Writers and artists in Tripura write to Muhammad Yunus condemning vandalism at Rabindranath Tagore's ancestral home in Bangladesh
A letter signed by eminent litterateurs Professor Mihir Deb and Ratul Debbarman; renowned theatre artist Bibhu Bhattacharya; painter, mime artist, and Sangeet Natak Academy awardee Swapan Nandy; and Professor Mujahid Rahman, was sent via the West Tripura district magistrate's office, from where it is expected to be forwarded to the Assistant High Commission of Bangladesh at Agartala. The Assistant High Commission is in turn expected to forward the letter to Dhaka.
In the letter, the signatories said their protest was voiced from Tripura, which has a long relationship with Tagore and was visited by him several times, and that the people of the state were 'deeply hurt' by the attack on the Nobel literature laureate's ancestral 'kacharibari' (revenue office) at Shahzadpur in Bangladesh's Sirajganj district last week.
'Rabindranath Tagore is the consciousness that encircles all our inspirations, awareness. He is a beacon holder of global thought, rising above the narrow barriers of language, identity, religion, colour. We celebrate him every day through the national anthem. We believe with all our heart that everything which share his memory are of pride for us. Insult or disrespect to Rabindranath Tagore – whether it is in our country or elsewhere, is shameful and condemnable, unpardonable,' reads the letter.
The vandals have not only damaged precious historical assets but also insulted the cultural values of millions of people and deserve 'proper justice' and 'exemplary punishment', the writers and artists further wrote in the letter.
On Monday, the ruling BJP protested in Agartala against the vandalism and attacks on minority communities in Bangladesh. BJP state president Rajib Bhattacharjee and leaders Subal Bhowmik, Bhagaban Das, Mimi Majumdar, and others carried placards and banners condemning the developments in the neighbouring country.
Earlier, on June 14, similar protests took place in other parts of the state, including at Kailashahar in Unakoti, the Raghna international border in North Tripura, Sonamura in Sepahijala, Belonia in South Tripura, and Agartala.
TIPRA Motha also organised several protests against the vandalism in Bangladesh.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
5 minutes ago
- The Wire
Explained: The Delhi Governments Bill to Regulate Private School Fees Is No Victory for Parents
The Delhi Private Schools Fee Regulation Bill 2025 makes dissent impossible and de-risks the business of education. The Delhi government has just passed a new law to regulate private school fees . It is being called "historic" and a victory for parents. But reading the fine print of the law shows that one cannot accept it for what it says, but for what it is designed to do. This Bill is not a shield for parents but for school managements. It is a web of rules and omissions designed not to deliver justice, but to manage and exhaust dissent. The background Private education in Delhi isn't a simple service. It is a market defined by a power imbalance. Getting your child into a decent school is an ordeal. Once they are in, you are a captive consumer for the next 14 years. The schools themselves, many built on public land and legally mandated to be non-profits, operate as sophisticated businesses. The "non-profit" tag has become legal fiction, a convenient cloak for an industry whose real goal is profit generation. For years, the battle over fees has been fought in courtrooms and on the streets. The previous Aad Aadmi Party government's strategy was aggressive: forcing schools to open their books for a financial audit. It correctly identified the core of the issue: you cannot regulate fees without scrutinising accounts. But the effort was bogged down in politics and litigation. This new Bill by the BJP is the response. The question is: does it learn from that history and empower the parent or does it simply create a more elegant system to keep them in their place? The labyrinth The Bill creates a three-tiered system . On paper, it looks orderly. In practice, it is an architecture of disenfranchisement. Let's walk through it. First, the school level committee. The composition of the school-level committee is laid out in Section 4. The chairperson is from the school management. The secretary is the principal. On one side of the table, you have them, plus three teachers – their own employees, in a position of structural dependency. On the other side? Five parents, selected by a "draw of lots." The power in that room is deliberately rigged. The management are insiders with the data and authority. The parents are temporary outsiders, atomised by that "draw of lots" – a mechanism that ensures any skilled, troublesome