
Starmer has been ‘mugged by reality' since general election, senior Tory claims
The Prime Minister has been 'mugged by reality', a Conservative frontbencher has said, as he claimed Labour is becoming more similar to the Conservative Party every day.
Shadow Commons leader Jesse Norman detailed Labour's record since it came to power last year, from settling pay disputes to having to increase defence spending in response to the changing policy by the United States on Ukraine.
Addressing Cabinet minister Lucy Powell at the despatch box during Business Questions he paraphrased writer Irving Kristol, who said a 'conservative is a socialist who's been mugged by reality,' with Mr Norman giving Sir Keir Starmer as an example.
Leader of the House of Commons Ms Powell said his speech was 'another diatribe that took us through various myths and misinformation'.
Mr Norman said: 'The Government's brand of socialism started well from its point of view, if disastrously for the country. We had the union payoffs, the rapid settlement of pay disputes in the public sector for zero apparent efficiency benefits and a heavily tax and spend budget.
'The Chancellor was even so bold as to announce to the CBI (Confederation of British Industry) that she would not be raising taxes or increasing debt over the course of the Government.'
Mr Norman added: 'Next week we will have hasty and almost certainly ill thought through cuts to welfare.
'Labour were red under Jeremy Corbyn. They became a gentle cerise for voters at the time of the general election. Now the reality is setting in, they are a pleasing shade of purple, with more and more patches of blue.
'The Prime Minister and the Government are becoming more Conservative by the day.'
He then criticised Labour over its rural stance, and policies on farming.
'The Labour message is clear, don't be a farmer, don't feed the country, don't give us food security, don't work every hour god sends, whatever the weather. We don't care,' he said.
In response, Ms Powell said: 'He will know that this Government had to take some very difficult decisions when we were coming in to deal with an economy that no government wants to deal with, high debt and rising, stagnant growth, low productivity, low wages and public services on their knees.'
Ms Powell rejected his criticism of the increase in employers' national insurance contributions, as he was in the Treasury under the previous Conservative government when it raised the tax for workers and employers.
On farming she said the Government had increased the farming budget to £5 billion over two years. 'This Government absolutely backs British farmers,' she said.
Ms Powell said Tuesday marked 100 sitting days in Parliament since the election, and 10 bills had been passed by MPs in that time. She said ministers had also made 115 statements to the House.
'What a contrast to the last Conservative government, they had to be dragged here to make a statement,' she said.
'Their last King's speech was threadbare. The pinnacle of their ambition was to ban pedicabs in London, and they're not doing much better now are they?
'Hardly any of them turning up in debates, they're barely here for PMQs, I don't really blame them, because they were a zombie government, and isn't it the truth, they're a zombie opposition now.'
Ms Powell outlined parliamentary business for the next fortnight.
MPs will debate the remaining stages of the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill's remaining stages on Monday March 17 and Tuesday 18, followed by Lords amendments to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill on Wednesday 19, with general debates on coastal communities and knife crime among children and young people on Thursday 20.
On March 24 the Planning and Infrastructure Bill will come to the Commons, March 25 will hear a debate on Lords amendments to the Great British Energy Bill, followed by the Terrorism (Protection of Businesses) Bill, and the motion to approve the draft National Minimum Wage (Amendment) regulations.
The Chancellor Rachel Reeves will give her spring statement on March 26, which will be followed by the remaining stages of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill. On March 27 there will be general debates on St Patrick's Day and Northern Irish affairs, as well as one on the 10th anniversary of the Modern Slavery Act 2015.
