Letters: The Tribune Editorial Board should give RFK more credit in his campaign against sugar
In reference to the editorial 'As sugar is attacked, Chicago candymaker Ferrara keeps the Nerds coming' (May 27), the Tribune Editorial Board should do more research and also admit some harsh realities concerning sugar consumption. Is the board aware that about 1 in 5 children are classified as obese, some severely so?
Sadly, many parents don't have the heart to deprive their children of something considered by society (and the board) as a 'treat.' But as Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy so accurately pointed out, it is a form of poison and an addictive one at that. Just examine the percentage of people suffering the effects of Type 2 diabetes. That one disease alone accounts for enormous health care costs — costs that the government must absorb when a patient is on Medicare or Medicaid. So, the government indeed has a vested interest in controlling the manufacturing and consumption of sugar.
Ferrara Candy Co. CEO Katie Duffy stated that 'everything we produce is safe to eat.' That does not mean it is 'healthy' to eat! The board states that it has 'long recoiled against Uncle Sam telling Americans what to eat.' And that 'if a food product is safe from a scientific standpoint, the government has no business blocking it from the marketplace.' Again, that ignores the fact that the government shares some of the burden for the cost of medical care for the health disorders caused by sugar consumption. And just to enlighten the board further, pay for the government. So, it costs us all as a whole.
The board further states that 'armed with that information, we believe people are smart enough to make their own decisions without Nanny State intervention.' The board has to be joking. It gives people far more credit than they deserve.
Sugar is being consumed in quantities that most people are not likely aware of. And that is what I think Kennedy is trying to address. I appreciate what he is trying to achieve, and the board should as well.
Keep in mind that a country is only as strong and as healthy as its people. We have an epidemic of obesity in this country. Don't gloss over the facts in the name of some false sense of sovereignty over choice.Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is absolutely correct about the American diet. There's too much salt, sugar and bad fat; not enough fiber; and too many additives. The consequences are substantial: obesity, diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, cancer and more. He is dead wrong about vaccinations, 'dead' not being just an expression: People are going to die, needlessly.
During a measles epidemic in Samoa, Kennedy campaigned against vaccination; too few people were vaccinated, thousands got sick and dozens died. Almost all healthy individuals who get measles completely recover. About 1 in 1,000, however, will have serious complications or die. Great odds in a casino but not for a preventable disease.
In contrast, there have been no reports of the measles vaccine causing death in healthy people, and the incidence of permanent harm is less than 1 in 500,000.
Kennedy's efforts to restrict the messenger RNA-based COVID-19 vaccine is not based on credible evidence of significant harm. Worldwide, at least 5 billion people have received COVID-19 vaccinations, including hundreds of millions of Americans. Many have sore arms, and some, brief flulike illness. Very rarely does serious short-term illness occur. In contrast, more than 1 million Americans have died from COVID-19, and 20 million Americans have been diagnosed with long COVID-19, sometimes with debilitating symptoms. People who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 have dramatically lower rates of hospitalization, death and long COVID-19.
Kennedy proposes a clinical trial against a placebo to test the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. In any clinical trial, when the drug being studied against a placebo is found to be safe and effective, the trial is stopped. The safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine has already been proved; there is no need for a trial.
Kennedy's proclamation restricting recommending who should receive the vaccination is medical idiocy. Infants have poorly developed immune systems and are very vulnerable to infections, including COVID-19. If pregnant women are vaccinated, their babies get some protection against COVID-19. Being under 65 is no guarantee against COVID-19 causing hospitalization or death, and the incidence of some forms of long COVID-19 is actually higher in young people.
It is worth noting that Kennedy made these recommendations on his own without input from recognized experts. There is a new COVID-19 variant, and the need for vaccinations is still great. When the Senate confirmed Kennedy, it failed the American people.Michael J. Medley's letter ('What our nation needs,' May 29) regarding President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which has been passed by the House, is on point but misses one very important issue. This bill contains a buried provision seeking to limit courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, from enforcing their rulings or orders.
In short, it states: 'No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued.' What I have read says that this means the courts cannot enforce decisions unless the plaintiffs have posted a bond. Federal courts do not require plaintiffs to post bonds; therefore, this provision would mean that the courts would not be able to enforce their rulings. And Trump and his administration could proceed to do anything they want to, regardless of whether it is unconstitutional.
