Daryl Hannah Claims Neil Young's Citizenship Process Was Hindered by ‘Every Trick in the Book'
Hannah, who has been married to Young since 2018, made the claims in a new interview with the BBC, alleging that the process was delayed purposefully. 'They tried […] every trick in the book to mess him up, and made him keep coming back to be re-interviewed and re-interviewed,' Hannah explained. 'It's ridiculous [because] he's been living in America and paying taxes here since he was in his 20s.'
More from Billboard
Luke Bryan Reacts to Katy Perry's Space Flight: 'It Roped Me In'
King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard Preview 'Phantom Island' LP With New Single, 'Deadstick'
Adrianne Lenker Details New Live Album, 'Live at Revolution Hall'
Indeed, Young was born in Toronto in 1945 but relocated to the U.S. in 1966. In a 1975 interview with Rolling Stone, Young admitted that he had lived in the country illegally until he obtained a green card in 1970.
In November 2019, Young discussed some of the delays his citizenship application had faced, noting that a policy update from earlier that same year meant that his previous use of marijuana had not seen him meet the standard for 'good moral character.'
'When I recently applied for American citizenship, I passed the test,' Young wrote at the time. 'It was a conversation where I was asked many questions. I answered them truthfully and passed. Recently however, I have been told that I must do another test, due to my use of marijuana and how some people who smoke it have exhibited a problem.'
Ultimately, Young was granted U.S. citizenship in January 2020, though he would later relocate to Canada that same year.
Recently, Young's criticism of the U.S. government has seen him share fears that he may be blacklisted from a return to the U.S. based upon the 'latest actions of our US government.'
'When I go to play music in Europe, if I talk about Donald J. Trump, I may be one of those returning to America who is barred or put in jail to sleep on a cement floor with an aluminum blanket,' Young wrote on his website on April 1. 'If I come back from Europe and am barred, can't play my USA tour, all of the folks who bought tickets will not be able to come to a concert by me.'
'If the fact that I think Donald Trump is the worst president in the history of our great country could stop me from coming back, what does that say for Freedom?' he added. 'I love America and its people and its music and its culture.'
Despite these comments, Hannah noted that she doesn't share the same fear that Young might be detained at the border, largely due to his status as a U.S. citizen.
'They've been detaining people who have green cards or visas – which is hideous and horrifying – but they have not, so far, been refusing to let American citizens back in the country, so I don't think that's going to happen,' she stated.
Best of Billboard
Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1
Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits
H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How are Strictly's partners chosen? Inside the BBC's 'speed dating' event
How Strictly bosses use 'speed dating' to pair the celebrities with their professional dance partners The BBC bosses match the Strictly celebrity line-up with professional dancers at an event that has been likened to "speed dating". Strictly Come Dancing's partnerships can make or break how well the celebrity performs on the show. The incredible winners Chris McCausland and Dianne Buswell's natural dance chemistry made them immediately fan favourites months before they lifted the Glitterball trophy. One of this year's competitors Ellie Goldstein — who is a trailblazing model with Down syndrome — has declared who her dream partner would be. "The best partner is Nikita [Kuzmin]," she said on Good Morning Britain last week. "I love him! I want him, please, I love him so much." It begs the question about how the pairs are selected for the BBC's crown jewel. How are Strictly's partners chosen? Celebrity contestants and the professional dancers engage in a "speed dating" exercise when they meet face-to-face for the first time. This year's contestants and pros have met for the first time but the 2025 pairings remain tightly under wraps. The event, where the partnerships are chosen, is one of the first rehearsals held in the summer ahead of the show starting in mid-September. The celebrities have the chance to have a quick dance and chat with all of the professional dancers while the TV staff are watching on. Their first encounter leads to the choices made by TV bosses about who will be paired with whom. Whether the celebrity and their partner have natural chemistry is one of the big things on the checklist for those organising the pairs. They also have to take into account the height of the contestants compared to the professional dancers too. Lorraine star and presenter Ross King, who is used to the bright lights of Hollywood, revealed how it played out behind the scenes this year. He said: "It was like the first day of school... Everyone was so warm and welcoming. The 'speed dancing' which was really funny. All the men get in a circle. "All the female pros are on the outside. Then you do a little waltz. Then they move on and then you dance again... It's a little chemistry test. The chemistry of who gets on with who." It's the same exercise used for the female contestants taking part in Strictly. Last year, former 2023 