Private members' bills will be discussed on March 28.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Reporter
32 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Demands for UK Government to do more for housing in Scotland
First Minister John Swinney has urged the UK Government to do more to support Scotland's housing sector in the upcoming Spending Review. The First Minister will set out his vision for the future of Scotland's housing sector in a speech at the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations in Glasgow later. Ahead of his speech the First Minister said: 'Scotland faces a housing crisis which is why we are investing £768 million in affordable housing in 2025-26, the majority of which will be for social rent. This includes up to £40 million for acquisitions, to help reduce the number of homeless households, especially with children, in temporary accommodation. 'We are keenly aware of the benefits of providing multi-year spending plans to our partners and want to prove this stability across the public sector. We continue to call on the UK Government to provide multi-year funding for housing to give developers and third sector organisations long-term certainty. 'The UK Government must also commit to unfreezing Local Housing Allowance rates. These rates set the amount that private renters receive to help with rent. Increasing these rates can be a key lever that can help protect tenants. Repegging these rates to the 30th percentile of local rents would mean greater security for many households across Scotland.' Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer met with First Minister of Scotland, John Swinney in July 2024 at Bute House. Photo courtesy of The Scottish Government Like this: Like Related


South Wales Guardian
32 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Geologists unveil UK ‘super regions' with best potential for transition projects
The findings, published by the British Geological Survey (BGS), show the UK has an incredibly diverse subsurface, which can play a key role in supporting efforts to reach the country's legally binding climate goals. Many areas have geology that is well suited to certain net zero technologies, including shallow geothermal installations or critical minerals occurrences. But BGS scientists say eight super regions contain subsurface formations and conditions that are favourable to multiple different technologies within a relatively small area. These are Northern Ireland, the Scottish Central Belt, north-east England, north-west England, the South Yorkshire and Humber region, the East Midlands and East Anglia, South Wales and south-west England. Here, the subsurfaces can provide a sustainable heat source for geothermal energy, geological formations for secure storage of energy and carbon dioxide (CO2), rocks containing important resources for mineral extraction, and suitable geological foundation conditions for onshore and offshore wind infrastructure projects, the scientists said. For example, south-west England has significant deep geothermal resources offering opportunities for sustainable heat and power generation while its sedimentary basins provide potential sites for CCS and energy storage, they added. Meanwhile, the Scottish Central Belt boasts a complex geology, including sedimentary reservoir rocks and significant igneous intrusions, abundant geothermal resources, abandoned coal mines and a legacy of subsurface data, they said. The BGS said its findings offer crucial insights and a road map for decision makers, ministers and land managers looking to maximise return on investment in the energy transition. The geologists assessed that strategic spatial planning for such technologies in these areas can help unlock an estimated £40 billion of annual investment and support the Government's target of creating 650,000 jobs through renewable energy by 2030. But they added that further investigation will be required to fully establish each of the super region's true potential, ensure safe deployment of each technology, and understand environmental impact. Michelle Bentham, BGS chief scientist for decarbonisation and resource management, said: 'The UK is incredibly diverse in its geology. 'Because it's out of sight, geology gets a little bit forgotten about. 'And I don't think people realise how blessed we are in the UK, if you like, in terms of the geology that could really help us have a sustainable future. 'But you can really see the difference that geology could make to reaching Government goals in terms of net zero, energy provision, clean energy.' Ms Bentham said funding and the policy landscape may have been barriers to rolling out technologies such as CCS and geothermal energy across the UK. 'In Europe, geothermal energy is used much more widely. In the UK, we don't use it as widely and it's always been a bit of a Cinderella of clean energy technologies,' she said. 'And in the North Sea, we could potentially become a hub for carbon storage in Europe for countries that don't have the right geology who are trying to decarbonise,' she added. The BGS contributed to the consultation on the Government's upcoming land use framework, which looks at how England's finite land can meet the escalating demands of food security, clean energy, nature restoration and new homes. But the framework is focusing more on surface demands, with some scope for shallow subsurface areas such as geothermal infrastructure. Ms Bentham said strategic spatial planning for the subsurface could also help optimise the UK's resources for the energy transition. For example, it could stop decision makers from locking into one technology – such as wind farms or CCS – in one area where another could have yielded more benefits, or where multiple technologies could have been deployed. 'Like the map, it's not one technology that's going to be the answer,' she said. 'That's why we need this combination to give us flexibility.' The BGS highlighted that the data underpinning its research has been shaped by geologists' current understanding of the subsurface, adding that a few parts of the country have been less extensively surveyed than others, and more research is required to fully assess their potential.

Rhyl Journal
36 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C
The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding at the GMB Congress on Tuesday. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Trade unions welcomed the move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The Government is also due to confirm one of Europe's first small modular reactor programmes and will invest £2.5 billion over five years in fusion energy research as part of plans to boost the UK's nuclear industry. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'Delivering this funding for Sizewell C is a vital step forward, this project is critical to securing the future of the nuclear industry in the UK. 'New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy, as well as supporting good, unionised jobs. 'Further investment in SMRs and fusion research shows we are finally serious about developing a 21st-century nuclear industry. All funding must be backed up by a whole-industry plan to ensure we have the workforce and skills we need for these plans to succeed.' Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. 'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? 'Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2.'