When setting up the federal government, our Founding Fathers did not feel any one person should have all the power. Therefore, they set up a government of three equal parts: executive (president), legislative (Congress) and judicial (Supreme Court). Trump has already taken over the legislative aspect — with no pushback from the Republican majority — by overturning many aspects of the government and funding that had previously been put in place by Congress. Now he wants to make judicial rulings unenforceable.
If Trump does that, he will be king. This country was developed as a democracy, and I believe the majority of Americans do not want a king.
Readers should call their senators and demand this bill not be passed with this provision in it. Save our democracy and our Constitution!I'm thrilled National Public Radio has legally challenged the administration's misguided executive order targeting its appropriately sourced federal funds and relationships with local stations. I've grown accustomed to the measured objectivity and factual analysis of the reporting through daily programs such as 'All Things Considered' and 'Morning Edition.'
We financially support NPR's frequent funding drives, the real lifeblood of its operations, not only because its revenues significantly rely on voluntary contributions by listeners, but also due to its prize-winning journalism that opens our eyes to hard-hitting domestic and international news analysis.
The president's bizarre claims that NPR fails to provide 'fair, accurate or unbiased' programming can be summarily rejected by those who actually listen to the variety of viewpoints included. NPR routinely covers important events like it did with the president's speech to a joint session of Congress in March and even presented rare audio of Supreme Court oral arguments about the birthright citizenship case, followed by riveting independent coverage.
Cutting this funding is more than just a violation of free speech. America should refrain from emulating autocratic leaders in other societies that deliberately silence views it does not like.National Public Radio is suing President Donald Trump's administration because it stopped taxpayer funding to the network; NPR contends that curtails its free speech.
What nonsense. NPR remains free to utter what it wants, but the public does not need to pay for it.
NPR can fund itself and say whatever it pleases. Its reflexive lawsuit is frivolous and vexatious without merit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
What are Americans' morning struggles?
Two in five Americans are 'bad' at mornings, according to new research. The survey of 2,000 general population Americans revealed 38% agreed with this sentiment — and respondents get out of bed later than planned an average of eight times per month. Advertisement For one in 10 respondents, this happens more than 20 times per month. When they're rushing through their morning routine, after staying in bed longer than planned, respondents were most likely to skip eating breakfast (41%). But others will neglect their personal hygiene: 16% will skip showering, while 11% will go about their day without brushing their teeth. 5 The average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed according to new research. Ana Blazic Pavlovic – Advertisement Commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and conducted by Talker Research, the survey also looked at respondents' alarm habits. Less than half (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning — and for these respondents, the results revealed their first alarm goes off at 6:33 a.m. Younger generations were more likely to rely on an alarm: While just a fifth (19%) of baby boomers set an alarm, 63% of Gen Z and millennials do the same. Across ages, the average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed. 5 The survey revealed that less than half of the people who participated (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning SWNS Advertisement The survey also split respondents by early birds and night owls to see how that impacts their alarm habits and their sleep overall. Two-thirds (67%) of early birds who use an alarm said it's 'very effective' at getting them out of bed on time — compared to just half (52%) of night owls. Early birds were more likely to use a 'standard' or preset alarm sound (70% vs. 58%), while night owls were more likely to have an 'annoying' sound — like a fire alarm or honking cars — to wake them up (20% vs. 12%). Unsurprisingly, night owls were more likely to struggle to get out of bed on time (54% vs. 17%). Night owls were also more likely to say their body needs more sleep than they're currently getting (70% vs. 55%). That's despite the two groups getting about the same amount of sleep — right around six and a half hours per night. Advertisement 'Whether you're a morning person or a night owl, quality sleep is non-negotiable,' said Laura Scott, Director of Brand Marketing at Avocado Green Mattress. 'Your natural sleep rhythm should be supported — not disrupted — by an environment designed for deep, restorative rest.' 5 51% of Americans are 'bad' at sleep due to their own anxieties keeping them awake. SWNS The top reason Americans aren't getting enough sleep? Their own worries are keeping them up (51%). That was followed by a sleep condition (like insomnia, sleep apnea, etc.) (30%) and nightmares or stress dreams (20%). Also in the top five was an uncomfortable bed or mattress making it more difficult to sleep (19%) and loud noises outside (14%) keeping respondents awake. 