Strictly contestant Angela Rippon revealed how she bagged her partner Kai Widdrington. She told The Express: "When we all meet for the first time before we get into the studio, what they do is they have a day where all the new celebs come to meet all the professionals and what they do is they ask all the men to go downstairs into the canteen with all the female professionals.' She added: "We female celebrities were put in circles and all male professional dancers were put in a circle around us and they played eight bars of a cha cha. And what happened is we all danced eight bars with whoever was in front of us. Then after eight bars, they moved on. "So we had the next one, and then they moved on and it was just like speed dating. We all ended up playing the music so we all danced with each other three times." Who gets a celebrity dance partner? Every year, only some of the professional partners get the enviable role of teaching a celebrity partner to dance. The other professional dancers remain focused on the group routines that make up some of the BBC show. This remains a secret until the show begins. However, this year, fan favourite Gorka Marquez announced he will not get a dance partner because of his conflicting schedule. He has taken up judging duties on the Spanish version of the show, Bailando Con Las Estrellas, and some of the filming times clash but he plans to take part in the group dances on Strictly. The professional dancers confirmed for Strictly in 2025 include: Dianne Buswell, Nadiya Bychkova, Amy Dowden, Karen Hauer, Katya Jones, Neil Jones, Marquez, Nikita Kuzmin, Luba Mushtuk, Jowita Przystal, Johannes Radebe, Aljaž Škorjanec, Kai Widdrington, Nancy Xu, Carlos Gu, Lauren Oakley, Michelle Tsiakkas and Vito Coppola.
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Democrats urge Trump to walk back Nvidia, AMD deal
Several top Senate Democrats are urging President Trump to walk back a deal with Nvidia and AMD that would allow the companies to sell artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China after they agreed to share 15 percent of revenue from sales. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) argued in a letter sent Friday that the move runs counter to U.S. national security interests and could violate the law. Warner is the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, while Reed, Shaheen and Warren are the top Democrats on the Senate Armed Services, Foreign Relations and Banking panels, respectively. 'This 'negotiated deal,' allowing American semiconductor manufacturers to pay a 15 percent fee for the ability to sell critically sensitive technology to our adversary, blatantly violates the purpose of export control laws,' they wrote. Nvidia and AMD have each agreed to share 15 percent of revenue from the sales of their H20 and MI308 chips in order to secure export licenses from the Trump administration, which had imposed new licensing restrictions effectively blocking sales earlier this year. The deal has raised legal questions, as federal law prohibits fees on export licenses, while the Constitution bars export taxes. However, it's unclear whether the agreement would be considered a formal fee or tax and whether anyone would challenge the move. It has also provoked national security concerns, as the U.S. seeks to outpace China on AI and prevent Beijing from using the technology to boost its military capabilities. 'Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains,' the senators said. 'The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies.' 'The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm,' they added. The Democratic lawmakers pressed Trump for information about who participated in the negotiations, what legal standards were applied, how the 15 percent will be determined and collected, what the funds will be used for and what other companies are under consideration for such a deal. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested last week that the administration could pursue similar agreements in the future, even as the legality and mechanics of the Nvidia and AMD deal are 'still being ironed out' by the Commerce Department. 'Right now, it stands with these two companies. Perhaps it could expand in the future to other companies,' she said. 'I think it's a creative idea and solution.'
Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
The last time Zelensky met Trump in the Oval Office, things got heated. Here's what happened.
Tensions flared when Vance confronted Zelensky, saying, 'Mr. President, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In response, Zelensky asked Vance, who has criticized efforts to send US aid to Ukraine, if he had ever visited his country. Advertisement 'Had you ever been to Ukraine? Did you see the problems we have?' Zelensky asked Vance. Vance replied that he had only seen 'the stories.' When Zelensky pointed out that the US had not fully grasped the war's repercussions, Trump bristled. 'You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel,' Trump told Zelensky, raising his voice. 'You're in no position to dictate that.' 'You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards,' Trump added. 'You're gambling with World War III, and what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country, that has backed you.' Advertisement After the Oval Office meeting, Trump 'He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace,' Trump wrote. Alyssa Vega can be reached at
