logo
Brisbane news live: Federal fund for council's cyclone clean-up dries up

Brisbane news live: Federal fund for council's cyclone clean-up dries up

Go to latest
Federal fund for council's cyclone clean-up dries up
By
Residents who have been faced with broken trees and playground shade sails since Cyclone Alfred lashed Brisbane in March might be left waiting, as the council doubles down on a funding bid.
The Brisbane City Council said federal funding had 'barely scratched the surface' of damage in the region, and it would not continue clean-up efforts until it was given more aid.
Loading
Deputy Lord Mayor Fiona Cunningham said each council had received $1 million before the storm hit, but 'as the largest local government in the country' Brisbane's share was not enough.
'Right now we're facing a funding gap of $2.2 million just for tree-related damage, with broader citywide cyclone impacts estimated close to $45 million,' she said.
The Commonwealth approved a further $32 million on clean-up efforts in Brisbane on April 9, but Cunningham said the council CEO had appealed for a boost to finish up repairs.
'Seventy-eight days in, the reality is that we're still waiting for approval of category D funding despite our repeated requests,' she said.
Cunningham added the council had already begun 'essential recovery works' across the city.
7.28am
State pares back 'good character' evidence in sexual violence cases
By Catherine Strohfeldt
A person's social position, reputation, or contributions to the community will have a drastically reduced effect on sentencing for sexual offences in Queensland.
Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said the changes to 'good character' evidence were a major win for victims, and came alongside harsher penalties for sexual offences against children.
Loading
'No one wants to hear that a rapist is an all-round great person, a trustworthy mate, or that they're respected in the community – especially not their victim, bravely sitting in court,' Frecklington said.
Evidence of 'good character' will still be admissible in sexual violence cases, but only if it helps establish a defendant's likelihood of reoffending, or their ability to be rehabilitated.
Queensland Victims' Commissioner Beck O'Connor said the law should have been amended so 'a court must not consider any 'good behaviour' evidence for offenders in any circumstance'.
'Victim-survivors have said this evidence is an attempt to minimise, or counteract, the hurt caused by an offender,' O'Connor said.
'These limited amendments proposed by [the] Queensland Sentencing and Advisory Council will not resolve these issues.'
The changes follow a QSAC report released in February, and follow a spate of changes to youth crime sentencing rolled out in the government's first seven months.
7.27am
Australia 'in danger of permanent structural decline', former deputy PM says
By Sarah McPhee
Former deputy prime minister John Anderson says the country is in danger of permanent structural decline after the Coalition breakdown.
'Now, there's no doubt in my mind that experience shows over the 80 years that the Coalition agreement has been in place that working together produces better government for the country and Australia needs better government now more than ever,' Anderson told Sky News.
'We are in danger of permanently entering structural decline and this is happening in the context of a very dangerous world. So I hope they can sort their differences out very, very quickly.'
Anderson said he was 'dismayed' at what was happening.
'The parties do not exist to serve themselves. They exist to serve the national interest,' he said.
Loading
'We've just been through an election which could've been won, in my view, and I profoundly believe that to be true, if we'd had the policies to address the issues … that have to be addressed if we are to halt our structural decline.'
Anderson was the leader of The Nationals and deputy prime minister to John Howard from 1999 to 2005.
7.21am
Federal fund for council's cyclone clean-up dries up
By Catherine Strohfeldt
Residents who have been faced with broken trees and playground shade sails since Cyclone Alfred lashed Brisbane in March might be left waiting, as the council doubles down on a funding bid.
The Brisbane City Council said federal funding had 'barely scratched the surface' of damage in the region, and it would not continue clean-up efforts until it was given more aid.
Loading
Deputy Lord Mayor Fiona Cunningham said each council had received $1 million before the storm hit, but 'as the largest local government in the country' Brisbane's share was not enough.
'Right now we're facing a funding gap of $2.2 million just for tree-related damage, with broader citywide cyclone impacts estimated close to $45 million,' she said.
The Commonwealth approved a further $32 million on clean-up efforts in Brisbane on April 9, but Cunningham said the council CEO had appealed for a boost to finish up repairs.
'Seventy-eight days in, the reality is that we're still waiting for approval of category D funding despite our repeated requests,' she said.
Cunningham added the council had already begun 'essential recovery works' across the city.
7.07am
The weather this Wednesday
The mild weather continues in the River City today, with what is predicted to be a partly sunny Wednesday.
While the weather bureau has forecast a small chance of a shower, only a millimetre would be in it. We think you can leave the umbrella at home.
Otherwise, after some early fog, we're expecting a pleasant top of 26 degrees in Brisbane today.
Here's the outlook for the rest of the week and into the weekend.
7.00am
While you were sleeping
Here's what's making news further afield this morning:
The Nationals have split from the Liberals for the first time since 1987.
Former prime minister John Howard has damned the split as a 'stupid move' that threatens to deepen the parties' differences.
The radioactive debate over nuclear energy is at the core of the Coalition meltdown.
And, writes Tony Wright, the Nationals were once feared. 'Now they merely stamp their feet.'
Anthony Albanese is on track to f all 262,000 short of his target of 1.2 million new homes by the end of the decade, a government adviser warns.
Weight-loss drugs come with unpleasant side-effects. But these readily available foods can help you lose weight without the need for medication.
Bitcoin is back. After a pretty miserable start to the year, the world's most well-known digital asset has staged a sharp rebound. So, is now a good time to invest?
And the world's richest man, Elon Musk, says he will cut back or completely stop his record-breaking political spending following a bruising start to 2025 in which shares in his car company Tesla sank.
6.47am
The top stories this morning
Good morning, and welcome to Brisbane Times' live news coverage for Wednesday, May 21. Today we can expect a partly cloudy day and a top temperature of 26 degrees.
In this morning's local headlines:
The father of the merged Liberal National Party in Queensland, Lawrence Springborg, insists the Coalition's federal split will have no bearing on the party in Queensland.
Under pressure to come clean over its sudden decision to close the Story Bridge's footpaths, Brisbane's council is releasing all its reports on their maintenance and restoration.
A teenager who used a paint-filled fire extinguisher to vandalise former federal opposition leader Peter Dutton's office has been sentenced in Brisbane.
Brisbane is likely to fine Reece Walsh over a social media post in which the star fullback punches a friend in the head while wearing a boxing glove.
In sport, Robert Toia turned down Wayne Bennett and battled injuries for three years. Now Queensland's latest rookie has been .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reynolds' fresh target in Higgins lawsuit
Reynolds' fresh target in Higgins lawsuit