5 Sleep conditions, nightmares, uncomfortable mattresses, and loud noises are other significant sleep deterrents. Prostock-studio – While night owls (35%) and early birds (37%) were almost equally likely to struggle to stay asleep, night owls were more likely to face other difficulties. This included going to bed later than they 'should' in the evening (48% vs. 24%), struggling to fall asleep (44% vs. 27%) and staying in bed longer than they 'should' in the morning (25% vs. 8%). Advertisement 5 Creating a stable sleep habits is very important for daily living. Elnur – 'So many of us lie awake at night, our minds racing with worry or stress,' said Scott. 'That's why it's so important to create sleep spaces and habits that are calm and supportive — so you can wake up feeling like yourself again.' Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; the survey was commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 9–15, 2025.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These Are The States On The Brink Of A Caregiver Crisis — And Trump Medicaid Cuts Could Make It Worse
Some days are quiet and peaceful. Other days, Jenise Griffin's brother Michael Griffin spends hours talking to himself out loud or laughing uncontrollably. Auditory hallucinations, episodes of paranoia and other outbursts also aren't uncommon throughout the day. Michael, 59, was diagnosed with schizophrenia in the 1990s, and spent 23 years at state hospitals and jails, including one in their hometown of Naples, Florida. For the past three years he has lived with Jenise, 67, in Riverview, a small city about 20 minutes from Tampa, where she has been his full-time caregiver. Even though she works from home, balancing caregiving for Michael with her own busy work schedule has been a challenge for Jenise. 'I have to take care of his medications, doctors' appointments, therapists and case worker schedules, so his needs constantly interrupt my day,' she said. It has also taken a toll on her health: Jenise was diagnosed with bradycardia —a heart rate that's slower than normal — in December 2023 and had to get a pacemaker. She has moderate asthma and takes medication to manage her depression. 'The stress of taking care of him has made me sick,' she said. Jenise is far from alone. Although it's difficult to determine how many caregivers there are in the United States, AARP estimates that there were 53 million in 2020. Caregivers can be family members or hired professionals, paid or unpaid, full time or part time. But unlike professional home health aides, the labor family caregivers provide is unpaid, and often invisible yet expected by other members of the family. In many cases, the only support family caregivers receive comes from state or local programs that require jumping through multiple hoops in order to get the most basic services or financial assistance. According to a new report from the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, where you live can make all the difference—and 48% of states are on the brink of a caregiving emergency. After assessing the urgency of local caregiving needs, the authors of the Columbia report, titled 'America's Unseen Workforce: The State of Family Caregiving,' classified all 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, into four categories: critical, high risk, safe for now, and well-supported. States in the 'critical' category include: Florida Alabama Arkansas Georgia Louisiana Nevada South Carolina Tennessee States in the 'high risk' states are: Arizona California Hawaii Idaho Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi New Hampshire New Mexico North Carolina Oklahoma Oregon Texas Virginia West Virginia 'These states didn't land in a crisis by chance,' Stacey B. Lee, professor at Johns Hopkins Carey Business School with a joint appointment at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, told HuffPost. 'The Columbia Caregiving Index shows a consistent pattern: a lack of paid leave, low Medicaid reimbursement rates, [Home- and Community-Based Services] HCBS waitlists, and the absence of caregiver tax credits.' So why are some states faring so much worse than others? One reason for this, according to Holly Wiberg, Ph.D., assistant professor of operations research and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University's Heinz College, is that the current landscape of policies to support family caregivers is fragmented, with limited national coverage and a lot of variation on the state level. 'This fragmentation has multiple consequences,' Wiberg explained. 'First, caregivers have inconsistent protections with disparate impacts on their own lives and those of their patients. Second, this creates a challenging landscape to navigate, involving multiple agencies, which imposes a further burden on caregivers. The current model is unsustainable and places an undue burden on caregivers, both unpaid and underpaid.' That's been the case for Elizabeth Miller, 53, of Georgia, who spent years juggling caring for her aging parents while raising school-age children and working full time. 'They were some of the most exhausting and emotionally challenging years of my life,' she said. 'I felt completely overwhelmed, isolated and unprepared. I had no prior caregiving experience to draw from, and every day felt like a steep learning curve.' Trying to balance caregiving with parenting and a career meant a demanding schedule for Miller. 