logo
Afghans in MoD data breach can claim £4,000 compensation

Afghans in MoD data breach can claim £4,000 compensation

Timesa day ago
Afghans who had their 'lives put at risk' because of a data breach have been told they can claim up to £4,000 in compensation four years after the incident happened.
Human error resulted in the personal information of 265 Afghans who had worked alongside British troops being shared with hundreds of others who were on the same email distribution list in September 2021.
In December 2023 the UK information commissioner fined the Ministry of Defence (MoD) £350,000 and said the 'egregious' breach could have been life-threatening.
John Healey, who was shadow defence secretary, said in 2021: 'We told these Afghans interpreters we would keep them safe, instead this breach has needlessly put lives at risk.'
On Friday afternoon the MoD slipped out a statement to update MPs and the Afghans on the case, saying that Afghans were now entitled to compensation.
In a written ministerial statement, Lord Coaker said the MoD was taking a 'proactive' approach to the historical data-handling incident involving those who had applied to the Afghan Relocation and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme in 2021.
He said the emails mistakenly made recipients' email addresses visible to all, instead of using the blind carbon copy function.
Coaker said the MoD would 'make good' on previous ministers' commitments to financially compensate those individuals affected. It was unclear why it had taken a year since Labour had entered government to arrange the payments.
He said: 'I can confirm to members the Ministry of Defence will be directly contacting those individuals who were affected by the data incident. Once a response is received and the affected individual's identity confirmed, a single ex-gratia payment of up to £4,000 per individual will be made.'
The total cost is expected to be in the region of £1.6 million. Lord Coaker said 'every effort will be made to ensure payments are made as quickly as reasonably practical'.
'I cannot undo past mistakes, but I wish to assure members that in my role, as minister for the armed forces, I intend to drive improvement in the department's data handling training and practices.
'[The Ministry of] Defence's record on these topics must improve and I am determined to ensure it does,' he added.
The UK information commissioner found previously that the department did not have the procedures in place to ensure group emails were sent securely to Afghans seeking relocation.
'This deeply regrettable data breach let down those to whom our country owes so much,' John Edwards, who was the UK information commissioner, said in 2023.
He said it was a 'particularly egregious breach of the obligation of security owed to these people, thus warranting the financial penalty my office imposes today'.
The Times reported in September 2021 how the MoD sent an email to a distribution list of Afghan nationals eligible for evacuation using the 'To' field, with personal information inadvertently disclosed.
The email addresses could be seen by all recipients, including the thumbnail pictures that 55 people had on their email profiles. Two people even 'replied all' to the entire list of recipients, with one of them providing their location.
The original email was sent by the team in charge of the Arap, which is responsible for assisting the relocation of Afghan citizens who worked for the UK government in Afghanistan. There were concerns at the time that the data disclosed could have fallen into the hands of the Taliban.
The Information Commissioner's Office said the team had relied on 'blind carbon copy' (bcc) when sending emails at the time, which carried a 'significant risk of human error'.
Soon after the data breach, the MoD contacted the people affected asking them to delete the email, change their email address, and inform the Arap team of their new contact details via a secure form.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We have only ourselves to blame for the UK's land monopoly
We have only ourselves to blame for the UK's land monopoly

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

We have only ourselves to blame for the UK's land monopoly

While we might fume at the eviction of a whole village by its landlord, we only have ourselves to blame for allowing such power to remain in the hands of so few (An entire village in Dorset is facing eviction – proof that private money holds all the power in rural England, 28 June). Even socialist governments have balked at dealing with the issue of land monopoly, and we have failed to hold them to account. In 1909, when landed power was largely synonymous with the aristocracy, Tom Johnston, later to become secretary of state for Scotland, noted that land titles had originally been created 'either by force or fraud'. He urged the people to 'shatter the romance that keeps the nation numb and spellbound while privilege picks its pocket'. As George Monbiot's article shows, land monopoly today is not confined to the aristocracy. The most effective way to neutralise its power would be through land value taxation, which would ensure that those who claim to own the country bear its running costs. In 1910, the Inland Revenue initiated a full survey of land use, value and ownership across Britain. It was completed in five years, but the outbreak of war and a change of government meant the proposed tax measures were never implemented. Our present Labour government has four years to repeat the exercise and reform our broken tax system. It should start DigneyStirling The eviction of the inhabitants of Littlebredy in Dorset by their new owner Bridehead Estate Ltd, excoriatingly exposed by George Monbiot, has a strong historical echo from the 1770s at Milton Abbas, less than 30 miles away. Lord Milton bought Milton Abbey, near Dorchester, in 1752. Capability Brown was brought in to 'improve' the surrounding landscape. He faced the problem of what to do about the unsightly medieval village of more than a hundred households. The solution was to move it. In 1774 Brown drew up plans for a new 'model village' of new homes. Over the next decade the villagers were decanted, some against their will, to new homes in Milton Abbas. Barely a trace of the old village exists. Lord Milton is often cited as one of the worst examples of the callous ostentation common among the English landowning Whig oligarchy of the 18th century. But at least he felt obliged to rehouse his tenants. Judging from Monbiot's piece, it seems that a corporate landowner in today's Britain is not even obliged to do that when it decides to socially engineer an inconvenient community out of house and GutchLondon Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Family hubs to open in every council in England
Family hubs to open in every council in England