Perth Now

time5 days ago

  • Perth Now

Reynolds' fresh target in Higgins lawsuit

Linda Reynolds has turned her attention to former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in her bid to sue the Commonwealth over its compensation payment to Brittany Higgins, as the nation's anti-corruption agency revealed there was 'no corruption issue' in the payment. The retiring former Liberal minister in May launched action in the Federal Court against the Commonwealth, with the crux of the claim over the $2.4m compensation payment to Brittany Higgins in 2022. Senator Reynolds argued the payment was 'publicly affirming' of Ms Higgins allegations against her that she didn't support her former staffer when she alleged she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann. Brittany Higgins was paid a $2.4m compensation payment. NewsWire / Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia The Federal Court has found Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding. An amended version of Ms Reynolds statement of claim was filed on Wednesday, just a day before the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) said there was 'no corruption issue' in the $2.4m payment. The NACC on Thursday announced there was 'no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official'. Senator Reynolds' amended statement of claim was made public late on Thursday afternoon. Linda Reynolds has amended her statement of claim. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Among the changes is a reference to a speech by Mr Dreyfus the then Attorney-General made to parliament on March 15, 2021. Mr Dreyfus is not a party to the claim. Mr Dreyfus recounted to the House of Representatives a speech by Ms Higgins just outside Parliament House, where she told a large crowd she was raped inside the building by a colleague, and how her story was 'a painful reminder to women that it can happen in Parliament House and can truly happen anywhere'. 'If a woman cannot feel safe from rape in Parliament House, a veritable fortress ringed with security cameras, with entrances protected by armed guards and with Federal Police officers on duty inside, where can women feel safe?' Mr Dreyfus told the House of Representatives, according to a transcript excerpt in the claim. 'How strong is the rule of law if it isn't able to protect a young woman working in the ministerial wing of Parliament House?' The amended statement of claim argued Senator Reynolds had suffered loss and damage as a result of Mr Dreyfus' conduct, including denying her the opportunity to rebut Ms Higgins' allegation 'in the appropriate forum'. Former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia It also argues Mr Dreyfus 'enabled and encouraged the falsity of Ms Higgins' claim to be maintained by Ms Higgins'. HWL Ebsworth, which acted on the Commonwealth's behalf, is also being sued by Senator Reynolds for negligence. Lawyers on behalf of Senator Reynolds argued HWLE breached its fiduciary duty to her by excluding her from the mediation conference where the $2.4m settlement was reached, and failing to conduct independent investigations to establish if there was 'at least a meaningful prospect of liability' by Ms Higgins. However, similar alleged breaches initially put forth against the Commonwealth were withdrawn in the amended document, with it now largely focusing on allegations of Mr Dreyfus' misfeasance of public office and alleged breaches of HWLE. Mr Dreyfus has been contacted for comment. He earlier welcomed NACC's statement. 'The NACC has conclusively found there was no improper interference by any Commonwealth official at any stage,' Mr Dreyfus said. 'I regret the baseless allegation of corruption has been so widely publicised ahead of this finding and hope future matters can be resolved in a more timely manner. 'I also regret any further distress caused to Ms Higgins as a result of this matter.'