parent can be conveniently removed the next year by the luck of the draw. Then, Section 5(4) states that any decision on fees requires "unanimous agreement." This gives the management the power to block any parent-led initiative. Although it can also technically allow parents to block a management-led initiative as well, power will skew towards the management for more reasons than one (more on this in the subsequent paragraphs). It's a committee designed not for consensus, but for guaranteed deadlock. Second, grievance. The management uses its veto. You, the parent, are outraged and want to appeal. Here, the Bill erects its most formidable barrier. Section 2(2) states that an individual parent has no right to appeal. None. To appeal, you must form an "aggrieved parents group" comprising "not less than 15%" of the school's total parent body. In a school of 3,000 students, this would mean amassing 450 parents. This is monumental barrier to justice, designed to be almost insurmountable. It transforms the right to justice from an individual right into a privilege reserved only for those with the extraordinary resources to build a mass movement. Third, the bar on justice. Section 17 of the Bill explicitly bars the jurisdiction of civil courts. This removes an independent, final avenue for redress for every parent limited by the "15%" stipulation. Remember, the foundational committee is controlled by the very management they seek to challenge. The ghosts in the machine What a law does not say is often more important than what it does. This Bill is defined by its strategic silences. Consider this central fact: An audit, the single most important word for financial transparency is completely absent from this entire Bill. Instead of demanding a forensic financial audit, Section 8 offers a vague 18 "factors" for setting fees, like "location," "infrastructure," and "education standard." These words are meaningless without an audit. A school can claim it needs a fee hike for "infrastructure" without ever having to prove it could not be paid for from its existing surplus funds. It shifts the debate from the verifiable mathematics of an audit to an endless argument. It replaces "Show us your books" with "Trust our story." Tucked away in Section 19 is another ghost. The Bill gives the government the power to frame "Rules" to implement the Act at a later date. This is a classic statecraft technique. Pass a palatable Bill in public, but control its real teeth and claws in the fine print of the Rules, which are drafted later, away from legislative scrutiny. The most critical procedures are all yet to be decided. The poison pills Finally, the Bill is seeded with legal traps that ensure the powerful stay powerful. First, the amnesty clause. A proviso in Section 5(1) is a masterpiece of quiet deception. It says the fee being charged as of April 1, 2025, is the "deemed" legal starting point. The implication is staggering. It effectively launders any illegal or unapproved fee hikes that schools pushed through before the law came into effect. It takes a potentially illegal figure and sanctifies it, rewarding the lawbreakers by making their illicit gains the legitimate baseline for all future calculations. Second, the spectacle of the circular penalty. Section 12 boasts of hefty fines for violations. It is meant to look tough, but is an illusion. A "non-profit" school has one main source of revenue: your fees. A fine imposed for exploiting parents will, by financial necessity, be recouped from the very same parents through future fees. The punishment is circular. The Bill studiously avoids the only real deterrents: personal financial liability for management officials, or a credible process for the government to take over the school. The private school fee regulation bill thus paves the way for a law that rigs the debate in a committee room, makes appealing a near-impossible task, removes the power of judicial review, strips out the essential tool of a financial audit, and forgives past illegalities and creates a fake punishment. This Bill does not help parents but de-risks the business of education. It provides stability and predictability not for the parent, but for the school industry, making it a safer, more attractive investment. This article went live on August twelfth, two thousand twenty five, at thirty-three minutes past four in the afternoon. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
PM Modi brought us out of huge crisis: Late Ahmed Patel's son Faisal praises prime minister; says ‘I just exist in Cong'