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Family hubs to open in every council in England

Family hubs offering parenting support and youth services will be rolled out across every local authority in England, the government has announced. The £500 million plan aims to support 500,000 more children in the most disadvantaged areas. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said the "Best Start" family hubs would "give a lifeline" to Conservatives said there was "little clarity on what's genuinely new and what simply rebrands existing services". The idea of a family hub dates back to the early 2000s when New Labour introduced "Sure Start" centres - focused on supporting young families with early education, childcare and health advice. Many closed after 2010 when funding was cut by the Tories. But last year the Conservative government under Rishi Sunak rolled out 400 new "family hubs" offering a wider range of services across 75 local authorities. Now Labour say the hubs will be in every local authority by April 2026, before expanding them to up to 1,000 by the end of 2028. They will offer services ranging from birth registration and midwifery support to debt advice and youth clubs. Officials hope the spaces will also provide families access to other services and social Phillipson said: "It's the driving mission of this government to break the link between a child's background and what they go on to achieve - our new 'Best Start' family hubs will put the first building blocks of better life chances in place for more children."Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said the lack of clarity about what was actually new was "part of a wider pattern"."This is a government defined by broken promises and endless U-turns," she Save The Children has said it is "pleased" to see the government "making it easier for families to get the help they need".Dan Paskins, executive director of policy, advocacy and campaigns at Save The Children UK, said: "We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK government making it easier for families to get the help they need."

Met police arrest activists holding signs referring to Palestine Action
Met police arrest activists holding signs referring to Palestine Action

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Met police arrest activists holding signs referring to Palestine Action

Twenty-nine people have been arrested after protesters gathered in central London holding signs referencing Palestine Action a day after the group was banned as a terrorist organisation. The direct action protest group was banned on Friday after a last-minute legal attempt to suspend the group's proscription under anti-terrorism laws failed. It means that, from Saturday, being a member of, or expressing support for, the organisation became a criminal offence, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The campaign group Defend Our Juries, which organised the demonstration, said 'a priest, an emeritus professor and a number of health professionals' were among those arrested. More than two dozen people gathered close to the statue of Mahatma Gandhi in Parliament Square, holding signs that appeared to express support for the group. At about 1.40pm, Metropolitan police officers began arresting people who were holding the signs. In a statement on X, the Met said: 'Officers have arrested more than 20 people on suspicion of offences under the Terrorism Act 2000. They have been taken into custody. Palestine Action is a proscribed group and officers will act where criminal offences are committed.' The force posted another update on X on Saturday evening to say 29 arrests had been made and added that those arrested remain in custody. A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: 'We commend the counter-terrorism police for their decisive action in protecting the people of London from some cardboard signs opposing the genocide in Gaza and expressing support for those taking action to prevent it. It's a relief to know that counter-terrorism police have nothing better to do.' On Friday, the group wrote to the Met commissioner, Mark Rowley, to give him advance warning of the demonstration. Before officers made arrests, the Guardian spoke to some of the demonstrators. Tim Crosland, of Defend Our Juries, said: 'What we're doing here as a group of priests, teachers, health workers, human rights lawyers [is] we're refusing to be silenced. Because it goes to the core of what we believe in: that we oppose genocide – I didn't think that was that controversial – and we support the people who resist genocide. 'In theory we are now terrorist supporters and can go to prison for 14 years, which is kind of crazy. I think what we are here to do is just expose the craziness of that.' An environmental campaigner, Donnachadh McCarthy, said: 'To proscribe an organisation of peaceful direct action as terrorists is a huge red line for our democracy. It means that all the rest of us, whether we're climate activists, Greenpeace, women's suffragettes, disabled activists, it means that the government can now declare any act of property damage to be terrorism, which gives you a sentence of 14 years. 'This is worse than Putin's Russia. I don't say that lightly. It's 10 years for doing what we're doing today in Russia; it's 14 years in the UK, because of Yvette Cooper's outrageous betrayal of democracy, liberalism, and what is in my view a step towards fascism.' A retired priest, Sue Parfitt, 83, said the group's ban was 'a very dangerous move that has to be challenged'. 'We are losing our civil liberties, we must stop that for everybody's sake. Whatever you want to protest about,' she said. Cooper, the home secretary, announced plans to ban Palestine Action late last month, days after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton and defaced two military aircraft with spray paint. MPs voted in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday. The House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. UN experts, civil liberties groups, cultural figures and hundreds of lawyers have condemned the ban as draconian and said it sets a dangerous precedent by conflating protest with terrorism. The ban means Palestine Action has become the first direct action protest group to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as Islamic State, al-Qaida and the far-right group National Action.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store