per cent in April, rising to 7.9 per cent in June. A recent report from Oxford Economics found that in July the ratio of duties paid on imports was 10.5 per cent, well below its estimate for the effective US tariff rate of 18.2 per cent. Adam Slater, the author of the report, said there were probably two main reasons for the gap. Firstly, the fact that some goods in transit could have been exempted from tariffs and, secondly, that the US's duty collection systems were not quite up to speed. 'It's a lot more complicated with a system of exemptions,' Slater said. 'If you just had across-the-board import tariffs with no exception for all classes of products, it would probably be quite a lot easier to collect the tariffs quickly.' The most significant impact of the inconsistent collection of tariffs has been to further complicate the picture of how the tariffs are affecting the US economy. Slater said: 'This just pushes the full impact economically [of the tariffs] down the road even further, by however many months it may be; we don't really know at this point.' A separate report by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond found that the CBP appeared to collect no duties at all from $74 million of imports of aircraft between 2,000kg and 15,000kg from Canada in May, despite the product facing a US tariff of 25 per cent at the time. The bank attributed the shortfall between declared and actual tariffs to 'implementation frictions' in their rollout, due to shipment timing issues, deferred payments and delays in customs systems adapting to the new tariff schedule. For some UK exports, the US still appears to be receiving considerably less in levies than it should be. According to the US Census Bureau, the average tariff rate on British gin exports to the US was about 8 per cent in June, below the 10 per cent rate the products nominally face. Jose Sedano, the commercial director of Glenrinnes Distillery in Scotland, which makes Eight Lands Vodka and Gin, said that while he and his American counterparts had paid a 10 per cent duty, it had been charged on two different bases over the past three months. 'I'm sure if you ask different customs authorities in different ports of entry, you'll get different answers,' Sedano said. 'I have been dealing with international trade for the best part of 30 years and tariffs are always a nightmare in every country in the world.' Nonetheless, the US has still raised more than $100 billion from tariffs this year, with census data suggesting that British companies contributed about $1 billion of that between April and June.
