MPDO booked for sexual harassment of Dalit woman in Andhra's Prakasam
According to Tarlupadu SI Brahmanaidu, the accused officer, Chakrapani Prasad, allegedly harassed the woman—an office assistant on daily wages for the past 10 years—on two consecutive days last week. The first incident occurred on Monday evening when he allegedly misbehaved with her after calling her into his room. The following day, she did not attend work out of fear. On Wednesday, the officer reportedly tried to forcibly pull her into the restroom, causing minor injuries to her hand. She later filed a complaint at the Tarlupadu police station on Thursday night.
In response, Madiga Reservation Porata Samiti (MRPS) leaders staged a protest in front of the Mandal Office on Saturday. Tahsildar assured them that the matter would be reported to higher authorities. The accused officer is currently absconding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cop shoots at teen after attack on constable in Tirunelveli
MADURAI: A teenager with a machete who attacked and injured a man and a cop who came his rescue was shot and injured in the chest by a sub-inspector who opened fire when the assailant turned on him near Ambasamudram in Tirunelveli early on Tuesday, police said. The incident occurred when a police patrol responded to a distress call from Sakthikumar, 22, who was attacked by two teenagers at Rasthavanur near Pappakudi on Monday night. Police said the teens were upset with Sakthikumar for reporting them to the cops for rowdyism. Sakthikumar, who was injured in the leg, fled from the spot and hid at a nearby house. When the police patrol arrived and confronted them, the teens attacked and injured constable Ranjit in the leg. By then sub-inspector Murugan of Pappakudi police station reached the spot and tried to calm the teenagers, but they attacked took refuge in a house nearby, but the teens gave chase and started hacking open the door with the machete, police said. SI Murugan then fired at them through the splintered door. The teens then fled the scene. Tirunelveli district SP N Silambarasan said that the SI opened fire due to the extraordinary circumstances that prevailed then, to protect the lives of people. Police fanned out to search for the two attackers and found them hiding not far away. One of the teens had a gunshot injury in his chest. He was admitted to Tirunelveli govt medical college hospital for treatment. His condition was stable. The injured Sakthikumar and constable Ranjit were also hospitalised. The Pappakudi police registered a case under various sections of BNS against the teens who had a dozen previous criminal cases against them, including of murder, hurling of petrol bombs, and under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. Police said documents showed the teen who suffered the gunshot, Shanmughasundaram, had turned 18 four days ago. The other one was 17. The minor had been sent to a govt observation home.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Why age of consent laws need a nuanced rethink
Across India, there is a growing dissonance between the spirit of child protection laws and their real-world consequences, particularly when the setting of adolescent relationships is considered. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, enacted in 2012 to shield minors from sexual exploitation, sets the age of consent at 18. While this offers a clear safeguard in theory, it has often become a tool for families to penalise relationships that cross lines of caste, community, or gender norms. What began as a shield has, in many instances, turned into a sword. Romantic love is reframed as rape. Adolescence becomes another battleground for families to reassert control — often at the cost of the boy's future and the girl's agency. This legal rigidity ignores the rapidly changing world adolescents inhabit. Teenagers today grow up in a hyper-connected environment — exposed early to sexual content, peer influence, and evolving norms around intimacy. Public displays of affection no longer scandalise the urban middle class. Smartphones, dating apps, and social media shape adolescents' understanding of love and identity. Yet, our laws pretend that teenage desire does not exist — or worse, that it must be punished. The real issue lies in POCSO's failure to account for context. It makes no distinction between an exploitative relationship and a consensual one between two teenagers. A 17-year-old in love is treated the same as a 45-year-old predator. The fallout is harsh — boys branded as rapists face shattered futures, and girls lose their voice in decisions about their own bodies. Many countries have grappled with this complexity more pragmatically. Canada allows consensual sex at 16, or even 14–15 if the partner is within five years of age. Germany permits consensual sex from age 14, provided there's no coercion and the partner is under 21. These 'close-in-age' exemptions protect against abuse while recognising adolescent sexuality as a part of growing up. At the other end are countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, where all sex outside