logo
Defence shares are booming as Trump, Middle East fuel expectations for government spending

Defence shares are booming as Trump, Middle East fuel expectations for government spending

Herald Sun4 hours ago

Investors who bought into defence-focused companies and exchange traded funds months before Donald Trump was elected US president are laughing all the way to the bank.
As wars intensify and President Trump pressures allies to dramatically increase their defence budgets, hundreds of billions of extra dollars will soon be spent on countries' war machines – and a slice of that will flow to savvy investors.
Several global defence stocks have doubled their share price in the past year, while many others have climbed three times more than overall markets in the US, Europe and Australia, which are up eight per cent to 10 per cent. Analysts say the outlook remains strong, with the Israel-Iran conflict the latest in a string of international crises.
Unlike last year's AI boom, which largely focused on US companies, the defence boom spans many countries. However, some of the best-known US defence stocks Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin, have generated only meagre returns.
This global theme, combined with the fact that Australia does not have a significant listed defence sector, means many investors are looking to exchange traded funds for global exposure, and they have been rewarded so far.
Three ASX-listed defence ETFs debuted last year and have climbed between 55 and 74 per cent.
The best performer is the VanEck Global Defence ETF.
VanEck deputy head of investments and capital markets, Jamie Hannah, said flows into ASX-listed defence ETFs have surged since March as companies including Italy's Leonards SpA, Germany's Hensoldt AG and Britain's Babcock International enjoy 'triple-digit price growth in the last year'.
Mr Hannah said government spending is increasing across Europe, the US and Asia-Pacific, providing long-term revenue for defence companies.
'We often hear the term 'arms race' used in everyday contexts, but the literal meaning of countries competing for military superiority essentially describes the current geopolitical predicament,' he said.
'The thing about an arms race is that there is no finish line and no one can ever actually win the race, yet countries, even those unwilling, are compelled to participate in order to maintain national security.'
Mr Hannah said the VanEck ETF does not hold any Australian defence stocks, although clients have expressed interest in Droneshield, which is up 18 per cent in the past year.
Another Australian stock with defence exposure is Perth-based Austal, which is up 164 per cent over the past year. Backed by the billionaire Forrest family, it's attracted interest from South Korea's Hanwha Group.
Other local companies benefiting from defence spending include Codan, up 75 per cent, and Electro Optic Systems, up 109 per cent.
Equity Trustees Asset Management head of equities Chris Haynes said Trump 'wants everyone to be more self-reliant'.
Mr Haynes noted the June 5 decision by NATO Defence Ministers to strengthen the alliance's deterrence and defence capabilities, through a spending commitment of 5 per cent of GDP.
'In Europe, the NATO directive will require Germany to spend €40bn for a new infantry division,' he said.
'The political will has changed and the German chancellor says spending needs to go to 3-3.5 per cent of GDP. Rheinmetall Ag is a German company that will benefit as a result of this directly.'
Investors can buy overseas defence stocks directly through brokers and platforms, but will achieve more diversification buying broader funds that allocate their money throughout the sector.
Betashares senior investment strategist Cameron Gleeson said many global defence contractors, including Rheinmetall, BAE Systems and Palantir, have seen a significant increase in orders and new government contracts.
'Investors are seeking exposure to the earnings growth these companies are experiencing, as well as the long tail of innovation that increased defence spending often provides,' he said.
'However, while defence companies are showing strong performance, much of the growth is happening outside Australia. As a result, investors may wish to look beyond the ASX for exposure to more mature global players with diversified revenue streams and government-backed contracts.'
Mr Gleeson said investors should not focus solely on defence. 'Consider this sector for a satellite allocation, complementing a well-diversified core portfolio of Australian and international equities,' he said.
Stake markets analyst Samy Sriram said defence ETFs are benefiting from investments in Palantir Technologies, which provides AI-powered defence software and sensors and has surged more than 440 per cent in a year.
'Palantir is a major beneficiary of higher defence spending, as it relies on government contracts for revenue,' she said.
'It is the third most traded stock on Stake this year. Firms that are investing in AI will be seen as increasingly important to the defence sector.'
Stockspot CEO Chris Brycki said the shift to higher military spending started before Trump's re-election but his victory 'has added fuel to the fire'.
Mr Brycki said Germany's defence spending increase is a notable example after it 'broke from decades of fiscal restraint by lifting its post-WWII cap on military spending'.
'This was a major policy shift that signalled how seriously many countries are now taking security,' he said.
Originally published as Defence shares boom as wars intensify, company revenues surge Read related topics: Donald Trump

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

War in the Middle East is dangerous; Albanese missed his opportunity
War in the Middle East is dangerous; Albanese missed his opportunity

