logo
I Don't Golf. But I Love These Surprisingly Stylish Golf Shorts.

I Don't Golf. But I Love These Surprisingly Stylish Golf Shorts.

New York Times14-05-2025

For most of my adult life, I've resisted the urge to wear shorts in the summer months. The thought of traipsing around New York in shorts — my bare skin rubbing against the sweat of a stranger on the subway, the accumulation of city dirt kicked up by the heat of mid-July clinging to my legs — seemed unbearable.
And then there are the social implications of wearing shorts — as a man, you're told that bare legs are somehow unacceptable in almost any scenario except when you're working out or playing sports, or that shorts are not for men at all, but for children. That, along with the annual salvo of think pieces about the office-appropriateness of shorts, was enough to make me and many others shy away entirely. 'A don doesn't wear shorts,' you tell yourself as you put on black jeans in the middle of summer.
But after I endured several consecutive summers of heat waves with the temperature piercing the 100-degree mark, something inside me broke. Something needed to change. It was, finally, time for shorts.
What I wanted seemed impossible to find: a pair of shorts that I would feel as natural in as I did in denim.
After an exhaustive search and a lot of disappointment, the only shorts I now reach for all summer are Puli Men's Golf Shorts. I am not a golfer, but these affordable 7-inch shorts allow me to feel the summer breeze on my legs while also looking good in just about any situation.
When I've looked for shorts in the past, many of them have, well, fallen short. Cotton-twill chino shorts look good, but they can retain sweat and wear really hot, defeating the purpose of shorts. Linen shorts are great for days of high heat and humidity, but quality linen can be expensive, affordable linen can wear out quickly, and linen wrinkles in ways that can make it look sloppy on day two or three.
Patagonia Baggies have been particularly popular as of late, but they swish loudly, have little stretch, and look more like swim trunks than shorts with the thoughtful, deliberate styling of something like jeans.
Puli's golf shorts are made from a blend of polyester and elastane and combine the best qualities of each of those other options without any of their pitfalls: The Puli shorts have the appearance of cotton twill, the fast dry time of Baggies, and the airiness of linen shorts. Puli's golf shorts have a cotton-like appearance that makes them suitable for wear in a variety of settings. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter
The great thing about golf shorts is that by design they are made to abide by golf-course dress codes while also providing mobility and moisture management.
Unlike most other golf shorts, however, which are often made from knitted elastic fabric, Puli's golf shorts look deceptively like woven cotton. That's what drew me to these shorts to begin with; I was looking for lightweight, twill shorts that still retained some features of athletic shorts to get me through the hottest days of August. And Puli's shorts were some of the very few I found in this category that did not have any water-repellent finish (which usually contains PFAS).
They're also some of the most affordable golf shorts available. At roughly $25 on Amazon, these shorts are from half to a quarter of the price of comparable shorts from Bonobos and Lululemon, few of which hide their athletic nature nearly as well.
In the right light, Puli's shorts have a subtle sheen that can betray their polyester composition, but in most settings they look indistinguishable from cotton. Their fabric creases like cotton, rather than forming fine wrinkles as athletic shorts often do. However, unlike cotton, which provides suboptimal sun protection, Puli's shorts are rated UPF 50+.
Puli's blend of polyester and elastane gives the shorts a subtle flex. They are pliant enough that you can sit in them comfortably for long periods of time without feeling like you're wearing spandex.
This fabric, in addition to the elastic-lined waistband, makes them suitable for more strenuous physical activity — I've worn them while kayaking and playing tennis. The shorts have a hidden zip pocket that keeps things like keys from falling out if you're moving around. The quick-drying material also makes them decent swim trunks in a pinch (though they lack a liner, so proceed with caution). The discreet zip pocket is large enough to store my iPhone 13. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter This smaller zipped pocket in the back is great for keys or small items. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter The elastic waistband adds a subtle stretch that keeps everything comfortable even over long days. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter The discreet zip pocket is large enough to store my iPhone 13. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter
By far my favorite thing about these shorts is the pockets. Rather than going with the typical, fabric-lined pockets, Puli uses only mesh for its pockets. That creates a ton of airflow, keeping these shorts breezy even on the hottest of days. The mesh pockets keep these shorts airy. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter
Puli's shorts have a higher, 10.5-inch rise and a relatively short, 7-inch inseam, which together make them look a little more stylish than standard-issue cotton chinos and athletic shorts.
All of those features make Puli's shorts an excellent one-short for summer trips. Save for formal occasions, I have been able to use these shorts to put together a week's worth of outfits, and they look crisp even at the tail end of that week. If they ever get dirty, I can wash them in the sink, and they'll be dry by the next morning.
Perhaps not all of my discomfort with wearing shorts has vanished, but thanks to these, I am hardly ever reminded of it. These shorts work just as well with loafers as they do with sandals by the pool. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter The poly fabric is breathable but still suitable for wearing on cool nights with layers. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter These shorts go well with outfits that are half a step above athletic. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter These shorts work just as well with loafers as they do with sandals by the pool. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter
There are a few things I'd change about these shorts. First, the stitching is a bit wonky in places, and the thread seems to have little flex. That, in combination with the somewhat stretchy fabric, means the fabric can stretch beyond the elastic limits of the threads holding the garment together, causing those threads to pop. That hasn't happened to me yet, but I would not be surprised if it did.
Second, although these shorts come in about a dozen colors, they don't come in a true, dark olive or any fun, gaudy colors you might want for a tennis court, like teal. Those two colors, along with the black pair I already own, would probably be the end of all the shorts I need.
These shorts are also a little less beefy than some of their counterparts. You won't find silky-smooth and robust YKK zippers or hefty buttons here. That isn't enough to put me off them, but those small things accumulate and detract from the overall feel, and I would happily pay slightly more for something just a touch more substantial. That said, something about their cheapness makes me feel like I can freely wear them without any care for what happens. The shorts have a cheap, small-toothed zipper and a lightweight plastic button, neither of which feels durable. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter Loose stitches that weren't trimmed are visible here and there. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter The shorts have a cheap, small-toothed zipper and a lightweight plastic button, neither of which feels durable. Alexander Aciman/NYT Wirecutter
I am no longer fussy about wearing shorts when the weather begins to peak. It is an easy decision for me now, one that I can make in full confidence that I will be comfortable and look good and not feel less myself. After next season, my original black pair will likely be due for a replacement — something will rip or tear or fade, and I will hardly be bothered at the thought of parting with another $25 for the only shorts that have ever felt as effortless as jeans.
This article was edited by Hannah Rimm and Maxine Builder. The right running gear can help you make the most of your training. After extensive research and testing with passionate runners, here's what we recommend.
How a magical, kind of ugly pair of undershorts forever cured my chub-rub woes.
Here are all the apparel and accessories you need to get through spring, from rain boots to sneakers and from rain pants to hip denim.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sutton Foster Steps Out in Cut-Out LBD For First Public Outing Amid Boyfriend Hugh Jackman's Divorce
Sutton Foster Steps Out in Cut-Out LBD For First Public Outing Amid Boyfriend Hugh Jackman's Divorce