marriage is criminalised. While seemingly strict, such systems often leave girls grappling with increased vulnerability — trapped in child marriages with no protection against non-consensual marital sex. India stands at a contradictory crossroads. We criminalise all sex with those under 18 — even within marriage, post a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2017. Yet, according to NFHS-5, over 23% of Indian women aged 20–24 were married before 18. These girls, often pushed into early marital sex, rarely find legal redress. The law steps in only when a girl elopes, not when she is quietly married off at 15. This contradiction reveals a deeper hypocrisy. Our laws are less about protecting children and more about preserving family honour. When girls choose partners outside accepted norms, the law becomes punitive. When families arrange early marriages, society looks away. This is the uncomfortable truth the current Supreme Court debate is beginning to confront. While the Centre defends the 18-year threshold, the Court has raised crucial questions: Should teenagers be jailed for exploring love? Could comprehensive sex education be a better response than prosecution? The answer lies not in lowering the age of consent indiscriminately, but in crafting a more nuanced legal framework. One that protects without criminalising, and recognises that teenage sexuality cannot be erased through denial or fear. Such a framework could include close-in-age exemptions for consensual relationships between 16–18-year-olds, judicial discretion to assess the nature and context of each case, mandatory sex education to empower young people with knowledge about consent, boundaries, and safety, unambiguous criminalisation of child marriage, with no exceptions for marital sex. Ultimately, this is not just a legal issue — it's a cultural reckoning. It forces us to confront our discomfort with adolescent agency, our refusal to talk openly about sex, and our tendency to confuse control with care. Laws alone cannot protect young people. True protection lies in equipping them to make informed choices. A just society does not fear its youth — it listens to them. AL Sharada is trustee, Population First. The views expressed are personal.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Battling caste in Tamil Nadu
The idea of social justice has shaped politics in Tamil Nadu for over a century. Political parties that subscribe to E V 'Periyar' Ramasamy's anti-caste ideology have had an uninterrupted run in office since 1967. Yet, caste violence, mostly targeting Dalits and perpetrated by members of castes under the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category, continues to roil Tamil Nadu, highlighting not just the administrative failure of successive governments but also the ideological hypocrisy of parties subscribing to the Dravidian Movement that takes pride in its anti-caste roots. The latest incident comes from Tirunelveli in southern Tamil Nadu that boasts 90% literacy, where a 27-year-old Dalit software engineer was killed for allegedly being in a relationship with a woman from the Most Backward Caste community. The woman's parents are police sub-inspectors, and the killer is her younger brother. The district was in the spotlight two years ago when a Dalit school boy and his sister were attacked by their schoolmates. The MK Stalin government had then appointed a retired judge to investigate the matter. The exhaustive Justice Chandru report found shocking evidence of not just deep-rooted caste prejudice in institutions but also a reluctance by heads of institutions to even recognise the malaise, let alone act against it. Anecdotal evidence too suggests large-scale use of caste markers among students in educational institutions, reflecting the polarisation in society. Dalits constitute close to 20% of the state's population and have become politically assertive in the past few decades. Improvement in educational standards and a shift towards service jobs have upset the traditional power relationship, triggering caste violence. Inter-caste marriages, especially when the girl is from a dominant caste, increasingly trigger a violent response, as witnessed in Dharmapuri (2012) and Udumalaipettai (2016). Unfortunately, the administrative apparatus, including the law enforcement system, has often failed to rise above caste associations and enforce the rule of law. Political parties that invoke caste pride covertly and overtly are equally to blame. For the Dravidian majors — the DMK and the AIADMK, primarily — the anti-Dalit violence suggests the failure to transcend their core vote bases, which are OBC communities, and usher in a politics that can enable the annihilation of caste. This task has been left incomplete by parties that now view politics entirely through the prism of economic development and ignore social fault lines that call for intense ideological engagement. Tamil Nadu's crisis is also the result of its economic advancement and improvement in human development indices, and its solution lies in political parties reinventing a paradigm of social justice.
