DWP confirms Universal Credit rule change set to boost income by £420 for over one million households
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has announced that over one million households struggling with debt will get to keep an average £420 more of their benefits each year, under a change to Universal Credit which came into force on April 30.
The Fair Repayment Rate places a limit on how much people in debt can have taken off their benefits to pay what they owe. The maximum amount that can be taken from someone's Universal Credit standard allowance payment to repay debt has been 25 per cent - but has now been reduced to 15 per cent.
This will mean an average £420 extra a year for 1.2 million of the poorest households, including 700,000 households with children, while helping people to pay down their debts in a sustainable way. The change will be applied to all assessment periods that start on or after April 30.
It forms part of the UK Government's Plan for Change to put more money into people's pockets and boost living standards and marks the Government's first step in a wider review of Universal Credit to ensure it is still doing its job.
The Fair Repayment Rate was introduced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves at the Autumn Budget, as part of broader efforts to raise living standards, combat poverty, and tackle the cost of living crisis.
The Chancellor said: 'As announced at the Budget, 1.2 million households will keep more of their Universal Credit and will be on average £420 better off a year. This is our plan for change delivering, easing the cost of living and putting more money into the pockets of working people.'
With as many as 2.8 million households seeing deductions made to their Universal Credit award to pay off debt each month, the new rate is designed to ensure money is repaid where it is owed, and people can still cover their day-to-day needs.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: 'As part of our Plan for Change, we are taking decisive action to ensure working people keep more of the benefits they're entitled to - which will boost financial security and improve living standards up and down the country.
'We're delivering meaningful change to ensure everyone has a fair chance, the support they need, and real hope for the future.'
The Fair Repayment Rate is one of a number of bold measures the UK Government is taking as part of its Plan for Change to kickstart growth and spread prosperity across the country.
Viewing work as a key route out of poverty, the Labour Government set out the Get Britain Working White Paper - aiming to achieve its target 80 per cent employment rate by overhauling Jobcentres, introducing a new jobs and careers service, and launching a youth guarantee so every young person is earning or learning.
This comes on top of increasing the National Minimum and National Living Wage to ensure being in work pays.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Would a £15bn investment in public transport ‘level up' the red-wall areas?
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has announced a £15bn investment in public transport projects in the English regions. Albeit her commitment to restore the pensioners' winter fuel payment (in whole or part is not known) has grabbed much of the attention, these plans for enhanced light rail, bus and tram links will no doubt make an impact. She said: 'We know the potential that exists in all of our towns and cities … I can tell you today that we will be making the biggest ever investment by a British government in transport links within our city regions, and their surrounding towns; £15.6bn in transport funding settlements, to be delivered by our regional mayors – more than doubling real-terms spending on city-region connectivity.' But it is not quite what it seems to be. Is this new money? Not exactly. Much of it is effectively a reannouncement of the schemes unveiled by Rishi Sunak at the Conservative Party conference in October 2023. That was when he announced, to no one's surprise but still widespread disappointment, that the HS2 high speed rail link between Birmingham, Manchester and beyond was being cancelled, but the funds would be redistributed to a wide variety of smaller transport schemes (some of which, embarrassingly, were to repair roads in the South). At that time, the figure of £13.8bn was allocated to the 'City Region Sustainable Transport Settlements 2' – ie public transport improvements controlled by the various elected mayors in Greater Manchester, Teeside, West Yorkshire and so on. Reeves says that these were never properly funded by the previous government, and she put them on hold when she came to power last year. Now they have been defrosted, topped up and presented as Labour achievements. They may turn out to be, but it will take years for them to come to fruition – as with earlier announcements focused on the South, such as the Heathrow expansion. And, just for the record, there's no prospect of the HS2 Northern extension, nor the potentially revolutionary (for growth) Northern Powerhouse east-west fast rail link between Liverpool and Hull via Manchester and Leeds ('HS3'). So, is it good for growth? In principle, yes, but building new tramways, say, doesn't necessarily leverage commensurate private investment or create new jobs. One of the more consequential of Reeves's announcements was that she's reviewing the criteria the Treasury uses to approve large-scale infrastructure projects, contained in the so-called Green Book. She wants civil servants to recognise the benefits of investment as well as the cost. This is fine in principle, provided the government's economists are not pushed into politically useful wishful thinking about regeneration projects that turn into white elephants. History is full of such prestigious (but in the end futile) dreams. As with the 'raid on pensions' – where funds are to be directed to invest in certain UK assets – the net effect of any misallocation of resources would be to reduce productivity rather than boost it. Is it good for Labour? Politically, the point is that it shows Labour cares about what used to be called 'levelling up' in 'left behind' areas, especially in Labour's red-wall areas previously taken by Boris Johnson and now vulnerable to challenge from Nigel Farage and Reform UK. The recent local elections showed just how deep and widespread the discontent can be. (Lisa Nandy, cabinet minister and MP for Wigan, has been warning that social pressures are so intense it could mean northern England could 'go up in flames'). Labour MPs representing marginal seats in the North West and the Midlands will thus have at least something to show for their efforts – or at least the prospect of improvement. However, it will be some time before any tangible improvements will be felt. And the irony? If Labour loses the next election, all the dividends of its investment in transport, housing and green power will be enjoyed by the Conservatives or, more remotely, Reform UK.