'I constantly felt pulled in two directions — guilty when I had to step away from work to care for them, and distracted and depleted when I was at work, worrying about everything that still needed to be done at home,' she said. What Miller and Jenise experience likely sounds familiar to anyone who has been a family caregiver. In fact, it's in line with the findings of a 2023 study from The Arc of the United States, in which 90% of participants reported some impact on their employment related to their caregiving responsibilities, while 54% indicated that they felt 'very' or 'extremely' stressed as a caregiver. After both her parents passed away, Miller became a support caregiver for her 62-year-old brother, who was born with an intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). 'The challenges are different now, but just as complex — and still incredibly isolating,' Miller said. 'There are few resources tailored to older adults with developmental disabilities, and even fewer that support sibling caregivers. Despite working in the care economy for over a decade, I still find navigating care for my brother incredibly frustrating and unnecessarily difficult.' Situations like Miller's and Jenise's aren't unusual in Georgia and Florida, nor in other parts of the country. 'The United States remains one of the least supportive high-income countries for caregivers,' Lee said. 'Policies fall short because they were never built to treat caregiving as essential labor. They assume it will happen informally, unpaid, and out of view, usually by women. That's not support — that's systemic erasure.' According to Lee, the systems currently in place assume that caregiving is 'endless, free, and invisible.' Plus, as Wiberg pointed out, caregiving roles are not equally distributed across the population. 'The burden falls hardest on women, especially Black and Latina women, and on low-income families with no access to institutional support,' Lee said. On top of all the emotional and logistical challenges of caregiving, it can be a huge financial strain on family members — who are typically paid little or nothing for their services. In Georgia, for example, family caregivers like Miller can only receive compensation if the care recipient qualifies for a Medicaid waiver — a process she says is grueling, confusing, and comes with long waitlists. 'I believe that any family caregiver who is actively providing care and can demonstrate it should be eligible for compensation and tax relief, regardless of Medicaid status,' she said. 'We are saving the system money — yet paying the price physically, emotionally and financially.' Miller is absolutely right: The Columbia report estimates that the labor of the country's unpaid caregivers is valued at $890.56 billion. But the countless hours that family caregivers essentially donate to the government don't seem to factor into financial support for caregivers and those requiring care. Each month, Jenise's brother Michael gets a $932 disability payment from Social Security and about $132 in food stamps. 'He is 270 pounds, so that doesn't cover the food he eats monthly,' she said. 'He had been giving me $400 a month, but I spend much of that on extra food, his pharmacy co-pays, his life insurance, and other necessities.' And like so many others who require care, Michael depends on Medicaid for health care. But Jenise and other caregivers fear that a reduction in benefits is imminent. That's at least in part because in a few short months, the Trump administration has been taking significant steps towards dismantling Medicaid as we know it. At this point, it's unclear how much damage these laws and policies will do, but it's safe to say things won't be getting better. If signed into law, the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed in the House of Representatives on May 22, would make the biggest cuts to Medicaid in the program's 60-year history. It's estimated that the bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $625 billion, causing 10.3 million people to lose their Medicaid coverage by 2034. 'The caregiver crisis is fueled by years of underinvestment — and it's about to get worse,' said Kim Musheno, senior director of Medicaid policy at The Arc of the United States. With caregivers already burned out and stretched thin financially, even minor cuts to Medicaid would make a major difference. 'If it becomes law, it will blow a hole in the safety net,' Musheno explained. 'Medicaid is the main source of long-term care in this country, including home- and community-based services that allow people with disabilities to live at home instead of in institutions. And when states face cuts, history tells us what happens: services that help families — like respite care, personal care assistants, and other supports — are the first to go.' Lacking adequate support from the state or federal government, caregivers like Miller have formed their own communities. 'There is a beautiful, grassroots network of caregiver-led organizations out there offering real help,' said Miller, whose Atlanta-based group, Happy Healthy Caregiver, helps caregivers find local resources and navigate the complicated systems in Georgia. But these groups are no replacement for laws and policies that provide actual resources and programs for caregivers. 'Without sustainable financial support and infrastructure, I worry these vital lifelines will burn out, just like so many caregivers do,' she explained. In order for that not to happen, Miller knows what she needs. 'What I need most as a caregiver — and what so many of us are lacking — is time back,' she said. 'Real respite options, financial compensation that reflects the value of our work, and a community of support that truly understands what we're navigating every day.' According to Miller, true respite is more than a day off. 'It means having the financial and practical resources in place to ensure your loved one is safe and well cared-for while you take a real break,' she said. 