Sydney Morning Herald

time27 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

War in the Middle East is dangerous; Albanese missed his opportunity

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's belated abandonment of Australia's neutral stance on the US joining Israel's attack on Iran is a continuation of the defensive and slow-footed reaction that has marked his record over the 18 months since the Middle East reignited. With US President Donald Trump posturing for days on taking military action against Tehran, Albanese had adequate preparation time. Yet, when the attacks came, the prime minister stayed silent on support. Instead, his office issued a statement by an anonymous government spokesperson calling for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy. Such lame silence opened the door for the opposition's canny acting foreign affairs spokesperson, Andrew Hastie, to seize the initiative and back the US strikes and scramble the government onto Monday morning television programs, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek eventually confirming that the government did indeed support Trump's strikes. Albanese then emerged on Monday to declare that, while the attacks were unilateral action by the US, 'Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and we support action to prevent that'. He should have said it loud and clear on Sunday. That is not to say the prime minister was letting down our ally by not automatically endorsing American action. The US has been so erratic of late that we do not owe it that, not least because so many unanswered questions flow from the weekend. The legality of the US action is wide open to interpretation and Trump's declaration that Iran's nuclear program had been 'completely and totally obliterated' sits awkwardly beside assertions a day later by senior US officials they did not know the fate of Tehran's stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium. Further, the UN's nuclear watchdog confirmed all three Iranian facilities had been badly damaged, but said it was not yet in a position to assess the impact underground and Iran has told the International Atomic Energy Agency there has been no increase in off-site radiation levels at the three sites. Trump's withdrawal in 2018 from the Iran nuclear deal reached by seven countries after two years of gruelling negotiation may have helped push Tehran down its current obstinate path. But in the 10 days of war with Israel this month, Iran has received little but verbal support from allies and is perhaps now the most isolated it has been since the 1979 US embassy hostage crisis.

Aussie motorists told to fuel up now as Iran-Israel conflict escalates
Aussie motorists told to fuel up now as Iran-Israel conflict escalates

Sky News AU

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Aussie motorists told to fuel up now as Iran-Israel conflict escalates

Australians are being warned that now is the low point in the petrol cycle and they should fuel up before prices rise in the coming days. With the price of Brent crude oil hitting a three-month high over the weekend as the Israel-Iran conflict escalates, surpassing $US80 a barrel, motorists are being urged to fill up. 'We will start to see the prices increase, but they are nowhere near as high as other economies have predicted,' NRMA spokesman Peter Khoury said. Mr Khoury said while the price of petrol was going up, it was not as much as some motorists feared, with on average drivers likely to pay 8 cents more a litre when fuelling up their car. 'Our regional benchmark – Malaysian Tapis – closed at $77 a barrel and we do expect it to go higher when the markets open tonight,' Mr Khoury said. 'But to put it in perspective, when we saw those really horrible record high prices back when Russia invaded Ukraine, Tapis was trading at $133 a barrel.' Australia motorists' fuel costs are based on Malaysian Tapis crude oil prices. While Tapis crude oil prices are influenced by the same factors as US brent crude oil prices, they do not necessarily trade at the same price. The price of Brent crude oil spiked to $US80 a barrel over the weekend after the US attacked and 'completely obliterated' three nuclear sites in Iran. Traders were worried about two major potential escalations in the conflict, with either the closure of the Strait of Hormuz or an all-out regional war negatively impacting the price of oil. Cutting off the Strait of Hormuz could send the price of oil above $US100 a barrel, as the 32km mile stretch is the primary route of exports from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the UAE, and Kuwait. But the passage that feeds the world with about 30 per cent of its oil supply is still open, at least for now, pending a final decision by Iran's Supreme Council after Iran's parliament voted to close it. Mr Khoury said it was important that Australians educated themselves before they filled up, with motorists in Sydney facing the bottom of the cycle, while Perth prices are set to fall on Tuesday. 'The reason I say that is because there is always a spread of prices,' he said. 'People are really surprised. We've had people say I thought the prices would be sky high and they are not.' Like an interest rate rise Higher petrol prices could act like an interest rate rise, as Aussies would have to spend more at the pump. Independent economist Saul Eslake said what happened next was unknown, but two scenarios could impact the Australian economy. 'One is the Iranians either choose to or find they can't do anything at all to which oil could fall back relatively quickly,' he said. 'On the other hand if they block the Strait of Hormuz, then the oil price could rise above $US100 a barrel, which while the world doesn't end it gets uncomfortably high.' Mr Eslake said the spike in oil prices was unlikely to move the Reserve Bank of Australia on interest rates in the short term. 'The RBA will look through the initial spike in oil prices, as it gets taken out through trimmed mean inflation rate,' he said. 'In a sense, higher oil prices act like an increase in interest rates; that is, to say people spend more on petrol and (have) less to spend on everything else. It's kind of the same way interest rates work.' Originally published as Aussie motorists told to fuel up now as Iran-Israel conflict escalates

US acted alone, Albanese declares while abandoning neutral stance on attack
US acted alone, Albanese declares while abandoning neutral stance on attack

Sydney Morning Herald

time30 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

US acted alone, Albanese declares while abandoning neutral stance on attack

The US acted alone to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, Anthony Albanese has declared, as he refused to say whether Australia received advance notice but departed from the government's neutral position to back US President Donald Trump's strikes. The shift was confirmed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Monday, a day after an unnamed government spokesperson released a statement that called for peace and remained neutral on the strike. Wong and Albanese declined to say how close Iran was to making a nuclear bomb or whether the joint US-Australia intelligence base at Pine Gap in the Northern Territory was used to garner intelligence for it at a press conference at which they were peppered with questions. 'The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon and we support action to prevent that – that is what this is,' Albanese said. 'The US action was directed at specific sites central to Iran's nuclear program. We don't want escalation and a full-scale war. 'We are upfront, but we don't talk about intelligence, obviously, but we have made very clear this was unilateral action taken by the United States,' Albanese repeatedly answered when asked whether Australia had been briefed on the US' decision to strike Iran. Loading British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has confirmed he was briefed just before the strike. Albanese said: 'The UK has been one of the countries that's been at the negotiating table with Iran for many years on its nuclear weapons program'. The government's shift from neutrality to full support emphasises Australia's close alliance with the US, echoing its stance before the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. When Trump confirmed the strikes on the weekend, the Australian government gave a statement that reiterated Iran's missile and ballistic missile programs were dangerous, but was neutral on the US decision to attack them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store