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Grinning and scratching his crotch, Calvin steals the Chancellor's thunder
Politicians are a right nuisance. You're in your place of work, quietly doing the crossword, when a minister shows up – and by some strange convention, you're required to stand around them for an hour while they lie to the TV cameras and dodge questions from the press. Why?! Well, someone has finally taken a stand. Let's call him Calvin (he looks like a Calvin). The latest stop in Rachel Reeves's Magical Misery Tour was a bus factory in Rochdale, where – as per usual – local workers were expected to semi-circle the Chancellor as she announced £15 billion for transport links we know we'll never see (put it this way, the service from Calais to Dover is cheaper and more reliable than Brighton to Victoria). Naturally robotic, she recited 'to serve Halton, St Helens and Woodchurch' as if announcing the service would leave in five minutes from platform three. 'Spades in the ground', she said, losing herself in the rhythm of the words, would 'link up Bradford, Kirklees, Calderdale, Wakefield, Pudsey and Leeds. If you see something that doesn't look right, speak to staff or talk to British Transport Police. See it, say it, sorted.' The pre-recorded Chancellor grinned her way through the Midlands, via a rail replacement bus, to Didcot Parkway, and around her the workers listened grimly but politely, with their arms folded as if bouncing outside a nightclub on a slow Tuesday in the pouring rain. Except for Calvin, standing to her immediate right in an grey jumper and 'not bovvered' beard. He looked unhappy to be there from the off, and dropped subtle visual cues. 'Secureonomics,' said the Chancellor: he rubbed his eye. 'Not prepared to tolerate a situation in which steel is undermined': he bit his lip. 'Growth made in Britain': he sighed deeply. When she arrived at her rhetorical terminus with 'This Government promised change and we are keeping that promise,' the bus workers applauded politely – but Calvin did not. Perhaps because he knew what they didn't. The journey wasn't over. 'I'll take questions': the workers looked horrified. There's more?! One could see the precise moment that the soul left the body of a boy in a blue jumper and disappeared into Heaven, screaming for release. Like an unscheduled stop at St Leonards, these poor creatures were forced to endure 20 extra minutes of mind-blowing tedium – without the bonus of seeing Calvin's commentary. The boy is clearly an economist. As Reeves said her policies were fully funded, he nodded and rolled his eyes. When she justified her decision to raise taxes, he grinned and scratched his crotch. Social media fell in love. The Tories, who have nothing better to do, dashed off a video of his highlights (they'd better pray he doesn't turn out to be a nutcase or, worse, a Lib Dem). His performance captured both the madness of expecting the public to act as a backdrop for politicians they probably don't support, plus the widespread feeling of being trapped with Labour – as though the Great British train had broken down, the aircon won't work, the windows are stuck and Rachel from Complaints is on her phone shouting about her 'manifestow'. This, Mr Miliband, is why so many of us prefer to drive.
BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
Glider buses best fix for Liverpool city transport woes
Glider buses funded by a £100m transport boost for Liverpool will be "the best quick fix" to link up the city's airport and football stadia, the city region mayor has City Region has been handed £1.6bn by Chancellor Rachel Reeves as part of a £15bn transport spending announcement. The £100m will be spent on a new rapid transit bus system on three routes to take passengers from Liverpool John Lennon airport to the city centre and to Liverpool and Everton's stadiums, Steve Rotheram will also be spent on a new fleet of buses across the city region, being rolled out in St Helens first in 2026, and on three new railway stations. The challenge of how to transport people from the airport into the city centre was a central debate in last year's Liverpool City Region mayoral election. The nearest railway station is Liverpool South Parkway, which still requires passengers to catch a bus or a taxi to reach the terminal building. Transport for fans attending Everton's new stadium has also faced criticism and it is hoped the gliders would address these concerns, although a timescale for their introduction has not yet been said the gliders were something he had first seen in Belfast. 'Fill the gaps' The 59ft (18m) articulated vehicles can carry about 30% more passengers than an average double decker bus. They have been described as "bendy buses" and look a bit like trams but have wheels and are designed to operate on roads. In Belfast they run on dedicated lanes. Rotheram said details needed to be worked out on how the vehicles would use the roads in Liverpool but part of the money announced earlier would pay for any required infrastructure councillors in Liverpool have criticised the plans for not being ambitious Rotheram said the gliders would "fill in the gaps" in the city's transport network. He told BBC Radio Merseyside: "We need to connect those areas with significant footfall much more quickly."A planned Liverpool tram system – Merseytram - which would have linked Liverpool's major landmarks and eventually other parts of Merseyside was scrapped in if the gliders were a poor relation to a tram system, the metro mayor said: "We haven't got a tram system and if we had a tram system like we should have done with Merseytram then I would be using this money to extend that and build on it but we would need an act of parliament to start that journey." Rotheram said he would "bite your hand off" for trams in the region and added it might be something future politicians could resurrect, but with the gliders scheme "we've asked what can be done most quickly". Leader of the opposition Liberal Democrat group on Liverpool City Council councillor Carl Cashman said the investment in Liverpool was welcome but described it as a "second best" said: "Manchester, Yorkshire and Birmingham get new tram lines while Liverpool is left behind with more of the same. Buses."Alan Gibbons who leads the Community Independent group of councillors in Liverpool said the announcement of these bus routes "falls far short of the needs of the city".He added: "It is ridiculous there is no Merseyrail train link to John Lennon Airport. "Transport links in this city are inadequate, particularly when it comes to cross-city travel. So much more is needed."Money from the £1.6bn pot will also be invested in the city region's rail network, with three new stations – Carr Mill in St Helens, Woodchurch in Wirral, and Daresbury in said: "We have seen with our new stations at Maghull North and Headbolt lane in Kirkby that people who might not have used public transport jump on the train." A new station has already been agreed for Liverpool's Baltic area. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