'Without that, respite is just another wishlist item.' So what would it take for caregivers to get actual support, in the form of programs and services that would genuinely make their lives easier? 'The biggest issue is simple: funding,' Musheno said. 'Good ideas don't go far if there's no money to make them real.' There also has to be a general shift of mentality, away from viewing caregiving as expected and invisible labor, and toward it being seen as legitimate and essential work. 'Unless we commit to federal caregiving infrastructure — paid leave, portable benefits, caregiver tax credits, and living wages for home care workers — we are not solving this crisis. We are institutionalizing harm,' Lee said. Though the situation is looking especially bleak at the moment, there are things you can do to help support caregivers. First, Miller suggests talking to caregivers to get an idea of what they're going through, and sharing their stories. You can also let your voice be heard through the ballot box by voting for candidates who support paid family leave, caregiver tax credits and respite programs. Additionally, Lee recommends organizing within churches, faith-based networks and community health centers. 'These institutions often carry more political and cultural weight in Southern states than formal lobbying efforts, and they're increasingly vocal on elder care and caregiver equity,' she explained. You may also want to seek out volunteering opportunities with organizations for caregivers. Finally, if you know a caregiver, ask how you can support them directly. This might mean grocery shopping, running errands, or spending time with their loved one so they get a much-needed break. 'At the end of the day, caring for the people we love shouldn't be this hard,' Miller said. 'The system should work with us — not against us.' The 1 Truly Difficult Part About Being A Caregiver That Often Gets Overlooked Our Daughter Was Born With A Rare Genetic Difference. Here's The Secret To Keeping Our Marriage Strong As Caregivers. I Was My Mom's Caregiver When She Was Terminal. I Was Shocked By What I Didn't Know About Dying.
Gizmodo
31 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
RFK Jr. Is Opening the Alternative Medicine Floodgates
Snake oil salesmen will be eating good during the Trump presidency. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently declared that he will greatly expand people's access to experimental and alternative medical treatments, even while acknowledging that a 'lot of charlatans' are likely to take advantage of suffering people as a result. RFK Jr. made the announcement during a recent interview on the Ultimate Human Podcast hosted by Gary Brecka, a self-proclaimed biologist, biohacker, and longevity expert (Brecka appears to possess two bachelors' degrees in biology, but is not a licensed medical doctor). Kennedy stated that, under his reign as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Americans will more easily be able to get their hands on treatments not currently approved by health regulators. 'If you want to take an experimental drug—you can do that, you ought to be able to do that,' Kennedy told Brecka. While many patient advocates in general have pushed for looser regulations surrounding experimental or off-label treatments, other experts have cautioned that it's important to strike a balance between improved access and safety. And it's unlikely Kennedy's approach will meet that threshold. For starters, Kennedy has long spread misinformation about vaccines (one of the most effective medical interventions ever created), nutrition, and other health topics. And he's no stranger to backing alternative treatments that have next to no evidence supporting their use. During this latest interview, for instance, he referenced chelation and stem cells as unproven therapies that people should have easier access to. Stem cell medicine is a legitimate and growing field of research. But direct-to-consumer stem cell clinics often exaggerate their benefits, claiming stem cells can treat everything from cancer to long covid. In recent years, this cottage industry has exploded in the U.S. and overseas, and some patients have been severely injured from buying into the hype. People have experienced pulmonary embolisms, bacterial infections, and other serious complications, including blindness, from visiting these clinics. The risk-balance equation is arguably even worse with chelation therapy. Chelation involves using drugs that bind to heavy metals in the body, allowing them to be excreted out through urine. It's an effective treatment for certain kinds of acute poisoning or toxic exposures. But in alternative medicine circles, chelation is regularly used to 'cleanse' people of supposed toxins dubiously blamed for a bevy of chronic illnesses, including autism. As with stem cells, people have gotten hurt or died after taking chelation for unapproved uses. RFK seems to be fully aware of the potential danger that would come with making these treatments easier to access, yet brushed that off as inevitable during his interview. 'And of course you're going to get a lot of charlatans, and you're going to get people who have bad results,' he said. 'And ultimately, you can't prevent that either way. Leaving the whole thing in the hands of pharma is not working for us.' The Food and Drug Administration has previously warned the public to stay away from chelation therapy for autism and from unregulated stem cell treatments, but who knows if these warnings will stay up for much longer. Kennedy and the Trump Administration have repeatedly undermined approved medical treatments like vaccines. Now he's set to open the floodgates for unlicensed drugs that may not work or will harm people desperate enough to use them.