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Sutton Foster Steps Out in Cut-Out LBD For First Public Outing Amid Boyfriend Hugh Jackman's Divorce

Sutton Foster hit the red carpet on Sunday night for the Drama Desk Awards amid her boyfriend Hugh Jackman's ongoing divorce drama. The Younger actress wore a shimmery LBD for the occasion. Jackman recently ended his 27-year marriage with the Australian actress Deborra-Lee Furness; Foster also filed for divorce last Foster has stepped out for her first public appearance on the red carpet following an escalation in Hugh Jackman's divorce drama thanks to rare, heartbreaking comments from Deborra-Lee Furness. Slipping on a shimmery LBD for the Drama Desk Awards, the Younger actress was verifiably glowing, despite the drama with her boyfriend and co-star's ex-wife. Foster's form-fitting black gown featured a prominent cut-out just below her bust, a plunging, open neckline, and thin sequined straps. She styled her hair in a slicked-back bun and a millennial side part. The look was accessorized with a black clutch and simple black strappy heels. Foster and Jackman have been linked ever since the two starred opposite one another in the Broadway production of The Music Man in 2022. Their romance was later confirmed in December 2023 by InTouch. Jackman and Furness had only just announced their separation that September; Foster, meanwhile, filed for divorce from her husband Ted Griffin in October 2024. Obviously, the timelines don't quite add up. Furness later called her split from Jackman a "traumatic journey of betrayal." "It's a profound wound that cuts deep," she wrote, per the Daily Mail. "We are all on our individual journeys and I believe that the relationships in our lives are not random. We are drawn to people, we invite them in, in order to learn our lessons and to recognize and heal the broken parts of ourselves...I remain grateful." Jackman has yet to release any official statement regarding the end of his 27-year marriage, however a source told US Weekly that the X-Men actor was "heartbroken" by Furness's comments. "Her statement took Hugh and mutual friends by surprise because she wasn't very direct with who she was speaking about but was alluding to Hugh," the insider said. "That added emotional weight to it." As for his budding romance with Foster? A source recently told Us Weekly that the duo are still going strong. "They are trying to navigate this delicately,' the insider said. 'She has been very supportive.' Read the original article on InStyle

How Democrats can make "Speaking with American Men" a success
How Democrats can make "Speaking with American Men" a success