Linda Reynolds targets former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in Higgins lawsuit
Linda Reynolds targets former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in Higgins lawsuit

News.com.au

time5 days ago

  • News.com.au

Linda Reynolds targets former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in Higgins lawsuit

Linda Reynolds has turned her attention to former Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus in her bid to sue the Commonwealth over its compensation payment to Brittany Higgins, as the nation's anti-corruption agency revealed there was 'no corruption issue' in the payment. The retiring former Liberal minister in May launched action in the Federal Court against the Commonwealth, with the crux of the claim over the $2.4m compensation payment to Brittany Higgins in 2022. Senator Reynolds argued the payment was 'publicly affirming' of Ms Higgins allegations against her that she didn't support her former staffer when she alleged she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann. The Federal Court has found Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding. An amended version of Ms Reynolds statement of claim was filed on Wednesday, just a day before the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) said there was 'no corruption issue' in the $2.4m payment. The NACC on Thursday announced there was 'no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official'. Senator Reynolds' amended statement of claim was made public late on Thursday afternoon. Among the changes is a reference to a speech by Mr Dreyfus the then Attorney-General made to parliament on March 15, 2021. Mr Dreyfus is not a party to the claim. Mr Dreyfus recounted to the House of Representatives a speech by Ms Higgins just outside Parliament House, where she told a large crowd she was raped inside the building by a colleague, and how her story was 'a painful reminder to women that it can happen in Parliament House and can truly happen anywhere'. 'If a woman cannot feel safe from rape in Parliament House, a veritable fortress ringed with security cameras, with entrances protected by armed guards and with Federal Police officers on duty inside, where can women feel safe?' Mr Dreyfus told the House of Representatives, according to a transcript excerpt in the claim. 'How strong is the rule of law if it isn't able to protect a young woman working in the ministerial wing of Parliament House?' The amended statement of claim argued Senator Reynolds had suffered loss and damage as a result of Mr Dreyfus' conduct, including denying her the opportunity to rebut Ms Higgins' allegation 'in the appropriate forum'. It also argues Mr Dreyfus 'enabled and encouraged the falsity of Ms Higgins' claim to be maintained by Ms Higgins'. HWL Ebsworth, which acted on the Commonwealth's behalf, is also being sued by Senator Reynolds for negligence. Lawyers on behalf of Senator Reynolds argued HWLE breached its fiduciary duty to her by excluding her from the mediation conference where the $2.4m settlement was reached, and failing to conduct independent investigations to establish if there was 'at least a meaningful prospect of liability' by Ms Higgins. However, similar alleged breaches initially put forth against the Commonwealth were withdrawn in the amended document, with it now largely focusing on allegations of Mr Dreyfus' misfeasance of public office and alleged breaches of HWLE. Mr Dreyfus has been contacted for comment. He earlier welcomed NACC's statement. 'The NACC has conclusively found there was no improper interference by any Commonwealth official at any stage,' Mr Dreyfus said. 'I regret the baseless allegation of corruption has been so widely publicised ahead of this finding and hope future matters can be resolved in a more timely manner. 'I also regret any further distress caused to Ms Higgins as a result of this matter.'

Corruption watchdog makes ruling on govt's multimillion-dollar Higgins settlement
Corruption watchdog makes ruling on govt's multimillion-dollar Higgins settlement

The Advertiser

time5 days ago

  • The Advertiser

Corruption watchdog makes ruling on govt's multimillion-dollar Higgins settlement

A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim." A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim." A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim." A multimillion-dollar settlement payment between Brittany Higgins and the Commonwealth involved no corrupt conduct, the federal watchdog has declared. The National Anti-Corruption Commission on Thursday confirmed it had conducted an extensive preliminary investigation into the $2.445 million settlement following "scrutiny and speculation". It also revealed the settlement figure was less than the maximum amount recommended by external independent legal advice. The Commonwealth agreed to the settlement - without admitting any liability - with Ms Higgins following her alleged rape inside Parliament House in 2019. She received $400,000 for "hurt, distress and humiliation" and $1.48 million relating to her loss of earning capacity. In 2023, The Australian reported that former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds had raised the issue with the anti-corruption commission. Ms Higgins worked in Senator Reynolds' office at the time of the alleged rape. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the anti-corruption commission's statement reads. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption watchdog has made a habit of making statements on issues that are well publicised, often finding it in the public interest to disclose findings of preliminary investigations in these cases. The commission said it had analysed thousands of documents provided by the relevant departments and considered aspects of the legal advice, mediation and settlement amount. It found that decisions made on the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced senior and junior counsel, and that there "was no material difference" in the initial advice provided to the Coalition government in 2022, compared to updated advice provided to Labor when it took power. The commission also found former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. It found that a mediation conference with Ms Higgins which was wrapped up within a day was "unexceptional". "It was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months," its statement reads. "None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store