Faisal Patel, son of late Congress stalwart Ahmed Patel, has showered rare praise on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership during Operation Sindoor, the military response to terror bases in Pakistan following the deadly Pahalgam attack that claimed 26 civilian lives. The remarks come at a politically sensitive time, with the Congress party openly criticising the BJP-led Centre over its handling of the operation. Yet Faisal Patel, while reaffirming his association with the Congress, struck a markedly different tone, somewhat echoing Congress MP from Kerala's Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor. Speaking to ANI, Congress stalwart Ahmed Patel's son Faisal was emphatic in his approval of the Modi government's crisis management. 'It can't be better than who's running the show (the central government) ... The armed forces have done a great job, and PM Narendra Modi showed great leadership and brought us out of a huge crisis,' he said. Faisal Patel further applauded the prime minister's approach to choosing capable bureaucrats and elevating them to key ministerial roles. 'I am proud of our armed forces. I have a lot of respect for Jaishankar ji. How Modi ji picks up bureaucrats and makes them leaders and puts them in ministry roles, is a very good thing,' he added. While clarifying that he remains a Congress member, Faisal Patel did not shy away from voicing his concerns about the party's internal functioning. 'Rahul Gandhi is a hardworking leader. There are some very bright and intelligent leaders in the Congress, like Shashi Tharoor, DK Shivakumar, Revanth Reddy, Deependra Hooda, and Sachin Pilot. They are very capable leaders. There are problems internally, and I believe the right advice is not given to seniors who are running the party... Their advisors are not doing a good job. They come and go. The senior leaders' advice is not heeded,' he remarked. Patel said he has taken a 'sabbatical from public life' but has not left the party. 'I am not upset with the Congress at all. The whole party is my family, and I have good relations with the senior leaders of the party... I am still in the Congress party... I just exist in Congress... The people of Gujarat and the local leaders have wonderful things to say about me,' he said. The late Congress leader's son also expressed strong confidence in India's defence apparatus and the current leadership's commitment to national security.
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
INDIA bloc doubles down on ‘vote chori', SIR protest—MPs wear T-shirts featuring ‘124-yr-old' voter Minta Devi
INDIA bloc MPs from different parties sharpened their attack on the Election Commission (EC) as they staged a protest in the Parliament House complex on 12 August over 'vote chori' and Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The lawmakers wore white T-shirts featuring a "124-year-old voter" Minta Devi, who was named in Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi's presentation on the alleged vote theft issue. The T-shirts also read '124 Not Out' on the back. Her alleged age is nine years more than Ethel Caterham, 115, the verified oldest person in the world. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, Congress parliamentary party chief Sonia Gandhi, party general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, TMC's Derek O'Brien, DMK's TR Baalu, NCP (SP)'s Supriya Sule, and other opposition MPs from the DMK and Left parties took part in the protest and chanted slogans, seeking the withdrawal of the SIR exercise. 'Our Vote. Our Right. Our Fight' and 'SIR - Silent Invisible Rigging' were written on banners they held on the 15th day of the protest. Congress leader Manickam Tagore claimed that the EC under Rajeev Kumar and Gyanesh Kumar has become a BJP department. "Minta Devi is a first- time voter and she is 124-years-old. The voters list carries her name as a first-time voter. We want a discussion on such issues. How the EC has become a party to the BJP. The voter list is full of such fraud," he stated. MPs marched with "Stop SIR" and "vote chori" placards, as well as posters that claimed there was a collusion between the EC and the government. The ECI launched the SIR of the electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the upcoming legislative assembly elections. This process entails a comprehensive overhaul of the electoral list from the ground up. The revision began on June 25, 2025, with enumeration forms being distributed to all 80 million registered voters in Bihar. The exercise is set to be completed with the release of the updated final electoral roll by September 30, 2025. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, on 7 August, made explosive claims regarding "vote theft" in a press briefing. According to Gandhi, in the Mahadevapura assembly segment, the Congress received 1,15,586 votes, whereas the BJP garnered 2,29,632 votes. The Congress won all the Vidhan Sabhas except Mahadevapura, where the BJP swept and secured a victory margin of 1,14,046 votes.