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

How Democrats can make "Speaking with American Men" a success

After losing big with men under 30 in the 2024 election, Democrats have spent $20 million on a program called 'Speaking with American Men' (SAM) to help figure out which 'spaces' they need to show up in to fare better with this demographic. A smart place to start would be the gym; the booming men's fitness market is expected to more than double by 2029, growth driven by men under 25, who are joining gyms almost twice as fast as women. And as SAM co-director Ilyse Hogue and I wrote here last year, the right has done an excellent job parlaying young men's healthy interest in exercise into an embrace of reactionary politics. But it doesn't need to be that way. Across the political spectrum, craving the surefire sense of accomplishment the gym provides is an age-old response to an unstable political and economic environment. And historically, championing physical fitness with appeals to American manliness has not been a partisan issue. If the SAM initiative is going to net the Democrats more than online snark, its leaders should appreciate that this history suggests the party's path forward might just begin at the gym. In the vast digital universe targeting young men, the idea that exercise is imperative to self-actualization is inescapable. It's most obvious in fitness-focused influencers like Ashton Hall, whose six-hour 'morning routine' recently racked up nearly a billion views on X. But plenty of public figures with grander concerns insist exercise is integral to achievement. Take Andrew Tate's obsession with 'plummeting masculinity' or Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s quest to make America healthy again. A commitment to early-morning workouts, Tate advises, is Step 1 to asserting alpha dominance. Performing pullups, as the septuagenarian Kennedy does shirtless at Gold's Gym, is proof of political power. Such encouragement spans the political spectrum. While it's become more common to see Republicans like Paul Ryan or Pete Hegseth flaunting their fitness, Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden often promoted exercise as a personal and policy priority, and former Rep. Jamaal Bowman went viral in 2023 for benching 405 pounds while wearing a Working Families Party T-shirt. Online, progressive streamer Hasan Piker expounds on his diet and fitness regimen as readily as he opines on capitalism and climate change. He recently met up with fellow streamer and 'big Trump guy' Bradley Martyn at a rare site of common ground: the weight room. When Piker, with mock seriousness, announced to his followers that he and Martyn hoped to inspire 'the young men out there who are lost — who feel anchorless, rudderless — by lifting some heavy weights,' he articulated an idea that long predates the so-called right-wing 'manosphere.' For more than a century, in moments of upheaval that raise questions about what it means to be a man, men have reliably sought a sense of agency in exercise. When the world feels confusing or out of control, make a man of yourself, beginning with your body is an especially enticing proposition. If, despite one's best efforts, landing a rewarding career or a loving mate proves elusive, then why not capture a sense of self-efficacy at the squat rack? Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg's billions may be out of reach, but attaining their newly sculpted bodies only takes some discipline and protein shakes. The social and economic roots of the American man's fixation on fitness date to the early 20th century. As urbanization and compulsory education laws kept middle-class, mostly white boys in schools staffed by women, psychologist G. Stanley Hall worried in 1904 that they were being weakened by the 'social instincts of girls' and prescribed rough sports such as wrestling and boxing to counter what he called the dangerous 'repressions of modern life.' Although the white-collar careers to which upwardly mobile young men aspired conferred superiority over the sweaty masses, this prestige came at a cost: so-called 'desk diseases,' as 19th-century doctors styled them, marked by sloped shoulders and sagging paunches. And President Teddy Roosevelt touted 'the strenuous life' as a way for young men to resolve the paradox of progress. During the Depression, as men of all classes reckoned with the emasculation of joblessness, bodybuilder and entrepreneur Charles Atlas successfully peddled an inexpensive mail-order muscle-building regimen that promised to unlock 'he-man living' and 'make you a new man.' To combat concerns at the time that caring for one's body and appearance was somehow effeminate, Atlas promised men that a muscular physique would inspire adoration in women and command the respect and fear of other men. The unprecedented prosperity of the 1950s, with its many desk jobs, televisions and time-saving appliances, ushered in yet more anxiety about the softening of the American male — among members of both major political parties. Worried that the sudden glut of leisure risked rendering boys unfit for military duty, Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower's administration launched what would become the Presidential Council on Youth Fitness in 1957. 'We are not a nation of softies,' Vice President Richard Nixon warned at its launch, 'but we could become one.' In the December 1960 issue of Sports Illustrated, President-elect John F. Kennedy, a Democrat, amplified this concern that 'soft Americans' who languished on the sofa, or as spectators in the stands, represented a national security and a moral hazard. A vigorous American man, he insisted, must be on the move — a lesson he reinforced in countless photos of him swimming, sailing, tossing a football or challenging the military (and his brother Robert) to hike 50 miles in 20 hours. The tumult of the 1970s, with its 'stagflation,' second-wave feminism and general loss of faith in government and the military coincided with another wave of male fitness boosterism. 'If neither our doctors nor the government can be expected to bring us good health, to whom can we look?' wrote running proselytizer Jim Fixx in his 1977 bestseller 'The Complete Book of Running.' 'The answer is plain: to ourselves.' Given the many physical and mental benefits of exercise, the latest push for men to self-actualize through fitness is hardly a negative — or necessarily partisan — development. Experts agree that exercise is close to a 'magic pill' for its many health benefits. Gyms have also never been more inclusive: Weight rooms welcome women and men frequent studio classes. It's progress, surely, that no one needs the reassurance Arnold Schwarzenegger offered in 1977, that 'men shouldn't feel like f--s just because they want to have nice-looking bodies.' Yet destabilizing moments like the one we are now living through reveal an enduring dynamic: Men are encouraged with particular urgency to get moving when their social status feels in flux. Generation after generation, boosters sell men the irresistible idea that at the gym, if nowhere else, the sweat of your brow is all that stands between you and success. It's an understandable, even healthy impulse, and Democrats would do well to start rebuilding their political muscle quite literally, by seeking to identify with the guy at the gym. This article was originally published on

FMR FDA COMMISSIONER KESSLER: Sorry guys, that beer gut isn't cool. It's killing you
FMR FDA COMMISSIONER KESSLER: Sorry guys, that beer gut isn't cool. It's killing you

Fox News

time3 days ago

  • Fox News

FMR FDA COMMISSIONER KESSLER: Sorry guys, that beer gut isn't cool. It's killing you

Men can get away with being fat. The beer belly is often joked about as a relatable feature of the typical male body. The reality is it is killing them. Studies have shown that men are less likely than women to see themselves as fat or overweight. They rationalize excess weight by prioritizing functionality and success. The acceptance of the "dad bod" reinforces this; it is seen as the hallmark of the "everyman" who relates to common struggles. In reality, many men don't feel good about carrying excess weight. Joking about one's "dad bod" is less an embracing and more of an embarrassed resignation. The passive acceptance of increased body fat — particularly belly fat — is proving deadly. Toxic visceral fat that accumulates in the abdomen gets into the liver, pancreas and heart. In contrast to the fat that sits just under our skin, deeper visceral fat is less able to hold on to fat molecules and is metabolically active, leaking free fatty acids and other molecules that cause inflammation. It also creates metabolic chaos, elevating insulin levels and laying the groundwork for insulin resistance. Men, especially as they get older, have more of this fat than women, especially compared to women before menopause. About two out of every five men, about 40-46%, in the United States meet the classification of obesity. Even men who are not overweight or obese but have increased visceral fat have an increased risk of mortality. This toxic fat causes cardiovascular and kidney disease, diabetes, certain cancers and likely contributes to neurodegenerative disease. Greater visceral fat is associated with increased mortality from all causes. Even if it does not result in an earlier death, it increases risk of disability from conditions such as diabetes and heart failure. I look around and see too many men suffering from these preventable conditions. And most have no idea how to tackle it. A waist circumference of more than 40 inches is an indicator that a man has too much visceral fat. While beer guts and dad bods are obvious signs of unhealthy fat accumulation, health-minded men who spend a good deal of time in the gym are not immune from this issue. In the course of researching my book, I attended a seminar on strength training in Los Angeles, where most men in the crowd could deadlift far more than I could. I asked an instructor about the composition of these barrel-shaped guys. "Many of them are strong, but they still carry too much body fat," he confessed. Even for this group, there is a lot of fat accompanying their large muscles. The key, then, is reducing the excess fat around the waist while maintaining as much muscle as possible. Men die at a younger age than women, on average five years sooner, in part because of this increased visceral fat. It's important to address the cultural standards reinforcing unhealthy body weight in men. And, while it would also be ideal to change the current food environment, that is unlikely to happen completely or anytime soon. The new anti-obesity medications provide an important tool for men to reclaim their health, but they are not a cure-all. They cause us to eat less, sometimes much less, which can be risky. These drugs work by their gastrointestinal effects, keeping food in the stomach longer, generating feelings that border on nausea, and sometimes outright distress, which induce feelings of fullness and satiation. Those feelings are able to counter the rewarding and addictive properties of food, reducing the "food noise" that reverberates in heads of people who have a hard time controlling their appetite. One of the gifts of these medications is that people condition themselves to eat less to avoid experiencing the ill effects of food staying in the stomach longer. A waist circumference of more than 40 inches is an indicator that a man has too much visceral fat. There are a lot of questions concerning these drugs that still need to be answered, especially around how they should be used in the real world. They are not for everybody, have a real risk of adverse events, and require good medical and dietary care. But they can help people control their appetite and learn to eat in a more healthful way. The American male body is in trouble, and the way to make it healthy again isn't simple, but it can be done with education and commitment. And it begins with making space for men to discuss their health vulnerabilities without stigma or shame. It is a matter of life and death.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store